<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
   <channel>
      <title>Making Light :: Open Thread 79 :: comments</title>
      <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#comments </link>
      <description>Language, fraud, folly, truth, history, and knitting. Et cetera.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:51:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.261</generator>
      
      <item>
      <title>Open Thread 79</title>
      <description>I drink so much coffee, 'til I grind it in my sleep I drink so much coffee, I grind it...</description>
      <content:encoded>I drink so much coffee, 'til I grind it in my sleep I drink so much coffee, I grind it...</content:encoded>
      <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html</link>
      </item>

      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #1 from fidelio</title>
         <description>comment from fidelio on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To quote an friend who is an old Marine, if the coffee can't sit up in the mug and slap you, it isn't really worthy of the name of coffee.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007 12:28 PM by fidelio&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166267</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166267</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:28:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #2 from P J Evans</title>
         <description>comment from P J Evans on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want it to float a ship. What <i>kind</i> of ship depends on my mood that day. (Actually I drink tea. No sugar, strong.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007 12:30 PM by P J Evans&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166268</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166268</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:30:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #3 from Chryss</title>
         <description>comment from Chryss on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody here ever been to a press check? Ever had printer's coffee? That stuff needs to be CHEWED. Plus, it has lovely notes of ink in its heady aroma...and it is best quaffed at 3 a.m.</p>

<p>Good times. Kinda.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007 12:31 PM by Chryss&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166269</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166269</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:31:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #4 from D.</title>
         <description>comment from D. on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaahhh, coffee.</p>

<p>As long as this is an Open Thread:  Safari and <i>Vanity Fair</i> Do Not Play Well Together; I've had to use Firefox.  (For those of you interested in Mob Studies, there is a fascinating article on Arnold Rothstein by Nick Tosches; I will dredge up the URL once I've pulled up Firefox.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007 12:33 PM by D.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166272</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166272</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:33:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #5 from Bruce Arthurs</title>
         <description>comment from Bruce Arthurs on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One time, way back when, my family went off on a week's camping vacation, and no one remembered to unplug and empty the electric coffeepot that still had a good half-pot or more simmering away.</p>

<p>Got back from vacation, and found that the contents had condensed down into a thick syrup, about a cup's worth.  Waste not, want not, so Dad poured it into a cup and added a splash of evaporated milk.</p>

<p>(This was before Coffee-Mate or other artificial creamers, so in lieu of real cream, one used evaporated milk, from a can punctured on the far side with a church key to make a pour spout.) (The topic of "church key art", using a can opener to cut cans into decorative or useful items, is one for another post.)</p>

<p>That splash of milk hit that coffee, sank briefly, then floated to the top, <i>curdled into a twisted lump</i>.</p>

<p>But since Dad had been a Navy guy, he drank it anyway.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007 12:44 PM by Bruce Arthurs&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166275</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166275</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:44:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #6 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Vanity Fair, D @ 4...</p>

<p>Every time my wife goes to James Wolcott's site (*) from her computer (which runs on Windows XP), it starts displaying its contents then it shuts her Internet Explorer session completely. I don't know if there's some IE setting that needs to be changed. Or maybe it's something in her Norton Internet Security. This started when his column moved back to Vanity Fair's site.</p>

<p>Any ideas?</p>

<p>(*) http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/blogs/wolcott </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007 12:48 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166276</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166276</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:48:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #7 from D.</title>
         <description>comment from D. on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK.  <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/fame/features/2005/05/tosches200505" rel="nofollow">Here</a> it is.</p>

<p>The Wolcott piece (see previous post) was pretty good, too.  <i>Vanity Fair'</i>s long essays would lead me to subscribe, if the rest of the mag were not instant recycling--several months ago they ran an article on the early history of surfing; there really was a Gidget.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007 12:48 PM by D.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166278</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166278</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:48:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #8 from Tim Walters</title>
         <description>comment from Tim Walters on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like my coffee black. Like my humor.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007 12:54 PM by Tim Walters&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166279</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166279</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:54:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #9 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, D... I'm curious about whether or not that link will make my wife's Internet Explorer act up too. Now on to yet another cup of coffee.</p>

<p>"Real programmers drink real coffee."</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007 12:56 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166280</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166280</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:56:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #10 from D.</title>
         <description>comment from D. on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge @ <b>6</b>:</p>

<p>I suspect some kind of weirdness in their HTML, but I haven't looked at that yet (it doesn't shut down Safari; it just mucks up the screen display).  Security software might be the problem, though.  </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007 12:57 PM by D.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166281</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166281</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:57:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #11 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I noticed, D, is that, while I have no problem getting to Wolcott from my own computer, I can't cut/paste the text into an email for later reading.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007 12:59 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166282</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166282</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:59:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #12 from Steve Buchheit</title>
         <description>comment from Steve Buchheit on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I cut you a slice of coffee, Sergeant?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  1:02 PM by Steve Buchheit&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166283</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166283</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:02:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #13 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve... Remember Ava Gabor's coffee on <i>Green Acres</i>?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  1:04 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166284</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166284</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:04:54 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #14 from D.</title>
         <description>comment from D. on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#<b>9</b>:  You're welcome.</p>

<p>#<b>5</b>:  I had to laugh.  (I remember evaporated milk and the wadded-up wedges of waxed paper one inserted in the church-key holes, but the last time I used it [not counting Vietnamese coffee], it was Not As I Remembered.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  1:05 PM by D.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166285</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166285</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:05:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #15 from Kip W</title>
         <description>comment from Kip W on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You're not drinking enough coffee, if you can still sleep.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  1:09 PM by Kip W&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166286</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166286</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:09:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #16 from D.</title>
         <description>comment from D. on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, so when I pull up "View Source" I get what I would get if it were displaying properly.</p>

<p>Perhaps the Javascript (pardon the pun) is creating the problem.</p>

<p>Oh, and #<b>8</b>:  *Snort*</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  1:13 PM by D.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166289</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166289</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:13:32 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #17 from Steve Buchheit</title>
         <description>comment from Steve Buchheit on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge, as I remember it was somthing akin to sludge. But it's been a while. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  1:13 PM by Steve Buchheit&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166290</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166290</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:13:54 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #18 from Avram</title>
         <description>comment from Avram on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D (#4), I can read <i>Vanity Fair</i> just fine with Safari. What happens when you try? </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  1:14 PM by Avram&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166291</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166291</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:14:04 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #19 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve @ 17... Eva Gabor's coffee was indeed akin to sludge - with cool molasse thrown in, I'd say, from the way it reluctantly crept out of the coffee pot.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  1:16 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166292</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166292</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:16:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #20 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D @ 16... "view source"? Forgot about that. I'll try it tonight.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  1:17 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166293</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166293</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:17:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #21 from Q</title>
         <description>comment from Q on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first cup of coffee recapitulates phylogeny.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  1:25 PM by Q&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166296</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166296</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:25:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #22 from xeger</title>
         <description>comment from xeger on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.<br />
It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed,<br />
the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning.<br />
It is by caffeine only I set my mind in motion.</i></p>

<p>One variant, at least.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  1:31 PM by xeger&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166297</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166297</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:31:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #23 from Madison Guy</title>
         <description>comment from Madison Guy on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as you don't get it in the Forbidden City: <a href="http://letterfromhere.blogspot.com/2007/01/chinese-brewhaha-campaign-to-oust.html" rel="nofollow"> Chinese brewhaha: Campaign to oust Starbucks from Beijing's Forbidden City is heating up.</a></p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  1:34 PM by Madison Guy&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166298</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166298</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:34:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #24 from D.</title>
         <description>comment from D. on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avram @ <b>18</b>:  I get the <i>Vanity Fair</i> banner in mid-page with the page's bottom off to the right.  There's an east/west scroll, but no north/south.  If I play with it, I sometimes get more, but that's always the screen I get.</p>

<p>(In William Kienzle's mysteries, Father Koesler's coffee repelled hardened policemen.)<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  1:36 PM by D.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166299</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166299</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:36:50 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #25 from Stefan Jones</title>
         <description>comment from Stefan Jones on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wandered over to the break room to do some research.</p>

<p>There are six airpots there, of which only one or two (Sumatran and Columbian) are filled on a regular basis.</p>

<p>Occasionally someone makes a pot of Decaf; a little less often, someone gets bored and brews one of the flavored coffees.</p>

<p>There are three types of "pre mixed" non-dairy creamer, plus one or two types of the powdered stuff. This muck is essentially edible tempera paint; fortunately, there is a dispenser with one of those little buckets of Half & Half.</p>

<p>Three types of sweetener.</p>

<p>A dozen types of tea. Hot cider and hot chocolate mix up in the cabinets.</p>

<p>Two posters asking people who've emptied a pot to make a new one. I created one of them:</p>

<p><b>If you use up a pot of coffee, please make a new one.</b></p>

<p><a href="http://home.comcast.net/%7Estefan_jones/clown_knife_door_lo.jpg" rel="nofollow">Click here for the image</a></p>

<p><b>Or we send the clown after you</b></p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  1:38 PM by Stefan Jones&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166300</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166300</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:38:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #26 from Adrian</title>
         <description>comment from Adrian on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(This is a decaffeinated post.)</p>

<p>I'd like to spend Saturday at Boskone with a small group of local friends that includes a 3-year old.  The logistics of commuting to the con all look workable, except for the problem of "where can the child nap in the early afternoon?"  Are any of you Boston fans with young children (or limited stamina) facing similar problems, so this is a solved problem I just don't know about?  Or are you traveling from afar, and you have a quiet hotel room, part of which you can lend or sublet to a small napper and a supervising adult?</p>

<p>We can offer baked goods, a soft sculpture dragon, or cash.  Without the nap, we don't expect a halfway-civilized preschooler in the late afternoon and evening, so this is really important.  We're trying to avoid the level of profound exhaustion that lets a person fall asleep in a crowded consuite or elevator lobby, because this particular child goes through hours of being short-tempered and unhappy on the way to being that tired.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  1:44 PM by Adrian&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166302</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166302</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:44:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #27 from RedMolly</title>
         <description>comment from RedMolly on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stefan @ 25: I may need to borrow that image for a sign exhorting my offspring to clean up their room. Perhaps simply printing and framing it would do--then I could threaten to bring it out and hang it on the wall whenever their living space slips below minimal hygienic standards.</p>

<p>*residual shudder*</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  1:50 PM by RedMolly&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166304</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166304</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:50:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #28 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Redmolly, if you want to scare the kids into cleaning up, get a poster of Tim Curry as the evil clown from Stephen King's "It".</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  2:01 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166310</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166310</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:01:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #29 from Lizzy L</title>
         <description>comment from Lizzy L on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About 3 weeks ago my body started reacting really strongly to my one morning coffee (true, it was Peet's French Roast)-- jitters, etc. I tried half-decaf, half-caffeinated -- same old, same old. So I switched to decaf. I miss the caffeine, I gotta say, but it's not too bad. And it means that I can now have a cup of java in the evening without worrying about whether or not I'm going to be able to fall asleep...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  2:01 PM by Lizzy L&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166311</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166311</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:01:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #30 from Lucy Huntzinger</title>
         <description>comment from Lucy Huntzinger on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flavored coffee is an abomination. I say this having recently tried Godiva chocolate coffee.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  2:02 PM by Lucy Huntzinger&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166313</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166313</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:02:07 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #31 from Linkmeister</title>
         <description>comment from Linkmeister on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>15 years ago I worked for a local coffee roaster/manufacturer.  We sold a ton of flavored coffees (chocolate, macadamia nut), but we occasionally misfired.  For a while there we had a pallet of Lilikoi-flavored coffee sitting in the warehouse.  Worst taste imaginable.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  2:06 PM by Linkmeister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166314</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166314</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:06:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #32 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the heck is Lilikoi?  Koi, like the fish?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  2:11 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166315</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166315</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:11:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #33 from Mark</title>
         <description>comment from Mark on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another decaffeinated comment: a friend of mine was looking for genre titles that deal with or mention what philosophy/social theory/etc look like in the future, and I couldn't think of anything off the top of my head. Does anybody have some ideas?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  2:15 PM by Mark&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166317</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166317</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:15:34 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #34 from Tracie</title>
         <description>comment from Tracie on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking for a picture of one of those old evaported milk can openers, the ones that made a spout in the old round-edged cans, I found instead a company that sells post-WWI <a href="http://reprorations.com/index.htm" rel="nofollow">reproduction military rations</a> for re-enactors and historical displays. Apparently, they contain real edible food. The WWII instant coffee ration contains about 1 ounce, which they claim is "enough to keep caffeined up for an entire weekend." Don't know about that. I think one ounce of instant makes about 5 cups, which is not enough for me on a weekend.</p>

<p>Still haven't found the spout-making can opener (though I could go home and find mine), but I found a number of other styles on e-bay.</p>

<p>Now I think I'll open my fresh can of <a href="http://www.jitteryjoes.com/index.php?section=1" rel="nofollow">Jittery Joe's coffee</a> (sundown blend, ground Friday) and inhale.  Ahhhhh...  It's off to the coffee pot.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  2:17 PM by Tracie&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166318</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166318</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:17:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #35 from JC</title>
         <description>comment from JC on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#26: According to Boskone's list of <a href="http://www.nesfa.org/Boskone/hours.html" rel="nofollow">area hours</a>, their babysitting facilities are available from 12:45pm to 5:15pm on Saturday afternoon. I've never been to Boskone. (This will be my first year going.) So I don't know any more than this. Sorry.</p>

<p>If you're planning on getting a Boskone membership for your child though, this looks like an option.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  2:19 PM by JC&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166320</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166320</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:19:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #36 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"...Marvel Studios announced today that it has signed on Academy Award® winner Gwyneth Paltrow to join the cast of the highly-anticipated summer 2008 event film Iron Man. Paltrow will take on the role of Virginia "Pepper" Potts, personal secretary and confidant to Tony Stark aka Iron Man. The film is slated to hit theaters May 2, 2008. (...) Paltrow joins a star-studded cast for Marvel Entertainment's first self-financed and produced feature film, which also includes Oscar® nominees Robert Downey Jr. in the title role and Terrence Howard as Jim "Rhodey" Rhodes, Stark's best friend. Jon Favreau is set to direct..."</p>

<p>Robert Downey Jr. as Tony Stark? What's next? Will Ferrel as Captain America?<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  2:27 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166326</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166326</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:27:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #37 from Linkmeister</title>
         <description>comment from Linkmeister on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xopher, it's a fruit.  <a href="http://www.tradewindsfruit.com/lilikoi.htm" rel="nofollow">Yellow Passion fruit</a>, to be exact.  Tastes good on a plate with mango and papaya, tastes awful as a coffee flavor.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  2:28 PM by Linkmeister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166327</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166327</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:28:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #38 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AH.  Thank you.  Yes, coffeeizing that sounds like a waste of good fruit. *ducks hail of Starbucks&trade; cups*</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  2:31 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166329</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166329</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:31:40 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #39 from Claude Muncey</title>
         <description>comment from Claude Muncey on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to have expensive tastes where it comes to coffee.  On our honeymoon Marilee and I bought a pound of Wallensford Estate Blue Mountain from Capricorn Coffees in San Francisco -- for $30. This was more than 25 years ago when the quality of Blue Mountain had not been affected by the push for quanitity to ship to Japan.   We stretched that pound for months and gave the last bit to a friend who opened the first coffee house of some quality here.  He brewed it for himself -- and we never had to pay for coffee again at his shop.  (Capricorn had been the only source of the real stuff on the west coast for some time.  To their credit they stopped importing Blue Mountain once the quality dissappeared. They are worth a visit south of Market, especially if they are roasting at the time.)</p>

<p>On the other hand, my ancestors were merchants, ranchers and railroad men in and around San Antonio.  While railroad coffee had a strong reputation (as thick and black as axle grease) boiled trail coffee is what I heard about, and finally experienced. (<i>Drink</i> seems inadequate.) Fill up the traditional four quart tinware coffee pot with cold water and place on the fire.  When it boils dump in a level double handful of ground coffee, and bring back to a boil.  An eggshell is a traditional addition at this point as well.  (The traditional brand of course is Arbuckles Ariosa and there is a company that <a href="http://arbucklecoffeetraders.com/index.html" rel="nofollow">claims to have brought it back</a>, but you can use the corporate descendant of Arbuckles -- Maxwell House.)  Move to near but not on the fire, throw in a little cold water to help the grounds settle, and wait a couple of minutes.   Powerful stuff.  </p>

<p>Remember, pour carefully so the grounds don't get stirred up, and you don't want to drink this to the last drop. The last cup or so in the pot is perfect for helping put out the cook fire, or for taking the hair off cowhide.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  2:32 PM by Claude Muncey&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166330</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166330</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:32:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #40 from Stefan Jones</title>
         <description>comment from Stefan Jones on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#27: Go ahead and use the picture for personal use.</p>

<p>I'm seriously thinking of doing a little photoshop work to make it look like the stuffed clown in actually gripping the knife in its hand, then making a commercial "make the coffee" poster.</p>

<p>I have another version of the poster using a different photo, one that used to be up on Lilek's newspaper photo archives site. It shown an OLD clown. A really scary wrinkled decrepit clown of the sort that makes wee kids challenge the carrying capacity of their Huggies.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  2:33 PM by Stefan Jones&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166331</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166331</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:33:36 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #41 from P J Evans</title>
         <description>comment from P J Evans on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Decaffeinated, I think: the current Google ads I'm seeing on the front page, and where else could you find this set?</p>

<p>Top Agents Seek Authors<br />
Hottest New Sock Yarn<br />
Premium Russian Yarns<br />
Usborne-Books.com (USA)<br />
Free Sam Hamster Cage</p>

<p>and the 'see more ads' ads:<br />
Self Publishing<br />
Publish My Book<br />
How to Publish a Book<br />
Sock Yarn Patterns<br />
Alpaca Yarn</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  2:41 PM by P J Evans&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166332</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166332</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:41:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #42 from Kathryn from Sunnyvale</title>
         <description>comment from Kathryn from Sunnyvale on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re @23: a picture of <a href="http://pic.templetons.com/cgi-bin/imget?d=brad/photo/china/forbidden/&fn=img_9216.jpg" rel="nofollow"> The Forbidden Starbucks. </a> 'at least there is not one at the Cappusin Monastery. Yet.'</p>

<p>Lizzy L @29,</p>

<p>Consider switching to decaf. tea, or a low-caffeine green tea: it is darn good for you. (look up EGCG or  Theanine <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?DB=pubmed" rel="nofollow"> in Pubmed</a>. Coffee just doesn't have results like "Green tea extract reverses the despair behaviour in reserpinised* and diabetic mice")</p>

<p>* depressed mice, given the depressant reserpine.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  2:45 PM by Kathryn from Sunnyvale&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166333</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166333</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:45:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #43 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you haven't looked at Chris Clarke's <a href="http://faultline.org/index.php/site/comments/a_completely_innocent_photoshop_tutorial/" rel="nofollow">Completely Innocent Photoshop&trade; Tutorial, honest</a>, you really should.  </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  2:58 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166336</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166336</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:58:40 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #44 from MD²</title>
         <description>comment from MD² on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark (#33):</p>

<p>A.E Van Vogt's <i>The World of Null-A</i> ?<br />
Assimov's <i>Foundation</i> ?  (I'm thinking psychohistory, but it's been so long since I read the thing I don't really remember)<br />
Barjavel's <i>The Ice People</i> ? (I'm stretching a bit here, all right, this is a past futuristic society)</p>

<p>@Claude Muncey (#39):</p>

<p>Woohoo ! A way of making coffee I haven't tried yet. Thanks a lot for that.</p>

<p>Anyone here besides me ever been diagnosed with caffeine overdose ?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  3:13 PM by MD²&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166339</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166339</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:13:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #45 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caffeine overdose, MD(squared)? I know I get a slight headache if I go without caffeine over the weekend.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  3:21 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166343</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166343</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:21:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #46 from Tania</title>
         <description>comment from Tania on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge @ #36 re: Iron Man</p>

<p>At least Robert Downey Jr. can act. And Jon Favreau is enough of a geek that I am inclined to trust him. For now.</p>

<p>I'm still wondering about the Star Trek XI rumors. Here's the latest blurbs, if you're interested.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire/index.php?id=39438" rel="nofollow">SciFi Wire</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20007719,00.html" rel="nofollow">Entertainment Weekly</a><br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0796366/" rel="nofollow">IMDB Star Trek XI</a></p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  3:23 PM by Tania&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166344</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166344</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:23:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #47 from Jeremy Preacher</title>
         <description>comment from Jeremy Preacher on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diagnosed?  No.  Up all night grinding my teeth and listening to my heart gallop wildly, convinced that I was going to die to the point of writing a farewell letter?  Yes.  </p>

<p>And yes, I have a four-pack of Red Bull and a four-pack of Rockstar Juiced in my fridge...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  3:25 PM by Jeremy Preacher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166345</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166345</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:25:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #48 from harthad</title>
         <description>comment from harthad on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While living in southwestern Louisiana, I worked in an office that employed a mix of native Louisianans and out-of-state transplants like myself. I could always tell when one of the natives had made the pot of coffee that morning: even if held up to a strong light, the brew would be opaque. Transplants made translucent coffee, much to the disgust of the natives. </p>

<p>The only brand I ever drank while there, whether in the office or in homes or in restaurants, was Community Coffee. I don't know why the grocery stores bothered selling any other brand. It was good, though; I missed it after I moved away. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  3:32 PM by harthad&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166346</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166346</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:32:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #49 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the Star Trek links, Tania. From the looks of it, it won't be a reboot of the whole thing. I'd have prefered if they had take that approach. It certainly didn't hurt James Bond any. </p>

<p>As for Downey Jr.... You're right. Let's see what he does As for Favreau, he is a comic-book lover so he's less likely to screw up. If he does, that won't be on purpose. (Must have been interesting, having him, Ben Affleck and Michael Clark Duncan together in <i>Daredevil</i>, what with all three being comic-book people.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  3:34 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166347</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166347</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:34:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #50 from Tania</title>
         <description>comment from Tania on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and coffee. I'm not the greatest coffee drinker. Love the smell, but I don't drink it very often. What I don't understand is the mocha appeal. Blech. I like chocolate. I don't dislike coffee. But together - yuk. I know I'm in the minority here, but does anyone else experience this?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  3:34 PM by Tania&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166348</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166348</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:34:32 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #51 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coffee <i>and</i> mocha, Tania? I'm with you.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  3:37 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166349</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166349</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:37:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #52 from MD²</title>
         <description>comment from MD² on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, diagnosed. Trembling + Nausea + Slight aural hallucinations + Inability to stop thinking. At first the doctors tought I was on (other kinds of) drug. It seems it was just the result of lack of sleep/insufficient eating and lots, lots and lots of very strong coffee over a very short period of time (that's where trying to get an education when you have two jobs can get you).</p>

<p>I just realised the "²" character isn't on qwerty keyboards. Damn... talk about pestering people without realizing.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  3:38 PM by MD²&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166350</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166350</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:38:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #53 from Dawno</title>
         <description>comment from Dawno on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.thebulletin.org/weekly-highlight/weekly-highlight.html" rel="nofollow">Bulletin of Atomic Scientists</a> moves "Doomsday" clock forward by two minutes to 11:55.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  3:51 PM by Dawno&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166352</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166352</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:51:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #54 from MD²</title>
         <description>comment from MD² on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coffee + a pinch of chocolate made in a depression coffee maker with Evian water can save some arabicas if they've been held on for too long and have become a bit too sour because of oxidation.</p>

<p>Anyway, I wouldn't really to mix the two in any other way to tell the truth.</p>

<p>Generally, toying around with different type of waters can be pretty rewarding (very strong tar pit like robusta + Hepar via an espresso pot is an experience in itself, though I wouldn't necessarily recommand it)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  3:53 PM by MD²&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166353</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166353</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:53:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #55 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MD&sup2; #52: but they can type it with &amp;sup2;</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  3:55 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166354</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166354</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:55:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #56 from Howard Peirce</title>
         <description>comment from Howard Peirce on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MD&sup2; (44): New ways to brew coffee, eh? Have you tried the Toddy Cold Water Coffee System? I got one for Christmas. Basically, you combine a whole pound of ground coffee with nine cups of cold water and let it sit for 12 hours. Then you drain off about five cups of highly concentrated, low-acid coffee extract. To make a cup of coffee, you combine three parts hot water with one part extract. </p>

