March 26, 2002
Perhaps it’s art. That’s the ticket. Art. [09:34 PM]
But Clinton is evil. Eeeee-vulllll! a aBest, a a aJim
"This was my one sole moral objection to Clinton's sex life - not that he had affairs, which struck me as a matter between him and his wife, but that he had affairs with less powerful women he could control." a aThat didn't leave him with a whole lot of choices of women he could have affairs with, did it? Try to find someone who _isn't_ less powerful than the President of the US.
The link was broken, as far as I could tell. What did he say?
He was deploring Maxim's duplicity and took a standing broad jump to the conclusion that this is what a magazine edited by Bill Clinton would be like. a aThe link problem appears to be a glitch on his site. I've noticed before that his permalinks are flaky.
More evidence of the supernatural ability of the Clintons to turn otherwise intelligent people into gibbering hate-crazed loons. Other examples besides Sullivan: Chritopher Hitchens and William Safire.
"Try to find someone who _isn't_ less powerful than the President of the US." a aA Supreme Court Justice.
On second thought an individual justice isn't as powerful as the prez unless he's got 4 others that agree with him. Still looking. If I were cynical I'd say an oil executive with a large bank account. If I were cynical.
I point out to Jim Macdonald that he is missing Andrew Sullivan's obvious implication that Clinton should have had an affair with Margaret Thatcher. a aOh, wait, he did, and their illegitimate child is Tony Blair! Aieeeee!
Of course, the idea that Clinton would be editing a magazine as kickass and well-selling as Maxim is why bastards like me love him. a aI suppose Bush could edit Highlights, or perhaps Cowboys & Indians...?
Hard-Hitting Moderator: Teresa Nielsen Hayden.
Comments on Where would we be without him?: