<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
   <channel>
      <title>Making Light :: Open thread 78 :: comments</title>
      <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#comments </link>
      <description>Language, fraud, folly, truth, history, and knitting. Et cetera.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:17:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.261</generator>
      
      <item>
      <title>Open thread 78</title>
      <description>So the year doesn't end with &quot;Aargh!&quot; And we'll sing hallelujah At the turning of the year And we'll work...</description>
      <content:encoded>So the year doesn't end with "Aargh!" And we'll sing hallelujah At the turning of the year And we'll work...</content:encoded>
      <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html</link>
      </item>

      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #1 from Patrick Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Patrick Nielsen Hayden on 31.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(A man is like a three-stringed fiddle, I'm reliably informed.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted December 31, 2006 11:46 PM by Patrick Nielsen Hayden&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163533</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163533</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 23:46:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #2 from Larry Brennan</title>
         <description>comment from Larry Brennan on 31.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy New Year!</p>

<p>"Aaargh!" would be a fitting end for this year, and pretty much every year starting with 2001. So here's to the New Year, may it be much less aargh-worthy!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted December 31, 2006 11:49 PM by Larry Brennan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163534</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163534</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 23:49:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #3 from JulieB</title>
         <description>comment from JulieB on 31.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My year is ending with a big freelance job.</p>

<p>Money is good.</p>

<p>And a very Happy New Year to everyone!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted December 31, 2006 11:59 PM by JulieB&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163535</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163535</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 23:59:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #4 from Nenya</title>
         <description>comment from Nenya on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Felicitations at the start of 2007 to all of you as well. ML definitely helps with the dark bits. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 12:01 AM by Nenya&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163536</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163536</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 00:01:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #5 from Paula Helm Murray</title>
         <description>comment from Paula Helm Murray on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We're ending with a convalescing Margene (and it's looking good...).  Other various problems seem to be working out too, so I'm okay with it.  Best wishes to all on a happy and prosperous new year.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 12:06 AM by Paula Helm Murray&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163537</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163537</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 00:06:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #6 from Harriet</title>
         <description>comment from Harriet on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy New Year! May 2007 be brighter for all of us!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 12:16 AM by Harriet&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163538</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163538</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 00:16:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #7 from Teresa Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Teresa Nielsen Hayden on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That's great, Paula. Happy new year!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 12:17 AM by Teresa Nielsen Hayden&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163539</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163539</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 00:17:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #8 from Teresa Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Teresa Nielsen Hayden on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Harriet. Watching it on New York 1?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 12:17 AM by Teresa Nielsen Hayden&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163540</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163540</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 00:17:54 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #9 from will shetterly</title>
         <description>comment from will shetterly on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy New Year, New York!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 12:43 AM by will shetterly&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163542</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163542</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 00:43:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #10 from Linkmeister</title>
         <description>comment from Linkmeister on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out here in the Pacific we get the Times Square celebration tape delayed.  This has always struck me as really silly on the part of our local TV stations.</p>

<p>Fortunately I happened to have ESPN on at midnight ET and they showed the ball drop.</p>

<p>Happy New Year, everyone.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 12:55 AM by Linkmeister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163543</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163543</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 00:55:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #11 from Patrick Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Patrick Nielsen Hayden on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To add to the list of things that no longer work: Teresa's "Particles" sidebar, on the front page of Making Light, is supposed to show the most recent 12 entries from the "Particles" linkblog.</p>

<p>Suddenly, it was only showing two of them.  She managed to increase it to five by changing all the dates to January 1, 2007.</p>

<p>But there's no reason for this to happen.  It didn't happen in previous year changes.  We haven't altered the way it's set up.  And this definitely doesn't have anything to do with disk quotas.</p>

<p>I'm so tired of this.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 12:58 AM by Patrick Nielsen Hayden&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163544</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163544</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 00:58:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #12 from Harriet</title>
         <description>comment from Harriet on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Teresa - No, I forgot to drag the TV out of its corner and plug it in in a timely way -- and a friend phoned me at 11:30 and we talked our way into the New Year.  But I was able to peek at some live scenes from Times Square on my computer, courtesy of CNN :-)</p>

<p>And I had my little bottle of Champagne, and the accompaniment of noisemakers in the streets outside.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  1:00 AM by Harriet&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163545</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163545</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 01:00:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #13 from paula Helm Murray</title>
         <description>comment from paula Helm Murray on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And an alarming number of our neighbors have fireworks.  Yikes.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  1:19 AM by paula Helm Murray&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163546</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163546</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 01:19:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #14 from Dan Blum</title>
         <description>comment from Dan Blum on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>To add to the list of things that no longer work: Teresa's "Particles" sidebar, on the front page of Making Light, is supposed to show the most recent 12 entries from the "Particles" linkblog.

<p>Suddenly, it was only showing two of them. She managed to increase it to five by changing all the dates to January 1, 2007.</p></blockquote><br />
I see a problem in the source. The entry that should be third ("Holy moly") has its second href malformed - it has a single quote at the beginning of the URL and a double quote at the end. A later entry has a single quote in it which causes things to display properly from then on.

<p>Also, Happy New Year.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  1:28 AM by Dan Blum&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163547</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163547</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 01:28:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #15 from adamsj</title>
         <description>comment from adamsj on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's not simply how many of our neighbors have fireworks, nor how many fireworks those neighbors have, or even how loud the fireworks they have are, so much as it is how late they shoot fireworks off.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  1:33 AM by adamsj&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163548</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163548</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 01:33:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #16 from adamsj</title>
         <description>comment from adamsj on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, yeah--Happy New Year. Yay.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  1:33 AM by adamsj&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163549</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163549</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 01:33:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #17 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"This is the way the year ends...not with a bang, but an 'Aargh'"?</p>

<p>Happy New Congress...um, New Year everyone!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  1:34 AM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163550</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163550</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 01:34:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #18 from philS</title>
         <description>comment from philS on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And we’ll sing hallelujah<br />
At the turning of the year</i></p>

<p>Singing in this fashion would appear to force the year to end with an 'aargh', or at least an 'ah' which sounds too close for comfort. A Happy New Year to all, regardless. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  1:45 AM by philS&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163551</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163551</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 01:45:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #19 from Owlmirror</title>
         <description>comment from Owlmirror on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What's amusing is that I thought that the resulting broken particle title was deliberate: "Holy I Hate Histology" does vaguely make sense, as absurd humour.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  1:45 AM by Owlmirror&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163552</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163552</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 01:45:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #20 from Patrick Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Patrick Nielsen Hayden on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#14: I just now figured that out.  Thanks, though.</p>

<p>I don't know why the tech aspects of maintaining this road show get harder all the time, but they do.  I think we've suffered basic damage to our confidence that Movable Type is any good at all, so we find it harder to summon up the confidence needed for that kind of systematic check of all the tiny details.  Alternately, maybe we're just dipshits.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  1:47 AM by Patrick Nielsen Hayden&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163553</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163553</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 01:47:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #21 from Owlmirror</title>
         <description>comment from Owlmirror on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>...And now it's fixed, which makes my comment look like absurd humour.</p>

<p>Oh, well.</p>

<p>Happy new beer!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  1:52 AM by Owlmirror&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163554</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163554</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 01:52:40 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #22 from Graydon</title>
         <description>comment from Graydon on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick --</p>

<p>There's a program called "tidy", found at http://tidy.sourceforge.net/, which -- unlike people -- does an excellent job of finding things like single-quotes-for-double.</p>

<p>I'm bad enough at catching small syntax errors that I try to use a validating editor when writing html by hand; I have absolutely no idea what to recommend for a Mac, though.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  2:00 AM by Graydon&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163555</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163555</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 02:00:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #23 from Patrick Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Patrick Nielsen Hayden on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(The fact is that I appear to be really, honestly, losing my eyesight at a rate faster than my age should by itself account for.  (I turn 48 on the 2nd.)  I need to see someone about this.  It's getting upsetting.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  2:02 AM by Patrick Nielsen Hayden&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163556</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163556</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 02:02:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #24 from Patrick Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Patrick Nielsen Hayden on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graydon #23: What is this "Mac" in your strange Earth talk?  I'm entering this comment on my Thinkpad T43 running Ubuntu 6.10, plus David Turner's patches for Cairo and XFT, which provide font anti-aliasing easily as good as OS X's and totally superior to anything out of Redmond.  So <em>there</em>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  2:05 AM by Patrick Nielsen Hayden&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163557</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163557</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 02:05:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #25 from Patrick Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Patrick Nielsen Hayden on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, I started this open thread in order to get away from an instance of my computers-don't-work whinging, and then I hijacked it right back into it.  Forget this.  How do <em>you</em> plan to spend New Year's Day?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  2:08 AM by Patrick Nielsen Hayden&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163558</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163558</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 02:08:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #26 from Dena Shunra</title>
         <description>comment from Dena Shunra on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2007 should be a better year, yes, at least on the personal, at-home level. We saw out 2006 with the single most beautiful movie I have ever had the pleasure to see: Rivers and Tides, a documentary about Andy Goldsworthy's artistic collaboration with nature. </p>

<p>Its preoocupation with death and change and the cycles of nature was somehow fitting for this year; its overflowing beauty made it fitting to carry from one year into the next. </p>

<p>Happy 2007, y'all. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  2:22 AM by Dena Shunra&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163559</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163559</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 02:22:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #27 from Dave Bell</title>
         <description>comment from Dave Bell on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am, when I get a chance to excape the myriad family medical problems that have plagued the last couple of months, going to make ingeniously perverted CGI porn.</p>

<p>2007 didn't start well, and it's only 07:22 Zulu.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  2:22 AM by Dave Bell&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163560</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163560</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 02:22:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #28 from D.</title>
         <description>comment from D. on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy New Year!  (Well, technically, forty minutes from now, but I've had my spiked eggnog and I'm turning in.)</p>

<p>Google's current logo is cute, by the way.  (it probably goes away tomorrow.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  2:23 AM by D.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163561</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163561</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 02:23:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #29 from Dawno</title>
         <description>comment from Dawno on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you all for a great year's worth of Making Light posts and comments. </p>

<p>Since this is an open thread, I would also like to give special thanks to Serge for driving all the way to my local Starbucks to meet - it was wonderful seeing you again. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  2:45 AM by Dawno&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163564</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163564</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 02:45:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #30 from Doug Burbidge</title>
         <description>comment from Doug Burbidge on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>But there's no reason for this to happen.</blockquote>

<p>It is increasingly common for the phrase "Why is it doing that?" to be heard during the last few minutes of audio from an aircraft black box recorder.  Our systems are more and more frequently so complex that even intelligent experts are commonly mystified.</p>

<p>And sometimes it shades over into "How is it doing that?"  The other day I had a PC power-cycling itself: four seconds on, four seconds off, ad infinitum, until I pull the plug.  I didn't even know a PC <em>could</em> do that.  The stop-gap fix was equally bizarre: move the graphics card to the other slot.</p>

<p>If you're not familiar with it, <a href="http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/risks" rel="nofollow">Risks</a> is worth a look.  It's a summary of things that go wrong in our modern world; often interesting, occasionally intriguing.</p>

<p>Dismiss the "dipshit" theory; the cognitive error you made while debugging is common, and merely evidence of imperfection, with which we all must find a way to live.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  3:40 AM by Doug Burbidge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163566</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163566</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 03:40:07 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #31 from Madeleine Robins</title>
         <description>comment from Madeleine Robins on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy 2007 to you both, from out here in the Wild West.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  5:45 AM by Madeleine Robins&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163569</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163569</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 05:45:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #32 from Wendy Bradley</title>
         <description>comment from Wendy Bradley on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick, in answer to #25, I shall be spending New Year's day - or at least this evening - at <a href="http://www.rsc.org.uk/WhatsOn/4367.aspx" rel="nofollow"> this</a> production of Much Ado by the RSC.  It won't have Keanu in leather trousers, like the movie, but still...</p>

<p>Which reminds me it's now twelve years since I went to Winnipeg in the New Year to see Keanu play Hamlet.  I stood at the stage door, wrapped in every piece of clothing I'd packed, to get his autograph, and then couldn't manage coherent speech.  So instead of giving him my utterly brilliant note on the blocking of the first scene, I managed to reply to his question and <i>spell my own name.</i></p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  6:06 AM by Wendy Bradley&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163570</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163570</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 06:06:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #33 from jane</title>
         <description>comment from jane on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I came out of the ghastly 2006 in much the same way I came in, taking care of a beloved family member. </p>

<p>Only this time it was my eldest granddaughter with the flu, throwing up in the parking lot (and not the inside of my car by seconds) of the Chinese resturant where we had just had lunch. Missed her sister's ballet performance, and Holly Black's New Year's party. But at least 2006 is finally over and buried. And not a moment too soon.</p>

<p>Jane</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  6:30 AM by jane&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163571</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163571</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 06:30:40 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #34 from Bill B</title>
         <description>comment from Bill B on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Between reheating leftovers, changing diapers, and fixing computers, it'll be a fun-filled New Year's Day here-- especially trying to install Solaris on a couple 'rescued' pieces of hardware.</p>

<p></p>

<p> </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  6:53 AM by Bill B&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163572</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163572</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 06:53:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #35 from John Houghton</title>
         <description>comment from John Houghton on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Rabbit, Rabbit!</em></p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  6:59 AM by John Houghton&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163573</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163573</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 06:59:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #36 from Steve Taylor</title>
         <description>comment from Steve Taylor on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graydon wrote:</p>

<p>>There's a program called "tidy", found at http://tidy.sourceforge.net/</p>

<p>Thank you - that sounds like something I need to check out.</p>

<p>Doug Burbidge wrote:</p>

<p>> If you're not familiar with it, Risks is worth a look</p>

<p>Long ago, when trilobites ruled the earth, newsgroups and ftp were what the net was all about, and gopher, let alone the www didn't exist, a friend told me about this network called "the internet", in order to explain what a "newsgroup" was, in order to tell me how cool comp.risk was. More than 20 years later I *still* think it's just about the best thing on the net.</p>

<p>I hope everyone had a New Year which involved minimal exposure to "Hits of the 80s" compilations.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  7:00 AM by Steve Taylor&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163574</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163574</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 07:00:34 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #37 from individualfrog</title>
         <description>comment from individualfrog on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Akemashita omedetou gozaimasu!</p>

<p>I went to do hatsumode today, which is where you go to pray at the shrine for a lucky year in Japan.  I went to <a href="http://www.enjoytokyo.jp/id/sator32/96504.html" rel="nofollow">Atago Jinja</a>, which has a lot of fun stuff.  For example, there are two sets of stairs, the easy stairs and the hard stairs; if you climb the hard stairs (pictured in that link, but you can't really tell how steep they are), you will be able to achieve success.  According to legend, a samurai climbed the steps on horseback!  And there is a lucky rock to rub, etc.  There's also a pretty <a href="http://image.blog.livedoor.jp/kayo1982/imgs/0/5/0567588e.JPG" rel="nofollow">pond with lots of koi</a>, and you can see Tokyo Tower...a nice shrine.</p>

<p>Unfortunately after I had done all my climbing, rubbing, and praying, I bought an omikuji, which is a paper telling your fortune for the year, and I got the second worst!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  7:31 AM by individualfrog&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163575</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163575</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 07:31:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #38 from Charlie Stross</title>
         <description>comment from Charlie Stross on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick, #25: get up disgracefully late, abstain from work, phone elderly parents, then go have a large meal with some friends. </p>

<p>(Having twisted my ankle the other day I didn't feel like venturing out for Hogmanay in 70mph wind and horizontal rain, so I'm relatively un-hung-over. Have to do something about that tonight; it's why we also get January 2nd off in Scotland. A sober New Year's Day is <em>wrong</em>.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  8:19 AM by Charlie Stross&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163576</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163576</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 08:19:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #39 from adamsj</title>
         <description>comment from adamsj on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We'll hang out at home, then go to the in-laws' for black-eyed peas. Oh, the thrill of it all.</p>

<p>Last night, however, we went out for <a href="http://www.rodspizzacellar.com/index.html" rel="nofollow">pizza!</a> </p>

<p>The web page doesn't do the joint justice--no shots of the model train, for instance, nor does it note that the late owner was a Rodenberry. One of <b>them</b> Rodenberrys? I doubt it.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  8:39 AM by adamsj&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163577</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163577</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 08:39:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #40 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Alternately, maybe we're just dipshits.</i></p>

<p>Long experience and a vast store of accumulated evidence demand that any person of science reject this hypothesis as fantastically unlikely.  If anyone attempts to teach this in schools, I will oppose them...oh, wait, we're <i>not</i> talking about Intelligent Design, are we?  Just something equally absurd.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  8:43 AM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163578</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163578</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 08:43:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #41 from Dave Hemming</title>
         <description>comment from Dave Hemming on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy new year! </p>

<p>While happily playing with the "Extreme Resolution" Sidelight, I happened across a partial torso and head just lying in a Boston street. Passersby seem remarkably casual.</p>

<p>Bottom left corner - I assume its an artifact of things changing between taking the pictures for each tile.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  8:53 AM by Dave Hemming&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163579</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163579</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 08:53:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #42 from Faren Miller</title>
         <description>comment from Faren Miller on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I envy you folks who got to see the Andy Goldsworthy film, but I found something that's almost as cool in the large second-hand section of a local bookstore: a UK art book called <b>Living Sculpture</b> by Paul Cooper. It features mostly current artists who are working in leaf, branch, turf, tree, mixed media and crop (as the chapters are divided), producing everything from modern topiary to living-wood basket-weaving to immense land art, plus labyrinths, etc. The UK publisher is Mitchell Beazley and the original cost was a hefty 30 pounds, but I got it for a relative pittance that was more than covered by trade-in books. (Some other customer who's really into dragons is going to have a field day!)</p>

<p>My husband has to work today, so we went to bed early, but I certainly <i>heard</i> the local fireworks display starting at midnight (they hold it less than a mile from us). Today I'm going to set the pile of galleys aside for a while and read the other book I picked up on Saturday, <b>Mind of the Raven</b> by Bernd Heinrich -- just the right thing to tell me more about our local birds, after my curiosity was fully roused by seeing almost 20 of them circling, doing acrobatics, and occasionally perching uphill of us last week (biggest group I've seen here).</p>

<p>Best wishes to all, for a much better year than the one just past!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  9:00 AM by Faren Miller&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163580</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163580</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 09:00:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #43 from Adrian</title>
         <description>comment from Adrian on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night, I stayed home, doing my bit for the MBTA's concerted effort to persuade people to save fuel and reduce traffic congestion.  That's not what it is?  They keep saying they have budget problems because not enough people are riding the bus, or the subway, or the commuter rail, for them to cover their costs.  (Their costs were very much higher than anticipated for the last 5 years.  I wonder how much of those were security related costs?)  So they increase fares and reduce service.  The higher fares aren't so bad...even now, when I'm out of work and fretting about income, I expect to make enough to cover fairly high commuter rail fares in the forseeable future.</p>

<p>Reducing service bothers me a great deal.  Last year, a lot of places were only marginally accessible to public transit.  If my doctor recommended a specialist there, I might be able to get there on public transit (or I might not), but I would have to schedule the appointment carefully and expect a very long walk through pedestrian-hostile territory.  They weren't places a person could commute to work every day without a car.  I'm concerned that reducing service is making places that used to have functional transit into places with only marginal transit.  </p>

<p>Last night, I was invited to a party in a home where I've been to a handful of parties.  In the past, I either walked from the bus stop (quite a long walk), or called and asked for a ride.  I feel a lot less awkward about begging rides from the bus stop, which inconveniences someone for about 10 minutes for the round trip, including putting their shoes on, than about trying to figure out who is coming to the party from my direction, before the party, and getting them to give me a ride.  After the party, it doesn't feel too overwhelmingly difficult to find a ride back, either home or to whatever subway stop is convenient to the driver.  But when the last bus is 2 hours before the party begins, it's discouraging.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  9:32 AM by Adrian&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163583</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163583</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 09:32:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #44 from LauraJMixon</title>
         <description>comment from LauraJMixon on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy New Year, P&T!  May 2007 be filled with pleasant surprises.</p>

<p>Patrick, my eyesight underwent a sudden deterioration in my mid-40's -- I believe it can be a bit like "punctuated equilibrium."  That may be all it is.  But yes, seems like a good idea get it checked.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  9:32 AM by LauraJMixon&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163584</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163584</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 09:32:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #45 from Jo Walton</title>
         <description>comment from Jo Walton on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy New Year!</p>

<p>We celebrated with a feast last night. It was great. Unfortunately, it looks as if I'm going to be spending the rest of 2007 washing dishes.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  9:45 AM by Jo Walton&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163587</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163587</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 09:45:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #46 from Lila</title>
         <description>comment from Lila on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy New Year to everyone!  I will be hanging out at home with the husband, kids and dogs, and later going to a New Year's Day party at the home of our community theater's set crew chief (very low-key, good company, good food).</p>

<p>Patrick, if you find out anything unexpected about your eyesight, will you please share? The same thing has been happening to my husband (age 47) and his ophthalmologist hasn't found anything out of the ordinary.</p>

<p>Faren, if you enjoy that Heinrich book, you should also check out his <i>Ravens in Winter</i>; great description of biological research as it is actually done. Two major themes: the chief workforce is grad students, who run on beer and pizza; and scientists spend a lot of time going "What the HELL is going on???"</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  9:55 AM by Lila&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163588</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163588</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 09:55:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #47 from Laina</title>
         <description>comment from Laina on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy New Year!</p>

<p>Paula, if you think too many of your neighbors had fireworks, try New Year's Eve in Germany where they sell them in the grocery stores the week between Christmas and New Year's.  Last night it seemed like there were fireworks going up from almost every house in the neighborhood.  I just kept reminding myself that these houses have tile roofs and are generally made of stone or concrete.  I know that fireworks precations developed for the Mid-West US in July don't really apply to Germany in winter, but still.....</p>

<p>Wishing everyone a happy, healthy and prosperous New Year.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  9:57 AM by Laina&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163589</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163589</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 09:57:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #48 from Lizzy L</title>
         <description>comment from Lizzy L on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I celebrated New Year's Eve in my traditional way: I drank a glass of wine and went to bed early. Woke up at midnight when the neighbors did the fireworks thing. Said "Happy New Year" to the cats and the dog. Went back to sleep.</p>

<p>Today I will go to church, take the dog to the park, and then head off to a party at the home of some dear friends. 2006 was a bumpy ride.I will pray this morning for peace, good health, and blessings on friends and family. Happy New Year, all!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 10:17 AM by Lizzy L&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163594</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163594</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 10:17:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #49 from Patrick Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Patrick Nielsen Hayden on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy Goldsworthy's <em>Rivers and Tides</em> is every bit as wonderful as Dena <a href="http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163559" rel="nofollow">says</a> it is.  It's also <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Andy-Goldsworthys-Rivers-Tides-Goldsworthy/dp/B0002JL9N6/sr=1-1/qid=1167665011/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/002-1303861-0814452?ie=UTF8&s=dvd" rel="nofollow">easily</a> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Andy-Goldsworthy-Special-Two-Disc-Collectors/dp/B000HDR8C8/sr=1-2/qid=1167665011/ref=pd_bbs_sr_2/002-1303861-0814452?ie=UTF8&s=dvd" rel="nofollow">available</a> on DVD, including from <a href="http://www.netflix.com/MovieDisplay?trkid=73&movieid=60027273" rel="nofollow">Netflix</a>.  </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 10:28 AM by Patrick Nielsen Hayden&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163595</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163595</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 10:28:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #50 from Adrian</title>
         <description>comment from Adrian on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick, you should definately see someone about those eyes.  It's really hard to assess how much vision loss your "age should account for," when it's happening to you for the first time.  </p>

<p>Somebody in my lab group once came to me in considerable anxiety.  He had been finding it increasingly difficut to read small print -- everything close looked blurry.  He asked someone else in the lab, another man in his early forties, and it turned out his eyesight had also been getting blurrier and blurrier over the last year...so they were both terrified they were slowly poisoning themselves with some trace chemical exposure that would eventually cause blindness.  It was just the change of vision that happens with age, but they hadn't expected it, or hadn't expected it so soon (but I'm not OLD!) and the eye doctor provided them both with reassurance and prescriptions for reading glasses.</p>

<p>Vicki was just recommending a NYC eye doctor on my LJ, when I was whining about a related subject the other day.  She likes hers very much, if you're looking for one.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 10:42 AM by Adrian&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163596</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163596</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 10:42:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #51 from Martin Wisse</title>
         <description>comment from Martin Wisse on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy New Year you people and may it be a better year than the one just ended.</p>

<p>Patrick, #25:</p>

<p>On New Years Day you get up late, watch the New Years Concerto from Wien (motto: All Strauss, all the time), then the skijumping from Garmen-Partenkitchen and veg out. </p>

<p>It's been a perfect day so far, only marred by the loss of one of those #$%^& tiny screws holding my glasses together during the night, which means I'm now wearing my backup pair, which is about roughly the size of two glass dinnerplates riveted together with bicycle frames...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 10:50 AM by Martin Wisse&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163597</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163597</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 10:50:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #52 from Adrian</title>
         <description>comment from Adrian on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't know if Patrick is looking for an eye doctor, or already has a good one.  Vicki sometimes suggests I give up on the Boston area and just get my eyes checked in New York, by <br />
Gerard Schiller, M.D. or Debra Guthrie, M.D.<br />
30 East 40 Street, suite 506<br />
212-685-1232</p>

<p>They have the new no-eye-puff glaucoma testing gear, and Vicki speaks highly of them, though I have not been to see them myself.  I'm giving this major metropolitan area, full of doctors and hospitals, with thousands of eye professionals, one more chance.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 10:53 AM by Adrian&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163598</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163598</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 10:53:32 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #53 from G. Jules</title>
         <description>comment from G. Jules on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was surprised this year -- my neighbors didn't do the fireworks-at-midnight thing. Of course, there were so many fireworks and firecrackers between 6 and 8 pm it sounded like the city was under hostile fire... but nothing at midnight but airhorns. Strange.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 11:04 AM by G. Jules&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163599</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163599</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 11:04:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #54 from xeger</title>
         <description>comment from xeger on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick, #25:  Sleep late (check!), spend time with family and friends - and hopefully spend some time with my long neglected but neat programming project.  I can't be the only person thinking that 2007 is the year of BBQ though...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 11:08 AM by xeger&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163600</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163600</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 11:08:34 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #55 from JC</title>
         <description>comment from JC on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy New Year! May 2007 be filled with joy and happiness, P&T.</p>

<p>As for me, I'm spending New Year's Day making chicken stock. I've accumulated enough bones. I'm going to be home all day anyways, finishing final drafts. My goal for 2007 is to submit more stories than I did in 2006. (Given that I submitted a whopping 3 in 2006, this can't be that hard...)<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 11:22 AM by JC&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163602</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163602</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 11:22:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #56 from Michael Weholt</title>
         <description>comment from Michael Weholt on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#45-Jo Walton : <em>Unfortunately, it looks as if I'm going to be spending the rest of 2007 washing dishes.</em></p>

<p>What, the deadbeats who chowed all your wonderful food can't help? Or even do the dishes for you? Where I come from you either cook or you wash. But then I grew up a Puritan.</p>

<p>As for me, I'm playing with my new computer today. Brand new MacBook with a Windows 2000 virtual machine tucked inside it (which is where I'm writing to you from, right now). </p>

<p>This thing is so beautiful I can hardly stand it. There has to be some sort of sin involved here.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 11:27 AM by Michael Weholt&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163603</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163603</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 11:27:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #57 from dave</title>
         <description>comment from dave on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
As for me, I'm playing with my new computer today. Brand new MacBook with a Windows 2000 virtual machine tucked inside it (which is where I'm writing to you from, right now).

<p>This thing is so beautiful I can hardly stand it. There has to be some sort of sin involved here.<br />
</p></blockquote>

<p>The feeling of guilt will hit you when Steve Jobs unveils something even cooler at MacWorld San Francisco in eight days and 25 minutes.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 11:35 AM by dave&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163605</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163605</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 11:35:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #58 from Sajia Kabir</title>
         <description>comment from Sajia Kabir on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Powerpoint Sidelight had me thinking: Do Nasa employees have t-shirts saying, "Actually, I <i>am</i> a rocket scientist?"</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 11:42 AM by Sajia Kabir&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163606</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163606</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 11:42:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #59 from last train to clarksville</title>
         <description>comment from last train to clarksville on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not that i know any of you and not that i am a regular poster (possibly 3 under a totally different name than this) and not that i want to bring anybody down (love this blog) but...</p>

<p>my new years eve?<br />
total emotional meltdown with partner on way to party following dinner where we always go to eat on new years eve. <br />
end of relationship.<br />
a dozen years up in smoke.<br />
brushfire.<br />
small spark escalates within seconds to full-blown engulfment of mountain.<br />
this has happened too many times.<br />
we're both tired of it.<br />
oh i'm to blame too. no doubt.<br />
and the kicker?<br />
not only is this a romantic relationship, it's also a highly productive creative partnership i.e. the partner's thoughts complete mine in ways not possible otherwise.</p>

<p>what silly mortals we be.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 11:46 AM by last train to clarksville&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163607</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163607</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 11:46:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #60 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy New Year to all!!</p>

<p>Here, we watched the Peach Drop. It did not, however, go splat. Nor was there a boy named James in it...</p>

<p><i>The year begins with warmth and lots of light,<br />
the year went out with dark and heavy rain.<br />
We say these things in order to explain<br />
just how the change comes, in order to do right<br />
by all that's past and all will be bright<br />
in conception, though we still will strain<br />
to overcome the normal wear and pain.<br />
Each sunny day's a sign that the long fight<br />
has some real purpose, though we cannot tell<br />
where we are going yet we forward march<br />
towards the objective, to what we hope to get<br />
for all our efforts; we'll pass through hell<br />
itself to reach our goal, pass through the arch<br />
in triumph. Above all, we will not forget.</i><br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 11:49 AM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163608</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163608</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 11:49:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #61 from amysue</title>
         <description>comment from amysue on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy 2007 and thank you for hosting such a wonderful blog.</p>

<p>We've no special plans for the day.  There will be lounging about, reading, knitting and at some point I will cook a brisket.  The kids will spend the last day of their vacation in an orgy of computer/hand held gaming device and tv use.  It's possible we will drag ourselves out of the house and over to visit friends but mostly we're slothy.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 11:52 AM by amysue&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163609</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163609</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 11:52:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #62 from Dan Blum</title>
         <description>comment from Dan Blum on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>They have the new no-eye-puff glaucoma testing gear, and Vicki speaks highly of them, though I have not been to see them myself. I'm giving this major metropolitan area, full of doctors and hospitals, with thousands of eye professionals, one more chance.</blockquote>
I like Burlington Eye Associates for regular eye care, myself (I'm not seeing them now only because they referred me to a cornea specialist). However, they may not be convenient to you.]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 12:06 PM by Dan Blum&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163610</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163610</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 12:06:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #63 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>How do you plan to spend New Year's Day?</i></p>

<p>Back from Our Bay Area trip last night. I just finished shoveling away the snow that was blocking our front yard. It confirmed my feeling that, after my youth in Quebec City, the only white Christmas I like is the movie one, with Danny Kaye. On the bright side, I understand that the bad weather here grounded Don Rumsfeld so it's not all bad.</p>

<p>Among our other plans... The Skiffy Channel is having its traditional Twilight Zone marathon. And, tonight, we're watching MST3K's <i>The Day the Earth Froze</i>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 12:30 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163613</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163613</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 12:30:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #64 from Graydon</title>
         <description>comment from Graydon on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick in #24 --</p>

<p>Oh, well then; you've already got tidy, or at least it's already been packaged for your distro.</p>

<p>You've also got quanta, out of the KDE web development tools; it's a validating HTML (and javascript and php) development tool, with excellent documentation (they include the W3C HTML docs, very handy) and automated upload/download of projects.  Might make wrassling with Making Light less stressful.</p>

<p>(There are at least three other things that will do this, if you count emacs; quanta is the one which I happen to have used.)</p>

<p>Patrick #25 --</p>

<p>Built what's going to be (when it gets a RAID card) the fileserver yesterday, and did laundry; today is dishes, phoning people, and stuffing the next couple of months of work into a tool called TaskJuggler.  (I knew there had to be a decent open source project management tool; I have finally found out what it is.)</p>

<p>2006 wasn't, personally, all that bad; changed employer in place, went cramped quarters to rattle-around-in quarters, and my social life has managed to improve.</p>

<p>I'm still listening to the locally traditional list of sad songs, just because.</p>

<p>Happy New Year, one and all!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 12:38 PM by Graydon&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163614</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163614</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 12:38:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #65 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sajia @ 58... I don't know about NASA's people, but I've talked to a Sandia Lab scientist who goes to the same gym I do, and he does have a t-shirt that says <i>"Actually, I am a rocket scientist"</i></p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 12:43 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163615</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163615</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 12:43:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #66 from Linkmeister</title>
         <description>comment from Linkmeister on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laina @#47, Germany sounds like Hawai'i (only in the "fireworks overkill on NYE" dept.).  Despite laws by our gutless legislature limiting the use of the things to a four-hour window on the night, we have to tranquilize the dog starting about noon.  And aerial fireworks, although illegal, are a big part of the night's events.  One landed on my (tarpaper) roof, which caused quite a bit of concern for a few minutes.</p>