<p>Because the extract is so low in volatile acids, it'll keep up to two weeks in the fridge with no loss in flavor. It tastes better than automatic drip (IMO), and it's great for coffee-on-demand, a cup at a time. It's so low in acid, I notice I no longer get the sour stomach that lets me know when I've had too much coffee. Sure, it can't compare to, say, real espresso, but for the morning eye-opener I really like it.</p>

<p>The actual process is a bit more involved than brewing a pot in the Mr. Coffee, but you only have to do it once a week or so.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  3:59 PM by Howard Peirce&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166355</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166355</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:59:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #57 from Rob Rusick</title>
         <description>comment from Rob Rusick on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stefan Jones @25: <i>[I created this poster] asking people who've emptied a pot to make a new one:<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;If you use up a pot of coffee, please make a new one. Or we send the clown after you</i></p>

<p>This reminded me of <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2006/06/28/fake_eyes_boost_hone.html" rel="nofollow">this BoingBoing post</a> where posters were placed to remind people to contribute to the coffee fund. When the poster had eyes, contributions went up.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  4:06 PM by Rob Rusick&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166356</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166356</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:06:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #58 from joann</title>
         <description>comment from joann on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'll confess to flavored coffee here, which I just made. You see, somebody left some Godiva Vanilla Hazelnut coffee on spouse's desk sometime during the holiday festivities, and it made its way home before anyone figured out it was coffee, not chocolate. So I, who can occasionally tolerate such stuff, am using it for afternoon coffee during this icy period, accompanied by panforte. (Normally this time of afternoon would find me at one of several coffeehouses, medium-size latte at my side.)</p>

<p>I get bulk Italian Roast coffee and use it in the expresso machine (the type Starbucks sells but not bought from them) for breakfast lattes. I tend to make them a bit strong (quantity of beans, *and* amount of coffee vs milk).</p>

<p>On the mocha front: nothing better for studying Latin than a large mocha made with Guittard chocolate and lots of whipped cream. Too bad the purveyor turned into a Diesel store some years back.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  4:18 PM by joann&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166360</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166360</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:18:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #59 from joann</title>
         <description>comment from joann on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot believe I actually typed "expresso". The fact that the x is just below the s is absolutely *no* excuse. And then that I missed it on preview. (Abases self yet again.) Espresso, espresso, espresso ...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  4:21 PM by joann&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166361</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166361</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:21:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #60 from MD²</title>
         <description>comment from MD² on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howard Peirce (#56):</p>

<p>Rooooooooooooooooooooooooohhhhh ! I need to get myself one of those. Just for the insterest of experimentation, of course.</p>

<p>Thanks a lot.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  4:26 PM by MD²&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166364</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166364</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:26:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #61 from Christopher Davis</title>
         <description>comment from Christopher Davis on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>joann (#59): "expresso" is what American tourists abroad ask about when trying to get on a faster train. (I'm re-watching Amazing Race 2 on GSN while waiting for All-Stars to start....)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  4:30 PM by Christopher Davis&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166366</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166366</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:30:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #62 from TexAnne</title>
         <description>comment from TexAnne on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joann: You were being influenced by the French construction "café express." Weren't you, now?</p>

<p>I haven't been on the Drag in too long--I don't remember what turned into Diesel. Then again, I've never forgiven Strfcks for destroying Les Amis.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  4:30 PM by TexAnne&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166367</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166367</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:30:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #63 from joann</title>
         <description>comment from joann on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TexAnne: Quack's. As to French influence, the Italian is supposed to be a *lot* stronger these days.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  4:36 PM by joann&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166369</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166369</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:36:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #64 from meredith</title>
         <description>comment from meredith on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coffee.  Ugh.  Only in the past couple years have I been able to walk into a coffeehouse without immediately wanting to hurl (which is a good thing, since my job now involves sitting in coffeehouses for hours at a time, several evenings a month).  To me, it smells like a skunk just let go right underneath my house.</p>

<p>I can't eat or drink anything that has even a hint of coffee/mocha flavoring in it ... and woe to the person who ever tries to serve me tea made in a receptacle that was ever used to make even half a cup of coffee.</p>

<p>(Yeah, kinda sensitive here.  I wish I knew why.)</p>

<p>But tea ... ah, tea.  Preferably Earl Grey.  Hot.  And don't try to put anything in it, either.  Steep it until the spoon starts to dissolve.</p>

<p>*sips day's 5th cup of tea*</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  4:38 PM by meredith&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166370</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166370</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:38:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #65 from Sean Bosker</title>
         <description>comment from Sean Bosker on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My stepdad says, "Expresso." When I called him on it, he challenged me to look it up. Every single dictionary I've found lists both "expresso" and "esspresso" as being correct. But he's the only guy I know who says "expresso."</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  4:40 PM by Sean Bosker&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166371</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166371</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:40:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #66 from abi</title>
         <description>comment from abi on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Useless coffee rambings:</p>

<p>I was amused to learn that the Dutch term for cafe latte is <em>koffie verkeerd</em>, which literally means "wrong coffee".  They like it darker.  (Though, more and more, it's just "latte" now, apparently.)</p>

<p>If Latin studies are aided by mocha (and I agree with joann that they are - I made it through a BA in Latin on Sufficient Grounds mochas), then Greek is only possible with strong espresso.  I tried both, and disliked both.</p>

<p>And this thread reminds me of the year that my mother gave up coffee for Lent.  None of the rest of us in the house gave up anything - we were suffering enough.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  4:46 PM by abi&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166374</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166374</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:46:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #67 from TexAnne</title>
         <description>comment from TexAnne on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joann: Ugh. I knew Quack's was closed (O their black beans and rice!) but I didn't know what the space had become. What a cryin' shame. </p>

<p>Sock yarn pimpage!--Blue Moon gave their sock-club subscribers a free skein in the December shipment. One-offs, irreproducible accidents, small lots...I got cabin fever today and started Yet Another sock with mine. It's gorgeous. They couldn't have picked a better colorway for me if they'd known me personally. I'm doing a plain old round-and-round, no fancy patterning to take away from the beautiful colors. (Join ussss, Tereeeessssaaaaa...joiiiiin usssss....)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  4:50 PM by TexAnne&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166375</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166375</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:50:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #68 from RedMolly</title>
         <description>comment from RedMolly on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A moment of silence for my dad's coffeehouse, Roadrunner Coffee of Lockeford, California, which closed its doors December 28th after a nine-year run.</p>

<p>On the bright side, though, my parents now have sufficient custom-dark-roasted coffee beans stashed in their kitchen cabinets to see them through a year of two-pots-a-day drinking habits.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  4:51 PM by RedMolly&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166376</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166376</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:51:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #69 from Erik Nelson</title>
         <description>comment from Erik Nelson on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the list of sidebar ads reminds me of what Froogle (Google's mail-order-search thingy page) does. It gives you a randomly generated list of things that can be searched for.</p>

<p>So when I read it it gives me visions of dangerous Rube Goldberg contraptions involving fleecelined ferret hammocks, creme brulee torches and explosion-proof refrigerators.</p>

<p>Funny how the Google sidebar comes up with amazing non sequiturs sometimes.<br />
(Identification tags for fish)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  4:52 PM by Erik Nelson&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166377</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166377</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:52:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #70 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coffee.</p>

<p>Sigh.</p>

<p>Back when I was young and strong and found sleep to be a waste of time, I started the day with the entire contents of a seven-cup stovetop espresso maker. Drank office drip all day. Had another pot of espresso with brandy (or, in summer, mineral water, milk, and brandy) after work.</p>

<p>I'm told these habits are not unconnected with my current regime of anithypertensives, but it was fun while it lasted.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  5:00 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166379</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166379</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:00:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #71 from Erik Nelson</title>
         <description>comment from Erik Nelson on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>always follow the ways of Zen and have another expresso.</p>

<p>--Shel Silverstein</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  5:05 PM by Erik Nelson&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166380</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166380</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:05:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #72 from Mary Aileen</title>
         <description>comment from Mary Aileen on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meredith (64): I'm with you on the coffee. I hate the smell, and I don't like coffee-flavored *anything*. (Coffee-flavored ice cream is the only kind of ice cream I won't eat.)</p>

<p>We part company on the tea, however. I can't stand tea, either. Makes it hard to be social sometimes.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  5:10 PM by Mary Aileen&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166381</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166381</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:10:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #73 from joann</title>
         <description>comment from joann on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abi #66: <i>And this thread reminds me of the year that my mother gave up coffee for Lent. None of the rest of us in the house gave up anything - we were suffering enough.</i></p>

<p>Good heavens. Shouldn't there be some complementary church festival in which you assign yourself additional (non-papal) indulgences? I would have recommended double celebration that year for all concerned.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  5:11 PM by joann&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166382</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166382</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:11:40 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #74 from Chris Clarke</title>
         <description>comment from Chris Clarke on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RedMolly, I think I may have been in your folks' pplace. Either way, a damned shame.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  5:12 PM by Chris Clarke&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166383</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166383</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:12:54 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #75 from joann</title>
         <description>comment from joann on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TexAnne #67:</p>

<p>They held off closing Quack's until two months after I'd handed in my diss, so there's that in their favor. </p>

<p>If you were ever even able to get a cup of coffee at Les Amis, you're clearly luckier than I ever was. Stuff just did not appear for me, be it waitstaff, what I ordered, or anything else.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  5:18 PM by joann&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166384</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166384</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:18:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #76 from Iain Coleman</title>
         <description>comment from Iain Coleman on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to drink <i>so</i> much coffee. Then, about 18 months ago, I gave it up. I've never felt better, and my driving has markedly improved.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  5:39 PM by Iain Coleman&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166392</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166392</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:39:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #77 from Dave Weingart</title>
         <description>comment from Dave Weingart on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coffee?  Not if there's proper tea available.  Which there rarely is, because proper tea is theft.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  5:46 PM by Dave Weingart&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166394</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166394</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:46:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #78 from TexAnne</title>
         <description>comment from TexAnne on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joann #75: I went with long-established regulars--they may have started going in the early 80s. But Quack's was where my heart was, for obvious geographical reasons.</p>

<p>Aw, now I'm all homesick!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  6:00 PM by TexAnne&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166400</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166400</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:00:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #79 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in the pale light no shadows can be seen<br />
the sun is densely wreathed by a thick cloud<br />
only the music seems alert and keen</p>

<p>with little wind the thin trees do not lean<br />
against each other in their little crowd<br />
in the pale light no shadows can be seen</p>

<p>this weather is the kind that aches the spleen<br />
we pass each other with our bodies bowed<br />
only the music seems alert and keen</p>

<p>not noble but submissive is our mien<br />
on this dull day a fool could not be proud<br />
in the pale light no shadows can be seen</p>

<p>even the grass has turned a pallid green<br />
this day we feel was made to wear a shroud<br />
only the music seems alert and keen</p>

<p>the lethargy's not abolished by caffeine<br />
constricted are the limits of the allowed<br />
in the pale light no shadows can be seen<br />
only the music seems alert and keen</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  6:18 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166403</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166403</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:18:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #80 from Rikibeth</title>
         <description>comment from Rikibeth on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And many thanks to the Viable Paradise folks for providing morning coffee-and-bagels-and-Danish at the Arisia consuite on Sunday.  I got to meet Jim McDonald in person, yay!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  6:31 PM by Rikibeth&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166406</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166406</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:31:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #81 from Paul Eisenberg</title>
         <description>comment from Paul Eisenberg on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently ran across an old Hills Brothers can in my garage with the corporate-logo-guy wearing a turban. I'd forgotten about the walking turban guy, even though I remember him well from my childhood because my parents were loyal Hills Bros. drinkers. I buy whatever's on sale, and that, many times, is Hills Brothers, sans turban guy. Any idea when he left the building? I've speculated to my wife that it was around 9/11, but can't say for sure because that that time, Folgers was usually on sale. </p>

<p>Also Tania @ 46 brings up something juicy with the Star Trek update. Though glad to see a return of the franchise, I was hoping they'd bring back my buddy Picard and the Next Generation crew. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  6:48 PM by Paul Eisenberg&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166407</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166407</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:48:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #82 from Stefan Jones</title>
         <description>comment from Stefan Jones on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NYaAAAHHHHHH! Please, give me strengh!</p>

