Or possibly WJC.

Sillily,
Tom

As drawn, the first ones do look like they're hieroglyphs draw by a Greek scribe, with Greek writing instruments. Hieroglyphs were drawn with brush, then, if on stone, carved. Several of them sing Egyptian -- the top row, 2nd right is very closely related to "pr" -- to go (which was often written without the extra "r" symbol represented by the mouth shape,) the symbol to the right of that is very similar to "ntr", which is one way of saying "God" (one way to translate Jehovan/Allah/God into Egypitan would be "ntr nfr" -- "The Good God"). The first on the second line looks similar to the determinative form of Set, Anpu (Greek: Anubis) or Tothh (can't find image.)

(You'll have to scroll. Sorry)

There are symbols that are close to the first/last of the top line, but not so angular (Sumerian, being pressed into clay, became angular, Egyptian, typically written by brush, stayed rounded.) The fourth of the first line looks like "shs", but rotated with a tail (rotate so the dot is on top) And that last symbol of the 2nd line (not the one alone in the lower right corner) almost screams Coptic or Greek, rather than Egyptian -- indeed, if the contest was "Pick the symbol that doesn't belong to this unknown language", that's the one that I'd pick, almost instantly. All the rest are pictoral, that one's not -- it looks like an intermediate step between Phoenican and Greek.

Indeed, they could be related, since proto-sinatic seems to derive from pictoral, but our bastardized Rho is several centuries newer than the rest of the symbols on the page.

After that, it gets kind of vague. There's a sort of proto-Bagge character, and then modesty prevents me from saying more. "The rest," as Ron Cottingham once said, "is too terrible to tell."