<p>Not a single mention in the first 60-odd comments about the Rose Parade or the countless football games?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 12:50 PM by Linkmeister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163617</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163617</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 12:50:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #67 from Rob Rusick</title>
         <description>comment from Rob Rusick on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sajia Kabir @58: <i>Do Nasa employees have t-shirts saying, "Actually, I am a rocket scientist?"</i></p>

<p>I was told (<i>by someone who knew him</i>) one of the engineers who worked on the Mars rovers had a bumper sticker reading: "My OTHER car is on Mars".</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 12:51 PM by Rob Rusick&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163618</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163618</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 12:51:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #68 from P J Evans</title>
         <description>comment from P J Evans on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linkmeister @ 66</p>

<p>The parade just ended. The American Honda float is seriously impressive: firebreathing dragons! (Micaela doesn't beat Stephanie in the chitchat and color department. Thank you, KTLA!) Several Oklahoma centennial observances, both bands and floats. One float had the governor and his wife, but no Nazguls... and a guy with a real rocketpack, who flew several hundred feet down Colorado, and as Lucas's car came by, got to shake hands with him. Imperial stormtroopers, various Jedi and Sith, Vader (and the shot I saw had someone behind him holding up and 'Impeach' banner), queens of Naboo.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  1:16 PM by P J Evans&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163620</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163620</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 13:16:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #69 from Dawno</title>
         <description>comment from Dawno on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were <a href="http://www.examiner.com/a-451067~18_Llamas_to_Appear_in_Rose_Parade.html" rel="nofollow">llamas </a>in the Tournament of Roses parade this year. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  1:25 PM by Dawno&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163622</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163622</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 13:25:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #70 from beth meacham</title>
         <description>comment from beth meacham on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy New Year!</p>

<p>My day will be quietly at home, basking in the glory of my completed Project, cleaning up after myself, and riding in the afternoon.  Posole is cooking for dinner.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  1:36 PM by beth meacham&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163623</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163623</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 13:36:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #71 from Linkmeister</title>
         <description>comment from Linkmeister on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PJ, thank you.  We turned it on just in time to see Punahou (a local private school) march, and then saw some attractive horses with burled coats.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  2:11 PM by Linkmeister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163624</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163624</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 14:11:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #72 from Mary Aileen Buss</title>
         <description>comment from Mary Aileen Buss on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I missed the Rose Parade dammit! I meant to watch this year because my mother's alma mater (University of Redlands) had a float honoring their 100th anniversary. Oh, well.</p>

<p>--Mary Aileen</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  2:11 PM by Mary Aileen Buss&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163625</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163625</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 14:11:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #73 from Larry Brennan</title>
         <description>comment from Larry Brennan on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the article Dawno @ 69 linked: <i>llamas had not been allowed in the parade because horses fear them and react as if the llamas were predators.</i></p>

<p>Another point for llamas. Horses <i>fear them</i>! Llamas rock, whereas I've never trusted horses. They're shifty.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  2:38 PM by Larry Brennan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163626</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163626</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 14:38:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #74 from mary</title>
         <description>comment from mary on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Making Light people, happy new year. My son is downstairs playing World of Warcraft, my mother is dozing in front of the fireplace. I'm in the kitchen and the dog is lying at my feet; his being at my side, given the choices, heartens me considerably. This has been a difficult holiday season--my father passed away 8 months ago and my mother's a fish out of water. It's very trying. She never wanted me in her kitchen and I don't want her in mine, etc.; you reap what you sow. But nevermind all that--anyway, happy new year. *sigh*</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  2:56 PM by mary&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163627</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163627</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 14:56:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #75 from Larry Brennan</title>
         <description>comment from Larry Brennan on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just went and read the Tufte particle (The lethality of PowerPoint). To my mind, it represents a case of a poorly structured presentation flow, exacerbated by using the wrong choice of tool.</p>

<p>If you're driving a decision like this, it seems wrong to me to use slideware as a basis for decision making. Far better to use slideware to set out an agenda and drive agreement on how decisions will get made, and then use discussion and good old documents and data sets to provide evidence.</p>

<p>Tufte has a well known bias against PowerPoint. He's also a brilliant man who is probably the foremost expert in visualization of data in the world. I respect and admire his work. That doesn't mean that he doesn't have his own personal hobby horses that he'll ride whenever the opportunity presents itself.</p>

<p>Blaming PowerPoint for bad decision making by NASA is rather like blaming the US Mint when someone sticks a penny into a fuse box and burns the house down. Selecting the wrong tool is the responsibility of the tool wielder, not the tool maker.</p>

<p>Disclosure time. I am speaking as an individual, and the thoughts I am expressing are my own and in no way represent the opinions or policies of my employer. (I work for Microsoft and am responsible for the marketing launch of the new versions of Office, Windows and Exchange to mid-size businesses in the US.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  3:04 PM by Larry Brennan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163629</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163629</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:04:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #76 from Rob Rusick</title>
         <description>comment from Rob Rusick on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry Brennan @73: According to Robert Graves in <b>Claudius the God</b>, Claudius used camels in one of his battles in Britain because of the fear and confusion they inspired in the enemy horses.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  3:11 PM by Rob Rusick&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163632</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163632</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:11:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #77 from Mary Kay</title>
         <description>comment from Mary Kay on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#58 ::: Sajia Kabir:</p>

<p>I don't know about NASA engineers, but my husband has multiple t-shirts and a button saying that.  However, as of last Friday he really isn't one anymore. </p>

<p>Everytime he wore the button to a meeting or conference, everyone else wanted one.</p>

<p>MKK</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  3:18 PM by Mary Kay&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163635</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163635</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:18:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #78 from Martyn Taylor</title>
         <description>comment from Martyn Taylor on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our local midnight fireworks roused me from my sickbed - or it may have been the gale - where I was suffering the flu Cathie tells me I can't have.  She's a nurse, she knows these things.</p>

<p>I'm feeling a lot more optimistic now.  Here's hoping we all get what we need in 2007.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  3:30 PM by Martyn Taylor&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163638</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163638</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:30:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #79 from David Dyer-Bennet</title>
         <description>comment from David Dyer-Bennet on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Tufte has a well known bias against PowerPoint. </i></p>

<p>Well, perhaps he does.  Or perhaps he has a well-considered expert opinion that PowerPoint is a bad tool.  It's easy to accuse somebody of "bias" or "prejudice" whenever they have an opinion about anything.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  3:34 PM by David Dyer-Bennet&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163639</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163639</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:34:40 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #80 from Linkmeister</title>
         <description>comment from Linkmeister on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob Rusick @76,<br />
The US Army briefly <a href="http://www.scvhistory.com/scvhistory/hijolly-ap.htm" rel="nofollow">experimented</a> with camels.</p>

<p>"You've heard of how horses bolted at the sight of the first automobiles. That wasn't anything compared to the fright those ugly, loping camels threw into mules. The mules would lay back their ears and run for their lives and then the prospectors would cuss and reach for their guns and shoot at the camels. A lot of camels got killed that way."</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  3:39 PM by Linkmeister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163641</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163641</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:39:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #81 from Larry Brennan</title>
         <description>comment from Larry Brennan on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David @79 - Personally, I think the real issue is people choosing the wrong tool, rather than the tool being a bad one. I've never heard of Tufte making a non-critical comment about PP. Used appropriately, PP can be a very effective tool, especially for guiding discussions, presenting findings and making a case for a particular position.</p>

<p>FWIW, the specific example citied shows what I often see in newspaper articles as well. Headline says "America Loves Iraq War" and you don't see any real analysis or counter-argument until the last paragraph, which totally undermines the headline. To my mind, this was more of a case of the author of the deck being afraid to put  a difficult opinion in the title or to be neutral and drive a real discussion.</p>

<p>(See disclaimer @ 75)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  3:55 PM by Larry Brennan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163646</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163646</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:55:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #82 from Patrick Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Patrick Nielsen Hayden on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's also worth observing that what Tufte is criticizing isn't PowerPoint, it's the way PowerPoint is widely used in organizations.  We use Powerpoint all the time at Tor--to quickly assemble tidy slideshows that illustrate impromptu spoken presentations.  We don't use it to make actual arguments, or to leave people with the impression that something's been established when in fact nothing has.  </p>

<p>The comments to Tufte's piece are also illuminating.  We can assume that there exists, among scientific and technical people, a widespread unhappiness with the way Powerpoint is used to substitute for actual analysis and argument.  Or we can assume that all of those comments were written by other people who also happen to have "a well-known bias against" a product that is in fact without any drawbacks worth discussing.  Which of these seems more likely?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  3:58 PM by Patrick Nielsen Hayden&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163647</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163647</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:58:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #83 from P J Evans</title>
         <description>comment from P J Evans on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last PP 'presentation' I saw was via e-mail, a set of slides (one with title, the rest photos) of the recent pipeline explosion in Wyoming. My boss forwarded it with the comment that 'this is why we're doing what we're doing'.</p>

<p>Mary Eileen, the Redlands float had a very large bulldog on the front half and a building (from the University, I assume) on the back (the live dog was next to the floral version, sitting on his handler's feet).</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  4:06 PM by P J Evans&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163649</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163649</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 16:06:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #84 from Patrick Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Patrick Nielsen Hayden on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry and I crossposted; my "it's also worth observing" was meant to signal agreement with DDB.</p>

<p>Of course PowerPoint isn't inherently evil; Tufte isn't suggesting that it is.  He's suggesting that, as used by many organizations, it tends to lead to bad ends.  Lead-based paint isn't inherently evil, either, but as a society we've decided that it's not sensible to let it be used inside homes, because inevitably a certain number of children will eat the lead-based paint chips and poison themselves.  You can call it "using the wrong tool" and charge building-code reformers with having a "well-known bias" against lead paint, but the fact is, when we discuss tools, we're never discussing their Platonic nature as they float in deep space; we're always talking about them <em>as they get used by real people</em>.  Tufte is saying that Powerpoint has a strong tendency to get misused, with effects that are sometimes very bad indeed.  Brushing off his very well-made arguments with charges of "bias" is mere namecalling.  Suggesting that "the real issue is people choosing the wrong tool" sounds great, but you know, that's what Tufte was saying in the first place.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  4:08 PM by Patrick Nielsen Hayden&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163650</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163650</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 16:08:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #85 from Julia Jones</title>
         <description>comment from Julia Jones on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy New Year to one and all, and may it be better than last year.</p>

<p>Presbyopia can set in younger than you think. To my great resentment, last year I had to go out and get my first pair of reading glasses, a month shy of my 40th birthday. I don't need them very often, but there's no denying now that sometimes I *do* need them. To my even greater resentment, my husband, who is a Patrickish sort of age, does not yet need them.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  4:31 PM by Julia Jones&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163659</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163659</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 16:31:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #86 from emgrasso</title>
         <description>comment from emgrasso on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick #24 re: syntax checking html on a linux box. This is fairly easy using KDE tools if your site is actually xhtml (which your site is. I just performed the steps below</p>

<p>1. Load the optional XML widgets in the KATE browser.<br />
2. Open the site you are worried about in the Konqueror web-browser.<br />
3. Right click in the site and select "Open With... KATE<br />
4.Wait while the page downloads and opens in Kate<br />
5. Select XML/Validate XML on the top Kate menu bar<br />
6. Click XML Checker Output in the bottom status bar, and drag the separator line up so you can see.</p>

<p>The output from performing these steps on this very page where I am inputting this is:</p>

<p>#  line  column message<br />
1    26      44 validity error: No declaration for attribute REL of elem...link REL="SHORTCUT ICON" HREF="favicon.ico"</p>

<p>(I left out the pointies on the link quoted in the message to avoid recursion)</p>

<p>Sometimes it takes a little digging to figure out the cause of what it is complaining about: missing end-tags cause miss-matches for other end-tags, for example, but the messages generally help me decide where to look.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  4:31 PM by emgrasso&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163660</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163660</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 16:31:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #87 from Marilee</title>
         <description>comment from Marilee on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched the "Twilight Zone" marathon yesterday and today.</p>

<p>What are you guys mentioned about in the book?  I'm not getting a google account just for that.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  4:43 PM by Marilee&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163661</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163661</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 16:43:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #88 from P J Evans</title>
         <description>comment from P J Evans on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed my myopic-astigmatic eyes had gone over the hill a few months short of 40, when I started having to hold things farther away to see them properly. (For really small stuff, I now have to take glasses off to see clearly. The focal range is, um, short and not conveniently located.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  4:44 PM by P J Evans&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163662</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163662</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 16:44:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #89 from mary</title>
         <description>comment from mary on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got a prescription for a third pair of glasses, which seems kind of crazy and I can't imagine myself carrying three pairs around with me. I already have prescription sunglasses and clear glasses. Both pairs are blended bifocals, with the upper part of the lens for distance and the lower part for reading. The prescription I just obtained is also for blended bifocals, with the lower part of the lens for reading and the upper part for viewing something 22 inches in front of me--the distance between my nose and the computer monitor on my desk in my office.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  5:27 PM by mary&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163668</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163668</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 17:27:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #90 from Charlie Stross</title>
         <description>comment from Charlie Stross on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insanely weird piece of small-world fannish trivia, number 36356753: PowerPoint was <a href="http://www.physics.ohio-state.edu/~wilkins/group/powerpt.html" rel="nofollow">based on work by</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitfield_Diffie" rel="nofollow">Whitfield Diffie</a>.</p>

<p>Truly, the scriptwriter for the universe has a warped sense of humour.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  6:00 PM by Charlie Stross&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163673</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163673</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 18:00:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #91 from Erik Nelson</title>
         <description>comment from Erik Nelson on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever I see the ball drop over Times Square I want to make a pun about distance over time squared but I can't figure out how to frame it right.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  6:22 PM by Erik Nelson&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163678</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163678</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 18:22:04 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #92 from Erik Nelson</title>
         <description>comment from Erik Nelson on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever I see the ball drop over Times Square I want to make a pun about distance over time squared but I can't figure out how to frame it right.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  6:22 PM by Erik Nelson&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163679</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163679</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 18:22:07 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #93 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marilee @ 87... Do you know if they showed TZ's episode "the last hunt"? That's the one about the old hillbilly who dies along with his dog and then he comes across a place that looks like the entrance to Heaven, but luckily for him his dog stops him.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  6:27 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163680</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163680</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 18:27:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #94 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marilee @ 87... Do you know if they showed TZ's episode "the last hunt"? That's the one about the old hillbilly who dies along with his dog and then he comes across a place that looks like the entrance to Heaven, but luckily for him his dog stops him.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  6:28 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163681</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163681</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 18:28:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #95 from abi</title>
         <description>comment from abi on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So does the server have hiccups, or is it a coincidence that the previous two comments are doubled?</p>

<p>(this is a test0</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  6:29 PM by abi&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163683</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163683</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 18:29:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #96 from abi</title>
         <description>comment from abi on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, it's not hiccups.</p>

<p>And I can't proofread.</p>

<p>Good night, all.  Happy New Year.</p>

<p>(Welcome home, Serge.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  6:31 PM by abi&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163684</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163684</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 18:31:54 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #97 from &quot;Charles Dodgson&quot;</title>
         <description>comment from "Charles Dodgson" on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More real-world rocket scientists:</p>

<p>I've never seen Thom Moran wearing an "As a matter of fact, I am a rocket scientist" button, but his (erstwhile?) day job (running high-altitude atmospheric probes for MIT Lincoln Lab, IIRC) is all over <a href="http://myspace.com/bonsavants" rel="nofollow">his band</a>'s publicity.  Which also figures in, sometimes, to their oddball lyrics (the songs have been described as "spare, melodic love songs for androids")...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  6:34 PM by &quot;Charles Dodgson&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163686</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163686</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 18:34:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #98 from xeger</title>
         <description>comment from xeger on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#27 ::: Dave Bell threatened:<br />
<i>I am, when I get a chance to excape the myriad family medical problems that have plagued the last couple of months, going to make ingeniously perverted CGI porn.</i></p>

<p>One of the things on my todo list is Acme::Yak::Shaving ...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  6:34 PM by xeger&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163687</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163687</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 18:34:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #99 from xeger</title>
         <description>comment from xeger on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#90 ::: Charlie Stross enlightened:<br />
<i>Insanely weird piece of small-world fannish trivia, number 36356753: PowerPoint was based on work by Whitfield Diffie.</i></p>

<p><i>Truly, the scriptwriter for the universe has a warped sense of humour.</i></p>

<p>Heh.  Warped indeed - although the best setup for something really daft being done does seem to be a bunch of otherwise smart people sitting around and saying "Gee - wouldn't it be dumb if they did _that_"  [IPv6 over XML anybody?]</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  6:37 PM by xeger&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163688</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163688</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 18:37:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #100 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, abi. As for the duplicate post, there were indeed no hiccups. Just yours truly not realizing he had already hit 'submit'.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  6:42 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163689</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163689</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 18:42:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #101 from Dave Luckett</title>
         <description>comment from Dave Luckett on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, it's the New Year Test cricket from the Sydney Cricket Ground (if it ever stops raining) and the possibility of a 5-0 series whitewash, the most comprehensive rout of the Old Enemy in eighty years.</p>

<p>Oh, and three brick-like fantasy novels to read and review. None from Tor, so I can say that without feeling guilty.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  6:45 PM by Dave Luckett&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163690</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163690</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 18:45:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #102 from JC</title>
         <description>comment from JC on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#90: Worse than finding out that Diffie is responsible for PowerPoint is: "[Diffie] is one of the few computer scientists to receive erotically charged fan mail." Now I'm wondering if Diffie-Hellman slash exists out there on the intarweeb.</p>

<p>It would give a whole new meaning to the term "key exchange."<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  6:58 PM by JC&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163691</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163691</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 18:58:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #103 from Mary Aileen Buss</title>
         <description>comment from Mary Aileen Buss on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, PJ (#83). I believe that building was intended to be the chapel. My mother had a drawing of the float, but it didn't mention the live bulldog.</p>

<p>--Mary Aileen</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  8:07 PM by Mary Aileen Buss&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163700</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163700</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 20:07:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #104 from Anne Sheller</title>
         <description>comment from Anne Sheller on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had to get my first pair of reading glasses at 37. They were weak, and needed only for fine print or fine embroidery. Now, at 53, a medium strength pair is on my nose except when I am sleeping, driving, or showering. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  8:55 PM by Anne Sheller&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163708</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163708</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 20:55:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #105 from Aconite</title>
         <description>comment from Aconite on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best wishes that 2007 be far, far better than 2006.</p>

<p>Teresa, Patrick, thanks for having us.  It's a good place, this is.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  9:09 PM by Aconite&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163710</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163710</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 21:09:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #106 from xeger</title>
         <description>comment from xeger on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1 ::: Patrick Nielsen Hayden wrote:<br />
<i>(A man is like a three-stringed fiddle, I'm reliably informed.)</i></p>

<p>That reminds me of a friend who was quite startled when my response to "Why are you looking so annoyed" was "I broke my G string".</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  9:22 PM by xeger&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163713</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163713</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 21:22:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #107 from Patrick Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Patrick Nielsen Hayden on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only did I already know about the Whitfield Diffie/Powerpoint connection, I know Whitfield Diffie.  He's an old friend of Avedon Carol's, and once when she was visiting us in New York, he wound up coming over, tagging along with us to a fan gathering at a bar in Park Slope, and crashing overnight on our couch.  Nice guy, plenty interesting to talk to.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  9:23 PM by Patrick Nielsen Hayden&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163714</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163714</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 21:23:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #108 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been lying low the past few days on the off chance that something I said would give 2006 an idea of another way to thwack me. Even with that caution Saturday, foggy and frozen, turned into a marathon work day for my offspring. They went to discharge their feudal obligations to my sister by helping vaccinate and wean the Angus calves and ended up stomping around in mud the temperature and consistency of gelato while the cattle ran through fences and jumped over gates. Opinion is divided between neighbor kids, loose dogs, or possibly the random bear that wanders into our neck of suburbia every once in a while making the cattle restless.</p>

<p>Since then, the words have been food and beads: a trip to TJ's Sunday morning for goodies, then a trip to the Great Mothership of Beads, Shipwreck, to pick up some more mixed faceted beads to finish a few dozen small projects. Ham and johnnycake for New Years dinner, French toast for brunch, handmade pizza for dinner. </p>

<p>Was supposed to go bird watching with The Only Nephew today, but the weather turned all January on us: 41F, small fine rain, and winds gusting to 15mph. So I worked on two projects and on sorting the beads by color.  </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007  9:52 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163721</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163721</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 21:52:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #109 from Jon H</title>
         <description>comment from Jon H on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: the NoKa chocolat story:</p>

<p>Some clever chocolatier ought to use the same French chocolate NoKa uses to make some goodies (ice cream? dipped cookies?), and advertise them as being made with NoKa chocolate.</p>

<p>And charge half of NoKa's price, thus undercutting NoKa's sales.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 10:07 PM by Jon H&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163724</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163724</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 22:07:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #110 from Jon H</title>
         <description>comment from Jon H on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone here live around Cambridge, MA and going to the antiwar march this month in DC?</p>

<p>Interested in carpooling?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 10:09 PM by Jon H&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163725</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163725</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 22:09:04 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #111 from paula Helm Murray</title>
         <description>comment from paula Helm Murray on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JESR, Insanely jealous that you can "go" to Shipwreck beads.  Our bead stores flourished, then all went away except for a scant few that, because of their 'specialness'  have outrageous prices, I can do better waiting and ordering from Ornamental Resources or Fire Mountain when I have to because of price.  Then again, Big Lots (of all places) occasionally emits a bag of 'dice' glass beads at $1.68 (dozen) and I snatch them up, turn 'em into earrings or include them in a bracelet and sell for way more.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 10:32 PM by paula Helm Murray&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163726</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163726</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 22:32:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #112 from Michael Weholt</title>
         <description>comment from Michael Weholt on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#94:Serge: <em>...the old hillbilly who dies along with his dog and then he comes across a place that looks like the entrance to Heaven, but luckily for him his dog stops him.</em></p>

<p>Which only confirms something I have always believed: only a dog can tell you how to really get to heaven.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 10:44 PM by Michael Weholt&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163729</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163729</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 22:44:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #113 from Paula Helm Murray</title>
         <description>comment from Paula Helm Murray on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMFG</p>

<p>Madison Square Garden is  holding some sort of Professional Bull Riding contest.  It was advertised on TV here.  </p>

<p>Just Yikes.  I consider that beyond extreme spot (and I've know a couple of bull riders when I was younger).  </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 11:21 PM by Paula Helm Murray&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163732</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163732</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 23:21:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #114 from Bruce Arthurs</title>
         <description>comment from Bruce Arthurs on  1.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick @ #23:<br />
<i>"(The fact is that I appear to be really, honestly, losing my eyesight at a rate faster than my age should by itself account for. (I turn 48 on the 2nd.) I need to see someone about this. It's getting upsetting.)"</i></p>

<p>At 48, you're reaching the age where, even if you've paid for an extended warranty (by exercising, eating right, getting enough sleep, avoiding stress, maintaining a phlegmatic temperament, etc.), your body starts showing signs of wear and tear.</p>

<p>The eyesight weakens, the teeth become a regular concern, bruises and scratches take longer to heal, and you start using the word "regularity" to refer to your bowels instead of your sex life.</p>

<p>And this is just the minor stuff, the normal stuff, the routine stuff that comes with aging, not any major life-and-lifestyle-threatening medical problems.</p>

<p>This is all annoying.  Very, very annoying.  Especially since, while you can take steps to slow the process down, you can't <i>stop</i> it.</p>

<p>(The thought strikes me that the original ROCKY movie works as a good metaphor for Life and Death.  Rocky Balboa is the "Everyman" who finds himself rushing towards an appointment with "Death" in the form of Apollo Creed, and who finds his inner peace in the realization that his "win" won't be by defeating Death, but by going the distance, by lasting the entire fifteen rounds.)</p>

<p>(Of course, if you go with that reading, the subsequent ROCKY movies get tossed into the fantasy category:  ROCKY II is where Rocky actually <i>does</i> defeat Death/Apollo.  Rocky III is Rocky vs. the Devil/Clubber Lang.  And ROCKY IV, with the barely-human Russian fighter, is Rocky vs., ummm, Galactus, maybe?)</p>

<p>Myself, I'm trying, at age 54, to make myself look as good as 65-year old <a href="http://www.allposters.com/-sp/Growing-Old-Is-Not-for-Sissies-Man_i846775_.htm?aid=798379" rel="nofollow">John Turner</a> did.</p>

<p></p>

<p>(Jeez, what a depressing little comment.  Am I a great guy to invite to parties or what?  It may have something to do with just having read Julie Phillips' biography of James Tiptree Jr./Alice Sheldon.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  1, 2007 11:51 PM by Bruce Arthurs&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163735</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163735</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 23:51:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #115 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paula Helm Murray @111 (which, coincidentally, is the I-5 exit for Shipwreck): I've been buying from Shipwreck since they were a dinky store in Mud Bay; now they're dangerously near, and I've fallen into the habit of buying bags of mixed beads, which are really inexpensive compared to unbroken strings. It's a sort of oppressive place, though, like a really well-lit jewelry store crossed with Home Depot. One is constantly aware they number their inventory in millions.</p>

<p>I was looking at beads at Big Lots yesterday (there's one next to the nearest Trader Joe's) hoping that I could find some big blue faceted beads to finish a memory-wire bracelet as a delayed Christmas present. All they had were small beads, and mostly plastic, at that. But they did have Christmas bags 80% off their original price. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  2:12 AM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163748</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163748</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 02:12:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #116 from ethan</title>
         <description>comment from ethan on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy 2007!  Or, as I like to call it, the 7th year of the future, or, alternately, Y2K7.</p>

<p>I went to a party and was dancing my damn fool butt off to the Pet Shop Boys (and no, I'm not really <i>that</i> gay most of the time) until I developed a severe case of champagne hiccups.  Unpleasant.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  2:14 AM by ethan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163749</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163749</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 02:14:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #117 from David Goldfarb</title>
         <description>comment from David Goldfarb on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NYE, Katie and I went to a free concert by the SF Chamber Orchestra -- and very nearly didn't get in!  Despite arriving half an hour early.  (We were told some people had arrived an hour early.  Sheesh.)  But we did get in, sitting in the very top row of the balcony, and the concert was very nice.  Then we went back to my place where I baked brownies and we watched this years Doctor Who Christmas special.</p>

<p>New Year's Day was spent, as usual, at Debbie Notkin's house party (which is why I baked the brownies) where I got to see and talk to many cool people, including meeting Anna Feruglio Dal Dan FTF for the first time.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  5:13 AM by David Goldfarb&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163760</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163760</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 05:13:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #118 from miriam beetle</title>
         <description>comment from miriam beetle on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i woke up, went with my boyfriend to a new years brunch with his family, them we went to his parents house & slept on couches for the next six hours. we slept about four hours last night, but that nap was ridiculous. i don't know if we'll get to sleep tonight at all.</p>

<p>then i got up, worked on my big honking writing/drawing project i have to finish by the end of the month or else, & drank two cups of coffee from my boyfriend's mum's new machine, & watched half an episode too much of <i>csi:miami</i>.</p>

<p>eventually, my boyfriend got up, as his parents got home from their dinner party. then my boyfriend's mum made extraordinarily good potato & corn tempura, & sauteed three-kinds-of-mushroom. oh man. & we watched <i>a few good men</i> cause it was on. i hadn't known it was an aaron sorkin movie, but boy is it ever an aaron sorkin movie.</p>

<p>then, after i finished all my page breakdowns, i dragged my 230-pound boyfriend on his back through two rooms before he was persuaded not to go back to napping but to get up & drive us home. i could do it, but i won't be able to lift my arms tomorrow (today, but, like i say, it'll be awhile before bed yet).</p>

<p>then i got home & got right on making light. don't know what i'll do now. go on with my layouts, or play with google image search (i can't imagine being a cartoonist before google image search, especially if one simply needs to draw michelangelo's moses as envisioned by r. crumb).</p>

<p>you asked....</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  5:13 AM by miriam beetle&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163761</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163761</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 05:13:54 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #119 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Weholt @ 112... <i>only a dog can tell you how to really get to heaven</i></p>

<p>Indeed and, as that animated movie from the early Nineties reminded us, all dogs go to Heaven. As for cats...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  5:44 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163764</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163764</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 05:44:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #120 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick @ 23... <i>I appear to be really, honestly, losing my eyesight at a rate faster than my age should by itself account for.</i></p>

<p>I was worrying about that too until last summer, when, after my exam, I got my new glasses. My vision was even worse with those than with my old pair that I had to go back. The doc had indeed made a mistake. How much of a mistake? The equivalent of one quarter of one out of ten. Apparently my peepers are sensitive to very slight changes. Maybe it's the same for you.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  6:06 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163766</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163766</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 06:06:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #121 from Jo Walton</title>
         <description>comment from Jo Walton on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dreamed last night that Mike Ford was dead. Then I woke up, and after the initial shock of relief, remembered. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  8:17 AM by Jo Walton&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163767</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163767</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 08:17:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #122 from Jo Walton</title>
         <description>comment from Jo Walton on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and Happy Birthday, Patrick! Many happy returns of the day.</p>

<p>We used some of your rum to make brandy butter... actually, I suppose that makes it rum butter, technically.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  8:29 AM by Jo Walton&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163770</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163770</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 08:29:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #123 from Aconite</title>
         <description>comment from Aconite on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best wishes, and many happy returns, Patrick.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  8:34 AM by Aconite&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163771</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163771</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 08:34:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #124 from ajay</title>
         <description>comment from ajay on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#121: <i>I dreamed last night Mike Ford was dead.</i></p>

<p>That sounds like the start of a revised version of "Joe Hill". </p>

<p>"Don't mourn. <i>Iterate</i>."</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  9:20 AM by ajay&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163773</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163773</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 09:20:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #125 from Carrie S.</title>
         <description>comment from Carrie S. on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spent most of yesterday playing World of Warcraft, which was noteworthy only insofar as I was able to do it from my living room couch rather than the desktop machine in the bedroom.  Laptops are good; laptops that will talk to wireless routers are better.  It means that Liam and I can be in the same room while indulging in our respective favorite timesinks--his requires a cable-enabled TV and mine needs an Internet connection, which until now were on different floors.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  9:22 AM by Carrie S.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163774</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163774</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 09:22:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #126 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw <i>Night at the Museum</i> over the weekend. Everybody, especially my nephews, thought it was hilarious. I found it amusing, at least in the last act, especially the scene where they throw in a <i>Brokeback Mountain</i> joke involving a cowboy and a Roman general. </p>

<p>The best part though was the coming attraction for the next <i>Fantastic Four</i> movie. It sounds like it might be better than the original movie. Which isn't that difficult, I know. Anyway, Johnny Storm's chasing after the Silver Surfer made for some spectacular stuff.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  9:37 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163775</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163775</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 09:37:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #127 from debcha</title>
         <description>comment from debcha on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy birthday, Patrick, and many happy returns!</p>

<p>I had a fabulous start to 2007 - slept in, spent much of the day on the couch with a book (and one or both cats), and then went to a very civilized dinner party.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  9:57 AM by debcha&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163776</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163776</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 09:57:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #128 from adamsj</title>
         <description>comment from adamsj on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge,</p>

<p>I was surprised by how much I enjoyed the Fantastic Four movie.</p>

<p>Perhaps I had low expectations, or perhaps it was my wife's thoughtfully asking every few minutes, "Now, is that how it was in the comic book?" which is one of my favorite questions to try to answer.</p>

<p>I enjoyed it, whatever my reasons, and I even liked it.</p>

<p>My impression is that most of the underwear movies lately have sucked, both by movie and by comic fan standards. I wouldn't know--this is the first I've seen in years--but I thought this one was fine.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007 10:01 AM by adamsj&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163778</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163778</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 10:01:40 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #129 from Michael Walsh</title>
         <description>comment from Michael Walsh on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: "Holy Moly"... reveals that I don't read everything we publish (just as well, my brain would turn to guacamole in a noonday Tucson sun).</p>

<p>In the Johns Hopkins UP book: "Single Stage to Orbit Politics, Space Technology, and the Quest for Reusable Rocketry"  there are a few references to Tim Kyger, which really shouldn't be that much of a surprise.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007 10:11 AM by Michael Walsh&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163779</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163779</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 10:11:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #130 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>adamsj... My big problem with the original FF movie is that they gave themselves plenty of opportunities for dramatic events and yet they dropped the ball. An example? Where to begin? There's this mysterious cloud in space that's coming straight at Earth. Do the main characters do something to deflect the cloud, no matter what the danger, thus saving the Earth at their own expense? Nope. The darn cloud just transforms them into the FF then goes away, its plot purpose fulfilled. Do we then have Ben Grimm risk his own life to bring the shuttle and everybody safely down? No. Instead, we have him suddenly wake up in a clinic, and we're 'treated' to a lame joke by Johnny Storm.</p>

<p>Things seem to happen in a vacuum in this movie. I mean, they happen because, well, they happened in the comics. Ben Grimm is mad at Reed Richards for his own monstrous appearance, which made sense in the comics because Reed had cut corners on their fateful flight. Not so in the movie. We have New Yorkers cheer on the FF as heroes after that major car crash even though the whole mess happened because of Ben.</p>