<p>Last week, in a moment of weakness, I reinstalled Civilization III & various upgrades and patches on my PC. It hadn't been there for over a year.</p>

<p>Started and quit several games before getting a really good set-up. Worked things up to a really strong position over the course of several days, until last night, when the Indians invaded with overwhelming force. Spent an hour conducting the first turn of the war, which didn't go too badly, but after saving my position for the night realized I could do better.  (Using my Knights to destroy his rail lines and roads to prevent reinforcements from coming over the border.) Of course I had saved at the beginning of the war, and could play it over again...</p>

<p>In a fit of resolve and self-disgust I un-installed the game, erased the directory it was in, and emptied the windows trash file. Went to bed feeling good.</p>

<p>Now I want to play again. </p>

<p>F**k.</p>

<p>There really needs to be a 12 Step meeting for these things:</p>

<p>"Hello, my name is Lyle G., and I'm a 4xAholic."</p>

<p><i>"Hello Lyle!"</i></p>

<p>"I once spent fifteen hours playing Masters of Orion II. I wore adult diapers and went through three two liter bottles of Diet Mountain Dew and a box of Little Debbie Chocolate Star cakes." </p>

<p><i>"I hear you man. We've all been there."</i></p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  7:13 PM by Stefan Jones&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166408</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166408</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:13:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #83 from RedMolly</title>
         <description>comment from RedMolly on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ChrisClarke--thanks. Times are rough for ye olde coffeehouse just down the highway from ye olde Starbuck$. Makes my heart hurt to hear my dad--a small-l libertarian and big-C Contrarian--declaiming on the absolute right of large corporations to come in and squish his business if they want to.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  7:15 PM by RedMolly&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166409</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166409</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:15:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #84 from Nina Armstrong</title>
         <description>comment from Nina Armstrong on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>      Mark @ 33<br />
     Try Cory Doctorow's <b>Down and out in the Magic Kingdom</b> or <b>Eastern Standard Tribe</b><br />
, Charles Stross' <b>Accelerando</b>, or Elizabeth Bear's <b>Carnival</b> or her Jenny Casy novels, or maybe Sher S. Tepper.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  7:30 PM by Nina Armstrong&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166411</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166411</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:30:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #85 from Bill</title>
         <description>comment from Bill on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>To make a cup of coffee, you combine three parts hot water with one part extract.</i></p>

<p>I'd be tempted to chug the extract, especially first thing in the morning.</p>

<p>Then I'd die horribly of the ensuing intestinal complications, since I love coffee but it does not love me back.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  7:47 PM by Bill&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166416</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166416</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:47:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #86 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could never get the hang of coffee. Some time ago, I had to go to Israel for work and it turns out that Mountain Dew hasn't civilized that part of the world yet, and the only stuff they had at the office was an automatic coffee machine that can make a bunch of different coffee flavors, so coffee it was. All the text was in Hebrew. Every time I needed caffeine, I'd go push a random button. Even if I dind't like the first sip, I'd try to finish the cup, just in case the flavor "grew" on me. The fourth button down from teh top wasn't too bad. No idea what flavor it was. But when forced into the situation, I can do coffee.</p>

<p>I switched back to Mt. Dew as soon as I got back, though.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  7:56 PM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166417</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166417</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:56:54 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #87 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and could someone explain what the "tragic" knowledge was and what the "farce" was? Maybe I haven't had enough Mt Dew.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  8:00 PM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166418</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166418</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:00:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #88 from Bob Oldendorf</title>
         <description>comment from Bob Oldendorf on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, at last, a new Open Thread.</p>

<p>Back on Open Thread 77, as 2006 was winding down,<a href="http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/007688.html#163332" rel="nofollow"><br />
Bruce Adelsohn</a> at #294 introduced us to the terrors of the <a href="http://www.capitalradiogroup.com/content/cgi-bin/planetrock_albumquiz/" rel="nofollow">Planet Rock Album Quiz</a></p>

<p><br />
A few of us here (I see Tim Walters, Rikibeth, abi, otherdeb, and myself)  kicked it around a while, but then the thread moved on to other topics, and then it died out, as all threads must.</p>

<p>Well, I told my old college-radio buddies about the Planet Rock Album Quiz.</p>

<p>And one of my friends ran with the idea:</p>

<p><i> All the people I work with got hooked on the Planet Rock album quiz, but they all had the same reaction: too much Heavy Metal, and not enough ’80s bands. I took this as a challenge, and so here's the 1980s (give or take a few years) version of the quiz. See how you do:</i></p>

<p><br />
<a href="http://www.metadma.com/AlbumQuiz/" rel="nofollow">Danny’s New! Improved! Version of the 'Album Quiz'</a>.</p>

<p><br />
I found it to be even more maddening than the original.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  8:05 PM by Bob Oldendorf&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166420</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166420</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:05:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #89 from Will A</title>
         <description>comment from Will A on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, Fragano. It's on.</p>

<p>My fuel is coffee, made in Cuban style. <br />
The Cubans start their coffee-training young,<br />
With sugared milk (we're also sucro-philes)<br />
And just a drop of kaff to train the tongue.<br />
Then, as the years go by, the drink is changed.<br />
The milk decreases, dwindles, and is gone.<br />
But with the milk more coffee is exchanged,<br />
Increasing in its darkness and its brawn;<br />
So dense that even light cannot escape,<br />
So rich that old King Solomon would blush,<br />
As strong as Kal-El in his scarlet cape<br />
And smooth and pure as is the driven slush.<br />
The training ends. Thus are the Cubans made:<br />
With azucar and cafe, weapons-grade.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  8:07 PM by Will A&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166422</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166422</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:07:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #90 from MD²</title>
         <description>comment from MD² on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stefan Jones (#82)<i>There really needs to be a 12 Step meeting for these things.</i></p>

<p><a href="http://www.civanon.org/" rel="nofollow">There is.</a></p>

<p>Greg London (#87) <i>Oh, and could someone explain what the "tragic" knowledge was and what the "farce" was?</i></p>

<p>From what my meager english could gather: Tragic = B. Senior's realisation, farcical = B. Junior's  (non)-raction.</p>

<p>Hum.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  8:16 PM by MD²&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166423</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166423</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:16:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #91 from Brooks Moses</title>
         <description>comment from Brooks Moses on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am curious to know how long it will take the assembled company to recognize the source of the following set of instructions:</p>

<p><i>Don't oil the escapements.  The oil will surely get on to the matrices.</i></p>

<p><i>Don't put oil in the magazine.  In other words, don't be foolish.</i></p>

<p><i>Don't attempt to remove a magazine without first inserting the locking bar.  If you do, the matrices will spill on the floor.</i></p>

<p><i>Don't forget to close the cover on the lower magazine before starting to remove it.  The matrices may run out.</i></p>

<p><i>Don't force the first elevator when a tight line prevents its dropping out enough to release the vice automatic.  Ruined matrices will result, and a "squirt" is bound to follow if you do.</i></p>

<p><i>Don't abuse the machine when it balks or stops or fails to function properly.  It is because you have neglected something, or something has broken.  The machine is the most reasonable thing in the world, no matter how unreasonable it may seem.</i></p>

<p><i>Don't forget that the machine always does the best it can, in view of the treatment it receives.<br />
</i></p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  8:36 PM by Brooks Moses&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166427</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166427</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:36:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #92 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will A #89: Tomo nota de tu café cubano y, aunque mi te es chino, mi respuesta se escribe en inglés:</p>

<p><i>Bach sang of coffee, for he music made<br />
and that swift jangly rush hit a right note;<br />
I write of tea, for my less urgent trade<br />
allows me on the slow warm rise to dote.<br />
Caffeine's in both, we know that to be true,<br />
and in both gives us that aura of power,<br />
but tea is better, that's the honest view,<br />
although its making takes up half an hour.<br />
Teas that are green, or black, or even white,<br />
teas full of flavour, teas with tang and nerve,<br />
teas with an attitude, teas with a real bite,<br />
these from my regular course will make me swerve.<br />
I hold that we can't judge a people free<br />
unless over harsh coffee they praise tea.</i></p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  8:40 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166428</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166428</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:40:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #93 from Neil Willcox</title>
         <description>comment from Neil Willcox on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stefan - that's a coincidence, I found my copy of Master of Orion II while tidying up yesterday.  In fact it's right behind... sorry, it's calling me.  I'll be back when I've found out what it wants.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  8:46 PM by Neil Willcox&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166430</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166430</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:46:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #94 from Brooks Moses</title>
         <description>comment from Brooks Moses on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I played CivIII once.  I started sometime about mid-morning, figuring I'd get started and then get some breakfast.  And then I was going to get some lunch, after the next turn.  And then it occurred to me that it was a bit late for lunch, but I really should get some dinner pretty soon.  That shifted to thinking that I really did need to eat dinner at some point, and I think it was somewhere well past midnight that I came to the conclusion that I needed to get something to eat, get to sleep, and never play Civ ever ever again.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  8:52 PM by Brooks Moses&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166432</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166432</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:52:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #95 from Awesome Lies</title>
         <description>comment from Awesome Lies on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brooks Moses@91: a linotype machine? </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  8:55 PM by Awesome Lies&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166433</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166433</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:55:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #96 from grndexter</title>
         <description>comment from grndexter on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stefan Jones:<br />
In Re the Clown - Photography lesson #8. When using a flash, be thou aware of reflective surfaces behindeth the subject that will bounceth the flash back into the lens and make thee sore angry after the film cometh back from the processor.</p>

<p>:-D</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  9:01 PM by grndexter&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166435</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166435</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 21:01:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #97 from Marilee</title>
         <description>comment from Marilee on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't like coffee. I'm not fond of chocolate.  But Darjeeling tea, that I love.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  9:03 PM by Marilee&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166436</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166436</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 21:03:40 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #98 from P J Evans</title>
         <description>comment from P J Evans on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome Lies @ 95:<br />
I think you're right.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  9:29 PM by P J Evans&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166439</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166439</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 21:29:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #99 from Brooks Moses</title>
         <description>comment from Brooks Moses on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome Lies (#95): Well, <i>that</i> was certainly rather fast!</p>

<p>Yup.  I picked up a copy of the <i>Linotype Instruction Book</i> (1925, Mergenthaler Linotype Co.) at a used-book store a few days ago, and have been gleefully reading through it to see how all the various bits worked.  It's simultaneously considerably more complicated and considerably less complicated than I had imagined.</p>

<p>And I keep tripping over bits of writing in it that I want to quote at people, too.  For instance:</p>

<p><i>The mold is made of special steel, very carefully case-hardened and ground.  It has to be made with very great accuracy in all its dimensions.  Screwdrivers, or other instruments of the kind should never be used around the mold, except to tighten or loosen screws.</i><br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  9:32 PM by Brooks Moses&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166440</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166440</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 21:32:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #100 from Nancy C</title>
         <description>comment from Nancy C on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tea may also have anti-ovarian cancer properties.  (Very important to me.)</p>

<p>I like plant coffee.  I used to travel to chemical plants for work, and there was always coffee available, even if it had been sitting on the warmer for hours.</p>

<p>And Community Coffee is awesome!  We're coming to the end of the 3 lbs. from 1999....</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  9:34 PM by Nancy C&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166441</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166441</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 21:34:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #101 from Paul Eisenberg</title>
         <description>comment from Paul Eisenberg on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two Septembers ago, I watched from a distance as the calamity in New Orleans unfolded. I read with horror  the posts here about that awful event, and I still feel sorry for the displaced and stricken residents of that city. <br />
***nevertheless***<br />
Go Bears! I hope they crush the Saints Sunday. <br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  9:35 PM by Paul Eisenberg&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166442</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166442</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 21:35:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #102 from Will A</title>
         <description>comment from Will A on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now, the low road...</p>

<p>There once was a cuban named Will,<br />
Whose Spanish was virtually nil,<br />
Though his verse was alright,<br />
And with it he did fight<br />
O'er his favorite caff'nated swill. </p>

<p>His opponent was worthy Fragano,<br />
And their poems went mano a mano.<br />
It was leaves vs. beans.<br />
It remains to be seen<br />
When the gorda will sing in soprano. </p>

<p>Because tea is a blessing, it's true.<br />
It's contemplative. Raises IQ.<br />
But when deadlines arise,<br />
Then there's no compromise<br />
And I needs me some stronger voodoo.</p>

