Nielsen Hayden genealogy
Anne Dynewell
Abt 1516 - -
Name Anne Dynewell [1, 2] Born Abt 1516 [3] Gender Female Person ID I35257 Ancestry of PNH, TNH, and others | Ancestor of JDM Last Modified 19 May 2021
Family Henry Whitgift, b. Abt 1505, of Great Grimsby, Lincolnshire, England 
, d. Between 9 Jun 1550 and 7 Oct 1552 (Age ~ 45 years) Married Abt 1530 [3] Children 1. John Whitgift, Archbishop of Canterbury, b. Between 1530 and 1531, Great Grimsby, Lincolnshire, England , d. 29 Feb 1604, Lambeth, Surrey, England (Age ~ 74 years)+ 2. William Whitgift, b. Abt 1535, d. Aft 13 Jun 1615, Clavering, Essex, England (Age ~ 80 years)Last Modified 18 May 2021 Family ID F20711 Group Sheet | Family Chart
-
Notes - Marshall K. Kirk's posthumously-published "A Probable Royal Descent for Thomas Bradbury of Salisbury, Massachusetts", edited for publication by Martin E. Hollick and published in The New England Historical and Genealogical Register, Volume 161, page 27, January 2007, lays out an involved and yet well-constructed circumstantial case for a descent from Edward I for Anne Dynewell and by extension her great-grandson the seventeenth-century immigrant Thomas Bradbury (1611-1695). Explaining each step in Kirk's reasoning is beyond the scope of this entry, but it may be noted that much of it is founded upon genuine statements made about the family of John Whitgift (d. 1604), Archbishop of Canterbury, by Francis Thynne, Lancaster Herald from 1602 until his death in 1608, and thus a contemporary of the archbishop. Archbishop Whitgift was a son of this Anne Dynewell and her husband Henry Whitgift. These are the specific steps for which Kirk argues:
Margaret Welles (d. 1480) was a 5XG-granddaughter of Edward I of England via his second wife, Marguerite of France. She married Thomas Dymoke (1428-1470), and they were the parents of Jane Dymoke, born about 1467.
Jane Dymoke married, as his second wife, in about 1485, John Fulnetby, born about 1455, died between 30 Aug 1523 and 3 Nov 1528. They were probably the parents of Katherine Fulnetby, born about 1490.
Katherine Fulnetby (~1490-1546) married, about 1510, William Dynewelll, born about 1485, died 1544. They were probably the parents of this Anne Dynewell.
- Marshall K. Kirk's posthumously-published "A Probable Royal Descent for Thomas Bradbury of Salisbury, Massachusetts", edited for publication by Martin E. Hollick and published in The New England Historical and Genealogical Register, Volume 161, page 27, January 2007, lays out an involved and yet well-constructed circumstantial case for a descent from Edward I for Anne Dynewell and by extension her great-grandson the seventeenth-century immigrant Thomas Bradbury (1611-1695). Explaining each step in Kirk's reasoning is beyond the scope of this entry, but it may be noted that much of it is founded upon genuine statements made about the family of John Whitgift (d. 1604), Archbishop of Canterbury, by Francis Thynne, Lancaster Herald from 1602 until his death in 1608, and thus a contemporary of the archbishop. Archbishop Whitgift was a son of this Anne Dynewell and her husband Henry Whitgift. These are the specific steps for which Kirk argues:
-
Sources - [S76] The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford University Press, 2004-ongoing.
- [S5811] Robert Charles Anderson and John B. Threlfall, "Ancestor Table for Thomas Bradbury of Agementicus and Salisbury (1611-1665)." The American Genealogist 55:1, 1979.
- [S5817] Marshall K. Kirk, posthumously edited by Martin E. Hollick, "A Probable Royal Descent for Thomas Bradbury of Salisbury, Massachusetts." The New England Historical and Genealogical Register 161:27, 2007.
- [S76] The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford University Press, 2004-ongoing.