<p>From some comments I read elsewhere, Michael Chikliss, who is a fan of that comic-book, wasn't happy with the original movie, and enjoyed the sequel much more. I can't wait for Galactus to show up near the end.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007 10:24 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163781</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163781</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 10:24:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #131 from Harriet (01/04) also wishes Patrick (01/02) a happy birthday</title>
         <description>comment from Harriet (01/04) also wishes Patrick (01/02) a happy birthday on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although it's been said<br />
Many times, many ways --<br />
Happy Birthday To You!</p>

<p>(to paraphrase the words of one Robert Wells)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007 10:24 AM by Harriet (01/04) also wishes Patrick (01/02) a happy birthday&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163782</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163782</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 10:24:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #132 from fidelio agrees with Harriet</title>
         <description>comment from fidelio agrees with Harriet on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy birthday indeed, and get those eyes checked. Because complaining about the cost of the new glasses beats complaining about the broken leg you got when you fell down a flight of steps you didn't see.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007 10:35 AM by fidelio agrees with Harriet&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163783</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163783</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 10:35:32 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #133 from Bill Higgins-- Beam Jockey</title>
         <description>comment from Bill Higgins-- Beam Jockey on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In #58 Sajia Kabir wrote:</p>

<p><i>The Powerpoint Sidelight had me thinking: Do Nasa employees have t-shirts saying, "Actually, I am a rocket scientist?"</i></p>

<p>To which Mary Kay Kare replied in #77:</p>

<p><i>I don't know about NASA engineers, but my husband has multiple t-shirts and a button saying that. However, as of last Friday he really isn't one anymore.</i></p>

<p>"Death does not release you."</p>

<p>(Happy birthday, PNH!)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007 10:46 AM by Bill Higgins-- Beam Jockey&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163784</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163784</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 10:46:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #134 from Nancy C</title>
         <description>comment from Nancy C on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy Birthday Patrick!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007 11:06 AM by Nancy C&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163787</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163787</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 11:06:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #135 from JC</title>
         <description>comment from JC on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy Birthday, Patrick! I hope you and Teresa do something wonderful to celebrate.</p>

<p>(As for my New Year's Day, I made the chicken stock and got some writing done. Plus, I saw the first episode of The Sarah Jane Adventures. I have episodes 12 and 13 of Torchwood ready to watch tonight.)<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007 11:10 AM by JC&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163788</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163788</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 11:10:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #136 from Xopher wishes PNH a Most Excellent Birthday with Many Happy Returns, With or Without Deposits</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher wishes PNH a Most Excellent Birthday with Many Happy Returns, With or Without Deposits on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>!yadhtriB yppaH</p>

<p>Oh, wait.  Strike that.  Reverse it.</p>

<p>Wow, you're only a few months older than me.  I feel totally inadequate.  </p>

<p><i>Anyway, Johnny Storm's chasing after the Silver Surfer made for some spectacular stuff.</i></p>

<p>Boy Meets Strange Stoned Interstellar Being, Boy loses SSIB, Boy gets SSIB?  Human Torch/Silver Surfer slash...it has possibilities!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007 11:17 AM by Xopher wishes PNH a Most Excellent Birthday with Many Happy Returns, With or Without Deposits&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163789</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163789</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 11:17:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #137 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xopher... Why must you take everything that is good and wholesome and make it sound so dirty? Next, I suppose you'll bring up Galactus/Watcher slash.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007 11:33 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163791</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163791</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 11:33:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #138 from Laina</title>
         <description>comment from Laina on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy Birthday, Patrick!</p>

<p>I woke up at 7:30 New Year's Morning, ate breakfast, and fell asleep in the recliner for most of the morning.  Read and picked up a few things the rest of the day.</p>

<p>No work today because of the National Day of Mourning for President Ford. I'm watching the funeral right now. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007 11:35 AM by Laina&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163792</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163792</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 11:35:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #139 from Madeleine Robins</title>
         <description>comment from Madeleine Robins on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy Birthday, Patrick.  May it be full of good work, good food, and much celebration.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007 11:35 AM by Madeleine Robins&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163793</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163793</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 11:35:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #140 from Jon Sobel</title>
         <description>comment from Jon Sobel on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy birthday, Patrick!<br />
Right behind you (if not ahead) in the poor vision department - and I'm only 43.  Reminds me of the New Yorker cartoon with two men walking away from the viewer, both have huge butts, and the younger says to the older, "Thanks for almost everything, Dad!"</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007 11:42 AM by Jon Sobel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163794</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163794</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 11:42:34 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #141 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xopher... Or Galactus and the High Evolutionary...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007 12:07 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163796</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163796</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:07:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #142 from Larry Brennan</title>
         <description>comment from Larry Brennan on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy Birthday Patrick, and many returns. Of the birthday, not the presents.</p>

<p>And do get those eyes checked out. It's amazing what they can do these days, but be sure to avoid the guy in the bazaar with the tankful of orbs who proclaims, "I just do eyes!"</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007 12:12 PM by Larry Brennan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163798</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163798</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:12:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #143 from Patrick Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Patrick Nielsen Hayden on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, we're celebrating my birthday by being sick as dogs.  Both of us have what we suspect to be a bacterial sinus infection, and we're going in together to see our doctor first thing tomorrow morning.  But thank you all for the kind thoughts!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007 12:15 PM by Patrick Nielsen Hayden&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163799</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163799</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:15:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #144 from Patrick Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Patrick Nielsen Hayden on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"If only you knew what I've seen through your eyes..."</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007 12:16 PM by Patrick Nielsen Hayden&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163800</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163800</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:16:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #145 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge: actually, the slash I've always wanted to write is Magneto/Iceman.  Magnetism is stronger when it's cold, isn't it?  Hmmm...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007 12:27 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163803</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163803</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:27:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #146 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mother? Let me tell you about my mother....</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  1:17 PM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163814</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163814</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 13:17:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #147 from Aconite</title>
         <description>comment from Aconite on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge: <i>Next, I suppose you'll bring up Galactus/Watcher slash.</i></p>

<p>Well, we know that Giles did some things in his youth that he regr--oh.  Never mind.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  1:22 PM by Aconite&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163816</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163816</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 13:22:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #148 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry to hear about the sinus infection. They totally suck.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  1:22 PM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163817</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163817</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 13:22:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #149 from Linkmeister</title>
         <description>comment from Linkmeister on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I was 45 when I got my first pair of bifocals.  It was an awful shock to be informed that I needed them, but that was overcome within moments of picking up a book and not having to extend my arms full-length to read it.</p>

<p>Happy Birthday and cleared-up sinuses, Patrick.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  1:30 PM by Linkmeister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163819</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163819</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 13:30:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #150 from xeger</title>
         <description>comment from xeger on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy birthday Patrick!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  1:53 PM by xeger&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163823</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163823</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 13:53:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #151 from Charlie Stross</title>
         <description>comment from Charlie Stross on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy birthday!</p>

<p>(I was tempted to send a PowerPoint presentation to sing "Happy Birthday To You", but got worried that  I'd have to pay a performing rights royalty on the song ...)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  2:05 PM by Charlie Stross&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163824</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163824</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:05:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #152 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just painted "Happy Birthday" on the side of a round in my recoiless rifle strapped to my Vespa. At 3 pm, I plan on driving it up a hill and firing it over the ocean. Keep your eyes peeled for it.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  2:54 PM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163829</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163829</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:54:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #153 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For sale: One used, slightly charred Vespa. Still runs. Downhill. </p>

<p>Also for sale: Empty fire exstinguisher, needs recharging. But confirmed operational.</p>

<p>Good price. </p>

<p>Need bail money.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  3:31 PM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163834</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163834</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:31:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #154 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paula Helm Murray #113: Out, damned spot!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  4:50 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163843</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163843</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 16:50:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #155 from joann</title>
         <description>comment from joann on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spent NYE cooking the nice dinner while watching bits of Marx Brothers on the living room computer, consuming dinner with a *very* nice vin blanc, watching old vacation slides, and then finishing off the year in bed, sharing a bottle of fairly nice champers, some shortbreads and chocolates, while channel-surfing the usual Times Square etc. suspects and watching some Twilight Zone. Then we discovered one of the local channels was showing the San Antonio Riverwalk Holiday Parade, in which the floats are all tourist boats. This all looked like a dive straight back to the Fifties, and was just perfect after vast quantities of French stuff.</p>

<p>We Tivoed the Rose Parade, as broadcast by HGTV since we like the way they go into the technical aspects of float decoration, and watched it last night. Yesterday spent taking down the tree and rearranging the living room furniture. For what may be badly-needed good luck, I cooked a sort of Hoppin' John with black-eyed peas, rice, and Canadian bacon among other things.</p>

<p>State decreed a day of mourning today, so spouse is off. If the funeral was broadcast, none of the Fry's large-screens was tuned to the festivities.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  5:09 PM by joann&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163845</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163845</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 17:09:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #156 from joann</title>
         <description>comment from joann on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary Aileen #103:</p>

<p>According to HGTV, it was indeed the chapel. I loved the bulldog; the muffler was an inspired touch.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  5:12 PM by joann&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163846</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163846</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 17:12:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #157 from joann</title>
         <description>comment from joann on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge #119: <i>as that animated movie from the early Nineties reminded us, all dogs go to Heaven. As for cats...</i></p>

<p>As for cats, they're already *in* heaven right here and now. Great state of affairs.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  5:13 PM by joann&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163847</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163847</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 17:13:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #158 from Magenta Griffith</title>
         <description>comment from Magenta Griffith on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jo @121, with apologies.</p>

<p>I dreamed I saw Mike Ford last night,<br />
Alive as you and me.<br />
Says I "But Mike, I heard you died."<br />
"It was a joke," said he,<br />
"It was a joke," said he.</p>

<p>And standing there as big as life<br />
And smiling like he would.<br />
Said Mike "True wit cannot be killed<br />
As long as it is good.<br />
As long as it is good."</p>

<p>From San Francisco to New York,<br />
At parties, cons, and such<br />
Where fans are laughing with their beers,<br />
Mike Ford will be in touch,<br />
Mike Ford will be in touch.</p>

<p>So Doctor Mike will yet live on,<br />
The poems will still be scribed,<br />
New games will run like railroad trains<br />
And drinks will be imbibed, <br />
And drinks will be imbibed.<br />
 <br />
I dreamed I saw Mike Ford last night,<br />
alive as you and me.<br />
Said I "But Mike, I heard you died"<br />
"It was a joke,"  said he,<br />
"It was a joke,"  said he.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  6:42 PM by Magenta Griffith&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163852</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163852</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 18:42:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #159 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy Birthday, Patrick! Sorry about the sinus pain; I've always found that the best thing for those is the most robust Hot and Sour soup you can find.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  6:51 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163853</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163853</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 18:51:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #160 from kate</title>
         <description>comment from kate on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Random and useless datapoint-- I did see info about that poll on CNN. I didn't listen to all of the story, though (I was in Dunkin' Donuts), so I don't know if they mentioned the "lots and lots of troops don't want the surge" part of the poll.</p>

<p>Also, happy birthday.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  7:14 PM by kate&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163857</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163857</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 19:14:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #161 from Kip W</title>
         <description>comment from Kip W on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#158 Magenta: If only. </p>

<p>#130 Serge: "the original Fantastic Four movie" -- I think we have two different movies in mind. To me, that's the Roger Corman one, where Dr. Doom "vogues" when he talks.</p>

<p>#161 Me: Does anybody here know a technical reason (or any other) why I shouldn't download the <a href="http://widgets.yahoo.com/gallery/?author=14432" rel="nofollow">Olbermann Widget</a>? I like Olbermann, so we can omit any reasons that have to do with not liking Olbermann.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  7:35 PM by Kip W&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163859</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163859</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 19:35:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #162 from James D. Macdonald</title>
         <description>comment from James D. Macdonald on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I have now seen <i>Snakes on a Plane</i> and have figured out why, despite a year's worth of outstanding internet anticipation, it sank like a stone.</p>

<p>The movie sucked.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  7:47 PM by James D. Macdonald&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163860</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163860</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 19:47:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #163 from Howard Peirce</title>
         <description>comment from Howard Peirce on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Indeed and, as that animated movie from the early Nineties reminded us, all dogs go to Heaven. As for cats...</i></p>

<blockquote><strong>"Stare at this wall long enough, and I am there. Cleave this squirrel, and there you will find Me. The kingdom of Heaven is laid upon the face of the earth, and dogs do not see it." </strong></blockquote>

<p>From the Gnostic Gospel of Bast, one of the Animapocrypha.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  8:08 PM by Howard Peirce&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163861</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163861</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 20:08:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #164 from ethan</title>
         <description>comment from ethan on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've got a very naïve question about things that are beyond my mortal ken, but probably not beyond most of your collective kens:</p>

<p>Does anyone know if the links to our own websites that we provide with our comments contribute to Google's complicated algorithms?  As in, does Google count every post I make as a link to my blog that increases its page rank?  Also, is that why there's such a thing as comment spam?</p>

<p>Just something I'm wondering about, both as a new blogger and as one who is irked by spam.  And as a human person, and before God and everyone.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  8:30 PM by ethan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163863</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163863</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 20:30:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #165 from Teresa Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Teresa Nielsen Hayden on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I expect the addresses get harvested by spammers. I don't know what Google does with them.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  9:45 PM by Teresa Nielsen Hayden&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163867</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163867</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 21:45:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #166 from Teresa Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Teresa Nielsen Hayden on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell us about the movie, Red Mike.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  9:47 PM by Teresa Nielsen Hayden&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163869</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163869</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 21:47:01 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #167 from CHip</title>
         <description>comment from CHip on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick -- HPHC (my HMO) used to look for a drop meriting bifocals at 40, and I have regretted not insisting on being checked several years earlier ever since I finally got my first pair; you should get checked ASAP. Some people get lucky and never need serious glasses despite abusing their eyes, but they're the minority. One possible bright spot: my prescription has been practically stable in the ~10 years since I got my first progressives. (NB: if your prescription comes up more than ~1.00 difference between distance and close vision, ask them to also test at whatever distance from a CRT you find comfortable; arbitrary intermediate monofocals are better than nothing, but not nearly as good as the correct prescription if you're spending lots of time in front of a screen.)</p>

<p>The one time I counted there were 70 people in the house where I spent New Year's Eve, and several had been and gone; the only dense crowd was the 20 players and onlookers of "Apples to Apples" in the 2nd-floor hall. <i>Pace</i> Charlie, a sober New Year's Night suited me quite well; it's hard to cook 5-10 gallons of sauce and 6 pounds of spaghetti (even with much help) when you're not stone sober. We heard very few firecrackers, but we drove home past a house that has appeared in news all over the country because of its gross excess of lights (and the fact that they stay on until well after midnight).</p>

<p>MKK#77: that's a pity -- I was looking forward to hearing the results of the 2nd level of propulsion experiment, using a watermelon-powered main with zucchini strap-ons. (I think Mike actually gaped for a second when J explained that one....)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  9:47 PM by CHip&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163868</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163868</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 21:47:01 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #168 from Patrick Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Patrick Nielsen Hayden on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>"Does anyone know if the links to our own websites that we provide with our comments contribute to Google's complicated algorithms? As in, does Google count every post I make as a link to my blog that increases its page rank?"</em></p>

<p>The answer is no.  Links from Making Light's comment section, whether embedded in the body of comments or in a commenter's headers, don't contribute to any site's Google PageRank, because our Movable Type setup is configured to automatically add a rel="nofollow" statement to any live link.  This is one of the basic things you do to make your commenting system less attractive to spam.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007  9:55 PM by Patrick Nielsen Hayden&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163870</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163870</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 21:55:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #169 from Patrick Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Patrick Nielsen Hayden on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CHip: I've been wearing progressives for years.  In fact, I just got a new pair, based on a new prescription, a few months ago.  Thus my concern.</p>

<p>I already know I have presbyopia.  (As I observed when I was diagnosed, my eyes refuse rule by bishops.)  What I'm experiencing is an alarming increase in how quickly my eyes get tired, and how hard it is to maintain focus at whatever focal length I choose.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007 10:00 PM by Patrick Nielsen Hayden&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163871</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163871</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 22:00:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #170 from P J Evans</title>
         <description>comment from P J Evans on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick, are they sure that the lenses-as-built and the prescription are the same? Because opticians have been known to make mistakes. (My mother got one pair where each lens had the prescription for the other eye. Individually correct, but the sum was not good.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007 10:17 PM by P J Evans&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163875</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163875</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 22:17:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #171 from Marilee</title>
         <description>comment from Marilee on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge, #93&94, yes, it was on Sunday.</p>

<p>JESR, #108, The HR person at Shipwreck, Carol, is a friend of mine.  Say Hi the next time you go.</p>

<p>Paula, #111, consider ordering from <a href="http://www.whimbeads.com" rel="nofollow">Out on a Whim</a>.  Fire Mountain Gem cheats artists.</p>

<p>The local (DC) NBC station gave the results of the <a href="http://www.nbc4.com/news/7541767/detail.html" rel="nofollow">military poll</a>.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007 10:39 PM by Marilee&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163877</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163877</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 22:39:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #172 from Dr Paisley</title>
         <description>comment from Dr Paisley on  2.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In re the "Army Times" survey, it was mentioned tonight in a discussion of the "surge" on "Countdown with Keith Olbermann." M. Olbermann also presented another of his brilliant, blistering "Special Comments" on Iraq. It will be on again starting at midnight EST.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  2, 2007 11:22 PM by Dr Paisley&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163883</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163883</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 23:22:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #173 from ethan</title>
         <description>comment from ethan on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, quick answer from both Nielsen Haydens.  Thanks!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  1:21 AM by ethan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163897</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163897</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 01:21:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #174 from ajay</title>
         <description>comment from ajay on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#158: the other possibility goes to the tune of "The Ballad of Rodger Young"...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  5:38 AM by ajay&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163903</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163903</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 05:38:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #175 from Julia Jones</title>
         <description>comment from Julia Jones on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick, get the short/long-sighted part of your prescription checked, if you haven't already done so. It can drift in some people, and I've had to have my contact lens prescription changed twice in the last 18 months for this reason -- the presbyopia certainly wasn't helping, but my basic myopia prescription had changed enough to make focusing tiring and uncomfortable. Your description sounds similar to what I was experiencing. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  6:53 AM by Julia Jones&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163905</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163905</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 06:53:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #176 from Charlie Stross</title>
         <description>comment from Charlie Stross on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JDM, #162: <em>Well, I have now seen Snakes on a Plane and have figured out why, despite a year's worth of outstanding internet anticipation, it sank like a stone. The movie sucked.</em></p>

<p>Unlike "The Apocalypse Door", which I finally got my hands on, bolted down at one sitting, and which definitely <em>didn't</em> suck.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  8:48 AM by Charlie Stross&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163908</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163908</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 08:48:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #177 from Faren Miller</title>
         <description>comment from Faren Miller on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick, it turns out you share a birthday with <i>Locus</i> Reviews Editor/anthologist Jonathan Strahan, whose <a href="http://www.jonathanstrahan.com.au/wp/" rel="nofollow">blog</a> posting about being 40-something is similarly morose. Now all of us 50-somethings (and older) can join in a chorus of "Cheer up, young whippersnappers!" [to the tune of mumble er, "Young Lovers"]</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  9:16 AM by Faren Miller&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163912</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163912</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:16:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #178 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kip W @ 161: <i>"the original Fantastic Four movie" -- I think we have two different movies in mind. To me, that's the Roger Corman one, where Dr. Doom "vogues" when he talks.</i></p>

<p>Ah yes, there was that unreleased version. It was, to say the least, terrible, but its heart was in the right place.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  9:52 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163918</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163918</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:52:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #179 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marilee @ 171... Drat. When we came back from our trip to the Bay Area, the first thing I did was turn on the TV because a cold and silent house just is no fun during the Holidays. Anyway the TZ marathon was on, in the middle of episode "little girl lost", which tells us that, if you hear your kid sobbing and can't find her, the first thing you must do is call your scientist neighbor.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  9:57 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163920</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163920</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:57:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #180 from Skwid</title>
         <description>comment from Skwid on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge @178, Just to be clear, we're talking about <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0109770/" rel="nofollow">this thing</a>, right?  The movie that held easily the title of "worst non-porn movie I've ever seen" right up until <i>Ultraviolet</i> came along last year to give it competition?  The movie so bad that I hallucinated a Latvian dance number in the middle of it, and when I realized later it wasn't actually in the film my estimation of it went <i>down?</i></p>

<p>I don't think that movie's heart was anywhere near where it was supposed to be, anymore than the rest of its figurative anatomy was properly placed.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007 10:15 AM by Skwid&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163922</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163922</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 10:15:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #181 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean, a <i>Latverian</i> dance, Skwid, but yes we are both talking about 1994's <i>Fantastic Four</i>. Was it really the worst non-porn movie ever made? No way. That title goes to 1986's <i>Ishtar</i>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007 10:22 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163924</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163924</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 10:22:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #182 from James D. Macdonald</title>
         <description>comment from James D. Macdonald on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Ishtar?</i>  Hah!  I laugh at your <i>Ishtar!</i>  Now <i>Spawn of the Slithis</i> ... that movie was <i>bad</i>.</p>

<p>Or are we only talking about big-budget wide-release movies?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007 11:18 AM by James D. Macdonald&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163932</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163932</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 11:18:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #183 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Spawn of the Slithis </i>, James? I must say I've never heard of that one. Considering imDB's synopsis ("A nuclear leak creates a mutant Slithis sea monster, which terrorizes the variety of pets, winos, and hippies who hang around Venice, California."), it's probably just as well.</p>

<p>Anyway, there's no big-budget limitation although having a big budget gives a movie even less of an excuse for its being atrocious. Another top contender for the title of Really Bad Movie would be the sequel to <i>Highlander</i>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007 11:45 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163937</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163937</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 11:45:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #184 from Carrie S.</title>
         <description>comment from Carrie S. on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My local paper used to include a weekly TV schedule pullout, and one of the things I liked to do was read the movie blurbs in the back.  I have long since forgotten the name of the film, but the synopsis is burned into my brain: "A fading comic's career is revived when a third arm sprouts from his back."</p>

<p>I'll see your <i>Ishtar</i> and raise you a third-arm movie. ;)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007 12:02 PM by Carrie S.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163941</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163941</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 12:02:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #185 from ajay</title>
         <description>comment from ajay on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#184: Carrie, it gives me great pleasure to present <i>The Dark Backward</i> (Adam Rifkin, 2000).</p>

<p>"Marty Malt (Judd Nelson) is the worst stand-up comic in the entire world. He is equally terrible at his day job, a garbage collector. It seems that Marty is not destined for stardom ... until one day something strange happens that changes his life forever. His accordion-playing co-worker, Gus (Bill Paxton), notices a lump growing out of Marty's back while they are doing the rounds. This odd growth is diagnosed by the disturbingly incompetent Doctor Scurvey (James Caan) as a third arm."</p>

<p>According to <a href='http://www.amazon.ca/Dark-Backward-Adam-Rifkin/dp/6302298709' rel="nofollow">this </a> it is the director's best work...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007 12:16 PM by ajay&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163943</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163943</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 12:16:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #186 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carrie S, your challenge cannot go unmet.</p>

<p>How about <i>The Thing with Two Heads</i> ("They transplanted a white bigot's head on a soul brother's body!")? I understand that it is not the best movie that Ray Milland was in.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007 12:27 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163944</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163944</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 12:27:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #187 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Satan's Cheerleaders</i>?  The title really says it all.  Evil sheriff calling to his dogs: "Lucifer!  Diablo!  Get them!"</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007 12:52 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163946</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163946</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 12:52:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #188 from Carrie S.</title>
         <description>comment from Carrie S. on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ajay, dude, please tell me you had to google for that using keywords from the synopsis and didn't just know it.</p>

<p>Serge, I have never seen <i>The Thing with Two Heads</i>, so I fear I have to concede.  Somehow I don't think that even that one with the 7th planet and automated testicle remover (<i>Ice Pirates</i>?) can compare...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007 12:53 PM by Carrie S.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163947</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163947</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 12:53:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #189 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gawd... <i>Ice Pirates</i>... Why did you have to remind me of that one, Carrie S?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007 12:55 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163948</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163948</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 12:55:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #190 from Carrie S.</title>
         <description>comment from Carrie S. on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And wait, I just noticed the 2000 production date on <i>The Dark Backwards</i>.  Either Ajay's source got the date wrong, there are <i>two</i> movies that used the plot, or I'm once again not in the universe I started in, because I read that synopsis no later than high school, which is to say no later than 1994.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007 12:56 PM by Carrie S.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163949</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163949</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 12:56:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #191 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge #181: I'd go for either <i>Plan Nine from Outer Space</i> or <i>Manos, the Hands of Fate</i> as the worst non-porn film ever.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  1:25 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163953</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163953</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 13:25:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #192 from Paula Helm Murray</title>
         <description>comment from Paula Helm Murray on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Marilee, I have never actually ordered anything from Fire Mountain yet, just get their catalogs.  the place I order most from is Ornamental Resources, they're out Colorado and I like their findings a lot.  Beads I got, tons, metal parts (GOOD metal parts) are harder to come by.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  1:25 PM by Paula Helm Murray&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163954</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163954</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 13:25:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #193 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Fragano, but I maintain that <i>Ishtar</i> is the worst. I remember seeing it in Montreal, and when the lights came on, everybody just sat there, silent.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  1:30 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163956</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163956</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 13:30:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #194 from Erik Nelson</title>
         <description>comment from Erik Nelson on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In college we had the Bad Film Festival. You paid four dollars at the door and got a buck back for each one you sat through.</p>

<p>Plan Nine from Outer Space<br />
Attack of the Killer Tomatoes<br />
Invasion of the Bee Girls<br />
They Saved Hitler's Brain</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  1:35 PM by Erik Nelson&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163957</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163957</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 13:35:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #195 from Carrie S.</title>
         <description>comment from Carrie S. on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Serge, seriously, <i>Manos</i> is so bad <i><b>MST3K</b></i> couldn't save it.  It beats <i>Ishtar</i> by a country mile.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  1:37 PM by Carrie S.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163958</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163958</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 13:37:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #196 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, Carrie S, but <i>Ishtar</i> was done by professional movie people, with actors who do this for a living, and they had lots of money to play with. I don't think any of that applied to <i>Manos</i>.</p>

<p>How about this? They <i>both</i> are very crappy movies.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  2:07 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163962</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163962</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 14:07:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #197 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge #193: Worse than <i>Plan Nine</i> which was also made by professional movie people?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  2:09 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163965</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163965</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 14:09:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #198 from Marilee</title>
         <description>comment from Marilee on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PJ, #170, I saw the optometrist about two weeks ago, got my new glasses Friday and wore them home.  No problem until I got to the computer and there was no angle where I could see the computer clearly with the right lens. I did some more experimenting and I couldn't read, or see clearly with the right lens (I must have been looking with my left eye on the way home).  I have an appt at 10:10 tomorrow (ack) to recheck them.  I'm pretty sure something happened when the lens was made.</p>

<p>Serge, #179, I saw that one, too, for the first time.  I didn't realize the guy was the neighbor.  I figured he was a scientist the father knew.</p>

<p>Paula, #192, then try <a href="http://www.riogrande.com" rel="nofollow">Rio Grande</a>.  They were designed for the trade, but now sell to hobbyists and small businesses.  If you want things like clasps, rings, etc., I get those from <a href="http://www.monsterslayer.com" rel="nofollow">Monsterslayer</a>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  2:11 PM by Marilee&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163966</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163966</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 14:11:50 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #199 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn't call Ed Wood a pro, Fragano. As for the TZ episode "little girl lost", maybe the scientist was a friend of the father, not a neighbor, but that doesn't change the silliness factor. (Next time I misplace my socks, maybe I'll ask Bill Higgins if he could help.)</p>

<p>Here's one BAD movie that was made by pros that deserves to die a painful death... <i>The Devil's Rain</i>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  2:17 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163967</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163967</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 14:17:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #200 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Oops. The TZ comment should have been addressed to you, Marilee.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  2:20 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163968</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163968</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 14:20:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #201 from ethan</title>
         <description>comment from ethan on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the Spawn of the Slithis the legendary <a href="http://www.plyrics.com/lyrics/deadmilkmen/thethingthatonlyeatshippies.html" rel="nofollow">Thing That Only Eats Hippies?</a></p>

<p>I think the all-time worst big-budget name-cast movie is Pleasantville, but I guess people actually like that one for some reason.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  2:22 PM by ethan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163969</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163969</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 14:22:01 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #202 from Renee</title>
         <description>comment from Renee on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*peeks in*</p>

<p>If it's a bad movie theme, and non-Hollywood is allowed, then I nominate Prehistoric Bimbos From Armageddon City.</p>

<p>Even if it doesn't count (it's obviously amateur, possibly a high-school project) then I still think it should win for the title alone.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  2:23 PM by Renee&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163970</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163970</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 14:23:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #203 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge #199: OK. But I think <i>Ishtar</i> is also beaten by <a href="http://www.badmovies.org/movies/cannibalwomen/" rel="nofollow"> this film</a>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  2:32 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163972</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163972</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 14:32:04 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #204 from Stefan Jones</title>
         <description>comment from Stefan Jones on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holiday Luggage fun:</p>

<p>On check-in in Portland, my Giant Rolling Bag of Christmas Gifts turns out to be 6 lbs. overweight. I remove carefully wrapped parcel of fudge from it; bag is now 45 lbs and gets checked in penalty free.</p>

<p>The TSA folks don't bat an eye at the hand-carried fudge. </p>

<p>On a layover at Seattle airport, cheerful cheer-spreaders representing the in-terminal shopping center give me a totebag to carry the parcel of fudge. Cheers, cheer-spreaders! My hand thanks you.</p>

<p>In Newark, giant bag of gifts never materializes. Alaska Airlines luggage office is baffled.</p>

<p>On the 26th, I get a call from Delta Airlines luggage office in Atlanta. I positively identify my giant bag. It gets delivered on the 28th at 4:30 am, by a guy who made a wrong turn and ended up driving in the boonies south of the Catskills for 1 1/2 hours.</p>

<p>Everything is intact, including a gold watch and a hard drive hidden in various crevices.</p>

<p>Whew.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  2:33 PM by Stefan Jones&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163973</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163973</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 14:33:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #205 from joann</title>
         <description>comment from joann on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stefan, that settles it. We all need private wormholes.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  3:17 PM by joann&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163980</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163980</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 15:17:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #206 from Julie L.</title>
         <description>comment from Julie L. on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wrt #s 192, 198 etc.: if you can make their minimum total, <a href="http://www.halsteadbead.com/" rel="nofollow">Halstead Bead</a> is pretty good for a variety of metals. If you work with brass, <a href="http://www.guyotbrothers.com/" rel="nofollow">Guyot Brothers</a> also looks pretty good but I've never ordered from them.</p>

<p>I generally get glass beads from <a href="http://yorkbeads.com/" rel="nofollow">York Beads</a> and semiprecious from <a href="http://www.znetshows.com/" rel="nofollow">Znetshows</a>, <a href="http://vitabeads.com/" rel="nofollow">VitaBeads</a>, or <a href="http://beading.com/" rel="nofollow">South Pacific</a>; also, don't forget eBay, which can have some surprisingly good deals if you have specific beadage in mind-- I'm still trying to figure out where some of their sellers are getting their cubic zirconia beads, since their prices are staggeringly lower than I've seen just about anywhere else.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  3:49 PM by Julie L.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163989</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163989</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 15:49:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #207 from Skwid</title>
         <description>comment from Skwid on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge, you were correct regarding the spelling of Latveria, but your dismissal of the classic <i>Ice Pirates</i> and your invention of some sort of mythical sequel to <i>Highlander</i> clearly place you as posting from some alternate dimension.  No one would make a sequel to <i>Highlander</i>...what a dumb idea.</p>

<p>Renee @ 202, I'll see your <i>Bimbos From Armageddon City</i> and raise you <i><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093171/" rel="nofollow">Hell Comes to Frogtown</a></i>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  4:08 PM by Skwid&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163992</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163992</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:08:01 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #208 from Sarah S</title>
         <description>comment from Sarah S on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about <i>The Hand</i> and <i>Basket Case</i>, the latter of which spawned not one, but <b>two</b> sequels?!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  4:20 PM by Sarah S&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163993</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163993</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:20:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #209 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#201: I loved <i>Pleasantville</i>.  That's when I developed my crush on Toby Maguire.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  4:24 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163994</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163994</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:24:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #210 from Alex Cohen</title>
         <description>comment from Alex Cohen on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can't say how bad it was, because I didn't see it, but then again, only three people did:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.chud.com/index.php?type=news&id=8378" rel="nofollow">Zyzzyx Road grossed $30</a>.  Yes, $30.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  4:44 PM by Alex Cohen&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163995</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163995</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:44:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #211 from Susan</title>
         <description>comment from Susan on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Year's Eve: I raked fourteen bags of leaves off my lawn.  It is still covered with leaves, but I am out of leaf bags.  This was followed by a Girls' Night watching Johnny Depp prance through <i>Curse of the Black Pearl</i> and cutting out lavender fabric.  I have had exactly two dates for New Year's in my life and both were utterly disastrous, so this is what passes for a socially successful celebration nowadays.  All my ballgowns are slowly turning black and lavender as I enter a permanent state of mourning.</p>