<p>Your drink may have powerful chi<br />
It is virtuous stuff, I agree.<br />
But I will not be swayed.<br />
Coffee must be obeyed, <br />
And I'm just not as loyal to tea.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  9:52 PM by Will A&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166443</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166443</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 21:52:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #103 from Howard Peirce</title>
         <description>comment from Howard Peirce on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill (85): <i>I'd be tempted to chug the extract, especially first thing in the morning. Then I'd die horribly of the ensuing intestinal complications, since I love coffee but it does not love me back.</i></p>

<p>Bill, I hate to be a gadget evangelist, but the Toddy coffee extract has next to no oils or acids in it. That's the stuff that rots your gut. The first time I made the extract, I thought the coffee tasted so good, I had more. And more. And more! Finally it dawned on me that I was bouncing off the walls talking a mile a minute, and I realized it was because I usually stop drinking coffee when my stomach starts to turn. </p>

<p>The little booklet that came with it has a recipe for "Toddy espresso," which is basically the extract, heated, served in a demitasse. So it probably won't kill you. But I'd rather hold out for a real espresso with a nice crema.</p>

<p>I looking forward to summer, and pouring it over crushed ice with a bit of cane syrup -- and maybe some rum.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007  9:58 PM by Howard Peirce&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166444</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166444</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 21:58:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #104 from Howard Peirce</title>
         <description>comment from Howard Peirce on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>With apologies to the Memphis Jug Band--</i></p>

<p>Caffeine habit's mighty bad<br />
It's the worst old habit that I ever had<br />
Hey, hey, come and take a sip on me.</p>

<p>I went to Mr. Kroger's on a spree<br />
Saw a sign on the window says, "No more tea."<br />
Hey, hey, come and take a sip on me.</p>

<p>If you don't believe caffeine is good,<br />
Ask Alma Rose back in the woods.<br />
Hey, hey, come and take a sip on me.</p>

<p>I love my whisky and I love my gin,<br />
But the way I love my coffee is a doggone sin.<br />
Hey, hey, come and take a sip on me.</p>

<p>Since caffeine went out of style<br />
You can catch 'em drinking Red Bull all the while<br />
Hey, hey, come and take a sip on me.</p>

<p>It takes a little coffee to give me ease,<br />
Strut your stuff long as you please.<br />
Hey, hey, come and take a sip on me.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007 10:19 PM by Howard Peirce&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166448</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166448</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:19:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #105 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>xeger #22: I can't get the image of Brad Dourif reciting your lines out of my mind.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007 10:22 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166451</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166451</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:22:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #106 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will A #102:</p>

<p><i>Tea is the drink that more than merely cheers<br />
but doesn't make you drunk or falsely proud,<br />
it speaks in whispers but its voice is loud<br />
yet unlike coffee does not end in tears.<br />
To win approval of one's friends and peers<br />
never requires the plaudits of the crowd<br />
but a strong sense of what should be allowed,<br />
and mugs of tea till it comes out your ears.<br />
Coffee made strong will give men heart attacks,<br />
its bitterness could rival that of gall<br />
and heartburn is its truest consequence.<br />
So give us tea, and be neither slow or lax,<br />
for coffee's pleasures are so quick to pall;<br />
tea is the drink for all folk of good sense.</i><br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007 10:36 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166453</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166453</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:36:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #107 from Ursula L</title>
         <description>comment from Ursula L on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was listening to the BBC World Service show "The World Today" while driving home from work tonight. They had a story about a phenomena in rural India of having theaters produce plays about current news.  The play they were covering: "Saddam at the Gallows."  </p>

<p>Unfortunately, I can't find the exact story on the BBC website, but I'll summarize. Saddam is played as a folk-hero and martyr.  Apparently the actor playing him has a remarkable resemblance.  They did a bit of an interview with the actor.  One line that jumped out at me:</p>

<p>"Saddam was ruthless.  He killed and tortured.  But he did it for the good of his country.  Just like George Bush." </p>

<p>There are apparently three different theater companies touring with "Saddam" plays (that the BBC knew of), this one started the story way back when Saddam first took power. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007 10:44 PM by Ursula L&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166454</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166454</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:44:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #108 from Stefan Jones</title>
         <description>comment from Stefan Jones on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#90 Civanon.com is, of course, a clever marketing site by Firaxis.</p>

<p>#96: We were not in "professional photographer" mode when we took that photo. I have a variant made with the clown peering through pebbled glass that is even scarier, but the knife is hard to make out. And another, made without a flash, that shows the sillhouette of the clown behind the pebbled glass. What I linked to was best for my purposes.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007 11:27 PM by Stefan Jones&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166455</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166455</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:27:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #109 from Will A</title>
         <description>comment from Will A on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fragano #106</p>

<p>I sing of drink that vim to vigor gives,<br />
Its dark substance the stuff of <i>arete</i><br />
And drinks of lesser strength must now give way<br />
For none can this oppose and after live.<br />
I sing of coffee. It came first to earth<br />
Rectangular, out of the frozen void,<br />
Its influence among the apes deployed.<br />
The caffeinated obelisk gave birth<br />
To this world's howling band of <i>sapiens</i><br />
Who bonked the lesser apes upon the head<br />
With reimagined bones as deadly tools.<br />
Pay heed to this, dear citizens and friends.<br />
Less caffeinated apes were left for dead<br />
By those the coffee-obelisk did school.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007 11:33 PM by Will A&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166456</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166456</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:33:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #110 from Julie L.</title>
         <description>comment from Julie L. on 17.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wrt the Coffee Toddy gadget, in posts 103 and previous: the gadget itself is not strictly necessary for the process, though it does simplify the filtration. Every so often, though not recently enough for me to remember the proportions offhand, I buy a can of ground coffee (or bag of whole beans if I'm feeling energetic enough to feed them through my small hand-cranked coffee mill) and promptly submerge the contents in a pitcher of cold water for some introductory stirring and an overnight soak. The next day, I decant off as much liquid as possible without disturbing the grounds, and then pour the whole mass of grounds into a jelly bag or a cheesecloth-lined strainer to drip dry.</p>

<p>(Wring out the jelly bag or cheesecloth with some water beforehand. Also, it can be a good idea to filter the initial supernatant anyway, before the entire mass of grounds dumps in.)</p>

<p>The concentrate is wonderful as a minor addition to a glass of cold milk. Or to a glass of ice water with some condensed milk stirred in. (Mix the condensed milk with a small amount of water first, before adding the ice and filling the glass.) </p>

<p>Strangely, it's made me think of coffee as a mainly summer beverage; in winter, masala chai concentrate is more the thing. Definitely time to make another batch of that.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 17, 2007 11:36 PM by Julie L.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166457</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166457</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:36:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #111 from Dave Luckett</title>
         <description>comment from Dave Luckett on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feast on wine or fast on water<br />
And your honour shall stand sure<br />
God Almighty's son and daughter<br />
He the valiant, she the pure;<br />
If an angel out of Heaven<br />
Brings you other things to drink,<br />
Thank him for his kind intentions,<br />
Go and pour them down the sink.</p>

<p>Coffee is the Arab's pleasure,<br />
That the Prophet has allowed,<br />
Drunk with quite excessive leisure<br />
While the talk gets wild and loud.<br />
Coffee-house discourse is bitter, <br />
Like the liquid, sharp and hot,<br />
Acid, frothy, dark. Is it a<br />
Happenstance? No, I think not.</p>

<p>Tea is like the East he grows in,<br />
A great yellow Mandarin<br />
With urbanity of manner<br />
And unconsciousness of sin;<br />
All the women, like a harem,<br />
At his pig-tail troop along;<br />
And, like all the East he grows in<br />
He is Poison when he's strong.</p>

<p>Tea, although an Oriental<br />
Is a gentleman at least,<br />
Cocoa is a cad and coward<br />
Cocoa is a vulgar beast,<br />
Cocoa is a dull, disloyal,<br />
Lying, crawling cad and clown,<br />
And may very well be grateful<br />
To the fool that takes him down.</p>

<p>As for all the windy waters,<br />
They were rained like tempests down<br />
When good drink had been dishonoured<br />
By the tipplers of the town;<br />
When red wine had brought red ruin<br />
And the death-dance of oour times,<br />
Heaven sent us soda-water<br />
As a torment for our crimes.</p>

<p>- Chesterton, with additions.        </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007 12:08 AM by Dave Luckett&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166458</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166458</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 00:08:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #112 from Howard Peirce</title>
         <description>comment from Howard Peirce on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie (110): I can certainly see where you're right, but I probably would never have attempted the process without the rig and the written directions. When I first saw it online, I thought it was fairly cheap, but when I actually got the device, I realized it was a bit overpriced for what you actually got. My inner engineer began redesigning the thing as soon as I got hold of it. (I'd like a ball-cock spigot instead of a rubber stopper, and a permanent gold-plate-on-nylon fine mesh strainer instead of that nylon scrubby filter that comes with it, at the very least.)</p>

<p>I wonder if you couldn't put moistened coffee in the damp cheesecloth, tie it off, and immerse the whole thing? Then you could remove the mass of grounds in one go. </p>

<p>Also, I have learned a new word -- supernatant -- for which I thank you.</p>

<p>The proportions I'm using are 9 (8 oz) cups of water to 1 pound of coffee, although I find you have to adjust that for dark roasts, which weigh less per unit volume. I'm having tremendous fun with it right now, but I suspect that with time I'll go with different preparations for different purposes. </p>

<p>OTOH, my sister's Christmas present was one of those hideous coffee-pod one-cup brewers, which are an abomination, even worse than cartridge razors.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007 12:20 AM by Howard Peirce&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166459</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166459</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 00:20:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #113 from Julie L.</title>
         <description>comment from Julie L. on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I wonder if you couldn't put moistened coffee in the damp cheesecloth, tie it off, and immerse the whole thing? Then you could remove the mass of grounds in one go.</i></p>

<p>I think tying off the cheesecloth might compact the grounds enough to significantly reduce their combined surface area. Not that there's all that much convection going on overnight anyway, but it probably needs all the help it can get-- it's a deliberately inefficient extraction, after all.</p>

<p>A preliminary tie-off presents other problems as well-- you'll either have to scrape a nasty, gritty, messy pile of damp coffee grounds onto the also-damp cheesecloth to start with and then wrestle the entire mass into your container of choice, or neatly tie off the dry grounds inside dry cheesecloth and then hope the cheesecloth doesn't rupture as the grounds expand from liquid absorption.</p>

<p>I suppose the natural extension of this method would be to line the pitcher/bowl with cheesecloth before adding anything else, so the grounds are loose and swimmy overnight but in the morning, the cloth's sides can be gathered together to pull out the grounds in one go. (Potential drawbacks: capillary action wicking up liquid and dripping it out around the edges, or losing the edges down inside the container.)</p>

<p>However, you still end up with a final phase of waiting for the grounds to finish dripping out. It's <a href="http://www.canningpantry.com/jellystrainer.html" rel="nofollow">jelly bags</a> for me; they're fine-meshed, washable, and have cute little tripod stands. (Illustrative link mainly chosen on the basis of Google topness; I bought mine from Orchard Supply Hardware.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007 12:47 AM by Julie L.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166460</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166460</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 00:47:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #114 from Larry Brennan</title>
         <description>comment from Larry Brennan on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Madison Guy @ 23 & Katharine @ 42 - I bought a coffee in that very Starbucks. It's really odd seeing such a thing in the middle of the Forbidden City. I have the receipt in my photo album because it really does have "Forbidden Starbucks" printed on it.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  1:04 AM by Larry Brennan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166462</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166462</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 01:04:40 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #115 from Howard Peirce</title>
         <description>comment from Howard Peirce on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg (87): Others may have different views, but here's my take. Jeb was the great hope of the Bush dynasty. George junior was not originally being groomed for the presidency -- he was the black sheep up until Neal started screwing those Bangkok hookers -- but one thing led to another in 1999, and meanwhile Jeb was ensconced in Florida. When Jeb lost the gubernatorial election in 2006, it essentially meant the end of the Bush dynasty. Bush was crying because because Jeb, the good son, accepted defeat with equanimity, while George Jr, in the White House on his second term, is a petty, vindictive father-hating prick and the most reviled president in the history of the Republic. G. H. W. Bush's tears were his public recognition that the House of Bush is done for. That's the tragedy. </p>

