Nielsen Hayden genealogy

Hugues II

Male Abt 920 - 992  (~ 47 years)

Personal Information    |    Notes    |    Sources    |    All    |    PDF

  • Name Hugues II  
    Born Abt 920  [1
    Gender Male 
    Died Between 967 and 992  [2
    Alternate death Bef 991  [1
    Person ID I12772  Ancestry of PNH, TNH, and others | Ancestor of Barbara Hagan, Ancestor of DDB, Ancestor of JTS, Ancestor of TNH, Ancestor of TSW, Ancestor of TWK
    Last Modified 6 Jan 2018 

    Father Hugues I,   b. Abt 890 
    Family ID F7791  Group Sheet  |  Family Chart

    +1. Hugues III,   b. Abt 960,   d. Between 1014 and 1015  (Age ~ 54 years)
    Last Modified 29 Jan 2017 
    Family ID F7790  Group Sheet  |  Family Chart

  • Notes 
    • Comte de Maine.

      From The Henry Project:

      Given the continuing use of the name Hugues by the counts of Maine, it is not surprising that some have believed that Hugues II was a son of Hugues I. This conjecture has sometimes been stated with some kind of qualification [e.g., "peut-ĂȘtre un fils de Hughes Ier ou un autre de ses parents" Latouche (1910), 16; "probably his son" Barton (2004), 41; "probably his son" Keats-Rohan (1997), 192, but without qualification on the table on p. 194], but the relationship has often been stated without such qualification [Werner (1967), 461; Keats-Rohan (1996), 27 (table); Keats-Rohan (2000), 65 (table); Settipani (2000), 258 (table); Settipani (2004), 233, 235 (table)]

      Unfortunately, there is a twenty-four year gap between the last confirmed appearance of count Hugues I and the first confirmed appearance of Hugues II. (Here, I am regarding the identification with the counts Hugues appearing in two Poitevin charters from the 930's and the 939 appearance of a count Hugues in Le Baud, a very late source, as unconfirmed. See the page of Hugues I.) Indeed, there might even be enough room for a possible additional generation between Hugues I and Hugues II, although too little is known about the chronology to be sure in that regard (and even if there was an extra generation it would be rash to assume that the intervening individual was named David). Lacking better information, the above cautious statement by Latouche seems to reflect the situation well.

  • Sources 
    1. [S49] Genealogics, by Leo Van de Pas.

    2. [S91] The Henry Project: The Ancestors of King Henry II of England, by Stewart Baldwin and Todd A. Farmerie.