<p>New Year's Day was dedicated to sewing 1910s evening gowns and then a rigorous dance practice which left me with aches in really peculiar places.</p>

<p>Resolutions: <br />
1. lose another 40 pounds<br />
2. give up on men<br />
3. clean house</p>

<p>Only #3 is recycled from last year.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  5:27 PM by Susan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163999</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#163999</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:27:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #212 from Susan</title>
         <description>comment from Susan on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political giggle of the day:</p>

<p>Joe Lieberman seems to have neglected to join his own party.  Ooops.  <a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003527233" rel="nofollow">Connecticut for Lieberman taken over by Lieberman opponent</a>.</p>

<p>This should be entertaining.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  5:29 PM by Susan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164001</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164001</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:29:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #213 from P J Evans</title>
         <description>comment from P J Evans on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got my lily bulbs planted for New Year's. The grapevines got pruned for Christmas (find a day when they're reasonably dormant and start cutting). I'm hoping this year to get more grapes - last year's crop was a pound of Zinfandels. Now to get the species tulips and species crocuses planted.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  5:31 PM by P J Evans&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164004</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164004</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:31:34 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #214 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>skwid # 207... Well, <i>Ice Pirates</i> did have Anjelica Huston in it so it couldn't be all bad. As for your saying that no one would make a sequel to <i>Highlander</i>... Well, imDB says there was not one but TWO sequels. Or was it three, not including the TV series? It's hard to keep track when one hops all over the Multiverse.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  5:54 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164007</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164007</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:54:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #215 from Aconite</title>
         <description>comment from Aconite on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0069005/" rel="nofollow">Night of the Lepus</a>  Very silly.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0095444/" rel="nofollow">Killer Klowns from Outer Space</a> Much, much worse than you can imagine if you haven't seen it.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  6:01 PM by Aconite&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164008</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164008</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:01:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #216 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan @ 212... Now, now... You're not gloating, are you?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  6:03 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164009</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164009</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:03:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #217 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very BAD movie... Tim Burton's <i>Planet of the Apes</i>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  6:04 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164010</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164010</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:04:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #218 from Susan</title>
         <description>comment from Susan on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge @ #216</p>

<p>I'm not gloating - I'm thinking of joining.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  6:07 PM by Susan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164012</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164012</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:07:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #219 from ajay</title>
         <description>comment from ajay on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carrie: I'm afraid it was googling rather than a monumental knowledge of terrible films that led me to "The Dark Backward". And, checking IMDB, I see that it came out in 1991 - the 2000 probably refers to the VHS or DVD release.<br />
I'm actually quite tempted to try and find a DVD of it now... oh lord, help me.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  6:11 PM by ajay&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164013</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164013</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:11:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #220 from Susan</title>
         <description>comment from Susan on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aconite @ #215:  I've seen that clown movie.  I adored it in the way one adores bad movies.</p>

<p>I'm not sure if it's bad or good or, um, what but I am also very fond of <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0045464/" rel="nofollow">The 5000 Fingers of Dr. T</a>, which is a live-action Dr. Seuss movie that actually looks like it was drawn by Dr. Seuss.  Most of it is a child's nightmare come to life, but how can anyone resist the flaming lavender-clad Dr. T?</p>

<p><i>I want my leg-of-mutton sleeves, and in addition to those<br />
I want my cutie chamois booties with the leopard-skin bows.<br />
I want my pink-brocaded bodice with the fluffy fuzzy ruffs<br />
And my gorgeous bright blue bloomers with the monkey-feather<br />
cuffs.</i></p>

<p>Is it...atomic??</p>

<p>(The two movies are associated in my mind because I saw them both for the first time during the same evening.)<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  6:16 PM by Susan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164015</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164015</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:16:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #221 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan @ 218... Perfect. Then, when you decide to run for the Senate, we'll contribute. But there is your sordid past as an SF/F costumer, all traces of which must be erased.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  6:29 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164019</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164019</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:29:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #222 from joann</title>
         <description>comment from joann on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge, if it were me, I'd say publish and be damned. Unless ... were the costumes ... naughty?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  6:32 PM by joann&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164020</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164020</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:32:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #223 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Dr. Seuss, Susan... Did you ever see that old Warner Bros animated short about the elephant who's conned into taking care of an unhatched egg by its frivolous mother, and he does, in spite of everything that happens to him? It shows up every once in a while on Turner Classic Movies. (It even has a cameo by Peter Lorre - as a fish who, upon seeing the elephant on a ship, promptly blows his own head off.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  6:34 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164021</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164021</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:34:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #224 from Susan</title>
         <description>comment from Susan on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge & joann - </p>

<p>My sordid past pretty much permanently bars me from any office for which my opponent can afford oppo research.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  6:35 PM by Susan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164022</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164022</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:35:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #225 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea, joann... But I think Susan was involved in some Flash Gordon group presentation and you can imagine what mainstream voters would think of that.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  6:36 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164023</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164023</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:36:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #226 from Susan</title>
         <description>comment from Susan on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge: I seem to have missed that one.  </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  6:37 PM by Susan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164024</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164024</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:37:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #227 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what, Susan? We'd fund YOUR oppo research. Besides, some people on this site are quite good at digging things up on the internet.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  6:38 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164025</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164025</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:38:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #228 from Stefan Jones</title>
         <description>comment from Stefan Jones on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first half or so of "Dr. T," which concentrates on the trevails of the fatherless boy hero, is slow and a little shmaltzy.</p>

<p>It goes into high gear and goes way, way over the top when Bart (?) and his plumber friend get taken to Dr. T's dungeon by a singing elevator operator. Or maybe it's when the Terwilliker academy grads sing their fight song. Certainly, by the time Dr. T gets around to singing his "Dress Me!" song, which <i>I'm trying real hard not to think of</i>.</p>

<p>AAAAHHHHH!</p>

<p><i>Spody-do duds!</i><br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  6:49 PM by Stefan Jones&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164027</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164027</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:49:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #229 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. It looks as if Serge is heading up the Susan for President campaign.</p>

<p>I, for one, want to know what stand the candidate takes on:</p>

<p>weasels<br />
fruitcake<br />
sodomy<br />
dinosaurs</p>

<p>...not necessarily in that order.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  6:52 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164029</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164029</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:52:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #230 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan @ 226... That old Warner Bros cartoon was based on "Horton the Elephant". Here's a link:</p>

<p>http://www.toonopedia.com/horton.htm</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  6:52 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164030</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164030</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:52:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #231 from Susan</title>
         <description>comment from Susan on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stefan:</p>

<p>I was quoting the Dress Me song ("Do-mi-do Duds") above.  Careful not to think about the chiffon mother hubbard lined with Hudson Bay rat, now.</p>

<p>I can quote the executioner's elevator song ("Dungeon Song") too.  But I won't.</p>

<p><i>'cause I'm going do-mi-do-ing in my do-mi-do duds...</i><br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  6:53 PM by Susan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164031</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164031</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:53:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #232 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fragano @ 229... <i>It looks as if Serge is heading up the Susan for President campaign.</i></p>

<p>Riiiight... After all, in my high-school days, I was on the student council twice. Sure, that's because nobody else wanted to do it so they asked me to. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  7:09 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164033</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164033</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 19:09:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #233 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(cont'd from 232)</p>

<p>Another thing, Fragano. The only time I was involved in a 'grownup' campaign was when Howard Dean ran for President. And we all know how well that went.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  7:25 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164037</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164037</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 19:25:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #234 from MD²</title>
         <description>comment from MD² on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg London (#146): <i>My mother? Let me tell you about my mother... </i></p>

<p>Cue Marvin Gaye sample on smoked beats, with badly (yet greatly) stolen David Sylvian lyrics...</p>

<p>As for worst film of all times, I do not know, but worst film I've been imposed seeing: <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0113074/" rel="nofollow">Fist of the North Star</a>. The film's so bad I was left a writhing mass of nervous spasms well after it was other.</p>

<p>I hear <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0130236/" rel="nofollow">Samurai Cop</a> deserves a price also, but I won't go anywhere near it.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  7:34 PM by MD²&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164038</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164038</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 19:34:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #235 from Neil Willcox</title>
         <description>comment from Neil Willcox on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a long time I thought that <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091828/" rel="nofollow">Raw Deal</a> was just another Arnie film*, not withstanding Arnie's excellent advice: "You should not drink and bake".</p>

<p>Then I watched it when sober, and realised that it was terrible.  Not quite as bad as some mentioned so far, but nearly.</p>

<p><br />
On bad titles: I once started (and never finished) drawing a cartoon called "Time Travelling Bunnies from Planet Filth" - a friend well versed in bad movies told me the sequel must be "Renegade Vampire Bimbos from Planet Filth", which has occasionally been used as a pub quiz team name.</p>

<p>* We were very drunk when we watched it; for example:</p>

<p>Me:  Why did he blow up that oil refinery again?<br />
Jim: To get enough crude oil to slick back his hair to go undercover.<br />
Me:  Right.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  7:34 PM by Neil Willcox&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164039</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164039</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 19:34:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #236 from James D. Macdonald</title>
         <description>comment from James D. Macdonald on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see your <i>Samurai Cop</i> and raise you <i>Sgt. Kabukiman, NYPD</i>.</p>

<p>Sgt. Kabukiman is a mild-mannered NYC cop who, when he eats sushi, becomes a master of kabuki theatre, able to defeat the bad guys with his oriental acting talent.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  7:46 PM by James D. Macdonald&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164042</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164042</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 19:46:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #237 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marilee @171 et seq: Small world indeed. Thanks, by the way, for the plentiful new bead sources; strangely enough, I have needs that can't be fulfilled by Shipwreck, mostly because I'm looking for small quantities of semiprecious stones to repair a broken necklace.</p>

<p>Julie L @ 206: thanks also for your sources. </p>

<p>Paula Helm Murray, you are so right about the difficulty of finding decent clasps in small quantity; I'm having an outbreak of three-string necklace making, and coming up with a clasp for the one I made my sister for Christmas drove me to Michael's (shudder) as I was sans transportation and in dire need after I figured out she wouldn't be able to open the lobster-claw I'd planned on using.</p>

<p>General topic: the worst movie I've ever watched is the original <i>Children Shouldn't Play with Dead Things</i>. The last half of Dr. T is one of the best things ever, which is just as well,since the first half gives me the same creeping dread that most 1950s live-action kids movies did, and indeed, most of TZ.</p>

<p>We watched the TZ marathon here; it was substantially less crazy-making than my husband's preferred amusement, which was The Three Stooges in Spanish with French subtitles.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  7:53 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164043</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164043</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 19:53:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #238 from James D. Macdonald</title>
         <description>comment from James D. Macdonald on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skwid #207:</p>

<p>You saw <i>Hell Comes to Frogtown</i> too?  With my favorites, Rowdy Roddy Piper and Sandahl Bergman? </p>

<p>Gee, I thought I was the only one.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  7:58 PM by James D. Macdonald&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164044</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164044</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 19:58:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #239 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw <i>Hell Comes to Frogtown</i> too, and got a big laugh when I figured out which meaning of 'coming' the title referred to.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  8:02 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164045</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164045</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:02:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #240 from James D. Macdonald</title>
         <description>comment from James D. Macdonald on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hero was Sam Hell (go, Rowdy Roddy! Arch-enemy of Hulk Hogan!).  And it was called Frogtown because it was populated by ... giant frogs.  Who wanted nothing more than to ... y'know ... with human females.  Boy, they don't make movies like that any more.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  8:06 PM by James D. Macdonald&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164046</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164046</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:06:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #241 from ethan</title>
         <description>comment from ethan on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Sgt Kabukiman, NYPD!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  8:11 PM by ethan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164047</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164047</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:11:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #242 from MD²</title>
         <description>comment from MD² on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James D. Macdonald #236:</p>

<p><i>I see your Samurai Cop and raise you Sgt. Kabukiman, NYPD.</i></p>

<p>Hey, you're cheating, this is a Troma movie for [insert here the closest thing you have to a god (now, why does it now sound perverted ?)]'s sake !</p>

<p>I raise <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0077827/" rel="nofollow">Lady Oscar</a>, but that's as far as I'm willing to go.</p>

<p>(By the look of it, my friend the bad movies collector is going to love the finds on that thread if he doesn't know them already.<br />
Thank you. Brrrrrrrr.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  8:24 PM by MD²&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164048</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164048</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:24:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #243 from debcha</title>
         <description>comment from debcha on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open thread randomness: It had to happen. A news station got 'Obama' and 'Osama' <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6229649.stm" rel="nofollow">mixed up</a>.  I <i>am</i> a little surprised that it was on CNN, though, rather than on Faux News.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  8:31 PM by debcha&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164049</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164049</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:31:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #244 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MD2 @ 242... Does your friend, the bad-movie collector, know about the book <i>Better Living Thru Bad Movies</i>? It was reprinted from the 'critiques' posted on http://world-o-crap.com/blog/. These days, they're reviewing 1943's Batman serial on their site.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  9:03 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164051</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164051</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:03:01 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #245 from Dr Paisley</title>
         <description>comment from Dr Paisley on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got yer worst picture right here: "The Black Hole"</p>

<p>"That ship was on the same mission we are–to discover habitable life in the galaxy!"</p>

<p>Slim Pickens and Roddy MacDowell doing "Brokeback Robot." </p>

<p>Dishonorable mention: "Damnation Alley"</p>

<p>"Las Vegas is overrun with giant killer cockroaches!"</p>

<p>So was the theater we saw it in.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  9:12 PM by Dr Paisley&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164053</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164053</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:12:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #246 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I nominate <i>Cujo</i>. Favorite comment uttered by the audience I saw it with in the Big Apple: "Come ON, woman... You're not that stupid."</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  9:20 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164054</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164054</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:20:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #247 from nerdycellist</title>
         <description>comment from nerdycellist on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the worst movie I paid money for was that Highlander Sequel (was there more than one? The latest then) and the worst I ever watched on DVD was Zardoz. That orange diaper was enough to make me forget why I liked him so much in the first Highlander. But it was just as well that Zardoz was so heinous, as it was responsible for one of my most memorable New Year's Eves ever several years ago - lying on the frosty lawn in Wisconsin watching a meteor shower.</p>

<p>Also severely disliked by me, if no one else, was 21 Grams, which I felt was an irredeemably depressing load of pretentious horseshit. I just saw two in the theatre this last week that left me grossly disappointed and somewhat offended, but then saw Pan's Labyrinth and all was right with the world. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  9:27 PM by nerdycellist&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164055</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164055</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:27:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #248 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people in this thread seem to be mistaking deliberate camp for actual badness.  I mean, <i>Killer Klowns</i> is a Kamp Klassik!  It's mindbogglingly stupid, but all the stupidest bits are making fun of stupid horror-movie tropes.</p>

<p>I love <i>Killer Klowns.</i>  Maybe you could tell.</p>

<p><i>Attack of the Killer Tomatos</i> is another in that vein, though to my mind much less funny. I have to admit, though, that when the guy dresses in the tomato costume to go spy on the tomatos...<i>and it works</i>...that's a great moment, even before he gives himself away by asking for ketchup.</p>

<p>And, important rule: all movies made from Stephen King horror novels are bad.  Exception: Kubrick's version of <i>The Shining</i>.  All others are tah-rash.  (<i>The Green Mile</i> and <i>Stand By Me</i> are not horror novels; the latter is a short story, in fact.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007  9:42 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164056</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164056</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:42:04 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #249 from Bruce Arthurs</title>
         <description>comment from Bruce Arthurs on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one's mentioned the movie version of "Nightfall"?</p>

<p>As someone mentioned above, some bad movies are <i>made</i> with tongue far into cheek. KILLER TOMATOES is one; may I suggest SHAKES THE CLOWN as another?</p>

<p>I also have a deplorable love for Scott Phillips' short film, SCIENCE BASTARD.  (With SF/fantasy writer Bob Vardeman, and his son Chris, acting in it.)  You gotta love a superhero story with a villain named Skunk-Ape.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007 10:11 PM by Bruce Arthurs&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164057</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164057</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:11:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #250 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xopher... <i>all movies made from Stephen King horror novels are bad.</i></p>

<p>One major exception is 1983's <i>The Dead Zone</i>. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007 10:31 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164059</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164059</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:31:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #251 from CHip</title>
         <description>comment from CHip on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>joann@205: but wormholes are dangerous, and you can't get anything back out of them without a Heechee can-opener. I'd rather have the spell Sean O'Lochlain used on his bag of tools in <i>Too Many Magicians</i>; all I'd need to do is be on the plane before the last minute so the spell knows which direction the luggage should hitchhike in.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007 10:36 PM by CHip&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164060</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164060</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:36:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #252 from Bruce E. Durocher II</title>
         <description>comment from Bruce E. Durocher II on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan:</p>

<p><i>I'm not sure if it's bad or good or, um, what but I am also very fond of The 5000 Fingers of Dr. T, which is a live-action Dr. Seuss movie that actually looks like it was drawn by Dr. Seuss.</i></p>

<p>When I took film classes from him, Stanley Kramer was very bitter about that film, and would not show it to us.  The script was by Seuss, and when Kramer couldn't direct it he spent a <i>lot</i> of time to find a director who could handle the job.  When it was finished they delivered it to Columbia, where Cohn walked out of the screening room and said "That bastard has finally made a film I can't release."  Cohn's solution?  Kramer's contract said Columbia couldn't touch a frame unless a Kramer film made less than X amount over two weeks.  Cohn released it out without any advertising <i>anywhere</i> of <b>any</b> kind, and when nobody bought tickets because they didn't know it was playing Cohn cut out between 30 minutes and an hour of material.  From what little Kramer would say it was mainly from what's now the last half, with a little linking material involving the father at the front of the film.  He pretty much burned to get <i>It's A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World</i> and <i>The 5000 Fingers of Dr. T</i> restored to their full lengths.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007 11:33 PM by Bruce E. Durocher II&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164062</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164062</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 23:33:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #253 from Lloyd Burchill</title>
         <description>comment from Lloyd Burchill on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like no one here's beheld <a href="http://www.agonybooth.com/overdrawn/" rel="nofollow">Overdrawn at the Memory Bank</a> and lived to tell the tale. John Varley's delightful novelette got adapted -- mutilated, really -- into something that will destroy your will to live. It starts by giving away the novelette's main suspense point. Then Raul Julia provides cringetastically unfunny voiceovers for budget-slimming wildlife stock footage. Add an incoherent plot and plenty of parking-garage "lunar" interiors, and pretty soon the meteoric decline of intelligence plunges straight to Hell. Truly, it's astonishing; essentially <i>Atlanta Nights</i> in visual form.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007 11:40 PM by Lloyd Burchill&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164063</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164063</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 23:40:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #254 from ethan</title>
         <description>comment from ethan on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, come on!  Stephen King movies are <i>always</i> good!  Didn't you see <i>The Langoliers</i>?  (JOKING.)</p>

<p>My favorite Troma title is <i>Vegas in Space</i>, which is absolutely brilliant for several reasons.  I have not, however, seen it.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007 11:41 PM by ethan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164064</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164064</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 23:41:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #255 from Claude Muncey</title>
         <description>comment from Claude Muncey on  3.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering bad movies . . .</p>

<p>I considered therapy after seeing <i>Gwendoline</i>.  Alcohol worked instead.  Lots of alcohol.</p>

<p>TCM had a sentimental favorite on New Year's Day - a crisp print of <i>Red Planet Mars</i>.  They don't make 'em like that anymore, I'm glad to say.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  3, 2007 11:43 PM by Claude Muncey&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164065</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164065</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 23:43:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #256 from Stefan Jones</title>
         <description>comment from Stefan Jones on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's bad, there's bad-funny, and then there's just boring and lame.</p>

<p>I don't know the title, but there's this hunting-for-Bigfoot film I once started watching in my "See Anything Remotely SF&F Oriented" adolescence.</p>

<p>It began, as I recall, with a college professor sneering at a student who <i>didn't</i> take Bigfoot rumors seriously. Because ancient philosophers believed in griffins and phoenixes and who are we to question the likes of Aristotle?</p>

<p>What happens after that, I can't say. I fell asleep.</p>

<p>Dull, slow, bad sound quality . . . just a tedious mess.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007 12:14 AM by Stefan Jones&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164068</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164068</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 00:14:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #257 from Margaret Organ-Kean</title>
         <description>comment from Margaret Organ-Kean on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#207 & following</p>

<p>Not only is there <i><b>Hell Comes to Frogtown</b></i>, there's also the sequel, <i><b>Frogtown II</b></i>, the next sequel <i><b>Toad Warrior</b></i>, and (as of 2002) the last sequel, <i><b>Max Hell Comes to Frogtown</b></i>.</p>

<p>I've seen the first two (rainy afternoon, art deadline) insofar as I see movies on TV (I sorta listen and turn around if anything sounds particularly interesting).  I seem to recall turning around a lot during the Frogtown movies - simply couldn't believe what I was hearing.</p>

<p>But worse than those - so bad I objected (afterwards) to watching it for free - <i><b>A Nymphoid Barbarian in Dinosaur Hell</b></i>.  Actually it was so bad I almost thought I'd dreamed it, or maybe hallucinated it, as I was watching TV late at night since the flu was keeping me awake.</p>

<p>Worst movie I ever paid for?  <i><b>Death Becomes Her</b></i>.  <i><b>Van Helsing</b></i> is a close runner up.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007 12:20 AM by Margaret Organ-Kean&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164069</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164069</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 00:20:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #258 from James D. Macdonald</title>
         <description>comment from James D. Macdonald on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who will ever forget <i>Sorority Babes in the Slimeball Bowl-a-rama</i>?  Or <i>Night of the Blood Apes</i>?  Or <i>Hollywood Chainsaw Hookers</i>?</p>

<p>Seriously, now, <i>The Black Hole</i> goes down in history for two reasons: one is private -- that was the first Red Mike Review I ever wrote.  Second, it was the first movie that used computer animation.  (It predated TRON.)</p>

<p>Heh -- I know in which Friday the Thirteenth movie Jason got his hockey mask.  (And that was the only good part about that particular movie.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007 12:49 AM by James D. Macdonald&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164071</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164071</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 00:49:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #259 from ajay</title>
         <description>comment from ajay on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Sgt. Kabukiman is a mild-mannered NYC cop who, when he eats sushi, becomes a master of kabuki theatre, able to defeat the bad guys with his oriental acting talent.</i></p>

<p>Until he faces his arch-enemy, San Francisco crimelord Doctor Noh.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  5:00 AM by ajay&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164078</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164078</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 05:00:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #260 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Calude Muncey @ 255... I saw <i>Gwendoline</i> too. Gack.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  5:45 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164080</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164080</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 05:45:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #261 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for <i>Red Planet Mars</i>, Claude, I think I'll stick with <i>The Angry Red Planet</i>, which, instead of communists, has the bat/rat/spider creature. And Gerald Mohr with his shirt unbutonned.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  5:49 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164081</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164081</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 05:49:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #262 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge #250: We'll have to agree to disagree on that one.  I did like the book, and I thought they completely corrupted the whole point of the ending by dumbing it down to the point where the theme was completely ruined.  I also thing TDZ is marginal as a horror novel; it's a <i>slightly</i> horror-tinged thriller.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  7:38 AM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164084</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164084</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 07:38:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #263 from Bruce E. Durocher II</title>
         <description>comment from Bruce E. Durocher II on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Claude Muncey:</p>

<p><i>I considered therapy after seeing Gwendoline. Alcohol worked instead. Lots of alcohol.</i></p>

<p>Do you mean the French production of <i>The Perils of Gwendoline in the Land of the Yik Yak</i>?  From what I've heard you would have been better off with the legendary bondage comic it's based on, John Willie's <i>The Adventures of Sweet Gwendolyn</i>.  Sort of <i>The Perils of Pauline</i> with ropes and leather hoods.</p>

<p>(How do I know about the comic?  A friend wanted it and I found a [pardon the phrase] bound edition for her in pre-ADDDALL/ABE/Internet days.  You think I didn't page through it before I wrapped it up for Christmas?)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  8:30 AM by Bruce E. Durocher II&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164085</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164085</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 08:30:32 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #264 from Carrie S.</title>
         <description>comment from Carrie S. on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>"The Dark Backward"...came out in 1991 - the 2000 probably refers to the VHS or DVD release.</i></p>

<p>Thank heavens.  Brian Wilson's bad enough, I hate it when I switch universes.</p>

<p><i>I'm actually quite tempted to try and find a DVD of it now... oh lord, help me.</i></p>

<p>No, Ajay!  Be strong!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  8:34 AM by Carrie S.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164087</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164087</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 08:34:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #265 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The Dead Zone</i> really is an SF story, Xopher. Anyway, I approached the whole thing differently from the way you did. I saw the movie first and, when I finally read the book, I found myself agreeing with the changes that the scriptwriters had made. In fact, King himself liked the changes. Anyway, the movie had Christopher Walken in top form, before he became a parody of himself, and I loved his character's reading of Poe's <i>The Raven</i>. Finally, this is one of the few movies whose ending left me with a big lump of sadness in my throat. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  8:35 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164089</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164089</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 08:35:34 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #266 from Lila</title>
         <description>comment from Lila on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worst movie I ever paid for: Waterworld</p>

<p>Worst movie I ever saw all the way through: Manos, Hands of Fate (MST3K version)</p>

<p>Worst movie I ever tried to watch all the way through and failed: Plan Nine from Outer Space</p>

<p>Worst movie I ever actually enjoyed: um....actually...Overdrawn at the Memory Bank (crawls away and hides)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  8:43 AM by Lila&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164090</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164090</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 08:43:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #267 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wellllll, Lila... I liked <i>Waterworld</i>, AND <i>The Postman</i>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  8:52 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164092</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164092</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 08:52:07 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #268 from jennie</title>
         <description>comment from jennie on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan, aren't you going to try a flaming red ball gown soon? I think you need one, really you do. Not that there's anything <i>wrong</i> with black and lavender, really, but I think red would do very well by you. </p>

<p>Being a pop-culture ignoramus, I have nothing to contribute to the discussion of bad movies, so I shall mention a political development that pleases me greatly: In Ontario a child can now <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/cp/national/070103/n010315A.html" rel="nofollow">legally have three parents</a>. </p>

<p>Having spent some time with my 14-month-old godson this holiday season, I'm certain that this is a good and useful thing. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  8:53 AM by jennie&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164093</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164093</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 08:53:32 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #269 from Susan</title>
         <description>comment from Susan on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jennie - at some point, probably.  I have an offer from my grandmother of some gorgeous moire faille in a really icky pinkish-brown color.  I have abused a test swatch by running it through the washer and dryer and it survived, so maybe it would survive being dyed scarlet.  In the meantime, I have lots of lavender and black fabric and a melancholy affect.</p>

<p>I am currently engaged in an animated discussion about maxixe tempi (84bpm?  96?  112?  the music and the dance seem to want different things) and having a peculiar urge to take up cha-cha on Monday.  (Mostly because of a cha-cha version of "Oh, Holy Night" or whatever fall-on-your-knees-hear-the-angel-voices is called.  I mostly know it from the excerpt in "Mr. Tanner."  It seems important to cha-cha to it, don't you think?)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  9:21 AM by Susan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164098</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164098</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 09:21:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #270 from Susan</title>
         <description>comment from Susan on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6:45 AM:  Lying awake in bed, watching a flock of bats fly across the full moon centered perfectly in my bedroom window.</p>

<p>(Is flock the correct group-term for bats?)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  9:23 AM by Susan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164099</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164099</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 09:23:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #271 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan... I thought your bat problem had been resolved just before LAcon. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  9:29 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164101</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164101</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 09:29:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #272 from John Houghton</title>
         <description>comment from John Houghton on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan (270):<br />
 A quick google for "bat collective noun" yields "cloud, colony" from multiple sources. So you saw a cloud of bats transit the moon, and I've learned a new collective noun.</p>

<p>My, perhaps unanswerable, question is how did the wonderful idea of special collective nouns for various species come about?<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  9:35 AM by John Houghton&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164103</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164103</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 09:35:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #273 from ajay</title>
         <description>comment from ajay on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#270: definitely time to start thinking about flaming red ball gowns, then. ("...und leaf behind some of ze happiness you brink")</p>

<p>An otherwise normal friend of mine got married on New Year's Eve. In a mediaeval chapel lit only by candles, wearing a red dress with a black lace top. The first hymn woke up a bat in the rafters, which spent the rest of the service zooming around the place trying to get out. (The lesson, incidentally, was Job xxix.) Just shows there's a little bit of Goth in everyone. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  9:35 AM by ajay&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164105</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164105</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 09:35:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #274 from Dave Weingart</title>
         <description>comment from Dave Weingart on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan,</p>

<p>What does <i>An Exaltation of Larks</i> have to say on the subject of groups of bats? ;)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  9:37 AM by Dave Weingart&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164106</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164106</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 09:37:40 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #275 from Susan</title>
         <description>comment from Susan on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge - these bats weren't a problem, being safely outdoors, but I am bemused that I have slept in this bed, in this room, with that window, with no curtain except stacks of books, for seven years now and have never before seen the full moon perfectly centered in it.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  9:51 AM by Susan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164109</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164109</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 09:51:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #276 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question for Susan and other costumers, and to people who attend F/SF con masquerades...</p>

<p>Have you ever seen anybody wearing costumes inspired by <i>Girl Genius</i>? It has so many possibilities that I was surprised not to see it at LAcon's masquerade, or at Boston's in 2004.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  9:53 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164110</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164110</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 09:53:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #277 from Susan</title>
         <description>comment from Susan on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge: not being familiar with <i>Girl Genius</i>, I've no idea.</p>

<p>A few of us once (=a decade or more ago) had a plan to do "Do Mi Do Duds" as a group-costume, though.  We thought we'd need at least three bodies to get all those items of clothing in.  The final verse ("dress me up in liverwurst and Camembert cheese...dress me up in pretzels, dress me up in Bock Beer suds") would have featured a showgirl costume rather like the ones in "Springtime for Hitler" in the B'way version of <i>The Producers</i>.  Unfortunately, we never got around to doing this group, though I suppose it's never too late.<br />
 </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007 10:04 AM by Susan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164112</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164112</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 10:04:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #278 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I'm a bit of a movie snob. It takes quite a bit to entice me to go see a movie in the first place, so if there is any badness to it, I probably avoid it up front. Basically, I don't have TIME to see bad movies.</p>

<p>The most notable exception to this was <i>"Mars Attacks"</i> which suckered me in with a dozen A-list actors (Jack Nicolson, Glenn Close, Annette Bening, Pierce Brosnan, Danny DeVito, Martin Short, Sarah Jessica Parker, Michael J Fox, Tom Jones, Natalie Portman, Lisa Marie, Jack Black, Christina Applegate) AND Tim Burton directing. </p>

<p>http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0116996/fullcredits</p>

<p>It was the only movie I'd paid to see at a theater that I was considering walking out on. The only reason I didn't was because I kept thinking, if  I walk now, everyone will tell me it got better, or made sense, or had some payoff, at the end.</p>

<p>It didn't.</p>

<p>People who liked it try to explain that it was a spoof and/or homage to the silly science fiction movies of the 50's. But a spoof of stupid movies gives you a stupid movie.</p>

<p>Anyway, Tim Burton and I have stopped talking ever since I saw that movie.</p>

<p>Not that we were talking before, but....<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007 10:08 AM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164114</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164114</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 10:08:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #279 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your Seuss-inspired costumes sound neat, Susan. </p>

<p>You're not familiar with <i>Girl Genius</i>? If you click <a href="http://www.cafepress.com/airship.37502201" rel="nofollow">here</a>, you'll be taken to a CafePress calendar based on that comic-book. If someone drafted me into a masquerade presentation, I'd probably wind up dressed as the jaegermonster  seen on the page for the month of March.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007 10:19 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164115</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164115</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 10:19:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #280 from Skwid</title>
         <description>comment from Skwid on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge, nerdycellist, perhaps I was unclear.  There is no sequel to <i>Highlander</i>, and there is nothing you can do or say that will lead me to acknowledge otherwise.</p>

<p>In the "worst movie I've ever paid money for" category, I submit <i><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0099654/" rel="nofollow">Ghost Dad</a></i>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007 10:25 AM by Skwid&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164117</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164117</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 10:25:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #281 from Laurence</title>
         <description>comment from Laurence on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh.  Dr. T is not the same person as Mr. T.  Although I'm inclined to think that he should have been.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007 10:28 AM by Laurence&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164118</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164118</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 10:28:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #282 from Laurence</title>
         <description>comment from Laurence on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Second post:  Serge, you have seen the <a href="http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/cgi-bin/cosplay.cgi" rel="nofollow">costume pictures</a> on the Girl Genius site, haven't you?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007 10:30 AM by Laurence&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164119</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164119</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 10:30:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #283 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>There is no sequel to Highlander, and there is nothing you can do or say that will lead me to acknowledge otherwise</i></p>