<p>The farce came when the audience started to applaud Bush's emotional outburst -- farce because he wasn't crying out of pride for Jeb, he was crying for himself out of self-pity. Jeb stepping onstage to say, "There, there, it's all right," took the whole thing right off into the realm of abject humiliation. I found it painful to watch, yet fascinating, like the fourth act of a classic tragedy. It's like something out of Aeschylus*.</p>

<p>But that's just my take on it, perhaps because I'm trying to fit it all into a dramatic narrative that ends with W. in a psych ward in chemical restraints.</p>

<p>* I know we're all SF fans here, but I googled "Atreides" to get the correct name and spelling of Aeschylus, and all I got were references to <i>Dune.</i> I find that disheartening. Also, everyone should read Aeschylus's House of Atreides trilogy. And then post about it, with lots of links.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  1:51 AM by Howard Peirce&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166465</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166465</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 01:51:50 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #116 from Howard Peirce</title>
         <description>comment from Howard Peirce on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry. The House of Atreides trilogy is more properly known as <i>The Oresteia.</i> Stupid, unreliable memory. Everyone go read it. You'll never misuse "Cassandra" again.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  1:57 AM by Howard Peirce&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166466</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166466</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 01:57:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #117 from MD²</title>
         <description>comment from MD² on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Howard Peirce & Julie L.(100-112-113)</p>

<p>I was actually contemplating experimentations with a French press to try out that process.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  2:12 AM by MD²&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166467</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166467</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 02:12:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #118 from Brooks Moses</title>
         <description>comment from Brooks Moses on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie L. (#113): It's not just actual surface area as such; having the grounds closely packed together means that it only requires extracting a little stuff to get the water next to the grounds up to a fairly high concentration, and that inhibits further extraction while the stuff slowly diffuses out into the outside water.  You end up with an "effective surface area" that's less than the actual wetted surface area of the coffee grounds.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  2:37 AM by Brooks Moses&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166468</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166468</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 02:37:36 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #119 from abi</title>
         <description>comment from abi on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I go to bed feeling wrecked, and wake up to this?  Here is a tripartite answer, three forms of the same poem:</p>

<p>The two contenders joust with poetry:<br />
A caffeine-fueled SF sonnet slam.<br />
Fragano takes the part of honest tea<br />
And Will is coffee's advocate.  Hot damn!<br />
The verses fly.  Will has the grounds to show<br />
His drink produces forceful, urgent verse.<br />
Fragano's meditative sonnets go<br />
To prove that tea makes poets none the worse.<br />
Now me, I drink them both, but take up arms<br />
Against the two as well, if they're not bought<br />
From sources where the people on the farms<br />
That grow them are rewarded as they ought.<br />
So write your verse and drink your drinks, you two,<br />
But just make sure it's Fairtrade when you brew.</p>

<p>- o0o -</p>

<p>You're talking of coffees and teas<br />
And missing the wood for the trees.<br />
Whichever you choose,<br />
The growers still lose<br />
So make it all Fairtrade, guys, please?</p>

<p>- o0o -</p>

<p>Both coffee and tea<br />
Taste much better without the<br />
Salt of tears added.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  4:44 AM by abi&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166471</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166471</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 04:44:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #120 from David Goldfarb</title>
         <description>comment from David Goldfarb on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've recently discovered that my sonic screwdriver does a dandy job of charging up anything glow-in-the-dark.  One second's application gets a nice bright glow.</p>

<p>Howard Peirce@115:  I read the <i>Oresteia</i> in translation some years ago, and I agree:  wonderful stuff.  I plan to read it in the original sometime moderately soon.  (Not this year, though; this year is for the <i>Odyssey</i>.)  Also excellent:  Euripides' <i>The Bacchae</i>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  4:58 AM by David Goldfarb&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166473</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166473</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 04:58:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #121 from abi</title>
         <description>comment from abi on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The eighth line of the sonnet above should be:</p>

<p>"To prove that tea leaves poets none the worse."</p>

<p>Time for more of one or t'other to get the brain going.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  5:07 AM by abi&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166474</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166474</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 05:07:40 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #122 from Awesome Lies</title>
         <description>comment from Awesome Lies on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brooks Moses@99 - as it happens, I was reading our host's <a href="http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/005370.html#005370" rel="nofollow">musings on linotype machines just the other day.</a> I got to the bit about them squirting hot lead everywhere and suddenly felt very grateful to the inventors of Quark XPress and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raster_image_processor" rel="nofollow">RIP processors</a>. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  5:41 AM by Awesome Lies&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166475</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166475</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 05:41:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #123 from Paul Herzberg</title>
         <description>comment from Paul Herzberg on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I can be presumptuous enough to add another blues, this one is an adaptation of one of mine called Vanilla Pudding Blues (which was just a lumping together of a string of clichés, but never mind) and the move from something you eat to something you drink robs it of some of the obviousness...</p>

<p><br />
Sweet Black Coffee Blues</p>

<p>I can drink it in the morning<br />
I can drink it late at night<br />
Your sweet black coffee, baby<br />
Sure does taste just right</p>

<p>I can drink it in the bathtub<br />
I can drink it on the Stairs<br />
Your sweet black coffee, baby<br />
I can drink it anywhere</p>

<p>Sweet Black Coffee, Sweet Black Coffee <br />
I got the Sweet Black Coffee Blues</p>

<p>Well, you can keep your herbal teas<br />
Your milkshakes and colas, too<br />
The only beverage that I'll drink<br />
Is sweet black coffee made by you</p>

<p>Well I like to sip it real slow<br />
And roll it round my tongue<br />
And when I've finished drinking<br />
I've got to get me another one</p>

<p>Sweet Black Coffee, Sweet Black Coffee <br />
I got the Sweet Black Coffee Blues</p>

<p><br />
Your sweet black coffee, baby<br />
It don't taste like any other<br />
Even though you know I know<br />
You got that recipe from your mother</p>

<p>Well I can drink it from a mug<br />
Well I can drink it from a cup<br />
I'll drink it off your body, baby<br />
That coffee really gets me up</p>

<p>Sweet Black Coffee, Sweet Black Coffee <br />
I got the Sweet Black Coffee Blues</p>

<p><br />
You can cover it in whipped cream, baby<br />
You can sprinkle on Chocolate too<br />
I'll just spoon them out the way<br />
To get to the coffee made by you</p>

<p>I drink it all the time girl<br />
I can drink it by the pot<br />
But if you ever run out, baby<br />
I'll find someone else who serves it hot</p>

<p>Sweet Black Coffee, Sweet Black Coffee <br />
I got the Sweet Black Coffee Blues</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  5:48 AM by Paul Herzberg&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166477</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166477</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 05:48:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #124 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As tea is but glorified hot water,<br />
Coffee must be had, for real programmers.</p>

<p>I'll say, for me<br />
I blame abi<br />
For this converse<br />
Only in verse</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  5:56 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166478</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166478</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 05:56:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #125 from ajay</title>
         <description>comment from ajay on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"A mathematician is a machine for turning coffee into theorems" -- Paul Erdos.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  6:33 AM by ajay&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166479</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166479</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 06:33:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #126 from abi</title>
         <description>comment from abi on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An overly dramatic pantoum:</p>

<p>Your coffee can open your eyes.<br />
The finest Arabica bean,<br />
Is grown where the morning sun lies<br />
On mountainsides covered in green.</p>

<p>The finest Arabica bean,<br />
The delicate Indian leaf,<br />
On mountainsides covered in green<br />
Is grown amid hunger and grief.</p>

<p>The delicate Indian leaf<br />
To go in your afternoon tea<br />
Is grown among hunger and grief<br />
Of people whom you never see.</p>

<p>To go in your afternoon tea:<br />
That dollop of pain in your drink<br />
Of people whom you never see.<br />
Before you enjoy, stop to think.</p>

<p>That dollop of pain in your drink<br />
Is grown where the morning sun lies.<br />
Before you enjoy, stop to think.<br />
Your coffee can open your eyes.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  7:58 AM by abi&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166483</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166483</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 07:58:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #127 from ajay</title>
         <description>comment from ajay on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Genius, abi. You should write this stuff down. Er, you know what I mean.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  8:09 AM by ajay&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166484</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166484</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:09:04 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #128 from abi</title>
         <description>comment from abi on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ajay @127</strong><br />
Thanks.  I think I did better with my first pantoun than I did with my first villanelle.</p>

<p>I confess - I have actually sent three SF sonnets to Asimov's.  I blame Serge and Fragano.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  8:13 AM by abi&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166486</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166486</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:13:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #129 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>abi @ 129... <i>I blame Serge and Fragano.</i></p>

<p>Your Muse shall now pretend <br />
You didn't bite its hand.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  8:45 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166487</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166487</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:45:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #130 from abi</title>
         <description>comment from abi on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My muse's hand is safe, to date,<br />
Despite the statements he has made<br />
I bite, by preference, chocolate<br />
And that, when possible, Fairtrade.</p>

<p>(Just keepin' the theme)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  9:20 AM by abi&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166488</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166488</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 09:20:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #131 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which reminds me, abi, that I should soon have my first cup of instant cocoa, but first, a cup of joe. (No joementum. Too bitter.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  9:25 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166490</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166490</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 09:25:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #132 from Faren Miller</title>
         <description>comment from Faren Miller on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'll probably sound like a fussy old grouch for mentioning this, but during each of our last two cold winters I've made the mistake of downing huge amounts of coffee and tea -- until their diuretic effect diluted my prescription medicine and some very unwanted symptoms came back. (My coffee is decaf, so tea was probably the main culprit. And I don't think multiple coffee yogurts were to blame either, since I max out at three on days when I really crave the stuff.)</p>

<p>Maybe a switch to decaf tea would help. Till then, I'm cutting down on the stuff. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007 10:00 AM by Faren Miller&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166493</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166493</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:00:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #133 from Anticorium</title>
         <description>comment from Anticorium on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the middle of all this, I commend to you t<a href="http://www.avclub.com/content/node/57484?utm_source=newswire&utm_medium=RSS" rel="nofollow">an Onion AV Newswire post about Simon & Shuster's online-vote experiment</a>.</p>

<p>Even with so few comments, a spot-the-cliche drinking game would still be very, very dangerous. Put down the wine bottle before reading, lest ye be tempted.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007 10:01 AM by Anticorium&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166494</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166494</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:01:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #134 from abi</title>
         <description>comment from abi on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, what I've been drinking rather a lot of lately is rooibos tea.  I contracted the habit while working with a South African about 7 years ago, managed to kick it for a while, and then found a box of rooibos and orange in the local Lidl.  So I'm back into it.</p>

<p>(No, it's not addictive.  I just like the taste.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007 10:07 AM by abi&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166495</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166495</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:07:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #135 from Richard Brandt</title>
         <description>comment from Richard Brandt on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So...I wasn't <a href="http://richardthe23rd.livejournal.com/2007/01/13/" rel="nofollow">the only one</a> listening to Lucille Bogan this week?</p>

<p>I suspect Margaret Carter didn't really need grease in her frying pan, either.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007 10:14 AM by Richard Brandt&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166496</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166496</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:14:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #136 from Chris Clarke</title>
         <description>comment from Chris Clarke on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmmm rooibos.</p>

<p>Sorry. Carry on with the <em>substantive</em> commenting.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007 11:31 AM by Chris Clarke&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166502</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166502</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:31:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #137 from Chris</title>
         <description>comment from Chris on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could never really get into Civ3.  It felt like someone had read too much Jared Diamond, designed it and forgotten that they were supposed to be making a game, not a simulator.</p>

<p>In a game, y'see, the players often prefer to believe that their actions have some influence on the outcome of said game.</p>

<p>It may very well be that in actual history, the Europeans were doomed to succeed no matter how they tried, and people who lived on other continents were doomed to fail for pretty much the reasons Diamond sets out (or, then again, it may not); but that doesn't make for a very interesting game.</p>

<p>All of which is just to say that if you're in the Iron Age with no iron, and no horses either, you are unlikely to survive long enough to discover that you also haven't got any saltpeter.  (The idea of needing a particular technology in order to know what a horse is is quite ridiculous in its own right, of course.)  On the other hand if you have those resources and your opponent has not, winning provides all the enjoyment and feeling of accomplishment that comes from beating up a 3-year-old.  Overall this is a large step backwards in gameplay and enjoyability from Civ 2, where the influence of geography was much more moderate compared to the importance of players' actions.</p>

