Nielsen Hayden genealogy
Anne Dynewell
Abt 1515 - Aft 1550 (~ 36 years)-
Name Anne Dynewell [1, 2] Birth Abt 1515 [3] Gender Female Death Aft 1550 [3] Person ID I35257 Ancestry of PNH, TNH, and others | Ancestor of JDM Last Modified 29 Jan 2024
Father William Dynewell, b. Abt 1485 d. Bef 6 Jan 1544 (Age ~ 59 years) Mother Katherine Fulnetby, b. Abt 1490 d. Bef 6 Jan 1546 (Age ~ 56 years) Marriage Abt 1510 [3] Family ID F23653 Group Sheet | Family Chart
Family Henry Whitgift, b. Abt 1505, of Great Grimsby, Lincolnshire, England 
d. Between 9 Jun 1550 and 7 Oct 1552 (Age ~ 45 years) Marriage Abt 1530 [3] Children 1. John Whitgift, Archbishop of Canterbury, b. Between 1530 and 1531, Great Grimsby, Lincolnshire, England d. 29 Feb 1604, Lambeth, Surrey, England (Age ~ 74 years)+ 2. William Whitgift, b. Abt 1535 d. Aft 13 Jun 1615, Clavering, Essex, England (Age ~ 80 years)Family ID F20711 Group Sheet | Family Chart Last Modified 18 May 2021
-
Notes - Marshall K. Kirk's posthumously-published "A Probable Royal Descent for Thomas Bradbury of Salisbury, Massachusetts", edited for publication by Martin E. Hollick and published in The New England Historical and Genealogical Register, Volume 161, page 27, January 2007, lays out an involved, circumstantial, and yet reasonably convincing case for a descent from Edward I for Anne Dynewell and by extension her great-grandson the seventeenth-century immigrant Thomas Bradbury (1611-1695). Much of it is founded upon genuine statements made about the family of John Whitgift (d. 1604), Archbishop of Canterbury, by Francis Thynne, Lancaster Herald from 1602 until his death in 1608, and thus a contemporary of the archbishop. Archbishop Whitgift was a son of this Anne Dynewell and her husband Henry Whitgift.
The propositions for which Kirk argues are:
(1) That this Anne Dynewell was a daughter of William Dynewell and Katherine Fulnetby, and
(2) The aforementioned Katherine Fulnetby was a daughter of John Fulnetby and Jane Dymoke, who is known to have been a daughter of Thomas Dymoke and Margaret Welles.
- Marshall K. Kirk's posthumously-published "A Probable Royal Descent for Thomas Bradbury of Salisbury, Massachusetts", edited for publication by Martin E. Hollick and published in The New England Historical and Genealogical Register, Volume 161, page 27, January 2007, lays out an involved, circumstantial, and yet reasonably convincing case for a descent from Edward I for Anne Dynewell and by extension her great-grandson the seventeenth-century immigrant Thomas Bradbury (1611-1695). Much of it is founded upon genuine statements made about the family of John Whitgift (d. 1604), Archbishop of Canterbury, by Francis Thynne, Lancaster Herald from 1602 until his death in 1608, and thus a contemporary of the archbishop. Archbishop Whitgift was a son of this Anne Dynewell and her husband Henry Whitgift.
-
Sources - [S76] The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford University Press, 2004-ongoing.
- [S5811] Robert Charles Anderson and John B. Threlfall, "Ancestor Table for Thomas Bradbury of Agementicus and Salisbury (1611-1665)." The American Genealogist 55:1, 1979.
- [S5817] Marshall K. Kirk, posthumously edited by Martin E. Hollick, "A Probable Royal Descent for Thomas Bradbury of Salisbury, Massachusetts." The New England Historical and Genealogical Register 161:27, 2007.
- [S76] The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford University Press, 2004-ongoing.