<p>Not even a visit from Cardinal Fang, skwid?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007 10:32 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164121</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164121</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 10:32:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #284 from Alex Cohen</title>
         <description>comment from Alex Cohen on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own <em>Overdrawn at the Memory Bank</em> on VHS.  I'm not sure why.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007 10:40 AM by Alex Cohen&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164124</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164124</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 10:40:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #285 from joann</title>
         <description>comment from joann on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Debcha #243 (on CNN confusing Osama and Obama)</p>

<p>I'm not sure if it was CNN or some site aggregated on GoogleNews, but whoever it was thought a pilgrimage was made to Mt. Arafat a couple of days earlier.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007 11:07 AM by joann&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164126</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164126</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 11:07:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #286 from P J Evans</title>
         <description>comment from P J Evans on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>joann @ 285:</p>

<p>The pilgrimage story is correct - the mountain's name is (and has been for a very long time) Mt Arafat.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007 11:12 AM by P J Evans&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164128</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164128</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 11:12:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #287 from joann</title>
         <description>comment from joann on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PJ Evans #286:</p>

<p>Shame on me for not having done my homework and actually reading the article. Different hills--I was thinking large mountain in Turkey.</p>

<p>What is the appropriate position for abasement?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007 11:25 AM by joann&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164132</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164132</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 11:25:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #288 from ajay</title>
         <description>comment from ajay on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What is the appropriate position for abasement?</i></p>

<p>A basement.</p>

<p>("What most moves women when we them address?" "A dress." etc, etc.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007 11:39 AM by ajay&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164134</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164134</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 11:39:40 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #289 from Erik Nelson</title>
         <description>comment from Erik Nelson on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>speaking of typos, I have a theory that in times of crisis we get more misprints in tv closed captions.</p>

<p>last night I was watching TV in a bar and they were talking about airdropping bails of hey to stranded cattle and what to do in an american see.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007 11:42 AM by Erik Nelson&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164135</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164135</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 11:42:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #290 from ajay</title>
         <description>comment from ajay on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"American See" - a 2008 Hollywood remake (cf. the Stallone 'Get Carter') of "<a href='http://www.ibras.dk/montypython/episode17.htm#4' rel="nofollow">The Bishop"</a>. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007 11:48 AM by ajay&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164137</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164137</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 11:48:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #291 from Kip W</title>
         <description>comment from Kip W on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm. I like <i>Ice Pirates</i>, and not just because Garb worked on it. </p>

<p>The movie had the best robots I'd seen in years -- instead of being cute, gay, wisecracking servants, they were semi-functional used cars. I like the part where one of the heroes has to talk a robot through a fight scene, telling it every move to make. It wins, and afterwards, it's shaking and smoking a little, so the hero (showing great prudence) pushes it off a balcony. The other robots watching the scene straighten up a little (which was the only moment in the movie where robots showed any awareness, unless you count the canned spiel from the pimpbot).</p>

<p>Now, <i>The Black Hole</i> wasn't a good movie. It had cute robots. But I have to give it this: it was an attempt by Disney to grow up a little. There are one or two good images, and a good death scene that works. And, of course, it has Dave Mattingly's matte paintings.</p>

<p>I can't think what the worst movie I've ever seen might be. It's like the difference between 40 below zero and 41 below zero. Yeah, there's a difference, but I can't feel it. One of the worst supposedly good movies I can think of is Altman's wretched hash of <i>The Long Goodbye</i>, which re-imagines Marlowe as a self-pitying loser in a puddle of piss. One might as well envision him as a happy-go-lucky young hunchback who sings and dances with his gargoyle pals.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007 12:08 PM by Kip W&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164139</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164139</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 12:08:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #292 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kip W... Agreed on <i>The Black Hole</i>. I do give them credit for coming up with a story that was not a StarWars ripoff. Unfortunately, the Force was too strong and they felt obligated to include the stupid robots ('stupid' doesn't include Max, in spite of his salad-tossing appendages that mess up Tony Perkins's innards).</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007 12:13 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164142</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164142</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 12:13:36 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #293 from Neil Willcox</title>
         <description>comment from Neil Willcox on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0055946/" rel="nofollow">Eegah</a> is another bad film.  Something very strange is going on among the leads; as far as we could work out:</p>

<p>It's Written and Directed by Arch Hall Senior; he also plays the Heroine's Dad.</p>

<p>The (Teenage) Hero is played Arch Hall Jr. who shows very little of the talent one would expect that he would have to have shown to get cast without accusations of nepotism.</p>

<p>The Heroine is played by Marilyn Manning; the internet, which has been known to be wrong, suggests that Arch hall Sr. and Ms Manning were romantically linked at the time.</p>

<p>Eegah, a giant californian caveman, is played by Richard Kiel, best known for playing Jaws in two James Bond films.</p>

<p>So in the film:</p>

<p>AH(s) is father of MM who is dating AH(j)</p>

<p>and in real life:</p>

<p>MM is dating AH(s) who is the father of AH(j)</p>

<p>As you might imagine, this makes scenes with AH(s) and MM very peculiar.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007 12:29 PM by Neil Willcox&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164144</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164144</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 12:29:34 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #294 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Max, in spite of his salad-tossing appendages that mess up Tony Perkins's innards</i></p>

<p>Tony Perkins got his salad tossed by a ROBOT?  In a DISNEY movie?!?!?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007 12:41 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164147</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164147</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 12:41:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #295 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Xopher. Then Vincent used his own tiny appendage to drill a hole inside of Max. In a Disney movie. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  1:03 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164150</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164150</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 13:03:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #296 from Skwid</title>
         <description>comment from Skwid on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge @ 283, Well, I didn't expect a comfy chair...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  1:44 PM by Skwid&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164155</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164155</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 13:44:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #297 from Tania</title>
         <description>comment from Tania on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since this is the open thread...</p>

<p>Now that most of us have finished our holiday baking (I have Russian Orthodox friends, so I'm not off the hook for a few more days), here's something to think about - <a href="http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/01/04/snickerdoodle-spillage-in-puget-sound/" rel="nofollow">elevated levels of cinnamon and vanilla are detected in Puget Sound.</a></p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  2:34 PM by Tania&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164162</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164162</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 14:34:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #298 from ethan</title>
         <description>comment from ethan on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kip W #291: <i>One of the worst supposedly good movies I can think of is Altman's wretched hash of The Long Goodbye</i></p>

<p>Whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa.  Whoa.  Whoa.  One of my all time favorite movies, ever.  Damn, that movie's good.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  3:18 PM by ethan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164167</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164167</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 15:18:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #299 from Aconite</title>
         <description>comment from Aconite on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xopher@248: I understand camp.  I also know that Killer Klowns gave me the heebie jeebies for weeks afterwards, for many reasons.   </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  3:20 PM by Aconite&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164168</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164168</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 15:20:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #300 from Scott Taylor</title>
         <description>comment from Scott Taylor on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aconite wrote - <br />
<i>Xopher@248: I understand camp. I also know that Killer Klowns gave me the heebie jeebies for weeks afterwards, for many reasons.</i></p>

<p>Klowns are Kreepy.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  4:17 PM by Scott Taylor&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164174</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164174</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 16:17:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #301 from MD²</title>
         <description>comment from MD² on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge (244): Thanks a lot ! I'll be sure to pass the info (and probably the book) on as soon as I feel I can stomach the results it won't miss to have. ^_^"</p>

<p>Strange thing is, I must have been five or six when I saw <i>The Black Hole</i> and, while I don't remember anything about it except for the ship, I still feel it was a rather nice experience. <br />
I guess I should leave it that way</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  4:52 PM by MD²&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164178</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164178</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 16:52:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #302 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You're welcome, MD2. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  4:58 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164180</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164180</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 16:58:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #303 from Kathryn from Sunnyvale</title>
         <description>comment from Kathryn from Sunnyvale on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ajay at 273 reminds me of a question I should ask here:</p>

<p><i>Oh Fluorosphere, the shiny, the compleat expositors of fine gatherings (even to the cooking, from the mammoth and weasel to the Buddha and fruitcake), knowers of the five perfect rhymes for orange, you who are in blogs my daily floursphere,</i> [mudra of query to the enlightening]</p>

<p>Where are the secrets for making a traditional wedding* without the standard sacrifice ($30,000 average in 2005 for the US)? <br />
Or<br />
What knowledge of negotiations and parties and gatherings that comes from fandom could be applied to holding a wedding?</p>

<p>My dear friend and sister is recently engaged, and so I've dived into educating myself on the wedding process. </p>

<p>So far I can only conclude that this trillion-dollar industry exists due to a puppet-master like creature... a Toxoplasmosis wedii that makes the couple unafraid of 150% markups on all goods and services. </p>

<p>But, however explanatory this theory is, I can't tell it to my sister- that won't be helpful. Being helpful is what I need to be about, here. Helpfully able to gently** bring forth alternatives and ideas.</p>

<p>any ideas*** on remaining sane and helpful?</p>

<p>-----<br />
* Traditional typical late 20th century north american  ceremony + reception. [assume humorous and respectful description that differentiates 'traditional typical' from Ren-faire / FSM / barsoom weddings]</p>

<p>**Gently, because currently my reaction so far to my wedding industry research is "What? Insane!Gaaa!" For example, I've had a dinner at the *best restaurant in the United States* for less than the per-person price some think reasonable for  catered wedding dinners. What? Insane! Gaaa!</p>

<p>*** Or book ideas, if there's a good one. I know there are plenty of wedding planning books.  That worries me. If any of them truly worked, wouldn't there be fewer of them? (It's like all the "how to survive your child's terrible twos" books- they work because if you read them all, when you're done the child is 3.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  5:30 PM by Kathryn from Sunnyvale&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164184</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164184</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:30:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #304 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tania @297:</p>

<p>I've been thinking about that one for a very long time- starting a few years ago when it was found that it was impossible to use caffiene to trace food-chain linkages because the chemical was so pervasive in the Sound. The same study noted measuarable quanities of the kinds of hormones found in birth-control pills.</p>

<p>I know <i>why</i> (sewage treatment plants discharge treated waste water without running it through a stage where plants can absorb nutriants and biological agents) but I don't know why anyone thinks it's anything but scary.</p>

<p>// <i>Red Planet Mars</i> was also mentioned, above: I was surprised by the imdb page, as the writer of that hash of Civic Religion and SF cliche was also responisble for <i>Gaslight</i> and the original <i>The Mummy</i>. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  5:34 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164185</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164185</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:34:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #305 from Lori Coulson</title>
         <description>comment from Lori Coulson on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathryn at #303 -- Yes, you can do a wedding for much less than the industry would have you believe.</p>

<p>First, are the couple planning on a church wedding? Being members of the congregation can get you a break on the church fees.</p>

<p>Are they looking for something more secular or eclectic? Arboretums and conservatories make lovely settings and can be inexpensive.</p>

<p>If they're trying to save money, a late morning or early afternoon wedding will be less expensive. Brunch buffets (or afternoon teas) are cheaper than sit-down dinners.</p>

<p>If you're going with a hotel for the setting, get the budget figure the couple are willing to spend, then talk to the hotel -- the key question being "What are you willing to do for $XXXX?"</p>

<p>Wedding Cakes -- if there is a local school of cake decorating they often will give you a break on the price if you have the students make one for you...</p>

<p>Give me specific questions (email if you like) and I'll try to help.</p>

<p>(I help run a small convention, and I'd love a second career as a wedding planner...)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  5:55 PM by Lori Coulson&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164187</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164187</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:55:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #306 from Kathryn from Sunnyvale</title>
         <description>comment from Kathryn from Sunnyvale on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JESR @304, Tania @297</p>

<p>That combination of hormones and flavorings is going to be modern humanity's downfall. </p>

<p>All those steroids will make creatures grow gigantic. Then we're going to discover that components in cinnamon and vanilla make up the anger pheromone for squid and octopus (similar to how the ester amyl acetate [banana oil / juicy-fruit flavor] is the primary alarm scent for bees). Those roid-raged beasts will take down the shipping industry, including oil tankers. </p>

<p>But seriously, I remember reading journal articles about medication-contamination in waterways 20 years ago. Yet it's only been the past couple of years that there've been ad campaigns asking people not to flush medicines away.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  6:07 PM by Kathryn from Sunnyvale&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164188</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164188</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 18:07:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #307 from Stefan Jones</title>
         <description>comment from Stefan Jones on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooooh, shiny:</p>

<p>"The fastest way to break up know-it-all preconceptions is to get outside of the stuffy confines of your own head and engage with the grain of the material. Travel will do that in a hurry: meeting other people, other cultures.</p>

<p>And building stuff will do that, too. A two-by-four doesn't care how glib you are."</p>

<p>-- Bruce Sterling</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  6:24 PM by Stefan Jones&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164191</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164191</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 18:24:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #308 from jennie</title>
         <description>comment from jennie on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathryn from Sunnyvale:</p>

<p>I <i>strongly</i> recommend buying a copy of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Do-but-Don%C2%92t-Walking-without/dp/0738210129/sr=8-1/qid=1167952627/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/002-5613124-5354401?ie=UTF8&s=books" rel="nofollow"><i>I Do But I Don't</i> by Kamy Wickoff</a>, and reading it. Then give it to your sister. It's not a wedding book. It's a book about how weddings make women crazy, examined through the lens of the author's own wedding craziness, and it's excellent. </p>

<p>It doesn't really answer your question, but I'm recommending it anyway, because it was a very good read, and Wickoff really managed to get into the strained way in which we negotiate the mythos of the wedding and the bride and whatever feminist ideals we have, and how they don't really match and it drives people crazy. You may find it a welcome change from the wedding-industrial rhetoric. </p>

<p>Practical suggestions: Even if you don't want an SCA or Con-style wedding, consider how Things Get Done at SCA events or cons. A dear friend of mine had a more-or-less traditional NorAm wedding (she and the groom were married in her church, with a champagne-and-sparkling-cider and cake reception in the church common room and a nice, small dinner reception at a local restaurant; no dancing because nobody in the wedding party really likes dancing that much), but ran her wedding in a manner similar to the way she ran her first SCA event. She drew on the talents, skills, and willingness to help of her friends and family. Her mom made her dress. The groom's step-mom made the cake (and it was fantastic and beautiful). A friend provided music. Another friend arranged the flowers. The dinner was arranged as a private party, rather than as a wedding, and the size of the room at the restaurant capped the number of people who could come to dinner, so that it was an intimate gathering of people to support the bride and groom.</p>

<p>It may not be the kind of wedding your sister wants, but it was lovely, and entirely appropriate, and I think it cost the bride, groom, and their respective families comparatively little.  </p>

<p>Don't go to wedding shows. They're awful, and they'll only stress everyone out, and make everyone's wedding-related malaises much worse. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  6:30 PM by jennie&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164192</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164192</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 18:30:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #309 from Sharon M</title>
         <description>comment from Sharon M on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kathryn @ #303</p>

<p>A friend who got married in Dallas a couple of years ago reported success with two techniques: asking for a discount (surprisingly successful) and offering to pimp the vendors (moderately successful). </p>

<p>I know the bakery and the florist gave them discounts in exchange for brochure or business cards placed by the wedding cake/floral arrangements, and I think they got a deal on the catering that way, too. </p>

<p>Good luck with the wedding planning.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  6:57 PM by Sharon M&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164195</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164195</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 18:57:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #310 from Marilee</title>
         <description>comment from Marilee on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JESR, #237, did you bring the three strands together, like in a cone or something?  You can use any clasp then, although I don't recommend barrel clasps or magnetic clasps.  They both tend to come apart easily and the magnets tend to stick to unexpected things.  You can buy single clasps at <a href="http://www.starsclasps.com/" rel="nofollow">Star's Clasps</a>.  Star's is my local bead shop and she starts with beautiful somewhat-expensive clasps, so even one may be more than you want.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  6:57 PM by Marilee&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164196</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164196</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 18:57:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #311 from Lexica</title>
         <description>comment from Lexica on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathryn @ 303: When we were planning our wedding, one of the books I found very useful was <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Have-Wedding-Want-Everybody-Wants/dp/0425145786" rel="nofollow"><i>How to Have the Wedding You Want (Not the One Everybody Else Wants You to Have)</i></a>. I think it's what helped me realize I was getting sucked into the madness the day I found myself standing in front of a Union Square shoe store thinking, "Yeah, dyable satin shoes &mdash; gotta get some of those, because that's What You Do." Aiee!</p>

<p>Also, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Bridal-Bargains-Throwing-Fantastic-Realistic/dp/1889392170/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prod_2/002-8203851-2848067" rel="nofollow"><i>Bridal Bargains: Secrets to Throwing a Fantastic Wedding on a Realistic Budget</i></a> is a great resource. I don't know if I would have thought of shopping for a dress at a bridal consignment store if I hadn't read it. Considering how much bridal dresses go for these days, consignment is the way to go. (Brief moment of retro-squee over the dress: handmade, ivory-colored silk satin, with hand-applied beading and a detachable train &mdash; $200. I paid more to get it altered than I did to buy it.)</p>

<p>Check local colleges and universities to see if they rent function space for weddings. If someone in the wedding is a student or an alum at the school, you may be able to get a steep discount. We used the chapel at Mills College, and with the alumna discount it came to something like 1/3 the cost of comparable spaces.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  7:19 PM by Lexica&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164198</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164198</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 19:19:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #312 from Iain Coleman</title>
         <description>comment from Iain Coleman on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding weddings:</p>

<p>There are two things you can do to keep the budget under control. First, be ruthless about fripperies. Only pay for things you really, really want. If that includes personalised wedding stationery, floral arrangements at each place setting, and little wedding favours for every guest, then fair enough: but if you don't really want these things, don't bother with them. Nobody else will care, or even notice, that you haven't bothered with these sorts of small, yet terribly expensive details.</p>

<p>Second, be ruthless about the guest list. Your catering costs are directly proportional to the number of guests, and many other costs, from venue hire to any transportation you need to provide, will increase with the guest numbers. It's very easy to let the guest list swell uncontrollably when you invite everyone who really ought to be there, regardless of whether or not you like them or have seen them in the past decade, oh, and you <i>have</i> to invite Aunt Jemima, but if she's coming then you absolutely <i>must</i> invite the Rawlinsons, and if you invite them then Mr and Mrs Cordwangler and their kids will <i>have</i> to come as well or you'll <i>never</i> hear the end of it...</p>

<p>Sod that for a game of soldiers. Restrict the guest list to immediate family and close friends - you know, the people who you really <i> want</i> to have at your wedding - and you'll not just cut down the guest list substantialy, you'll also do a lot to contain the costs. </p>

<p>Basically, remember that this is your day, and do what you want to do, not what you feel you ought to do.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  7:20 PM by Iain Coleman&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164199</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164199</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 19:20:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #313 from Kathryn from Sunnyvale</title>
         <description>comment from Kathryn from Sunnyvale on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jennie @308,</p>

<p>Thanks! looks like a perfect book suggestion. And it does exactly answer my question, given that my question includes 'what are answers to questions I don't yet know to ask?'</p>

<p>On tips from Con and SCA style weddings: my initial fear is that they're too practical and pragmatic* to be guidelines for Traditional Weddings. But that's a fear I can overcome- I need to be practical and pragmatic in researching this.</p>

<p>I should say I helped with a low-budget yet 'magic with all the trimmings' traditional wedding, and for that family and friends were the core of success. However, in that wedding, reality- a very, very ill relative- kept everyone focused. There wasn't <i>time</i> to read all the foot-thick wedding magazines or engrave the doilies. </p>

<p>Not so this wedding. There's plenty of time for Tox. wedii to take over, for the magazines to arrive by the ton. </p>

<p>---<br />
* Planning for the non-trad weddings I've been to  (Con, Renfaire, Wizard-geek...) has generally appeared extremely realistic- rooted to reality. One can't rent pirate jackets at the Tux shop ($300), so the FSM wedding** uses $2 hats from the party store. Vera Wang doesn't make SCA-couture dresses ($9000), so the bride made it. Velvet robes as guest-attire can't be bought at Macys ($200), so friends sew velvet robes for non-renfaire guests.</p>

<p>** the reception was FSM. The ceremony was Jewish/Quaker.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  7:34 PM by Kathryn from Sunnyvale&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164202</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164202</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 19:34:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #314 from rams</title>
         <description>comment from rams on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathryn@#313</p>

<p>Doing the flowers yourself saves a bundle, and while I was reluctant, "The Knot Book of Wedding Flowers" from the library combined with a local mega-grocery with a big walk-in cooler saved us hundreds of dollars.  The good news?  Wired, taped stems are out!  The book shows imaginative examples, then says "four stems of this, eight stems of that, give it a quarter turn", and, held together by a ponytail-holder covered with wide organdy ribbon, pulled out of the vase of water and given a quick swipe as the procession formed proved elegant.  Took me two weeks to recover from the nervous prostration, but the flowers were fine.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  7:53 PM by rams&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164203</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164203</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 19:53:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #315 from Dave Luckett</title>
         <description>comment from Dave Luckett on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sally and I were married in my mother's back yard, with only immediate family present. I had a new shirt for the occasion. She wore a long dress she made herself. We had a bunch of friends to a restaurant in the evening, and we told them then.</p>

<p>On movies: Can anyone recall an example of a much-praised critical success that they couldn't, absolutely couldn't, stand, and couldn't understand what other people saw in it? I had that experience with "The Piano", a piece that made nonsense tedious. I walked out on it at the three-quarter mark. I'm told that the ending made as little sense as the rest of it, but as to that I cannot say.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  8:08 PM by Dave Luckett&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164204</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164204</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 20:08:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #316 from jennie</title>
         <description>comment from jennie on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say that <i>I Do But I Don't</i> might be one of the best remedies for Tox Wed that I've found. </p>

<p>It's amazing how even with the best, most resolute of anti-Wedding-Industrial intentions, the Wedding-industrial complex gets its hooks into people, and suddenly they're shelling out a bunch of money for things they'd have sworn up and down weren't important prior to deciding on a wedding. </p>

<p>By tips from SCA, I really meant the harnessing of volunteers who are invested in the wedding. One of the lovely things at the wedding of the friend I mentioned was that all the family members—her mom, dad, and sister, the groom's mom and step-dad, the groom's dad and step-mom, sundry aunties and uncles and grannies and step-whatnots—as well as her friends felt like they had a stake in this wedding. Everyone'd taken responsibility for something, and the magic happened. Because she was broke, and ruthless about her budget (not a Bridezilla, though), everything that happened was something that she or the groom  really wanted to happen—nothing happened just because it would be the "done" thing. She had the white dress of her dreams, the hair, the makeup, the choir, the music, the cake, the bubbly stuff, the nice dinner. </p>

<p>So, practical advice: </p>

<p>Set a limit on the magazines. They're not really necessary. Set a hard budget. Not having any money to work with can be a wonderful antiidote/dose of reality. Ask yourself/the bride if things really need to be done the Wedding Industrial way or if there's a way of doing things <i>just as well</i> that doesn't cost Wedding Industrial prices (do you need those weird, fancy, engraved invitations? Will something a friend designs printed on supernice paper with all the relevant information do just as well?) </p>

<p>Don't be afraid to ask friends and family for help with things, but make it very very clear that they can say no with no hard feelings. Generally, when you're asking for help, it's best to ask for something specific, but sometimes asking someone to do one of two or three necessary things works better "We could really use someone to prepare the rehearsal dinner—just some lasagne and salad, and maybe a dessert? Or you know what else would be a real help? We're having a flower-arranging get-together the night before the wedding, and I know you've got a great eye." sorta thing. </p>

<p>The Big Modern Magic Wedding isn't that different from planning an Event, according to friends who have done both (don't look at me! I eloped! i've been severel times a bridesmaid, though, with varying degrees of stress and a closet full of dresses to show for it.), at least it's not that different as long as you recognize the same constraints you'd recognise in planning an event. It's just the trimmings (and the social baggage) that differ. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  8:09 PM by jennie&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164205</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164205</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 20:09:04 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #317 from Lila</title>
         <description>comment from Lila on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathryn @ 303:</p>

<p>1. have it at someone's home</p>

<p>2. wear an ancestor's wedding dress/veil</p>

<p>3. have reception goodies prepared by a cadre of friends/relatives rather than by a professional caterer (if you have SCA friends, they probably know how to feed a crowd quite nicely)</p>

<p>Most of all: the more commercial/expensive/"that's how it's done" something is, the less likely you are to remember it 20 years down the road. Believe me (26 years and counting). Go for things that are MEANINGFUL TO THE TWO OF YOU; not things like strawberries in December (not a random example). <br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  8:52 PM by Lila&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164206</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164206</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 20:52:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #318 from CHip</title>
         <description>comment from CHip on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#268: Are 3 legal parents really news? RAH said (in SiaSL) that California law supported it; I had the impression from somewhere that he wasn't extrapolating.</p>

<p>#269: Officially, "Cantique de Noel". Don't ask me why; the only other "Cantique" I know is "de Jean Racine", a much looser-form ABA piece that some of you may remember from the credits for <i>Babe</i> (heard over the radio at Xmas on the farm).</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  8:53 PM by CHip&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164207</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164207</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 20:53:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #319 from ethan</title>
         <description>comment from ethan on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Can anyone recall an example of a much-praised critical success that they couldn't, absolutely couldn't, stand, and couldn't understand what other people saw in it?</i></p>

<p>Oh god yes.  I already said Pleasantville.  Every single one of the formulaic "biopics" that people seem to fall for--A Beautiful Mind, Ray, Walk the Line, etc.  Brokeback Mountain made me violently bored.  Gladiator won a Best Picture Oscar, for the love of god.</p>

<p>Older movies like that I'm having more trouble thinking of, though I know there are some.  It's not exactly the same, but I don't understand for the life of me why people think The Philadelphia Story is funny.  It's depressing as all hell.  I still think it's good, though.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  9:01 PM by ethan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164208</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164208</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 21:01:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #320 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marilee @310, I'm a low-hardware jewelrymaker, in general; the triple strand ones are just gang-strung into a short run of single beads, to whit:  http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a41/Julia_here/Yellownecklace.jpg</p>

<p>Since that one was made for me to wear, it has a silk tie; my sister's Christmas present ended up with toggles on a short run of hand-built chain.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  9:19 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164210</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164210</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 21:19:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #321 from Patrick Connors</title>
         <description>comment from Patrick Connors on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#303: We survived and it's all paid for except the cruise.</p>

<p>First: We avoided just about -anything- for sale that had the word "Wedding" on it. We actually purchased the rings, a book of ceremonies to crib from, and a tiered wedding cake stand.  Other than that, we stayed out of the clutches of the Wedding Industry.</p>

<p>Second: We had the wedding and reception in our back yard, and had trustworthy people around to clean up and run the house for us whilst we escaped to Mexico. This limited the festivities to a select group of people. For music, well, we're filkers, so of course there was some of that, but we lucked onto a local medieval band playing in Bookman's, so we had exquisite music for the ceremony for not a lot of money.</p>

<p>Last but not least: Our mantra: It's our wedding, we're paying for it, so there!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007  9:25 PM by Patrick Connors&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164211</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164211</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 21:25:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #322 from P J Evans</title>
         <description>comment from P J Evans on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My brother's older daughter had her wedding in a garden at the local university (my brother is an alumnus <i>and</i> does his research there), with reception/dinner following for part of the guests. Handmade-by-family invitation (a work of art in itself). Seasonal (autumn) flowers, one arrangement at each table. Food catered by restaurant where other daughter was working (appetizers between ceremony and dinner, and the dinner itself).</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007 10:53 PM by P J Evans&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164216</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164216</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:53:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #323 from JennR</title>
         <description>comment from JennR on  4.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many years ago (less than 20, but more than 15), I did a complete Am-Trad church wedding, including a 9 day honeymoon, for under $4K.  Have a dressmaker make the dress.  Keep the wedding party small, and/or let the bridesmaids pick their own dresses.  If the men have suits, they can wear them.  If not, they should probably get suits -- even fen have occasions where a suit is appropriate.  Lunch or afternoon light buffet receptions are less expensive than sit down dinners (the church ladies provided the labor -- we gave them a budget and let them loose on the food).  A friend of a friend made the cake, I made my dress (based on a designer original), the flowers were (good quality) faux, the pew bows were donated by a family friend whose daughter had just gotten married.  Music was provided by the church organist and a CD mix we put together ourselves. We ordered wedding invitations (this was back when home printers were, well, home printers), but printed the programs at work on the laser printer.  Pictures were done by a family friend who is a professional photographer, but not for free -- we would have felt uncomfortable if he'd done it for free, but we got the 'family' discount. [Pics are expensive, even if you do it yourself, or have friends do it.  Just shooting and proofing a wedding with a digital camera and photo printer (assuming you already have both of those) easily runs $100. (We've done two of those in the last 14 months as wedding gifts for under-employed family members.)]  We almost didn't have altar flowers, but it gave my worry-wart M-i-L-to-be something to panic about the morning of the wedding :-) .</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  4, 2007 11:07 PM by JennR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164221</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164221</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 23:07:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #324 from Tania</title>
         <description>comment from Tania on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathryn @ #303:<br />
Most everything here is spot on (as usual). Having been a bride, a groomsmaid* twice, and a marriage commissioner once**, here's what I can add.</p>

<p>If she wants flowers, have her talk to the florist about options. We said "this is what we like, this is what we can afford" and the florists were very understanding. Consequently, they are still my florist of choice, 13 years later. Of course, I focused more on colors than the actual plant. I'm not a horticulture/botany hobbiest.</p>

<p>For invitations (I'm a database manager, beware), get your list of invitees, or people who should receive announcements. Put them into your db, create a mail merge for the envelopes and print the addresses in an attractive READABLE font. Love stamps are cute, but if you have a large family (I do), it is much more reasonable to take the stack of envelopes to the local PO and have them metered, and pay the man. Remember that your/her time is worth something.</p>

<p>If you don't have a regular place of worship where these events would traditionally occur, see what service/community organizations your family members belong to. My father was/is an active Mason/Shriner and a member of the local Grange. My wedding and reception were at the Grange Hall ($100 rental fee), and the food was handled by one of the Masonic auxiliary groups (Eastern Star, I think). We had appetizers and finger food, and forced people to mingle.</p>

<p>Having been to way more weddings than I can count, mostly vanilla traditional, I cared more about the service and vows than the other trappings. People should be coming to the ceremony to celebrate the marriage, not pass judgment on the centerpieces, or lack thereof.</p>

<p>What are the accepted norms for the people involved - formal or informal? What would make them most comfortable and happiest - Uncle Norm in a tux making a toast with champagne, or Uncle Norm in a Hawaiian shirt making a toast with a foofy umbrella laden cocktail? Small children at home with babysitters, or underfoot and on the rampage? </p>

<p>Two final thoughts:<br />
1) The wedding and reception only need to please the people getting married, everyone else can piss off.</p>

<p>2) Traditions can be created. Be creative, do something meaningful.</p>

<p>Good luck!</p>

<p>* Well, you couldn't exactly call me the Best Man, and I wasn't comfortable with Best Woman, so we went with Groomsmaid.</p>

<p>** The bride*** was Quaker, the groom was Catholic, wrote their own vows and got married at the groom's family homestead with areligious me officiating.</p>

<p>*** Which leads to confused looks when I am introduced by the bride as "the woman who married me." </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007 12:40 AM by Tania&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164227</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164227</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:40:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #325 from Jen Roth</title>
         <description>comment from Jen Roth on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeing that the wedding-planning book I found most useful was published in 1994 has just brought home to me how long I've been married.   The book was <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Essential-Guide-Lesbian-Gay-Weddings/dp/1555834841/ref=cm_lm_fullview_prod_18/102-5809980-9697764" rel="nofollow">The Essential Guide to Lesbian and Gay Weddings</a> (the link is to an edition updated in 1999, which I haven't seen).  We're an opposite-sex couple, but it was still a good book to have.   It helps keep you rooted in what you want to get out of your wedding, rather than getting mired in the wedding industry's ideas of what you simply <i>must</i> do.</p>

<p>And $30,000?  Seriously?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007 12:40 AM by Jen Roth&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164228</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164228</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:40:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #326 from oliviacw</title>
         <description>comment from oliviacw on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Book recommendation: <a>Weddings For Grownups</a>.  Lots of creative ideas for doing things your way, not the wedding industry way.</p>

<p>For my wedding, I went to a regular florist for personal flowers (bouquets and corsages), but bought discounted Christmas decorations from craft stores for centerpieces (and 12 dozen bunches of roses from Costco).</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007  1:06 AM by oliviacw&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164230</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164230</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 01:06:34 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #327 from oliviacw</title>
         <description>comment from oliviacw on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, the link got eaten.  <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Weddings-Grownups-Everything-Wedding-Expanded/dp/0811814211/sr=8-1/qid=1167976335/ref=sr_1_1/002-7390121-7312862?ie=UTF8&s=books" rel="nofollow">Weddings for Grownups</a>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007  1:07 AM by oliviacw&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164231</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164231</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 01:07:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #328 from Larry Brennan</title>
         <description>comment from Larry Brennan on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Efficiency consultants sidelight - anyone who hires a firm called "Unipart" deserves what they get. And if anyone ever asked if a banana on my desk was "active or inactive" they'd likely find out exactly how active a banana can be.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007  2:27 AM by Larry Brennan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164235</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164235</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 02:27:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #329 from Mitch Wagner</title>
         <description>comment from Mitch Wagner on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've done some exploring of Internet video recently, and come up with three worth watching regularly, and one I <em>really</em> like -- The Show With ZeFrank. </p>