<p>In order to avoid worsening your addiction, I shall not mention Dominions 3: The Awakening, a game far more addictive than any version of Civ could ever be.</p>

<p>Oops.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007 11:34 AM by Chris&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166503</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166503</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:34:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #138 from Malthus</title>
         <description>comment from Malthus on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Juan Valdez's<br />
defunct<br />
who used to<br />
ride a dirtrough-brown<br />
burro<br />
and drink onetwothreefourfive cupsjustlikethat<br />
Jesus<br />
he was a bitter man<br />
and what i want to know is<br />
how do you like your redeyed boy<br />
Mister Coffee</p>

<p>-- with apologies to e. e. cummings</p>

<p><br />
Also, I'd heard the eggshell trick for disembittering* coffee elsewhere. Does anyone here know if and how it works?</p>

<p><br />
* It's a perfectly cromulent word.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007 11:46 AM by Malthus&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166504</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166504</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:46:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #139 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>abi...how to put this.  I've gone from thinking of you as a jolly internet pal to being quite intimidated and impressed.  I don't dare contribute my humble efforts lest comparison be invited.  </p>

<p>Foolish, I know.  But the last poetic attempt I made was an innocent little couplet, which touched off a veritable firestorm of couplet-capping; I may have brought the kindling, but you lit the flame, and whole threads were consumed.</p>

<p>Should we ever meet, I have no doubt I should feel moved to follow R. A. MacAvoy's instructions for a full prostration at your feet.</p>

<p>Unless we're, like, in a parking lot or something.  Then I'll wait until we're inside.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007 11:50 AM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166505</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166505</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:50:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #140 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MacAvoy herself suggested that you should prostrate yourself at abi's feet, Xopher?</p>

<p>All hail abi!!!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007 11:58 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166507</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166507</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:58:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #141 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>All hail abi!!!</i></p>

<p>So say we all!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007 12:00 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166509</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166509</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:00:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #142 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will A #109:</p>

<p><i>I plan my next class on good Master Kong<br />
with the fine aid of a large mug of tea,<br />
my thought and planning had been all at sea<br />
but with the warming cup I find my song.<br />
Had it been coffee, all would have gone wrong<br />
my mind would have been hasty and not free,<br />
out of my thinking would have come no tree<br />
of knowledge, shaped perfect and strong.<br />
The warming spirit that the soul revives,<br />
that comes to us from out the mystic East,<br />
gives us assurance to both think and act;<br />
from its kind impulse all that's good derives,<br />
it is the guardian sprite at every feast<br />
and leads us always towards truth and fact.</i></p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007 12:04 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166511</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166511</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:04:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #143 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abi #119:</p>

<p></p>

<p><i>Abi, when it is time for you to bake<br />
a little something for some celebration<br />
remember, if you will, the situation<br />
of those who grew the spices that you take.<br />
Those who love fair trade often only make<br />
their choices about drinks, no cerebration<br />
is needed, yet I have the strange sensation<br />
they don't think of what goes in the cake.<br />
The hard, dull work of reaping all that spice<br />
done for low wages (or, in my case, none)<br />
gets no attention from the cognoscenti;<br />
they don't think of the effort or the price<br />
of all that sweating under tropic sun;<br />
those who earn so little should get plenty.</i></p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007 12:20 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166512</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166512</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:20:01 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #144 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abi's work puts all others in the shade. I'm always amazed and impressed, and I hope the editors of <i>Asimov's</i> are too.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007 12:26 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166513</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166513</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:26:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #145 from Dana</title>
         <description>comment from Dana on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thoughts on HBO buying the rights to George Martin's Song of Fire and Ice Series? I have to say I'm excited.</p>

<p>http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117957532.html?categoryid=14&cs=1</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007 12:29 PM by Dana&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166515</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166515</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:29:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #146 from Jae Walker</title>
         <description>comment from Jae Walker on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah... coffee!</p>

<p>If it ain't good enough to drink black, it ain't good enough to drink!</p>

<p>Me</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007 12:48 PM by Jae Walker&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166517</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166517</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:48:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #147 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trying to get SF and tea into a ballade.</p>

<p><i><br />
we travel in our minds beyond the stars<br />
the planets circle fast in the mind's eye<br />
in our imaginations we see the scars<br />
of damage made by beings above the sky<br />
of this we're certain for we cannot try<br />
with our bare hands to keep our planet free<br />
we sip from our small cup we wail and cry<br />
and then we get our strength from honest tea<br />
<i><br />
we've sailed a distance seen the ghostly spars<br />
of flying dutchman that is sure no lie<br />
we've watched the light of that red planet mars<br />
and wondered if we could in its air fly<br />
the dreams of burroughs those we cannot buy<br />
with barnes or robinson we might just agree<br />
someone will get there we're certain by and by<br />
and then we get our strength from honest tea<br />
<i><br />
each day the lone commuters in their cars<br />
think as they watch the same old roads go by<br />
of those who're telling stories in the bars<br />
and trying to see through ray bradbury's eye<br />
the martian stories as if from on high<br />
from cluttered minds they now clear the debris<br />
to mars they'll go they know the reason why<br />
and then we get our strength from honest tea<br />
<i><br />
prince or princess when you the future spy<br />
from your high place in the great tall world-tree<br />
with our aspirations you will soon ally<br />
and then we get our strength from honest tea</i></i></i></i></p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007 12:56 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166518</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166518</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:56:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #148 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fragano @ 147... Metaphorical hats off.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007 12:59 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166519</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166519</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:59:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #149 from Sandy B.</title>
         <description>comment from Sandy B. on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>In order to avoid worsening your addiction, I shall not mention Dominions 3: The Awakening, a game far more addictive than any version of Civ could ever be.</i></p>

<p>Hail, fellow spirit!</p>

<p>... I find that I run into attention span deficit when the midgame comes around. </p>

<p>I have to say that a game where the spider-riding prophet of Me dies of a disease, AND THE SPIDER KEEPS ON PREACHING, is absolutely endearing. </p>

<p>That game, I got into a senseless war with Jotunheim while our neighbors grew large and crushed us... alas. </p>

<p>I am doing much better with my technologically clever Dryads and Minotaurs. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  1:04 PM by Sandy B.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166521</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166521</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:04:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #150 from Dave Bell</title>
         <description>comment from Dave Bell on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's two months since Mostafa Tabatabainejad was tasered by UCLA Police.</p>

<p>According to the report in <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/01/18/tasered_student_sues/" rel="nofollow">The Register</a>, he is now suing the University, the Campus Police, and the two Police Officers involved.</p>

<p>But get this:</p>

<p><i>UCLA's acting chancellor Norm Abrams said the university was "pursuing an independent investigation along with an internal campus police department probe". He said in a statement: "Shortly after the incident, I urged everyone not to rush to judgment and to let the investigations take their course. We regret that Mostafa Tabatabainejad has filed a lawsuit at this time."</i></p>

<p>It's been two months. I bet you really do regret this is going to be settled in court.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  1:13 PM by Dave Bell&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166522</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166522</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:13:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #151 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I once saw a trio of monkey statuettes that did an interesting variation on the familiar see/hear/say-no-evil theme. This trio used China's Monkey King, where the one with a hand on his eyes was peeking between his fingers, the other had a hand slightly cupped over one ear, and the third was sticking his tongue thru his fingers.</p>

<p>Does this sound familiar? Have you ever seen anything like that? Or did I imagine this in a dream?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  1:14 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166523</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166523</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:14:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #152 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge # 148: Thank you!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  1:38 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166525</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166525</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:38:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #153 from Tania</title>
         <description>comment from Tania on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge, I know I've seen it. I don't recall where, though.<br />
Maybe a cartoon?</p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  1:40 PM by Tania&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166526</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166526</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:40:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #154 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might have been a cartoon, Tania. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  1:42 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166527</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166527</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:42:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #155 from abi</title>
         <description>comment from abi on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Xopher @139</strong></p>

<p>1.  <em>quite intimidated and impressed</em><br />
Now you know how I feel about your puns.</p>

<p>2.  <em>I don't dare contribute my humble efforts lest comparison be invited.</em><br />
I just wrote a whole <a href="http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008118.html#166399" rel="nofollow">screed </a>on being intimidated by the phantoms of other people.  Short version: dare.</p>

<p>3.  <em>the last poetic attempt I made was an innocent little couplet, which touched off a veritable firestorm of couplet-capping; I may have brought the kindling, but you lit the flame, and whole threads were consumed.</em><br />
That's either both your doing and mine, or neither.  I can't see any construction that leaves you in the clear and me somehow taking credit.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  1:42 PM by abi&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166528</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166528</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:42:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #156 from abi</title>
         <description>comment from abi on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Fragano</strong>:</p>

<p>I rarely cook with spices - I'm more of a chocolate baker.  (Yes, fairtrade).  It's hard to obtain fairtrade sugar, which I would like to.</p>

<p>Overall, I reckon that every pound I spend on ethical products is better than spending it on unethical.  I can't get all good stuff, but all the goods stuff I get helps.  And the drinks are where I can easily source them (all the major supermarkets carry them).</p>

<p>And that is a very good ballad you've got there, after a sequence of very entertaining sonnets.  You guys set the bar high for late entrants!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  1:49 PM by abi&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166529</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166529</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:49:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #157 from Chryss</title>
         <description>comment from Chryss on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: "expresso"</p>

<p>The only person I know that says "expresso," besides the ENTIRE FREAKING STATE OF OHIO, is Sandra Lee of the dreadful "Semi-Homemade with Sandra Lee," aka TheCrazyDrunkLady. </p>

<p>Like nails on a chalkboard every. Single. Time. Yet, I cannot look away...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  1:57 PM by Chryss&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166530</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166530</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:57:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #158 from Lori Coulson</title>
         <description>comment from Lori Coulson on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fragano -- have you ever tried Lapsang Souchong? It's one of my favorites!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  2:03 PM by Lori Coulson&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166531</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166531</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:03:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #159 from P J Evans</title>
         <description>comment from P J Evans on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lori @ 158</p>

<p>It makes a very nice sun tea - less smoky, just enough to be interesting.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  2:18 PM by P J Evans&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166532</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166532</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:18:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #160 from joann</title>
         <description>comment from joann on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lapsong Souchong is my foggy-day tea, because of some weird association I have between it and San Francisco. Hmm, it's foggy out ...<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  2:23 PM by joann&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166534</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166534</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:23:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #161 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>abi #156: I agree with you on ethical purchasing. Farmers and farm-workers in the developing world get a really raw deal.</p>

<p>Thanks for the compliments. I am always in awe of your work (I haven't yet dared a pantoum, and am not sure I could carry one off).</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  2:25 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166536</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166536</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:25:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #162 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lori Coulson #158: Yes, I have. My preference, though, is for Earl Grey.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  2:27 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166538</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166538</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:27:34 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #163 from abi</title>
         <description>comment from abi on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Fragano @161</strong><br />
I actually found a pantoum easier than a villanelle, which surprised me.  I think it's that you only re-use each line once, so it only has to serve two stanzas.  It's a great way to progress slowly through a narrative.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  2:30 PM by abi&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166539</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166539</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:30:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #164 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>abi #163: I understand. One day, I'm sure, I'll over come my fear.</p>