<p>ZeFrank is this weird dude with five-o'clock-shadow and an unblinking stare who sits real close to the camera and talks in monologue. The show is filled with inside jokes and free association. He's occasionally hilarious. Here's three of my favorite episodes. They're only a few minutes each. Go forth and watch: </p>

<p><a href="http://www.zefrank.com/theshow/archives/2006/05/051506.html" rel="nofollow">Ze has airline troubles.</a> I thought of this one frequently during my recent misadventures with Julie. "At least things aren't as bad as they were for Ze," I thought.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.zefrank.com/theshow/archives/2006/05/050806.html" rel="nofollow">Ze goes to Austria.</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.zefrank.com/theshow/archives/2006/09/091806.html" rel="nofollow">Ze gets a message from the League of Awesomeness.</a></p>
]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007  2:40 AM by Mitch Wagner&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164236</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164236</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 02:40:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #330 from Kathryn from Sunnyvale</title>
         <description>comment from Kathryn from Sunnyvale on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On weddings- all, much thanks on the perspective and good ideas. I'm much less worried.</p>

<p>Jen @325,<br />
$30,000; £15000, those are quoted commonly.  I haven't seen a peer reviewed number, but with the $2000 dresses, the $75-$150 per person dinners, the $1500 photo packages... yeah, $30k, easily. </p>

<p>As Jennie @316 said:<br />
<i>It's amazing how even with the best, most resolute of anti-Wedding-Industrial intentions, the Wedding-industrial complex gets its hooks into people</i>. And while I think I'm immune to the pressure, it isn't my wedding*. The bride-to-be...well, it's her day, but it's all of our sanity.</p>

<p>Sharon @309.<br />
pimping the vendors- ohhhh, nice idea. The bride-to-be has a brother-out-law with a pagerank of 8 or 9**: that could be worth some trading.</p>

<p>Iain: <i>nobody else will care, or even notice, that you haven't bothered with these sorts of small, yet terribly expensive details.</i> <br />
well said.</p>

<p>* I understand that many girls go through a 'plan your own wedding' phase. Comes after the Barbie but before the horse phase. Dunno what it means, but I didn't have any of those. I <i>did</i> start going through a 'plan your own library' phase- came after the 'raise frogs' and before the 'build a michaelson interferometer' phase. </p>

<p>** high google-juice = the ability (for good or evil) to make a phrase a first-10-results. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007  3:02 AM by Kathryn from Sunnyvale&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164238</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164238</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 03:02:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #331 from Margaret Organ-Kean</title>
         <description>comment from Margaret Organ-Kean on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>#330</b></p>

<p>Wedding invitations:</p>

<p>If you want to be really, really correct, they're handwritten, not engraved, nor printed on a laser printer.  You can order blanks from somewhere like Paperzone (they're on the web).</p>

<p>This serves a couple of purposes.  It gives the bride something to do other than fret about things or come up with silly ideas.  It improves the bride's handwriting.  It really helps keep down the number of guests - how many invitations do you want to handwrite?</p>

<p>Needless to say, not paying for engraving & not inviting as many guests = saving money.</p>

<p>Venue:</p>

<p>If it's reasonable, don't hold the wedding in a large city.  Things are more expensive there, usually.  At least that was my experience.</p>

<p>Clothes:</p>

<p>If you have enough time, shop sales.  We saved between 75 and 50 percent on my gown - and it was gorgeous, and I'm not easy to fit.</p>

<p>Incidentals:</p>

<p>Talk to people who've gotten married recently in your area - that's how we found the best cake maker in the valley - and she was not attached to a bakery or restaurant.  She was also significantly cheaper than a bakery or restaruant.</p>

<p>My mom raised little pots of flowers (white impatiens, as I recall) for the table centerpieces for both my wedding and my brother's wedding.</p>

<p>I sewed my own garter, and wore white ballet slippers under my wedding gown.  A wedding is not the time to wear uncomfy shoes.</p>

<p>I'd avoid those magazines like the black plague, incidentally.  Most of them were just ad compendiums.  The only one I found interesting or useful was the Martha Stewart one.  If you get that one, remember - Martha has a staff!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007  4:17 AM by Margaret Organ-Kean&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164242</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164242</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 04:17:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #332 from abi</title>
         <description>comment from abi on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Kathryn @306</strong>:<br />
<em>All those steroids will make creatures grow gigantic. Then we're going to discover that components in cinnamon and vanilla make up the anger pheromone for squid and octopus (similar to how the ester amyl acetate [banana oil / juicy-fruit flavor] is the primary alarm scent for bees). Those roid-raged beasts will take down the shipping industry, including oil tankers.</em></p>

<p>No, they will dive ever deeper, and awaken the Ancient Ones.  Then our troubles begin.</p>

<p><strong>Stefan @307</strong>:<br />
Thus do I bind books.  It keeps me humble.  It also teaches me to love the leather and paper for their own sake, and let them do their own thing.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007  4:57 AM by abi&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164244</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164244</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 04:57:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #333 from abi</title>
         <description>comment from abi on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weddings:</p>

<p>I second (twenty-fifth?) the comment about getting family members to help with the wedding.  My father printed the invitations (basement printing press), my mother made the dress, a family friend did the flowers.</p>

<p>The other thing that happened is that, after a catastrophic fight (my mother threw the half-completed wedding dress at me and told me to finish the effing* thing myself partway through), a friend dragged us to his house and made us watch "Father of the Bride" (the original version, with Spenser Tracy).  That unwound us enormously.</p>

<p>We had no photographer at the reception. Instead, we put disposable cameras on the tables and let people do it themselves.  The results were more memorable, if less composed.<br />
_______<br />
* Well, not effing...more explicit than that.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007  5:02 AM by abi&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164245</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164245</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 05:02:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #334 from miriam beetle</title>
         <description>comment from miriam beetle on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i'm enjoying all this wedding stuff. i'm godwilling getting married this summer.... but i'm not allowed to start planning my wedding until my visa (or lack of visa) comes from immigration canada. arg.</p>

<p>anyhow, i have a whole bundle of secret plans to make my wedding cheaper & more meaningful. my boyfriend's parents are in town & have a big beatiful deck & backyard. i'm hoping to have the wedding there (the only problems i can see with that is lack of kosher kitchens, & the fact that i hope to avoid inviting all of mike's folks' friends). </p>

<p>a friend referred me to the dressmaker she used, who is in seattle, & whose designs are beautiful & unique & run to about $200-300. i have a friend whom i think can make my wedding cake (in my kitchen, to keep it kosher).</p>

<p>what i'm still not sure about is the food (it can't be potluck style, cause of the aforementioned kosher business), the music, or whether anyone cares about stuff like flowers (i don't).</p>

<p><i>this serves a couple of purposes. It gives the bride something to do other than fret about things or come up with silly ideas. It improves the bride's handwriting. It really helps keep down the number of guests - how many invitations do you want to handwrite?</i></p>

<p>i have a secret plan for this, too. i'd like to design & hand-screenprint the invitations. i have a table setup for my t-shirt production, & i've done a few postcards & things for screenprint classes, but i never have done a large volume of prints on paper.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007  5:43 AM by miriam beetle&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164246</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164246</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 05:43:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #335 from Jakob</title>
         <description>comment from Jakob on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weddings:</p>

<p>Ours was this summer, and was done for a fraction of the supposed £16k average. My number one tip would be to get friends and family involved helping out. Both being shortly out of university and burdened with school debt, there was no way we could afford the average sum, and we weren't going to make our parents pay. </p>

<p>We had a church wedding, followed by a afternoon tea in the church hall. As I was a member of the congregation and emergency organist, we weren't charged for church or hall hire, and the church organist provided some of the music. One of Sarah's theatre friends sang Gershwin during the service, and my professional musician cousin played cello during the signing of the register. Another of her director friends was put in charge of decorating the church hall. We asked our guests to bring food suitable for afternoon tea (at their discretion), and my former housemates down the road turned into a baking and sandwich assembly line. Sarah's parents paid for her dress, which was probably the single most expensive item. My dad's congregation (he's an Anglican vicar in France - long story) provided a number of cases of excellent champagne, and one of my friends I used to tend bar with ran that side for us. </p>

<p>But my favourite was came from one of my uni friends' dad, who was (amongst many other things) a freelance motoring journalist. 'Oh,' he said 'I happen to have the Bentley Continental GT on test that weekend. If someone happened to want to arrive somewhere in town at a certain time, I could use it as a city handling test...' I was bricking it waiting for my beloved's arrival so I never actually saw the car, but I am assured that it was the most beautiful vehicle she has ever been in. </p>

<p>A final thought: I can't speak for the bride, but I was so nervous before and overwhelmed by emotion afterwards that I didn't really notice many of the details. What struck me was that most of the people there had helped out in some way and were really enjoying themselves, and I felt loved and supported by all that. People still come and tell my how much they enjoyed it, so I guess it worked for everyone.</p>

<p>--Jakob</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007  5:44 AM by Jakob&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164247</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164247</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 05:44:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #336 from Faren Miller</title>
         <description>comment from Faren Miller on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>#291: "One might as well envision him as a happy-go-lucky young hunchback who sings and dances with his gargoyle pals.</i> Like the Monster sings and dances in <b>Young Frankenstein</b>?</p>

<p>And maybe we could tie this in with the wedding discussion, to get his Bride involved -- and runoff from the wedding banquet could draw up Ancient Ones with a sweet tooth (fang) from the Sound...? </p>

<p>[Don't mind me, I'm just being silly on a drippy gray morning.]</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007  9:43 AM by Faren Miller&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164259</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164259</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 09:43:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #337 from fidelio</title>
         <description>comment from fidelio on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard-nosed good sense, planning, and negotiating is always good for things like weddings. Otherwise you spend $30,000 and have some pictures, a certificate, and several women with expensive dresses that will only be used once.</p>

<p>Sit-down dinners are always more expensive than simpler receptions. They are not, in fact, a mandatory part of a wedding. </p>

<p>Open bars are not a good idea, no matter how much some of the guests love them.</p>

<p>Disc jockeys who spend the wedding reception organizing the guests into "fun" are also expensive, and are not necessary unless no one present knows how to act at a party. Dance-mix CDs prepared and played by ordinary people are just as good, or even better.</p>

<p>Activities (especially those involving the DJs, above) designed to get the guests to give the bride and groom cash (after they have, presumably, already bought a gift) are generally tacky, and are only tolerable when the couple and their families have limited resources and are having trouble covering even a small-budget wedding.</p>

<p>One reason wedding stuff (especially including clothes, flowers, food, and sites) costs so much is that brides and their mothers are traditionally major mega-PITAs to deal with. You're paying in part for the nuisance factor.</p>

<p>You also are dealing with the fact that lots of people have never handled any major entertaining before in their lives, and are at a complete loss to figure out how to Do It Right. They are threefore prey to ingenious merchants and hotelliers who are ready to sell them whatever they can for whatever they can get. Encourage everyone involved to keep their eyes on the prize and remain calm and civil. </p>

<p>Finally, as my niece observed "The exact variety of roses at the wedding seemed very important at the time--I'm not sure I can remember now what they were." What matters in the long run was whether people were having a good time. The guests should not be forgotten in the process of getting the couple hitched, and the family members should not have the day sullied by the start of half-a-dozen grudge matches.<br />
Anyone who tries to tell your sister that this is the most important day of her life and it should be PERFECT!!!!!! needs to be taken outside and spoken to. It's an extremely important day in both their lives, and both members of the bridal couple should be able to look back with joy. Perfect is not automatically the ally. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007 10:21 AM by fidelio&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164260</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164260</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 10:21:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #338 from Susan</title>
         <description>comment from Susan on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taking a left turn off weddings into personal event obsession:</p>

<p>I plan and execute a lot of tightly-budgeted events (though not weddings), but I'm having a severe attack of nerves today for some reason about one I'm holding tomorrow.  There's the usual no one will come vs. we won't have enough food worry, but the reality check says that all the people I expect will arrive, and that we will have a huge excess of food.  There's the My Dress Is Not Finished bit, but that's fixable this evening, I think, give or take several hooks and eyes and safety pins.  And in a pinch I have a backup dress.  And there's no financial worry, since it's privately backed.  Really, the worst that can happen is I throw a mediocre party, which is possibly mildly damaging to my reputation but otherwise not the end of the world.  But I'm still jittering around frantically today.</p>

<p>Trying to analyze my worries:</p>

<p>1. It's a posh party.  I don't usually do posh parties.  I have some worries about the mingling of the posh and the non-posh people, despite careful selection of the non-posh for both intra- and intergroup compatibility.  Successful mixing of social crowds is usually a skill of mine, but I don't either know or control the selection of the posh crowd, so there's a random factor I don't usually permit here, and the non-posh crowd is right on the lower edge of the number range for successful event, which takes out some of my room for error.</p>

<p>2. It's in New York City, so I am depending on other people for site-prep stuff that I usually o/b/s/e/s/s/i/v/e/l/y m/i/c/r/o/m/a/n/a/g/e supervise personally.  I also have to worry about getting punch bowls & cups and similar party props into the city without driving them in myself.</p>

<p>3. I do not have 100% confidence in the site-prep person, who is rather younger than her actual years and possessed of more money than sense, though presumably her senior family members (parents and grandmother) will not let it all go completely pear-shaped.</p>

<p>There's no point whatsoever to posting all this here, it's just symptomatic of my general state of tizzy.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007 10:44 AM by Susan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164262</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164262</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 10:44:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #339 from ajay</title>
         <description>comment from ajay on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another tip on keeping numbers small: my parents, both children of war and ration books, had a total of eight guests at their wedding, all of them either brothers, sisters, parents, the best man or the Mrs. Best Man. Then, after the honeymoon, they threw a few wedding parties for their friends. <br />
It is a hell of a lot cheaper and easier having a small wedding and two or three good parties than it is having one enormous wedding. Also, if everyone knows that the wedding is for immediate family only, no one's offended at not getting invited.<br />
They regard the trend for megaweddings with suspicion and distaste (mingled with gratitude for not having had any daughters...)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007 10:47 AM by ajay&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164265</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164265</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 10:47:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #340 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan #338: <i>presumably her senior family members (parents and grandmother) will not let it all go completely pear-shaped.</i></p>

<p>If it does, you can always <a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trois_Morceaux_en_forme_de_poire_(Satie)" rel="nofollow">play Satie</a>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007 12:47 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164272</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164272</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 12:47:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #341 from joann</title>
         <description>comment from joann on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ajay #339:</p>

<p>Concur on throwing parties after. We were married by the JP in the park next to the courthouse, no formal invites or decorations; the only other people who had to be there were the best man and the maid of honor, but others did show. I wore my interview suit; the groom bought a navy blazer. Photos were candid shots taken by friends. We picked up bouquets on the way down to the park, foregathered on our front porch afterward and had cookies and champagne. The core wedding party repaired to a brunch place afterward, and then we all went and voted, it being spring election day. (The JP had ended the ceremony with "I now pronounce you ... Y'all make sure and go vote, now!") Spouse and I went to fanciest restaurant in town for dinner, and then threw a large party, involving potluck, a couple of weeks later. The potluck included various forms of fondue including shrimp, which pulled in every cat in the neighborhood. Very successful party, still remembered fondly to this day.</p>

<p>The best man and maid of honor got married a few weeks later, also in the park, and we threw an informal wedding reception at our house; I made what seemed like several hundred tea sandwiches, and served vast quantities of not-expensive champagne.</p>

<p>But these were younger, more innocent times.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007 12:48 PM by joann&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164273</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164273</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 12:48:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #342 from Lexica</title>
         <description>comment from Lexica on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My family is rife with classical musicians, so the music for our ceremony was played by my aunt, uncle, and grandmother. Aunt & Uncle have played many, many weddings over the years, and Uncle's advice was to build musical interludes into the ceremony. We alternated the readings (a different friend doing each reading) with short musical pieces.</p>

<p>He was right &mdash; it helped slow things down so we were able to really be present with what was happening, instead of feeling like it had been a matter of walk-into-chapel-say-"I-do"-walk-out-of-chapel.</p>

<p>Having more than one reception worked well for us, too. We had the ceremony and first reception in Oakland, with my micro-family and his immediately family in attendance, then his mother held a reception for us in New York two weeks later, which all of his extended mega-family came to.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007  1:09 PM by Lexica&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164274</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164274</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 13:09:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #343 from abi</title>
         <description>comment from abi on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another tip, if you've kids about who will need entertaining: Pi&ntilde;ata.</p>

<p>The wedding after ours in the chain of copying and learning from one another had one, and it's continued through family and friend weddings for 13 years now.</p>

<p>(We introduced the tabletop cameras.  The previous wedding found the site we used for the reception.  It goes back into history.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007  1:49 PM by abi&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164276</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164276</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 13:49:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #344 from joann</title>
         <description>comment from joann on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An extra rule, for persons considering outdoor venues: don't do a dress with a train if you're having an outdoor wedding. Period. If the scheduling is such that you get the dress before the location, choose location accordingly.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007  1:54 PM by joann&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164278</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164278</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 13:54:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #345 from fidelio</title>
         <description>comment from fidelio on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inquiring minds--or this one, anyway--want to know more than they do about Australian port (which is "Australian wine-producers make and market something they call port"). For example, how do they compare to Portuguese port, and whose port is good and whose should be avoided like grim and cankered Death?<br />
I have a basic grasp of the differences between tawny/ruby/crusted/vintage as far as the Portuguese wines are concerned, if that's any help in explaining things.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007  1:57 PM by fidelio&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164279</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164279</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 13:57:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #346 from Susan</title>
         <description>comment from Susan on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dresses with trains are also bad if you're planning vigorous dancing at the reception.  When I was a Best Woman back in August at a conservadox Jewish wedding, I spent part of the reception sewing the bride's train firmly to the back of the dress - the snaps and button meant to hold it up for dancing were utterly inadequate to the task, and the first time someone stepped on her hem in a wild circle-grapevine-dance they ripped right off.</p>

<p>If you want both a train and dancing, get a detachable train and detach it before the reception.  Even if you're expert at managing it (and most women nowadays have no idea how to manage a train), no one around you will be accustomed to watching for it and it will get stepped on repeatedly.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007  2:13 PM by Susan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164280</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164280</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 14:13:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #347 from Lori Coulson</title>
         <description>comment from Lori Coulson on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#346 -- Corollary to the train problem, long bridal veils. If you must have one of these, please have a specific wedding party member detailed to mind it (i.e., a page or junior bridesmaid to carry it if necessary -- to keep it from wrapping round the end of a pew or a pillar).</p>

<p>These are also a no-no at outdoor weddings, unless the bride really wants to do an impression of Juliet's nurse. (Cue Mercutio: "A sail...")</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007  2:30 PM by Lori Coulson&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164282</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164282</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 14:30:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #348 from Dave Bell</title>
         <description>comment from Dave Bell on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've heard a couple of wedding stories from a friend in Georgia, who now has both daughters married.</p>

<p>Ladies, rest assured that, should your daughter be so foolish as to consider marrying me, I would settle for a conveniently-placed ladder and two airline tickets to Las Vegas.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007  3:29 PM by Dave Bell&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164286</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164286</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 15:29:01 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #349 from Lila</title>
         <description>comment from Lila on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>abi @ 343: on the subject of piñatas--</p>

<p>I accidentally started a tradition at my taekwondo school by bringing a piñata to a school party for the kids. They didn't hit it with sticks--they lined up and took turns kicking it (no blindfolds) until it broke. Unlike the traditional method, this method causes gradual leakage instead of one catastrophic break. </p>

<p>Now the kids insist there has to be a piñata at EVERY party.  I have become adept at finding piñatas with no pointy bits (so as not to injure bare feet) and contents that won't hurt if they fly across the room and hit you in the head. One of the most popular stuffings is, no lie, individually wrapped teabags (peppermint, orange spice, etc.). The kids grab them up as eagerly as they do the candy and small toys.</p>

<p>And at our last party, I got dubbed the Dojang Den Mother.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007  4:49 PM by Lila&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164296</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164296</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 16:49:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #350 from Chris Quinones</title>
         <description>comment from Chris Quinones on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That dinosaur comic you have in Particles is ripping off (or riffing on) both <i>The Electric Company</i> and <i>1776</i>. I never thought I'd put them in the same sentence, but there you go.</p>

<p><a href="http://utopianturtletop.blogspot.com/2007/01/on-recommendation-of-devin-mckinney-i.html" rel="nofollow">Utopian Turtletop is analyzing Beatles bootlegs</a>, which might be of interest.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007  5:27 PM by Chris Quinones&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164303</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164303</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 17:27:04 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #351 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goodness... I compare what others have gone thru for their wedding ceremonies to what my wife and I did (having a few friends over, serving some wine, cheese and fruits, and watching <i>Forbidden Planet</i>), I feel so... so... inadequate.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007  5:57 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164308</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164308</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 17:57:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #352 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tonight, on Turner Classic Movies... Two Pam Grier movies... 1973's <i>Coffy</i> ("A nurse sets out for vengeance when her younger sister becomes an addict."), followed by 1974's <i>Foxy Brown</i> ("When a government agent is shot down, his sexy girlfriend goes gunning for revenge.") <br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007  6:02 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164309</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164309</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 18:02:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #353 from Larry Brennan</title>
         <description>comment from Larry Brennan on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ran across more on Noka in the media. Seattlest had an <a href="http://www.seattlest.com/archives/2007/01/05/how_dark_was_my_chocolate.php" rel="nofollow">entry today</a> which in turn pointed out a bit of low-quality <a href="http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/12/dpk-public-relations-caught-with-its.html" rel="nofollow">PR sock-puppetry</a> defending Noka.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007  6:14 PM by Larry Brennan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164312</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164312</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 18:14:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #354 from ethan</title>
         <description>comment from ethan on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man, <i>Foxy Brown</i>...heh, I feel like any time anyone mentions a movie here it's either one of my very favorites or one of my very least favorites.  <i>Foxy Brown</i> is <i>definitely</i> in the "very favorites" category.</p>

<p>"She's my sister...and she's a <i>whole</i> lotta woman."</p>

<p><i>Coffy</i>, on the other hand, was like the trial run.  Pretty much the same story, same star, not nearly as good, one year before.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007  8:16 PM by ethan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164325</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164325</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 20:16:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #355 from CHip</title>
         <description>comment from CHip on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fidelio@345: to add to your investigation, there's at least one good Australian white port (one of the very few bottles a friend thought was worth bringing back). I will ask if he still remembers the name.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007  9:15 PM by CHip&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164331</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164331</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:15:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #356 from Susan</title>
         <description>comment from Susan on  5.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, you come home from work and dinner with a friend to find the storm doors to your cellar standing wide open.  The storm doors which are the only low-level entrance to your house that isn't wired for the alarm system.  The storm doors that have no business at all standing open.  The storm doors that lead into the basement from which you can get to any floor of the house through all the interior doors which you tend to leave unlocked because it's a hassle to carry keys all the time in the house.</p>

<p>You:<br />
1) wait for the police<br />
2) enter the house yourself <br />
3) 1 and then 2 after it's been over an hour and no police</p>

<p>I'm sure this day can get worse somehow.<br />
 <br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  5, 2007 11:03 PM by Susan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164336</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164336</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 23:03:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #357 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on  6.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'd probably</p>

<p>A) Get the steel spade out of the trunk of my car<br />
followed by <br />
B) Start beating my way through the basement and up into the house.</p>

<p>But that's just the mood I'm in right now...</p>

<p>I have been meaning to get a gun permit and a trench broom.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  6, 2007 12:23 AM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164340</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164340</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 00:23:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #358 from xeger</title>
         <description>comment from xeger on  6.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.  I'd probably get the crowbar out of the car, call the police, and head into the house...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  6, 2007 12:28 AM by xeger&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164341</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164341</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 00:28:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #359 from Allan Beatty</title>
         <description>comment from Allan Beatty on  6.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those of you pointing out that the wedding is the bride's and groom's day -- try telling that to the bride's mother. Some of them are certain that the whole point of the occasion is to congratulate them on raising a daughter who will actually marry a man instead of just living with him.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  6, 2007 12:39 AM by Allan Beatty&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164344</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164344</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 00:39:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #360 from Allan Beatty</title>
         <description>comment from Allan Beatty on  6.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent horrible movie that had name players: "Freddie Got Fingered" (2001, with Tom Green, Drew Barrymore, Rip Torn, and Anthony Michael Hall). And they knew it was bad while they were making it: towards the end a character marches by carrying a sign that says "Wll ths fcking mv vr nd?" The only good thing about it was we got free passes to see "Shrek."</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  6, 2007 12:47 AM by Allan Beatty&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164346</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164346</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 00:47:34 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #361 from oliviacw</title>
         <description>comment from oliviacw on  6.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah, pinatas.  The last party I went to with a pinata was a 40th birthday party, and the hostess (the best friend of the birthday celebrant) had filled the pinata with small "airline" bottles of various spirits and liquors. If anyone wishes to repeat this for other mature audiences, be aware that the clear plastic bottles (vodka, bourbon, etc) survive whacking and dropping at a much higher rate than the opaque bottles with liquors and cremes (Kahlua, Bailey's, etc.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  6, 2007  3:14 AM by oliviacw&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164349</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164349</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 03:14:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #362 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  6.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan @ 356... Sorry to read about that. Was anything stolen? Or broken just for the Hell of it?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  6, 2007  5:43 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164354</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164354</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 05:43:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #363 from JC</title>
         <description>comment from JC on  6.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The palaeography tutorial (linked in the particles) is much more fun than it has any right to be. However, I've only tried the easiest document.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  6, 2007 10:33 AM by JC&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164358</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164358</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 10:33:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #364 from jennie</title>
         <description>comment from jennie on  6.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Those of you pointing out that the wedding is the bride's and groom's day -- try telling that to the bride's mother. </i></p>

<p>I know several brides and grooms who have done so, explicitly and repeatedly, starting from the announcement of the engagement. </p>

<p>I've also seen couples, and brides in particular, bend themselves into pretzels trying to please everyone, and mothers, in particular, making it clear that <i>of course</i> the bride and groom should have their special day, as long as their special day is the day that <i>she</i>, the mother, thinks they should have, and use every sort of manipulative button-pushing trick she's learned to convince her offspring that <i>of course</i> she knows best, <i>of course</i> she is the reasonable one, and <i>of course</i> she has only the couple's best interest in mind. </p>

<p>The firm line can work, if the bride and groom really <i>believe</i> that the wedding is their day, and are willing to tell the MOB that she may either attend with good grace or not attend; if she chooses not to attend, they will be disappointed, but it will be her choice. </p>

<p>Something I've observed is that wedding planning can really shine a spotlight on the way a couple and their families are going to comport themselves throughout the marriage. Interfering MOBs often seem to make very present mothers in law. </p>

<p>I also think that the more we buy into these stereotypes, the more we perpetuate them, setting up patterns of expectation for our interactions, which patterns can exert a very strong pull on everyone involved, and don't really serve anyone very well at all.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  6, 2007 12:18 PM by jennie&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164365</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164365</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 12:18:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #365 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on  6.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#359,<i> Those of you pointing out that the wedding is the bride's and groom's day -- try telling that to the bride's mother.</i></p>

<p>Oh, GOD.</p>

<p>Between my mother and my husband's best friend, my midweek chapel wedding  with immediate family and very few friends, service provided by my husband's Episcopal priest father, ended up as a Saturday morning wedding in the main church at the Episcopal Church of the Olympia Power Elite, with everyone I know staring at my back (one of my particular phobias).</p>

<p>We did do it on the cheap, which was just as well as neither of us were employed on the date of the wedding.</p>

<p>(And Susan, please let us know you're OK as soon as you can?) </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  6, 2007  1:23 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164372</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164372</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 13:23:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #366 from Larry Brennan</title>
         <description>comment from Larry Brennan on  6.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan - The police took over an hour to show up?!? Unless you live in the boonies (way, way, way in the boonies) call the local media and tell them that the police de-prioritized a break-and-enter where the perpetrator(s) <i>may still have been in the house</i>.</p>

<p>As a teenager, I chased crooks out of my house by repeatedly ringing the doorbell. (There was a back door for them to run out of.) I then went to a neighbor and called the police.</p>

<p>Do what you need to take care of yourself, and don't deny your feelings. Having your home broken into can be surprisingly difficult to deal with.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  6, 2007  1:35 PM by Larry Brennan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164373</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164373</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 13:35:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #367 from Marilee</title>
         <description>comment from Marilee on  6.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I drove by the community center of a large development near mine and there was a sign on the driveway about a marriage there.  That's probably cheaper for homeowners than others.</p>

<p>LWE very cogently <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.sf.written/msg/919cc4e05ab34b09" rel="nofollow">lit into</a> this author who keeps spamming about his t/r/a/s/h/ book everywhere.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  6, 2007  6:46 PM by Marilee&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164424</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164424</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 18:46:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #368 from Stefan Jones</title>
         <description>comment from Stefan Jones on  6.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone here ever won a "non cash" prize in a sweepstakes?</p>

<p>Something substantial for which they had to pay taxes?</p>

<p>My sister and her husband just won -- courtesy Coors beer -- a fancy home entertainment system.</p>

<p>They're ecstatic, and are currently mostly concerned about where they'll mount the 50" plasma . . . but I'm wondering what kind of financial headache they'll be facing.</p>

<p>Any idea what they're in for? Do both the state and IRS get a cut? Are they liable for medicare and SS taxes? </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  6, 2007 11:05 PM by Stefan Jones&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164446</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164446</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 23:05:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #369 from P J Evans</title>
         <description>comment from P J Evans on  6.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stefan, just income ... at least for the feds. YMMV, but I think many states would also consider it income. They should ask a tax guy, though.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  6, 2007 11:36 PM by P J Evans&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164450</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164450</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 23:36:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #370 from Lizzy L</title>
         <description>comment from Lizzy L on  6.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stefan, they should report the value of the item on the "other income" line of the 1040. (It was line 21 in 2005.) I would guess that the sweepstakes folks will give them a letter stating the value, but if not, they should ask for one. And yes, the state, whichever one it is, will almost certainly consider it income as well. </p>

<p>I am a tax guy. </p>

<p>If they don't normally have a professional taking care of their taxes, they might consider finding one for the year in which this happened. You say they "just" won it -- did they receive the prize in 2006 or 2007? If 2007, they have some time to figure out how to deal with it.</p>

<p>A 50" plasma screen. OMG. <br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  6, 2007 11:55 PM by Lizzy L&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164453</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164453</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 23:55:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #371 from Stefan Jones</title>
         <description>comment from Stefan Jones on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks all. They apparently won it in 2007, which I suppose is a good thing for planning purposes.</p>

<p>Will the IRS expect them to make quarterly payments?</p>

<p>The agency which handles delivery and publicity wants it installed in time for the Superbowl, which I guess makes sense. I don't know if the family will have to pose watching the telly with bottles of beer in hand...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007 12:16 AM by Stefan Jones&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164455</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164455</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 00:16:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #372 from Larry Brennan</title>
         <description>comment from Larry Brennan on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stefan - The IRS requires quarterly payments of estimated tax, but they won't necessarily detect the absence thereof. BUT, it's often easier to make them when they're due. It's all a matter of what the value of the prize is relative to your sister's family income.</p>

<p>Oregon (if they live in that lovely state) has a reputation for being fairly enthusiastic about tax collection, so I'm sure that state taxes will need to be figured in.</p>

<p>Again, a tax professional could be very helpful. They really should find one.</p>

<p>One thing I'd wonder about is whether the cost reported by the company (who probably gets to claim it as a business expense) or an independent fair market value prevails for tax purposes.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007 12:44 AM by Larry Brennan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164457</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164457</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 00:44:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #373 from Stefan Jones</title>
         <description>comment from Stefan Jones on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My sister and brother-in-law live in NYState.</p>

<p>Very interesting stuff to consider. Sounds like having a professional preparer lend a hand is the way to go. Maybe they can invite him or her to watch some games . . .</p>

<p>When you think about the tax consequences, winning a non-cash prize is like having to buy something at a discount = (100 - your tax rate)%.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007  1:08 AM by Stefan Jones&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164462</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164462</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 01:08:07 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #374 from Eleanor</title>
         <description>comment from Eleanor on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello.  I have a question I'm itching to know the answer to but can't find it on Google, and somebody here is bound to know.  In which book (I think it's a book) does a character misunderstand "consciousness raising" as "consciousness raisins"?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007 10:23 AM by Eleanor&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164494</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164494</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 10:23:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #375 from Individ-ewe-al</title>
         <description>comment from Individ-ewe-al on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This talk of wedding planning prompts me to mention an idea I've come up with. I don't intend to get married, but the more I think about it, the more I'd like to have a wedding anyway. Hence, I have invented the unwedding.</p>

<p>I want to get all the people I'm fond of, including family, together for a big party. I want to give at least several months' notice, and make it significant enough that people will rearrange lives to be able to attend. Making it somewhat formal would help with that, and besides, part of the motivation is that I don't want to miss out on wearing a once in a lifetime dress and generally being a princess for the day.</p>

<p>I don't know if I should have some kind of ceremonial aspect; I'm thinking about a celebration of all the love in the world apart from heterosexual monogamous happily-ever-after two kids and a mortgage. I don't have anything against married couples, mind you; married couples also have friends and family and people they cherish who are not their partner, so hopefully would not feel excluded from this plan.</p>

<p>Among my circle, I've had mixed reactions. A minority think it's a good idea, while most people think I should just have the party, but not try to connect it to the wedding I'm not going to have (a slightly annoying subset think I can't tell whether I'm going to want to get married at some point in my life). So now I'm tossing it out to a wider group: does the world need unweddings? Should I try to start a trend?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007 11:16 AM by Individ-ewe-al&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164496</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164496</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 11:16:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #376 from Eleanor</title>
         <description>comment from Eleanor on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The oddest wedding I ever went to was an Islamic ceremony organised at extremely short notice.  My friends had been engaged for months and had set a date for their civil wedding the following year, but hadn't decided when the religious half was going to be.  I think they literally said to each other one day, "Let's do it tomorrow."  The ceremony was performed by a friend of theirs (not an imam), took place in his flat, and the guests were less than a dozen friends of whom all were Muslims except me.  We sat on prayer mats in the living room, I took most of the photos, and afterwards we went to an Indian restaurant for lunch.  And that was it, except that they could then move in together.  For a life-changing event it all seemed to be over far too quickly.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007 11:23 AM by Eleanor&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164498</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164498</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 11:23:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #377 from Eleanor</title>
         <description>comment from Eleanor on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#375: I don't know, Individ-ewe-al.  Why should people treat you like a princess for a day if you're not marking any specific occasion?  The point about unbirthdays in <i>Alice</i> was that you could have them almost every day.  But your unbirthday or unwedding is also almost everybody else's, so what makes you special?  I think you'd need unusually co-operative guests for it to work.</p>

<p>Why not pick another special occasion in your life, like getting your first book published, or college graduation, or maybe buying your own home, and throw the once-in-a-lifetime party to celebrate that?  Or if you don't plan on doing those things either or have already done them, pick a special birthday.  Or (more sneakily) organise the megabash for somebody else and make sure everybody appreciates the effort you've made - it will end up being your party too.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007 11:40 AM by Eleanor&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164500</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164500</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 11:40:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #378 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've been going thru my tapes of the 2nd season of <i>Doctor Who</i>. Due to some mislabeling of the cassettes (*), I wound up watching the season finale before many other episodes yesterday. <b>SPOILER!!!</b> So Billie Piper did leave the show. Does anybody know why?</p>

<p>(*) meaning, I didn't label them at all and foolishly relied on the order in which they were stacked</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007 11:53 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164501</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164501</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 11:53:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #379 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our 21st wedding anniversary is coming up soon and I very subtly told Sue what I'd like as a present for the occasion. A couple of days ago, TCM was showing a Seventies movie with Walter Pidgeon, James Coburn and Michael Sarrazin. The latter got me thinking so I left the room to do some checking on sites that sell DVDs and found out that, yes, <i>Frankenstein: The True Story </i> is finally available. It was either that of Patrick McGoohan as Father Syn in <i>Scarecrow</i>, but the latter hasn't been released yet.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007 11:58 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164502</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164502</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 11:58:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #380 from Varia</title>
         <description>comment from Varia on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the basic question here...my google skills are sucking today and I can't get to the library to look this up.  What is the name of the character who introduces Stephen Maturin to the Goliath heron?  Anybody remember offhand?</p>

<p>thanks in advance - </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007  1:15 PM by Varia&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164510</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164510</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 13:15:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #381 from Julie L.</title>
         <description>comment from Julie L. on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yow-- <a href="http://dinahhulet.com/Index/Pages/Portfolio/Marbles/EmbellishedMarbles.html" rel="nofollow">startlingly intricate</a> millefiori glass spheres. Sadly, the artist doesn't seem to've updated her site since 2004.</p>

<p>I am deeply nonplussed by the <a href="http://www.huletglass.com/web/Chocolates/Pages/ChocSelectionGuide/ChocSelectGuide.htm" rel="nofollow">glass chocolates</a> linked from her site (Noka, take note?), and even more croggled by another link of <a href="http://www.micromosaics.com/gallery_Laura_Hiserote.htm" rel="nofollow">micromosaics.</a></p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007  3:23 PM by Julie L.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164535</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164535</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 15:23:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #382 from Howard Peirce</title>
         <description>comment from Howard Peirce on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge, how long has it been since you've seen <i>Frankenstein: The True Story</i>? I ask because I picked up the DVD when it came out, and hadn't seen it since it first aired (I think I was about 11 or 12 at the time). I had fond memories of it, and of my Dad walking into the family room, rolling his eyes, and walking back out again. </p>

<p>That said, having watched it recently, I wouldn't necessarily put it on my "recommend to friends" list. It has that 70s "star-studded" vibe of great actors alternately overacting (Agnes Moorehead) and sleepwalking (James Mason) through their parts, and the story -- well, of all the travesties visited on Mary Shelley's <i>Frankenstein,</i> it's the travestiest. Now, that can be a whole lot of fun for 80 or 90 minutes, but at a running time of around three hours, it's a bit much to take. </p>

<p>Of course, if you're a Frankenstein completist, you've got to have it. </p>

<p>For a more enjoyable slice of cheese, I'd recommend Roger Corman's <i>Frankenstein Unbound</i> (1990), based on a story by Brian Aldiss. And it's got Raul Julia as Victor Frankenstein and John Hurt as a time-traveling mad scientist from the 21st century with a talking electric car. </p>

<p>Oh, heck, it's your 21st anniversary -- ask for both.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007  3:38 PM by Howard Peirce&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164538</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164538</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 15:38:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #383 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howard... I saw Corman's <i>Frankeinstein Unbound</i>. I can only say that I hope that the Brian Aldiss novel it's based on was better.</p>

<p>It has indeed been a long time since I last saw <i>Frankenstein - The True Story</i>. That was late in 1988, while recovering from my vasectomy (*). And I have this feeling I'd agree with everything you said, except that it's the travestiest version of the story - because I had no problem going along with the conceit that these are the events that Shelley's novel was based upon. It had sadness and beauty in it. And I got to see Jane Seymour, aka Dr.Quinn, medecine woman, playing the Bride and getting her head popped off her shoulders by the Creature.</p>

<p>(*) I know, I know, there is such a thing as giving too much information</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007  4:27 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164545</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164545</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 16:27:54 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #384 from Stefan Jones</title>
         <description>comment from Stefan Jones on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm surprised no one has already pointed out that Charles Stross was waxing erudite on NPR's Weekend Edition this morning:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6737044" rel="nofollow">"Writers Find New Fiction Source in Economic Genre"</a></p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007  4:50 PM by Stefan Jones&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164553</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164553</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 16:50:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #385 from ethan</title>
         <description>comment from ethan on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone mentioned Dr Who...</p>

<p>I have never, ever seen any Dr Who, and would love to watch it, only it exists on DVD in such gigantic but fragmented and very, very confusing form that I have no idea where to start.  Any suggestions?  (Preferably for things available on netflix, but I can be flexible, I guess...)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007  4:51 PM by ethan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164554</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164554</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 16:51:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #386 from Stefan Jones</title>
         <description>comment from Stefan Jones on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ethan:</p>

<p>You can't go wrong just watching the modern incarnation. They assume that most of the viewers don't remember the earlier show, and they don't base plots on bits of trivia from thirty years ago, so you won't feel like you're in over your head.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007  5:24 PM by Stefan Jones&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164558</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164558</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 17:24:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #387 from Howard Peirce</title>
         <description>comment from Howard Peirce on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge: I'm beginning to think that you and I have very similar movie collections, and very different opinions about the same set of films. De gustibus and all that. Still, it's nice to mention a fine old film and not receive blank, uncomprehending stares.</p>

<p>FWIW, on the Corman commentary track, he brags that the whole time-travel angle was his idea, and not in Aldiss's original story. Seeing as how that's basically the entire plot, I don't know what Aldiss's story might be about, other than involving the Shelleys as characters.</p>

<p>Ethan: I think most American Dr. Who fans first got hooked on the Tom Baker episodes. I can remember seeing one of the early series repackaged as a TV matinee, and being very disappointed. Then I saw Tom Baker fight the Daleks late one night on PBS, and it became a part of my life, until that guy in the porkpie hat became Dr. Who, and I lost interest again.</p>

<p>BTW, thread crossing: Tom Baker has a small role in <i>Frankenstein: The Untold Story.</i> He's quite good, and worth staying awake for when he finally shows up.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007  5:57 PM by Howard Peirce&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164560</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164560</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 17:57:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #388 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, Howard. Baker was in <i>Frankeinstein - The True Story</i>, where he played the captain of the ship that takes Frankenstein and the Creature to the North Pole.</p>

<p>As for our liking the same movies for different reasons... That's quite possible. Earlier, when people were coming up with the titles of bad movies in this thread, I thought of pointing something out on the subject of cheesy movies, then that sub-thread petered out so I decided to drop it. You gave me the excuse to say that I very much enjoy those old SF movies, even when they are extremely cheesy things like <i>The Angry Red Planet</i> or <i>Twelve to the Moon</i>. Why? There is one thing that they do that today's CGI-perfect movies don't do: in spite of their lacunae, they convey the sense of going into the Unknown. To me, anyway.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007  6:13 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164564</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164564</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 18:13:54 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #389 from Howard Peirce</title>
         <description>comment from Howard Peirce on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge, I bit my lip and stayed out of the bad movie subthread. I always lose my temper when people start bad-mouthing low-budget movies. I just have a very hard time seeing a threadbare, incompetent indie film as a <i>bad</i> movie. A movie like <i>Manos: The Hands of Fate</i> is like the chronically unemployed drunk nursing a cheap beer at the end of the bar at 11:00 AM. He's got no illusions, and he isn't hurting anyone but himself. <i>Manos</i> is the guy you feel sorry for, but you try not to be nice to him, because then he's going to start following you around because he's so lonely, and you don't need that grief.</p>

<p>Truly bad movies are those multimillion blockbusters that have been previewed and focus-grouped to death, serving up empty platitudes and base emotional manipulation, garnering huge profits and critical acclaim. <i>Forrest Gump</i> is a bad movie. <i>Jurrasic Park</i> is a bad movie. <i>Dances with Wolves</i> is a very, very, very bad movie. </p>

<p><i>Plan 9 from Outer Space,</i> on the other hand, is a very earnest, sweet, well-meaning movie. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007  6:44 PM by Howard Peirce&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164567</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164567</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 18:44:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #390 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Truly bad movies are those multimillion blockbusters that have been previewed and focus-grouped to death</i></p>

<p>Good point, Howard. That's why some of my nominees were <i>Ishtar</i> and Tim Burton's <i>Planet of the Apes</i>. And, if I remember correctly, that sub-thread had started because Skwid asserted that 1994's <i>Fantastic Four</i> was one of the worst non-porn movies while I thought that, terrible as it was, its heart was in the right place. (My favorite line was Reed coming to where Sue and Johnny were staying and him asking their mother: "Can Sue and Johnny come on my spaceship?")  I never got the sense that that movie had been made for the sake of making money, but because the person in charge wanted to do it. Unfortunately, his movie-making skills and his budget were not up to the task.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007  7:03 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164570</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164570</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 19:03:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #391 from Neil Willcox</title>
         <description>comment from Neil Willcox on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#375:  One of my friends who is pretty sure they will never get married has floated an unwedding-type idea a couple of times as a vague possibility.  In general there's been a slightly negative response*; when he linked it to a x0 or x5 birthday party with a wedding/unwedding theme, the response becomes slightly positive.  So basically I'm agreeing with Eleanor @377, but if you really want the unwedding thing, I'd suggest calling it a Birthday/Life Event Party to anyone who thinks it's weird.</p>

<p>Me (unmarried, no intention either to or not), if I ever had an unwedding, wouldn't do something formal and wedding-y, but that's me and I'm male.</p>

<p>I like the idea of a non-pair-bonding love celebration though, and will probably steal it for next time I throw a party for more than one reason.</p>

<p>*  Partly because he has 2 parents and 2 step-parents, none of whom get on anymore, and putting them all in the same room would be like a very unfunny sitcom; not unsuprisingly, this is one of the reasons he doesn't want to get married.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007  7:09 PM by Neil Willcox&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164571</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164571</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 19:09:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #392 from Marilee</title>
         <description>comment from Marilee on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Individ-ewe-al, #375, I think an unwedding is sort of weird.  I <i>did</i> throw a big party the first birthday after the first renal failure -- lots of people came and had fun.  I just called it a Spring Party, not a Birthday Party or a Not Dead Yet party.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007  7:46 PM by Marilee&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164575</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164575</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 19:46:54 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #393 from Iain Coleman</title>
         <description>comment from Iain Coleman on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I've been going thru my tapes of the 2nd season of Doctor Who. Due to some mislabeling of the cassettes (*), I wound up watching the season finale before many other episodes yesterday. SPOILER!!! So Billie Piper did leave the show. Does anybody know why?</i></p>

<p>I've no particular inside knowledge, but it's not hard to make an educated guess. Before <i>Doctor Who</i>, Piper was known to the public as a washed-up ex-pop-starlet, although a few people had started to notice the good performances she had delivered in a couple of one-off TV dramas. After <i>Doctor Who</i>, she is one of the hottest stars in the UK, starred in two high-profile costume dramas over Christmas, and has a starring role in the theatre coming up in the near future. Basically, DW gave her career a massive boost, and it was the right time for her to move on to other things and broaden her CV while she is still a hot property. If she'd stayed on much longer, she would have risked being regarded as just "the Doctor Who girl": as it is, I think she's likely to move on to a substantial career in TV drama. In short, I reckon she left because in career terms the time was right. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007  9:00 PM by Iain Coleman&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164582</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164582</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 21:00:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #394 from CHip</title>
         <description>comment from CHip on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry@372: <i>The IRS requires quarterly payments of estimated tax, but they won't necessarily detect the absence thereof.</i></p>

<p>Well, owing a large sum at the end of the year is rather obvious. Whether it gets you in trouble depends on what the rules are and whether the IRS profiles catch you -- but it's not exactly easy to hide.</p>

<p>I don't know how non-monetary income works, but each year our tax accountant prepares a sheet comparing taxes due with taxes paid and in one year having us pay some modest penalty, calculated as interest, because we paid taxes as the money came in rather than uniformly. The form assumes uniform income; if you're a personal business and get an unplanned-for uptick in the last quarter you're just screwed. (IIRC, salary bonuses usually aren't a factor because they get run through the same deduction mill as income; the form looks only at quarterly payments.) Sudden income at the beginning of the year, I was advised, actually wins because of the above assumption; you can spread the additional payments over 4 quarters and it will look ok.</p>

<p>I don't know the exact conditions for filling out the form at all -- that's why we pay someone to do this -- so all of the above should be considered anecdotal; but saying the IRS won't even notice strikes me as implausible.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007  9:05 PM by CHip&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164583</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164583</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 21:05:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #395 from Eleanor</title>
         <description>comment from Eleanor on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ethan @ 385: I agree with Stefan that the 2005 season is a good place to start, plus it ought to be easy to get hold of.  But it's rather different in flavour from older <i>Who</i>, if only because TV has evolved and the budgets got bigger.</p>

<p>If you want to watch the older stuff, the 1970s stories (Jon Pertwee and Tom Baker) are probably your best bet.  I have seen more Pertwee than Baker (due to BBC2 repeating them in the 1990s).  His first story was <i>Spearhead From Space</i> in 1970: the first <i>Doctor Who</i> in colour, introducing a new companion as well as a new Doctor.  So that might also be a good place to start, with comparatively little backstory to get to grips with.</p>

<p>Save the 80s Doctors (Peter Davison, Colin Baker, Sylvester McCoy) until you know more, and don't watch the American TV movie until you know enough to hurl abuse at it for the way it messed around with the concept.  (Paul McGann's Doctor was pretty good, though.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007  9:28 PM by Eleanor&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164585</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164585</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 21:28:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #396 from Randolph Fritz</title>
         <description>comment from Randolph Fritz on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here we have a <a href="http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=807" rel="nofollow">graphic obituary</a> of the inventor of that friend of starving students everywhere, <a href="http://www.instantramen.or.jp/english/index.html" rel="nofollow">instant ramen</a>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007  9:29 PM by Randolph Fritz&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164586</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164586</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 21:29:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #397 from debcha</title>
         <description>comment from debcha on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ethan (#385): While I absolutely second Stefan's comment about just jumping into the new series of Doctor Who (only 9 days 'til season 2 hits Netflix - huzzah!), if you want to get your feet wet in the old series, I'd recommend the six-ep Key to Time arc, which are all available on Netflix. It's got Tom Baker, K9, and an episode written by Douglas Adams. The six episodes in the series are, in order, The Ribos Operation, The Pirate Planet, The Stones of Blood, The Androids of Tara, The Power of Kroll, and The Armageddon Factor. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007  9:43 PM by debcha&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164588</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164588</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 21:43:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #398 from MD²</title>
         <description>comment from MD² on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Freddie Got Fingered" (360): Is it wrong of me that, upon reading this, I immediately imagined it was a slashy porn version of "Freddy vs Jason" ?</p>

<p><i>Truly bad movies are those multimillion blockbusters that have been previewed and focus-grouped to death.</i></p>

<p>They're one BIG type of bad, obviously.</p>

<p>We have the substantive "nanar" in french, both depreciative and affectionate, for the low budget, "very earnest", movies.<br />
A movie can be bad. It can be a "nanar". And it can be both (you can be low budget, bad, and very earnest about it).</p>

<p>I was hoping an english equivalent of the word would eventualy pop up in the thread and even had my hopes up for a moment when spotting "campiness". Too bad.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007  9:57 PM by MD²&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164590</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164590</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 21:57:54 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #399 from TexAnne</title>
         <description>comment from TexAnne on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ethan, 385: I agree with debcha (397). And once you've seen it all, certain bits of Buffy will make more sense.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007 10:29 PM by TexAnne&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164599</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164599</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:29:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #400 from Dave Luckett</title>
         <description>comment from Dave Luckett on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was always told that a wedding ceremony - however celebrated - was a <i>rite de passage</i>, a public statement of change of status, recognised generally by the society. One could mount a case for a divorce ceremony, with similar justification. But a non-wedding ceremony? A public statement that status hasn't changed, and isn't going to change? That's a <i>rite de non-passage, n'est pas?</i> Or some such?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007 11:05 PM by Dave Luckett&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164600</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164600</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 23:05:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #401 from Larry Brennan</title>
         <description>comment from Larry Brennan on  7.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CHip @ 394 - I am not an accountant, BUT I have had my income bounce around a lot over the past several years so I have some experience with being under-withheld and making lopsided quarterlies. Basically, you're responsible for making quarterly estimated tax payments based on when the income comes in. There's a form for this - I know because I needed to use it a couple of times to reduce or eliminate penalties. Also, underwithholding is generally only an issue if you underpaid, and if you paid less in withholding and estimated taxes than your prior year's tax liability. Up until a couple of years ago, the threshold for penalties was 90% of prior year's tax liability, but they changed it so that more people would have to pay up. </p>

<p>Prizes might be treated differently. Hence the reason that Stefan's sister needs a tax accountant for advice. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  7, 2007 11:11 PM by Larry Brennan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164601</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164601</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 23:11:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #402 from Individ-ewe-al</title>
         <description>comment from Individ-ewe-al on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, maybe the negative opinions are right, maybe I need at least some sort of achievement to celebrate. I'm kind of hoping that my friends would be willing to celebrate me for myself and the fact that I'm putting on a big party for them. I'm not intending to invite my third cousin's ex-husband's step-children; part of the point of an unwedding is that there wouldn't be any obligation guests, just people I'm genuinely close to.  </p>

<p>About the rite-of-passage thing, absolutely. That's a big part of my motivation to do it. There seems to be a sense that an unmarried person is not truly adult, and I really want to challenge that. Getting married is great, but it shouldn't be the only definition of fulfilled, socially valued personhood. (Yeah, I had a bat mitzvah, but in modern society nobody takes seriously the idea that a 13-year-old is adult. And even a coming-of-age party at 21 isn't really marking the same kind of transition that a wedding does.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  5:10 AM by Individ-ewe-al&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164620</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164620</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 05:10:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #403 from Sugar</title>
         <description>comment from Sugar on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm fascinated by the Improbable Research particle, but I can't help thinking that the authors must have been listening to <a href="http://www.alwaysontherun.net/velvet.htm#13" rel="nofollow">the Velvet Underground</a> a little too much lately.</p>

<p>PNH at #1: But is his sister called Rebecca?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  7:23 AM by Sugar&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164627</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164627</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 07:23:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #404 from Faren Miller</title>
         <description>comment from Faren Miller on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie L. (#381): Thanks for that millefiori link! I passed it on to a friend who likes beading and (sadly) doesn't read "Making Light".</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  9:11 AM by Faren Miller&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164632</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164632</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 09:11:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #405 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A web design question...</p>

<p>My wife's site is set up in such a way that, if someone wants to write to her, all they have to do is click on the hot link coded in. Unfortunately, most of the email she now gets thru that address involves offers to make her own penis bigger and so we've been thinking of shutting that address down and setting up a new one. But not as a hot link because we'd then quickly be back to square one and to offers of barnyard excitement that doesn't deal with solely human partners.</p>

<p>Instead, I've been thinking of doing what Tom Tomorow's own site does. Thus he displays...</p>

<p><i>tomtomorrow–at symbol–ix–dot symbol–netcom–dot symbol–com</i></p>

<p>Is that the best and simplest approach?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  9:11 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164633</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164633</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 09:11:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #406 from Sarah S</title>
         <description>comment from Sarah S on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Women! Know Your Limits!</p>

<p><a href="http://www.glumbert.com/media/women" rel="nofollow">link</a></p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007 10:15 AM by Sarah S&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164642</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164642</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 10:15:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #407 from Rob Rusick</title>
         <description>comment from Rob Rusick on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge @405: That sounds like a reasonable approach. On my webpage, I've got a graphic spelling out my email address. It uses a link set up as "mailto:nonsense@nowhere.com?SUBJECT=Re: your resume and portfolio...". It says on the page:<blockquote>If you want to contact me,<br />
click on the image below:</blockquote><blockquote><br />
It will bring up your default mail program, with a nonsense address;<br />
fill in the correct address from the image.</blockquote><br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007 11:52 AM by Rob Rusick&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164656</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164656</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:52:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #408 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Rob.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007 12:35 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164671</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164671</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:35:04 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #409 from ethan</title>
         <description>comment from ethan on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, people.  It looks like the consensus leads me to take Debcha & Texanne's advice (397 & 399)--Key to Time it is, to start at least.  How annoying is it, though, that it's just one episode to a disc?</p>

<p>Also, Texanne: <i>And once you've seen it all, certain bits of Buffy will make more sense.</i></p>

<p>Oh, nuh-uh...really?!?  I didn't know!  I'm excited!</p>

<p>I've also added the first season of the new show to my queueueueue.</p>

<p>Oh, and Sarah S #406--That. Is. Hilarious.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  3:37 PM by ethan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164702</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164702</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:37:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #410 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one who, upon seeing the word 'millefiori', hears an Irish band singing "Millefior-, fiori-ay!  Millefior-, fiori-ay! Millefior-, fiori-ay, workin' on the railway!"?</p>

<p>Thought so.  Mepf.  I want my Cylert.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  3:45 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164704</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164704</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:45:32 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #411 from Larry Brennan</title>
         <description>comment from Larry Brennan on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone here heard from <a href="http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164336" rel="nofollow">Susan, who came home to a break-and-enter</a>? Not seeing any comments from her after that one is somewhat alarming.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  3:49 PM by Larry Brennan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164705</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164705</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:49:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #412 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven't heard from Susan either, Larry, but, if something bad had happened, she wouldn't have been able to log in and tell us about the break-in.</p>

<p>You out there, Susan?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  3:52 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164709</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164709</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:52:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #413 from Larry Brennan</title>
         <description>comment from Larry Brennan on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless she has a handheld device.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  4:15 PM by Larry Brennan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164714</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164714</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 16:15:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #414 from adamsj</title>
         <description>comment from adamsj on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and Susan--how does one go about finding somewhere in a small city (say, Little Rock, Arkansas) where people tango? I started reading a book about tango and now I want to watch.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  4:21 PM by adamsj&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164716</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164716</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 16:21:36 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #415 from Dave Bell</title>
         <description>comment from Dave Bell on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.improbable.com/airchives/paperair/volume6/v6i4/postal-6-4.html" rel="nofollow">Improbable Research particle on Postal Delivery</a></p>

<p>Bricks...</p>

<p>Fish...</p>

<p>Does Harlan Ellison know?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  4:26 PM by Dave Bell&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164717</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164717</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 16:26:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #416 from joann</title>
         <description>comment from joann on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that Susan had previously stated she was in charge of an Event out of town the next day. I can see a combination of that and various legal hassles that could keep her busy enough not to post for a bit.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  4:39 PM by joann&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164721</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164721</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 16:39:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #417 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>joann... Do you think Susan might be an International Woman of Mystery?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  4:50 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164722</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164722</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 16:50:36 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #418 from xeger</title>
         <description>comment from xeger on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#410 ::: Xopher wrote:<br />
<i>Am I the only one who, upon seeing the word 'millefiori', hears an Irish band singing "Millefior-, fiori-ay! Millefior-, fiori-ay! Millefior-, fiori-ay, workin' on the railway!"?</i></p>

<p><i>Thought so. Mepf. I want my Cylert.</i></p>

<p>I don't know what I want, since I keep on wondering what you'll do with all those Cylons...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  5:03 PM by xeger&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164724</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164724</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 17:03:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #419 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've met Susan.  She's <i>definitely</i> an international woman of mystery, even if she's not an International Woman of Mystery&trade;.  Her historical-dance-expert disguise did not fool me.  She definitely had the air of someone who's Up To Something&trade;.</p>

<p>She's an utterly charming human being, IMHO.</p>

<p>xeger, I think you've figured out why the FDA banned Cylert!  </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  5:44 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164732</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164732</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 17:44:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #420 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I met Susan too, Xopher. I couldn't figure out how she'd managed to slip a personal message to me inside LAcon's newsletter, but it all makes sense now.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  5:52 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164735</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164735</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 17:52:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #421 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Xopher, how long do you think it'll take before Susan tells us to cut it out, with all those nice things we say about her?)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  5:55 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164737</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164737</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 17:55:01 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #422 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge...let's find out!</p>

<p>She was looking fabulous when I met her, and complaining of a cold.  If she looks that good with a cold, watch out, you people who are into women (I admired her esthetically, not being one of you)!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  5:56 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164739</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164739</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 17:56:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #423 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, Xopher, I think those glasses of hers are just a disguise. If Susan is not an IWoM, she might be the Last Daughter of Krypton.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  6:00 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164740</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164740</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:00:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #424 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only if the cold was also feigned.  But I suppose an IWoM or the LDoK can do anything.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  6:15 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164741</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164741</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:15:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #425 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Hmmmm... It's quiet, Xopher, <i>too</i> quiet.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  6:21 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164742</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164742</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:21:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #426 from xeger</title>
         <description>comment from xeger on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could be that Susan's really a cylon...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  6:24 PM by xeger&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164743</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164743</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:24:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #427 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan couldn't be a toaster, xeger... Could she?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  6:30 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164744</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164744</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:30:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #428 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't think she could.  Cylons don't get colds.</p>

<p>Of course...without my Cylert, I can't identify Cylons as easily.  If the woods are suddenly filled with beautiful dance instructors, it's Katy Bar the Door.</p>

<p>And Serge...don't use racial epithets.  It's beneath you.  (As you can see, I'm a Heloite rather than a Tighist.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  7:08 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164745</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164745</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:08:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #429 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You're right, Xopher. As for your being a Heloite rather than a Tighist, I can only quote Capitaine Renaud and say that I am shocked, <i>shocked</i>!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  8:21 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164754</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164754</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:21:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #430 from debcha</title>
         <description>comment from debcha on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ethan (#409): Each named story (eg 'The Pirate Planet') actually consists of several episodes. A quick check of IMDb for Doctor Who, Season 16 confirms that each of them is four episodes long except the last, which is six. Each ep is about 25 min long. Wheels within wheels.</p>

<p>Enjoy!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  8:51 PM by debcha&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164758</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164758</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:51:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #431 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tighists often accuse Heloites of being crypto-Baltarians, but this is unjust.  Heloites sometimes privately refer to Tighists as Daleks, for obvious reasons.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  9:04 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164759</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164759</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:04:36 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #432 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doctor Whooo oo<br />
HEY<br />
Doctor Who<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007  9:56 PM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164761</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164761</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:56:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #433 from Rob Rusick</title>
         <description>comment from Rob Rusick on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite Doug Adams Dr Who is "City of Death".</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007 10:01 PM by Rob Rusick&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164762</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164762</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 22:01:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #434 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#432 was a version of "Rock and Roll" by Gary Glitter that got some airtime way back when.</p>

<p>In case the melody wasn't coming through the text...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007 10:12 PM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164769</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164769</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 22:12:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #435 from Larry Brennan</title>
         <description>comment from Larry Brennan on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Eejanaika - here's the official <a href="http://eejanaika.jp/" rel="nofollow">site</a>, which has a higher res video.</p>

<p>Better go easy on the Okonomiyaki before riding that one!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007 10:33 PM by Larry Brennan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164772</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164772</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 22:33:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #436 from Larry Brennan</title>
         <description>comment from Larry Brennan on  8.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plus an interesting bit about the cultural context of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eejanaika" rel="nofollow">Eejanaika</a>, other than "really flippy roller coaster". And some pictures from <a href="http://flickr.com/search/?q=eejanaika&w=all" rel="nofollow">flickr</a>, because flickr sees all.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  8, 2007 10:40 PM by Larry Brennan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164773</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164773</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 22:40:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #437 from ethan</title>
         <description>comment from ethan on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, good, multiple episodes.  That's a relief and a half.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  3:26 AM by ethan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164787</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164787</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 03:26:32 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #438 from Niall McAuley</title>
         <description>comment from Niall McAuley on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case anyone read that <i>No Béarla</i> sidelight all the way to the jokey Guide to Gaelic at the end, be warned that <i>Sea</i> does not mean "Yes" and <i>Ní hea</i> does not mean "No". There are no words for yes and no in Irish, which is why Dr. Maturin often answers a direct question such as "Do you remember Breadfruit Bligh?" with <i>"I do not"</i> rather than simply saying <i>"No"</i>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  5:12 AM by Niall McAuley&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164789</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164789</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 05:12:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #439 from David Goldfarb</title>
         <description>comment from David Goldfarb on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My sonic screwdriver arrived in the mail today.  After a bit of confusion about which way to put the batteries in, I got it working. (Er, it's a toy, made to look like the prop; it has a little UV flashlight, and a pen at the other end with invisible fluorescent ink so you can write secret messages.  It also makes a sound effect similar to the one on the show.)  </p>

<p>I made Katie laugh with it tonight -- my apartment has a screen door, and I pointed the screwdriver at it for a few seconds prior to opening, pretending that I was using it to unlock the door.</p>

<p>The UV light will make my lab rubies fluoresce, but not the stripe on money or the g-rune on my Jon Singer bowl.  Interesting.  I guess the latter need shorter wavelengths.  (You really don't want short wavelengths on something you're giving little kids to play with.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  6:00 AM by David Goldfarb&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164792</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164792</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 06:00:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #440 from ajay</title>
         <description>comment from ajay on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I admired her esthetically, not being one of you</i></p>

<p>I suppose if you'd felt unconsciously attracted to her, you would have been admiring her anaesthetically.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  6:05 AM by ajay&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164793</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164793</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 06:05:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #441 from ajay</title>
         <description>comment from ajay on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ALTERNATIVE PUN</p>

<p><i>I admired her esthetically, not being one of you</i></p>

<p>You admired her <i>what</i>? Well, I've never heard it called that before.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  6:07 AM by ajay&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164794</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164794</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 06:07:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #442 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, ajay, if your posts don't get Susan to respond, nothing will.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  9:36 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164800</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164800</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:36:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #443 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did you get that sonic screwdriver, David? </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  9:38 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164801</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164801</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:38:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #444 from Neil Willcox</title>
         <description>comment from Neil Willcox on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Careful with sonic screwdrivers!  If you aren't you get situations with <a href="http://photo.hardstone.net/thumbs/Objects/Images/Photos/Digital/208/u20ds400du400d/200601/u20d20060124222721jpg/u20d20060124222721jpg-640.jpg" rel="nofollow">his-and-hers</a>; a <a href="http://photo.hardstone.net/thumbs/Objects/Images/Photos/Scanned/226/35MM/2000-1210/226-DEP-35MM-2000-1210-0016jpg/226-DEP-35MM-2000-1210-0016jpg-640.jpg" rel="nofollow">slippery slope</a> which inevitably results in <a href="http://photo.hardstone.net/thumbs/Objects/Images/Photos/Scanned/226/35MM/2000-1210/226-DEP-35MM-2000-1210-0018jpg/226-DEP-35MM-2000-1210-0018jpg-640.jpg" rel="nofollow">tragedy</a>.  (The screwdrivers came from a gadget shop in Bluewater (UK).  The photos are actually in reverse chronologicl order.  Note that the Tardis was much bigger o the inside than the outside).<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007 10:06 AM by Neil Willcox&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164806</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164806</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:06:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #445 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still, Neill, I'd like to have one, provided it doesn't cost an arm and a leg. (Or any other part of my anatomy.) It'd go well with my hall costume of a Victorian Time Traveller. What's the address and/or web site of that place?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007 10:18 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164809</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164809</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:18:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #446 from Neil Willcox</title>
         <description>comment from Neil Willcox on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before I got distracted by sonic screwdrivers, I just wanted to say that a <a href="http://nightofthehats.blogspot.com/2007/01/stans-tarot-cups-part-1.html" rel="nofollow">very silly post</a> of mine seems to have been copied by <a href="http://www.canyousaveyourmarriage.com/" rel="nofollow">can you save your marriage</a>.  I'm almost certain all their content has been automatically harvested.  Usually I would just be amused (as it's not going to impress anyone that they know anything about marriages*) but the photos on it are hosted by a friend.  Is there anything I can do about this, or is it just a risk of posting things on the internet?</p>

<p>* And I've just spotted a typo</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007 10:20 AM by Neil Willcox&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164810</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164810</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:20:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #447 from Neil Willcox</title>
         <description>comment from Neil Willcox on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge, can't find the place they actually came from (it was some time ago), but Amazon.co.uk seem to have them in <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Doctor-Who-Electronic-Sonic-Screwdriver/dp/B0009P5YXO/ref=pd_sim_k_h_b_cs_3/" rel="nofollow">stock</a>.</p>

<p>For some reason the BBC shop only seems to have the sonic screwdriver <a href="http://www.bbcshop.com/invt/dwtorch01" rel="nofollow">torch</a>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007 10:36 AM by Neil Willcox&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164815</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164815</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:36:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #448 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Neill.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007 10:58 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164821</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164821</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:58:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #449 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Niall #438: <i>Thank</i> you.  I was going to say that, but wasn't confident enough of my Irish to be sure.  <i>Sea</i>, I believe, means "it is," and <i>n&iacute; hea</i> means "it isn't" (please correct me if I'm wrong).</p>

<p>The tendency not to say 'yes' or 'no' persists in English in people of Irish descent, I find.  I rarely say either unless I'm being emphatic and very plain on purpose (as when the judge asked me "would that experience influence you in any way" right before I was picked for a jury).  Also, more Irish-Americans use the word 'slew' (meaning a lot, from Irish <i>slua</i>, host).  We used it all the time in the home I grew up in; some of my classmates at school had no idea what I meant!  It's in common use in the NYC area, but wasn't in Michigan, where I grew up.</p>

<p>Funny how things evolve over time though.  Irish may yet wind up with a word that means 'yes' exclusively.</p>

<p>Latin also had no words for 'yes' or 'no', but late speakers acquired the custom of saying <i>huic</i> (this) or <i>hoc</i> (that) to mean yes.  As French developed, different regions of (what is now) France preferred one or the other; the two forms developed into <i>oil</i> and <i>oc</i> respectively, and those words became shorthands for the two forms of French generally: <i>Langue d'Oil</i> and <i>Langue d'Oc</i>.  Modern French developed from Langue d'Oil, and that's the origin of the word <i>oui</i>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007 11:51 AM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164826</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164826</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 11:51:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #450 from P J Evans</title>
         <description>comment from P J Evans on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xopher @ 449</p>

<p>Oh, <i>that's</i> where a whole slew of things come from!</p>

<p>(I've got no Irish to speak of - not recently, at least - but I know that Welsh barely does 'yes' and 'no' as words, and the preference is still for 'it is' or 'it is not'.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007 11:59 AM by P J Evans&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164827</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164827</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 11:59:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #451 from Aconite</title>
         <description>comment from Aconite on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil Willcox@446: C.E. Petit offers <a href="http://www.authorslawyer.com/c-pir0.shtml#selfhelp" rel="nofollow"> this</a>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007 12:00 PM by Aconite&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164828</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164828</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:00:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #452 from Niall McAuley</title>
         <description>comment from Niall McAuley on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xopher #449: <i>Sea</i> does indeed mean "It is", so  it's the positive answer to common questions of the form "Is it ...?" e.g. "Is it yourself that's in it, at all, at all?".</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007 12:17 PM by Niall McAuley&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164831</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164831</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:17:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #453 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those interested, today's column by Jon Carroll is about how cats really are Republicans.</p>

<p>http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2007/01/09/DDGRJN7H211.DTL</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007 12:20 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164832</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164832</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:20:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #454 from ajay</title>
         <description>comment from ajay on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#452: To which the grammatically acceptable answer is of course "It is meself, sure and begob it is."</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007 12:21 PM by ajay&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164833</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164833</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:21:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #455 from jennie</title>
         <description>comment from jennie on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven't heard from Susan, but my gentleman-friend was with her after the break-in, and he said the house checked out okay. She was certainly at the event in NYC the next day, because so was the Gentleman. </p>

<p>Apparently the event went quite well, and many people had a lovely time. I wasn't there, so can't report. </p>

<p>I haven't heard from her since the event, I don't think, and the Gentleman hasn't mentioned seeing her. I owe Susan an e-mail, though (the blurb looks good to me!), so the ball's in my court, communication-wise. <br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007 12:34 PM by jennie&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164836</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164836</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:34:34 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #456 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to hear all is well with Senator Susan, jennie.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007 12:37 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164837</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164837</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:37:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #457 from Linkmeister</title>
         <description>comment from Linkmeister on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge @#453, I suppose that <a href="http://www.nicolehollander.com/navigate.htm" rel="nofollow">Sylvia's cats</a> are Republicans, too.  Any cat I've ever shared a house with displayed more monarchist tendencies, as I recall.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007 12:54 PM by Linkmeister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164841</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164841</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:54:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #458 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if cats are Republicans, linkmeister, are dogs (*) Democrats, or commies?</p>

<p>(*) all of whom go to Heaven.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  1:03 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164843</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164843</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 13:03:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #459 from Susan</title>
         <description>comment from Susan on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm alive.  The break-and-enter turned out just to be a break-and-stop, possibly defeated by my stylish misuse of a proto-bargello scrap of Christmas-themed fabric.  Power Twin's gentleman friend was present and most knightly in attitude and action (albeit armed only with a broomstick) throughout.  I will try to write a longer explanation later if anyone's interested.</p>

<p>My party was excellent (and my dress was finished for values of finished that include substituting discreet basting for actual fastenings) and was followed by a long afternoon of successful teaching in NYC followed by exhausted collapse.  I did a low-key maxixe with jennie's gentleman friend, whom I need to teach more maxixe to this coming Sunday, since he's of the perfect height to lead me but is somewhat short on interesting things to lead me into, maxixewise.  Monday started out with having a hole punched in my forehead and a Frankenstein-like Large Black Stitch applied to it.  My dance partner examined it carefully and sympathetically asked if they had located my brain.</p>

<p>Power Twin, we rocked through four figures (1-3-4-6) of L'Alliance.  You shoulda been there both days.</p>

<p>Serge and Xopher, I am pleased to have successfully deceived you both as to my true appearance and nature, but stop now.</p>

<p>My cats are Chavez-like socialists.  They have nationalized my favorite armchair.</p>

<p>Arkansas seems remarkably bereft of tango; I have no leads to offer except to look out for a touring show.</p>

<p>I will be at Arisia, minus my Large Black Stitch, I hope.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  2:38 PM by Susan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164858</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164858</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:38:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #460 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan #459: Glad you're OK.  OF COURSE we're interested!  How did fabric defeat the would-be burgulars?  </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  2:44 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164859</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164859</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:44:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #461 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Serge and Xopher, I am pleased to have successfully deceived you both as to my true appearance and nature, but stop now.</i></p>

<p>Damn.</p>

<p>(What's a burgular, Xopher?)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  3:10 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164860</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164860</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:10:40 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #462 from Neil Willcox</title>
         <description>comment from Neil Willcox on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Aconite.</p>

<p>If they were real human beings who were interested, I wouldn't mind (or not much).  As they're an automated search program collating things with certain keywords they probably won't pay attention to me sending them a notice asking them to remove it.  Not that that will stop me.</p>

<p>In future I'll try and only post things that are of no possible use to anyone.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  3:17 PM by Neil Willcox&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164863</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164863</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:17:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #463 from P J Evans</title>
         <description>comment from P J Evans on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil @ 462</p>

<p>Weaselly fruitcake? Dinosaurs and ... never mind. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  3:20 PM by P J Evans&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164864</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164864</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:20:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #464 from adamsj</title>
         <description>comment from adamsj on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge, I think burgular is what they call a Bulgarian in the movies these days.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  3:33 PM by adamsj&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164865</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164865</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:33:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #465 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>adamsj... Ah, that's what it is. If we're going to make Eastern European jokes... Did you ever notice that the first <i>X-men</i> movie established that Magneto was from Poland? That then makes him a magnetic Pole.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  3:41 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164866</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164866</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:41:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #466 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan... About true appearances... I must make a confession. The person you met at LAcon who identified himself as 'Serge' really is a bum I hired off the street to pretend to be me. I really am... Hugh Jackman. </p>

<p>Damn. Getting delusional again.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  3:46 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164867</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164867</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:46:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #467 from jennie</title>
         <description>comment from jennie on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan, do please teach the Gentleman more maxixe! </p>

<p>No! Wait! If you and he dance it together, who's gonna maxixe with me? </p>

<p>Ah well. I can share. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  4:17 PM by jennie&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164869</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164869</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:17:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #468 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge #465: I wouldn't touch that one with an eleven-foot Romanian.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  4:40 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164871</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164871</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:40:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #469 from Karl T.</title>
         <description>comment from Karl T. on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or a bouncing Czech.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  4:45 PM by Karl T.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164872</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164872</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:45:50 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #470 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An endecapedal Romanian, Fragano? As for Karl T's Bouncing Czech... That sounds like one of Kurt Busiek's sillier-named characters in <i>AstroCity</i>. (He did have a character called the Bouncing Beatnik.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  4:48 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164873</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164873</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:48:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #471 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge, a burgular is a Bad Guy who comes into your howiss, usually by burebeakibing sobumthibing, aband stebeals yobour stubuff.</p>

<p>It's also the word for 'burglar' in Uh-Oh-Scawy-Thingsese, a language spoken by couples in private when pretending to be scared as an excuse for snuggling up close.</p>

<p>Why are you all looking at me like that?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  4:49 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164874</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164874</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:49:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #472 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Why are you all looking at me like that?</i></p>

<p>We do because your post's spelling sounds like you're practicing for the next PublishAmerica sting.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  4:53 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164875</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164875</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:53:36 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #473 from abi</title>
         <description>comment from abi on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A burgular ownly steyeals yowur syuffuf ipf hee nyeeds thehe monyey becauze heeze Hungary.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  4:54 PM by abi&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164876</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164876</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:54:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #474 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boohiss, abi.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  4:58 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164877</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164877</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:58:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #475 from Sandy B.</title>
         <description>comment from Sandy B. on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things I learned just now: </p>

<p>1. There are a whole slew of people who don't know what "a whole slew" is. <br />
2. The reason for the phrasing "I have not" amongst Irish-Newyorkians. </p>

<p>It's a good core to the day. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  5:00 PM by Sandy B.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164878</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164878</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:00:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #476 from abi</title>
         <description>comment from abi on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*bows*</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  5:01 PM by abi&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164879</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164879</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:01:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #477 from TomB</title>
         <description>comment from TomB on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought "burgular" is the incorrect pronunciation of "burglear". </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  5:01 PM by TomB&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164880</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164880</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:01:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #478 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bolt.com/matt5000/video/monty_pythoni_wish_to_rep/2484716" rel="nofollow">"I wish to report a burgulary."</a></p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  5:07 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164883</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164883</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:07:50 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #479 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge #470: As Harry Turtledove wrote, an eleven-foot Romanian is for things you wouldn't touch with a ten-foot Pole.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  5:27 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164887</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164887</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:27:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #480 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fragano... Consider yourself as boohissed as abi was. (Yes, I'm envious I didn't think of it.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  5:31 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164891</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164891</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:31:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #481 from joann</title>
         <description>comment from joann on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fragano #479</p>

<p>I always use a 20-foot Czech. (Dollars would be nicer, but you can't have everything.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  5:32 PM by joann&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164892</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164892</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:32:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #482 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In re words that might be of Celtic origin, or might not: </p>

<p>I've googled "honyock", with many spellings, and although the definitions I've seen are congruent with my father's use of the word- a low class and boisterous child or young man- none of what I've found has a reasonable origin for it. </p>

<p>Any ideas where to look?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  5:41 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164894</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164894</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:41:40 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #483 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*bows*</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  5:51 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164895</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164895</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:51:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #484 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am reminded of the builder in Jamaica who offered to install 'burgular bars'.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  5:54 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164897</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164897</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:54:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #485 from Howard Peirce</title>
         <description>comment from Howard Peirce on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JESR (482): Did you find <a href="http://www.wordorigins.org/Words/LetterH/honky.html" rel="nofollow">this page</a> from Wordorigins.org's Big List? </p>

<p>There's no 100% certain etymology for honyock, but that's the case for a lot of words. Dave Wilton's one of the most scrupulous etymologists on the net. I doubt if you find anything more conclusive than this.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  5:58 PM by Howard Peirce&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164898</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164898</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:58:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #486 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JESR #482: The OED calls 'honyock' a variant of 'Hunyak'. The etymology of the latter is that it's formed on the analogy of 'Polack' as a term for persons of Hungarian origin.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  6:05 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164900</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164900</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:05:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #487 from ajay</title>
         <description>comment from ajay on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Burgular</b>: of or relating to a small burger. (from Lat. <i>burgulus</i>, dim. of <i>burgus, -i</i>). Citations: "Dude, I definitely feel like something burgular" - <i>Q. Horatius Flaccus and Kumar go to White Castle</i>, 2757 AUC.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  6:18 PM by ajay&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164901</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164901</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:18:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #488 from Marilee</title>
         <description>comment from Marilee on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan, I had two strange moles removed recently and the punched one healed much quicker (and looks better) than the one that was "scraped," for values of "scraped" that leaves a third-inch hole at the middle.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  7:51 PM by Marilee&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164903</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164903</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:51:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #489 from Julie L.</title>
         <description>comment from Julie L. on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AFAIK Mandarin Chinese also has no straightforward word for "yes". I continue to be hopelessly muddled by the many ways to say <a href="http://www.trinity.edu/org/ics/ICS%20Issues/01%20ICS%20I%201/Microsoft%20Word%20-%20p167%20McGloin%20&%20Tokunaga.pdf" rel="nofollow">"yes" in Japanese</a>, even though the entire set probably has English equivalents such as "well, okay...", "yup!", "yeah, yeah", and so on.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  7:58 PM by Julie L.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164904</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164904</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:58:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #490 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howard, I think I did come across that reference, but it was one which I may have dismissed out of hand because of the emphasis on African American usage for the term. Dad's vocabulary was liberally sprinkled with Chinook Jargon, Scotch flavored English, German, and Finnish words, but this neighborhood was sparsley populated and lily-white for most of his life. The only other person I know who uses the word as frequently as he did is Hungarian/Boheimian, and from Cosmopolis, the immigrant sawmill worker part of Aberdeen. </p>

<p>As used around these parts, among those who were over 18 in 1941, it has a precise usage: the young men (or, very rarely, boyish girls) are not only rowdy and idle but prone to mindless and pointless destruction, the sort of people who'd inadvertantly slash their own tires when vandalizing the cars outside a wedding reception.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  8:05 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164905</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164905</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:05:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #491 from debcha</title>
         <description>comment from debcha on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further to Fragano looking up 'honyock' (and 'hunyak') in the OED - if it isn't clear from the context in which your father uses, JESR, you may want to note that it is described as 'only in disparaging use.' </p>

<p>Greg (#434): <i>#432 was a version of "Rock and Roll" by Gary Glitter that got some airtime way back when.</i></p>

<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Adk1ujjmguo" rel="nofollow">Doctorin' the Tardis</a>, by KLF (as the Timelords).</p>

<p>I told one of my professors once that I thought I knew more about alternative and independent music since 1980 than I did about anything else. She said, "Surely you know more about your PhD work?" </p>

<p>She's wrong.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  8:07 PM by debcha&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164906</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164906</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:07:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #492 from debcha</title>
         <description>comment from debcha on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, JESR - our postings crossed. It looks like 'only in disparaging use' is precisely correct.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  8:09 PM by debcha&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164907</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164907</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:09:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #493 from JC</title>
         <description>comment from JC on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#489:<em>Mandarin Chinese also has no straightforward word for "yes".</em></p>

<p>This is technically true but misleading. Chinese does not have a generic word which maps onto the English word "yes," but the way one answers yes/no questions is quite straightforward. You repeat the question's verb for "yes" and you negate the question's verb for "no."</p>

<p>So if someone asked you "Do you have the sacred pickle of pastiche Wagnerian opera?" Your response would be either "have" or "not have."</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  8:24 PM by JC&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164908</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164908</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:24:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #494 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Doctorin' the Tardis, by KLF (as the Timelords).</i></p>

<p>Wow. That was a fricken flashback. I had no clue KLF (3AM Eternal) did that version. </p>

<p>Gonna go seach youtube for some of my 80's music now...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007  9:56 PM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164909</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164909</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:56:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #495 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ajay #487: Used in modern times primarily to refer to the <i>burgularis</i> region of the brain, a structure like a thick disk in the anterior hypothalamus.  Papers include Hatton, GI, "Nucleus Burgularis: is it an osmoreceptor in the brain?" Abstract:<blockquote>The nucleus burgularis, in the anterior hypothalamus, is a group of magnocellular elements arranged in a ring around a capillary bed. The cells are predominantly monopolar, tightly packed, and are flattened at the outer border of the ring. The entire nucleus is surrounded or encapsulated by myelinated fibers. Electrical stimulation of this nucleus produced a short-latency, long-lasting and substantial antidiuresis in ethanol anesthetized rats. Water deprivation induced changes in numbers of nucleoli and cell size increases in these cells. The multiplication of nucleoli in this nucleus during water deprivation was more profound than that previously observed in the supraoptic nucleus. Decreases in multiple nucleoli accompanied voluntary rehydration. Seven criteria for status as an osmoreceptor are listed and the nucleus burgularis was found to meet 6 of these criteria, the seventh being the demonstration of receptor potentials which has not yet been attempted.</blockquote>(OK, I can't make up stuff that good.  The <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=974791&dopt=Abstract" rel="nofollow">real citation</a>.)<br />
 </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007 10:17 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164910</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164910</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:17:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #496 from Howard Peirce</title>
         <description>comment from Howard Peirce on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JESR: Yeah, I think Dave Wilton's article was mainly for debunking the many spurious etymologies for "honky" floating around, and "honyock" just came along for the ride as a related term. </p>

<p>For what it's worth, as a young child in Milwaukee, I never heard the word "honyock" used as a generic term for young delinquents. It was always used as an ethnic slur against Americans with roots in southeastern Europe. To me, it carries the same connotations as "polack" or "bohunk."</p>

<p>I'd be careful about using the word "honyock" casually, if you don't know who you're talking to.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007 10:28 PM by Howard Peirce&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164912</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164912</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:28:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #497 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howard, being a Bohunk of sorts myself (my maternal grandfather was born seven months after his parents left Prague for New Orleans), I'm hardly likely to use it casually, especially with strangers. It's a strange regional distinction that the other perjoratives for Slavic people maintained their specificity in the Northwest, honyock was only and always used as a descriptor for obnoxious, noisy, and destructive boys as far as it was used here. I haven't heard it used by anyone of my generation or younger, though, until I found it coming from my own lips when my neighbor cousin's two sons came running across the field last summer, throwing golf balls at the cattle. Which was when I started to wonder about where it came from.  </p>

<p>The OED, although the gold standard for written language, isn't always of help in tracing the evolution of spoken rudeness. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007 11:02 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164913</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164913</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:02:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #498 from Clifton Royston</title>
         <description>comment from Clifton Royston on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got back from a very nice vacation, and while weeding my email inbox down a bit I discovered this insanely wonderful tidbit of a definition from the <i>A Word A Day</i> mailing list.  I quote:</p>

<p><b>malkin</b> (MO-kin, MAL-kin) noun<br />
   1. An untidy woman; a slattern.<br />
   2. A scarecrow or a grotesque effigy.<br />
   3. A mop made of a bundle or rags fastened to a stick.</p>

<p>A little quick browsing of <a href="http://m-w.com/dictionary/malkin" rel="nofollow">dictionaries </a> confirms that this is indeed a proper definition (and adds dialect meanings of 'cat' or 'hare'). Application to right-wing nutballs is left to the reader.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007 11:11 PM by Clifton Royston&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164915</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164915</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:11:34 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #499 from P J Evans</title>
         <description>comment from P J Evans on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The OED is missing a few British words too, and not necessarily disparaging ones. (I was trying to track down a definition for 'currick', a word I've seen on Victorian-era Ordnance Survey maps.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007 11:16 PM by P J Evans&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164916</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164916</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:16:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #500 from Paula Helm Murray</title>
         <description>comment from Paula Helm Murray on  9.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PJ, google comes through.</p>

<p>Curricks are small enclosures made from stones. They were used by shepherds as lookout points.</p>

<p>It makes sense.  another definition is a "chambered cairn."</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January  9, 2007 11:46 PM by Paula Helm Murray&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164917</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164917</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:46:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #501 from Tania</title>
         <description>comment from Tania on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bohunk. Hmmpf. I've only ever heard it used by my aunts, both of solid of Scandahoovian extraction, using it to describe young men that could be described as tasty pieces of eye-candy. I always figured it was a variant of 'hunk.'</p>

<p>It never occurred to me that bohunk was a pejorative term. It certainly gives me a better than usual discussion topic the next time I call.</p>

<p>Serge - What's your opinion on Canuck?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 10, 2007 12:10 AM by Tania&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164919</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164919</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:10:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #502 from Susan</title>
         <description>comment from Susan on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not useful for honyock, but I am amused by:</p>

<p>Hony-moon,<br />
     applyed to those marryed persons that love well at first, and decline in affection afterwards; it is hony now, but it will change as the Moon. </p>

<p>and</p>

<p>Melilla,<br />
     my hony, my sweetynge, a worde of wanton dalyers. <br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 10, 2007  1:17 AM by Susan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164921</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164921</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:17:50 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #503 from Susan</title>
         <description>comment from Susan on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clifton @ #498:</p>

<p>Malkin, Maukin, or Scovel<br />
     to make clean an oven (the Italians call it Scovola di forno, id est the broom or besome of the oven) the Lat. is Peniculus, or Penicillus, dim. a pene. id est a tail; because they were in times past, made of the tails of beasts, as now they are of old clouts. Min. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 10, 2007  1:24 AM by Susan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164922</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164922</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:24:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #504 from Susan</title>
         <description>comment from Susan on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Power Twin,<br />
<i>No! Wait! If you and he dance it together, who's gonna maxixe with me? </i></p>

<p>Both of us!  (And I'll still be better than the Gentleman because I'm more obsessed with practicing it.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 10, 2007  1:27 AM by Susan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164923</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164923</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:27:36 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #505 from Larry Brennan</title>
         <description>comment from Larry Brennan on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>debcha @ 49 - Doctorin' the Tardis - a.k.a. <i>Pimp my Police Box</i>?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 10, 2007  1:35 AM by Larry Brennan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164924</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164924</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:35:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #506 from Larry Brennan</title>
         <description>comment from Larry Brennan on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>491, not 49. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 10, 2007  1:45 AM by Larry Brennan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164925</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164925</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:45:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #507 from Kathryn from Sunnyvale</title>
         <description>comment from Kathryn from Sunnyvale on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who have clear eastern or western horizons, look for <a href="http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070109.html" rel="nofollow"> Comet McNaught</a> just before sunrise or just after sunset. That it's bright enought to see in twilight means it's quite shiny: there's some chance it'll be spectacular after it goes by the sun*.</p>

<p>The viewing is best the further north you are: I'm in California, and all my attempts so far have been for naught, but others have been <a href="http://www.spaceweather.com/comets/gallery_mcnaught_page2.htm" rel="nofollow">more successful</a>- see the San Francisco pics.** </p>

<p>*or maybe it'll fizzle. Either way, see it now while you can, or see it now before everyone else does too.</p>

<p>**the Farallons are hard enough to see, as they're 30 miles offshore and usually hidden by the marine layer of fog... Farallons plus comet: takes some waiting.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 10, 2007  1:46 AM by Kathryn from Sunnyvale&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164926</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164926</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:46:01 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #508 from Clifton Royston</title>
         <description>comment from Clifton Royston on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg: As The Timelords, they put out two versions of the Doctor Who track, "Doctorin' the Tardis" and the one with Gary Glitter, retitled "Gary  in the Tardis".  Both are on a CD called <i>History of the Jams a.k.a The Timelords</i>, which covers a bunch of the KLF's early stuff.  You may be able to find it used.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 10, 2007  2:58 AM by Clifton Royston&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164928</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164928</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:58:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #509 from Kathryn from Sunnyvale</title>
         <description>comment from Kathryn from Sunnyvale on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan @459,</p>

<p>Fabric? Break and stop? Please do write up more.</p>

<p>(or is this one of those "for the rest of the story, please paypal to..." situations where a bribe is needed? While I can't do paypal, I can offer something shiny at worldcon 2008*, for the rest of the story today.)</p>

<p>* assuming I've forgotten everything I learned this year ("throwing that bid party was hard, hard work") by 2008 ("Hey, throwing that party was nothing but fun fuzzy bunnies. Why not do it again?")</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 10, 2007  3:00 AM by Kathryn from Sunnyvale&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164929</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164929</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:00:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #510 from Rob Rusick</title>
         <description>comment from Rob Rusick on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg @432: <i>Doctor Whooo oo [..]</i></p>

<p>I thought you were talking about <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gg6UcEn9hyI" rel="nofollow">this song</a>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 10, 2007  3:14 AM by Rob Rusick&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164932</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164932</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:14:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #511 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tania @ 501... <i>Serge - What's your opinion on Canuck?</i></p>

<p>I don't mind it. But then again you might want to ask people who live in anglophone parts of Canada because I think that's who the term 'Canuck' usually applies to. As for Quebec's francophones, they're sometimes called frogs, for obvious reasons that don't really make sense because, really, frog legs are (supposedly) a delicacy with the francophones of France. 'French pea soup' <i>has</i> been used to refer to he segment of Canada's population from which I was spawned.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 10, 2007  6:24 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164935</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164935</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:24:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #512 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tania.. Another source of ethnic amusement for me is when American comics come up with characters from other nationalities. The first one that springs up in my mind is Marvel's Batroc zee Leaper, a minor two-bit French supervillain whose schtick is that he can bounce around like, yes, a frog.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 10, 2007  6:42 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164936</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164936</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:42:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #513 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>joann #481: How does one get such a thing through the mails?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 10, 2007  7:26 AM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164938</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164938</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:26:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #514 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan @ 504... If jennie and you are Power Twins, does that mean you hang around with the SuperFriends?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 10, 2007  8:07 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164939</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164939</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:07:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #515 from Neil Willcox</title>
         <description>comment from Neil Willcox on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P J Evans @ 463</p>

<p>I think I'm actually going to post on how bananas haven't had sex for 10,000 years*, despite the evidence to the contrary elsewhere on the internet.  Since 50% of my DNA is the same as that of a banana, I'm obviously going to have to investigate the (lack of) sex lives of my proud cousins, the bananas.</p>

<p>* Domesticated bananas that is.  Wild bananas are probably having sex right now.  </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 10, 2007  8:11 AM by Neil Willcox&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164940</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164940</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:11:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #516 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tonight on <i>MythBusters</i>... </p>

<p>"...In this action-packed episode of Mythbusters, Adam and Jamie turn dirigible detectives to try and solve one of aeronautics biggest puzzles, while Kari, Tory and Grant come face-to-face - and have to flee - from some of Nature's natural-born killers..."</p>

<p>Heck, just watching them build a miniature Hindenburg and then have it go down in flames as Adam exclaims "Oh, the humanity!" will make it worth my while.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 10, 2007  8:27 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164942</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164942</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:27:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #517 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'd say from <a href="http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/cgi-bin/ggmain.cgi?date=20070108" rel="nofollow">this</a> that Klaus Wulfenbach is finding out big-time what happens when you kill one of Agatha Heterodyne's friend. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 10, 2007  9:10 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164944</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164944</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:10:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #518 from Faren Miller</title>
         <description>comment from Faren Miller on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm a fourth-generation Californian, and I know what "a whole slew" means (though I wasn't sure how to spell it). </p>

<p>As for the politics of cats, as I've noted before, my 20-pound Norwegian Forest Cat is an Emperor! (For photo, see <a href="http://www.forestcats.net/gallery.htm" rel="nofollow"> this site</a>, second pic down. It's from several years ago, when he may have weighed a mere 16 lbs.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 10, 2007  9:51 AM by Faren Miller&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164948</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164948</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:51:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #519 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure what the politics of my cat <a href="http://pics.livejournal.com/serge_lj/pic/00004dy7/g1" rel="nofollow">Jefferson</a> are. I do know he is with the meowww-I'm-dying-feed-me party, but I'm not sure what their platform is about.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 10, 2007  9:57 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164950</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164950</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:57:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #520 from debcha</title>
         <description>comment from debcha on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Orbital do a great cover of the Doctor Who theme; they did it <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hymIVllFLjk" rel="nofollow">live</a> for many years before eventually putting a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T17rsuwAWDM" rel="nofollow">version</a> on their album <i>The Altogether</i>. I read an interview once in which they commented that it was so hard to play with 90s technology that they were astonished that it could have been created in the 60s.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 10, 2007 10:22 AM by debcha&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164951</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164951</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:22:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #521 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Gonna go seach youtube for some of my 80's music now...</i></p>

<p>Ooof, I was up till 2 am (eternal?) last night watching videos. I didn't discover "real" music until I went to college. The 80's for me was a world of farm country and country music on AM radio, with two distant FM stations that played top 40 stuff.</p>

<p>My taste for the decade appears to run towards the one hit wonders, and the very oddball songs.</p>

<p>Doctorin the Tardis being one example. Others that I rediscovered last night include "One night in bangkok", "You spin me around", "I wanna be a cowboy", "Rock me Amadaus", "Safety Dance", "Putting on teh Ritz". </p>

<p>Good grief, I'm a one-hit-wonder junkie or something.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 10, 2007 10:45 AM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164954</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164954</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:45:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #522 from P J Evans</title>
         <description>comment from P J Evans on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paula @ 500:</p>

<p>Thank you ever so much. It was a map of a sheep-raising area (north of the Wall, actually).</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 10, 2007 10:48 AM by P J Evans&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164955</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164955</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:48:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #523 from Susan</title>
         <description>comment from Susan on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg @ #521:<br />
<i>Others that I rediscovered last night include "One night in bangkok", "You spin me around", "I wanna be a cowboy", "Rock me Amadaus", "Safety Dance", "Putting on teh Ritz".</i></p>

<p>We used "Safety Dance" and "Bangkok" (the instrumental preceding "One Night in Bangkok") as music in my high school marching band (which competed along with playing at halftime and such.)  I'm still extremely fond of the <i>Chess</i> soundtrack.  If I ever directed a show, that would be high on my list - I had difficulties with both the London and B'way versions, but I think it has great potential.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 10, 2007 11:29 AM by Susan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164959</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164959</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:29:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #524 from Avram</title>
         <description>comment from Avram on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I probably shouldn't be surprised to discover that there is a <a href="http://transfigurism.org/community/" rel="nofollow">Mormon Transhumanist Association</a>, yet I am. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 10, 2007 11:49 AM by Avram&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164963</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164963</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:49:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #525 from Malthus</title>
         <description>comment from Malthus on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And of course, the most common usage of "malkin" is the one the OED said was dialect -- Greymalkin, anyone?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 10, 2007  1:26 PM by Malthus&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164972</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164972</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:26:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #526 from Skwid</title>
         <description>comment from Skwid on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>debcha, I was just about to post a link to the Orbital song.  It's one of my favorites, although the KLF/Glitter version is the one that tends to haunt me every time I hear the theme.</p>

<p>Speaking of, that's the first time I've seen a video on YouTube that basically just captures a visualizer rather than an actual video...I'm sure there are lots of them, it's just the first time I've seen it.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 10, 2007  1:31 PM by Skwid&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164973</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164973</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:31:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #527 from joann</title>
         <description>comment from joann on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fragano #513:</p>

<p>I don't. Cargo pants.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 10, 2007  1:31 PM by joann&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164974</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#164974</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:31:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open thread 78 -- comment #528 from Tania</title>
         <description>comment from Tania on 10.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge - Just be careful if you start beating up on Alpha Flight. I have a soft spot for Alpha Flight. My sympathies for the French and French-Canadian portrayals. Don't get me started on how Alaska is portrayed . . .</p>

<p>Western Canadians never seem to have an issue with Canuck (maybe the hockey team has something to do with that?), but easterners seem to be a little touchy. </p>

<p>I 