<p>I've tried a couple of different things lately, like  <a href="http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/46587292/?qo=27&q=by%3Afledgist&qh=sort%3Atime+-in%3Ascraps" rel="nofollow"> this</a>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  2:52 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166544</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166544</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:52:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #165 from Dave Bell</title>
         <description>comment from Dave Bell on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166536" rel="nofollow">Fragano</a>, it's not so good if you're a farmer in the developed world. The whole system seems rigged to give the end user cheap food</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  3:14 PM by Dave Bell&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166546</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166546</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:14:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #166 from Fade Manley</title>
         <description>comment from Fade Manley on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the topic of rooibos, now that it's come up: I've recently grown fond of loose teas and invested in a rooibos sampler, which is overall proving quite tasty. But even after swappin to a very fine-mesh single-cup filter, the rooibos grains inevitably get into the tea, because the darn things are small and thin enough to slip through just about anything. How do other rooibos-drinkers keep that stuff out of their tea? If it comes down to the choice, I'll live with a few grains over swapping to tea bags, but I have the faint hope that there's a Clever Trick everyone else knows which I simply haven't discovered yet.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  3:23 PM by Fade Manley&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166552</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166552</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:23:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #167 from Diatryma</title>
         <description>comment from Diatryma on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if there's a relationship between the Open Thread opening post and the amount of time (or posts) it takes to turn into verse combat.  </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  3:26 PM by Diatryma&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166553</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166553</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:26:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #168 from Madeline Kelly</title>
         <description>comment from Madeline Kelly on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the spirit of openthreadness, I'd like to offer <a href="http://www.isle-of-man.com/manxnotebook/fulltext/am1924/index.htm" rel="nofollow">this</a>. 'This' being the 1924 dictionary of Manx dialect -- extremely entertaining when you read the sample sentences out loud:  <i>He's got no Manx ; he's on’y got the Baarl, and fine he can twiss it on his tongue.</i></p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  3:44 PM by Madeline Kelly&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166556</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166556</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:44:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #169 from Adrian</title>
         <description>comment from Adrian on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave Bell (150), thanks for bringing up the UCLA taser incident again.  It's important, and I know how easy it is to forget things in the constant rush of fresh oncoming outrage.  I'm glad the student is suing...I just hope the court makes the situation more open instead of trying to impose gag orders all around.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  5:29 PM by Adrian&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166565</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166565</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:29:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #170 from Tania</title>
         <description>comment from Tania on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diatryma - I think of it more as "Bardic Challenge" than "Verse Combat." Other options that spring to mind </p>

<p>Stanzaic Standoff<br />
Doggerel Dare<br />
Prose Provocation<br />
Rhyme Trials</p>

<p>I'll quit now. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  6:43 PM by Tania&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166574</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166574</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 18:43:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #171 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave Bell #165: Depends where you are in the developed world. American farmers have been the beneficiaries of some amazing subsidies. And, over in the EU,the CAP seems to have made French farmers happy. (Of course, as two friends* of mine once wrote, farmers tend to be pessimists convinced they'd go under if bank managers didn't have soft hearts.)**</p>

<p></p>

<p>* Strictly speaking, one friend and one acquaintance.</p>

<p>** John Morris (John Hearne & Morris Cargill), <i>Fever Grass</i>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  7:01 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166575</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166575</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:01:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #172 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fade Manley #166: I find that this <a href="http://www.teavana.com/Swiss+Gold+Tea+Ball/keywords=tea+ball/page_no=1/edp_no=4897/shop.axd/ProductDetails" rel="nofollow"> item</a> works perfectly.</p>

<p>I get it from teavana (www.teavana.com, if you don't have a store nearby), which is where I get loose rooibos tea (and many other teas, I hasten to add).</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  7:07 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166576</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166576</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:07:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #173 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166465" rel="nofollow">#115:</a> Howard, thanks. I couldn't stomach watching the video. I tried three times, got to the point where Senior starts weeping and wanted to vomit chunks. I can't stand him to begin with. And seeing him crying just made want to hurl. THanks for 'splaining it to me. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  7:38 PM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166581</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166581</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:38:40 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #174 from Will A</title>
         <description>comment from Will A on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'll just toss off a couple lines in blank<br />
To say the poet abi is <i>sublime</i>;<br />
May all submitted poetry see print.<br />
Likewise I here salute Fragano's verse<br />
(Especially in hundred-forty-seven,<br />
A tea-soaked ballade of ethereal void.)<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  7:43 PM by Will A&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166582</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166582</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:43:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #175 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of tea and coffee it's not hard to rhyme<br />
but blank verse is a challenge i'll not take<br />
instead to keep things at the very prime<br />
i'll wander off and beside some peaceful lake<br />
will contemplate the consequence of crime<br />
as long as everything is fine and jake<br />
and in ottava rima will write verse<br />
that's clear direct and not so very terse</p>

<p>will a's convinced that coffee is the best<br />
and i'm an advocate of finest tea<br />
abi for fair trade has made good protest<br />
yet from the word-fight she will hardly flee<br />
we enter into combat with great zest<br />
for in this place such things can come to be<br />
it's been a pleasant way to spend some time<br />
engaged in a fun contest all in rhyme</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007  7:56 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166583</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166583</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:56:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #176 from CHip</title>
         <description>comment from CHip on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We went to see <i>A Night at the Museum</i> (slow, saccharine, and unbelievable, IMO), before which there was a trailer which after rather too long I identified as "Mimsy Were the Borogoves" -- only to see a few seconds later that they were calling it <a href="http://www.mimzy.com/" rel="nofollow"><i>The Last Mimzy</i></a>, apparently turning the abstract schooling ]toy[ into a stuffed rabbit (the aforementioned Mimzy). Does anyone know a reason to expect this will be any good? (I vaguely remember hearing, possibly here, that the Padgett was being filmed, but no details.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007 11:05 PM by CHip&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166594</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166594</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 23:05:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #177 from fliptopjay</title>
         <description>comment from fliptopjay on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sonnets to the left of them,<br />
Sonnets to the right of them,<br />
Into the Making of Light<br />
Wrote the Sensawonder'd...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007 11:12 PM by fliptopjay&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166596</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166596</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 23:12:54 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #178 from Marilee</title>
         <description>comment from Marilee on 18.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of drinks to start the morning with, I saw a new ad today on TV for Sunsweet PlumSmart.  They're clearly afraid of calling it <a href="http://www.plumsmart.net/plumsmart_solution.html" rel="nofollow">prune juice</a>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 18, 2007 11:36 PM by Marilee&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166599</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166599</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 23:36:36 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #179 from David Goldfarb</title>
         <description>comment from David Goldfarb on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re HBO and the Martin books:  I'd be more optimistic that they'd do a good job if they demonstrated attention to detail...such as, y'know, getting the name of the series right.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007  3:43 AM by David Goldfarb&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166608</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166608</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 03:43:01 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #180 from Adrian</title>
         <description>comment from Adrian on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fade Manley (#166), asked about how to keep small rooibos leaves in tea filters.  I use t-sacs, tea bags I fill with loose tea as needed.  Several of the local tea stores sell them.  Here's a picture.  http://shop.jaxteacompany.com/index.php?cPath=63_65&gclid=CIGBjYWQ7IkCFRyVFQodBlayKA</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007  4:07 AM by Adrian&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166610</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166610</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 04:07:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #181 from Peter Erwin</title>
         <description>comment from Peter Erwin on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chryss said (#157):<br />
<i>The only person I know that says "expresso," besides the ENTIRE FREAKING STATE OF OHIO, is Sandra Lee of the dreadful "Semi-Homemade with Sandra Lee," aka TheCrazyDrunkLady.</i></p>

<p>Well, Mark Knopfler used "expresso" back in 1980 (viz., the song "Expresso Love" from the Dire Straits album "Making Movies").<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007  5:03 AM by Peter Erwin&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166615</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166615</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 05:03:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #182 from Faren Miller</title>
         <description>comment from Faren Miller on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tania (#170) -- there's also parodies of genuine poems/poets, like the cummings example above. Those add to the fun. (No attempts myself this time, since it's review-writing week and I also have a lot of tennis to watch.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007  9:27 AM by Faren Miller&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166640</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166640</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:27:54 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #183 from Meg Thornton</title>
         <description>comment from Meg Thornton on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I drink tea.  To the point where I will go through two or three small pots of it per day (I have two small glass teapots with mesh filters, which I use to make my own tea at home).  I'm also fussy about the tea I drink these days - Fairtrade tea all the way (once I've used up the existing Twinings and Liptons, that is).  I prefer tealeaves to teabags, so I can't be a true Marxist [1], and I'm fond of scented teas (which is why I have so much Twinings, and why I'm glad to find the Clipper brand Fairtrade tea leaves in Earl Grey available in my district)</p>

<p>I love the smell of coffee, but it doesn't like me.  About the only coffe-like thing I can drink is by a mob called Jarrah - they do a sort of instant coffee mix thing where they take the sweepings which escaped the notice of International Roast, and mix them with flavour extract, powdered milk and powdered sugar, so that you have a "just add hot water" version of bad coffee.  There are two flavours I like - the Vienna (coffee and cinnamon) and the Barvarian (coffee and hazelnut), and in both cases they're only palatable if I add another 2 teaspoons of sugar to the mug.  These aren't Fairtrade (but then again, they're hardly coffee either, and I don't plan on buying any more after I've used up the current lot) which is a pity.</p>

<p>If I go into somewhere like Starbucks or Gloria Jean's, I'm more likely to order a hot chocolate (in winter) or a chocolate slushywhatsit (in summer).  At least those they can't stuff up too much.  I've never yet figured out how they managed to ruin a perfectly simple cup of black tea, but somehow, they do it.  Possibly because they wait for the teabag to leap out, rather than removing it prior to the tannin levels reaching leather preservation point.  However, at home I have fairtrade Hot Chocolate mix (Green and Black's brand - keep an eye out for it) and I've also purchased some Fairtrade cocoa.</p>

<p>For Fairtrade tea, coffee and cocoa, if you're Australian, look either in an IGA supermarket (they tend to have a wider range than the two big chains - even in the ones which used to be Mum and Dad corner shops) or in the Oxfam shop(s) in your city.  Failing that, there's a number of the Fairtrade suppliers which have internet sites, which means you've a chance of ordering it direct from the suppliers, and avoiding another link in the pricing chain.</p>

<p>[1] True Marxists use teabags, because all proper tea is theft.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007  9:54 AM by Meg Thornton&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166643</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166643</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:54:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #184 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meg Thornton #183: Shouldn't it be true anarchists use teabags &c. After all, it wasn't Marx who said that property is theft, but Proudhon who declared that 'la proprieté c'est le vol'. (Or was it, 'c'est le vol-au-vent'?)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007 10:19 AM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166645</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166645</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:19:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #185 from Debra Doyle</title>
         <description>comment from Debra Doyle on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wake up!  Coffee in cups&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;at the cusp of the morning,<br />
hot and steaming&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;in the hands of workers<br />
awaiting in cubicles&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;and windowless offices<br />
the mid-day moment,&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;their time for meals<br />
and personal errands&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;and other business<br />
best not engaged in&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;under the boss's eye --<br />
coffee alone it is&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;that carries them onward.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007 10:39 AM by Debra Doyle&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166647</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166647</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:39:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #186 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coffee in rowlock rhythm?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007 10:47 AM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166649</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166649</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:47:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #187 from Jakob</title>
         <description>comment from Jakob on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meg Thornton #183: Coffee shop tea is generally awful because either: </p>

<p>- The water isn't boiling<br />
- The water is boiling, but it has been so since the machine was switched on at 5am this morning.</p>

<p>Neither of which make for a good cuppa. Which reminds me - must go and put the kettle on...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007 10:55 AM by Jakob&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166650</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166650</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:55:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #188 from P J Evans</title>
         <description>comment from P J Evans on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The coffee places I've gotten tea from get the hot water from the espresso machine, put the teabag in (usually) and hand it to you.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007 11:04 AM by P J Evans&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166654</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166654</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:04:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #189 from Sandy B.</title>
         <description>comment from Sandy B. on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fear to enter this, the duel of wits<br />
As underarmed as I believe I am<br />
My tea and coffee lore is scattered bits<br />
My sonnets never form Petrarchian. <br />
I fear to say that I began with tea<br />
That vended from a scary dank machine<br />
It was both functional- and nearly free<br />
And I was sore in need of that caffeine. <br />
From this grim start, I've learned a little taste<br />
But still I take my barbarisms strong<br />
Six hours steeped? But still... I shouldn't waste<br />
The drinking's short, although the brewing's long.<br />
Someday I may refine my lingual sense<br />
Till then, I sip my tea with diffidence. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007 11:17 AM by Sandy B.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166657</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166657</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:17:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #190 from Vicki</title>
         <description>comment from Vicki on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are times that it seems that most of my fellow Americans are intent on proving Proudhon's other assertion, that proper tea is impossible.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007 11:34 AM by Vicki&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166662</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166662</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:34:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #191 from MD²</title>
         <description>comment from MD² on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmmmmmhhh...</p>

<p>Thinking that proper tea is vol-au-vent may be part of the problem.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007 11:46 AM by MD²&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166665</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166665</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:46:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #192 from abi</title>
         <description>comment from abi on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><br />
Assembled masses dance and shout "hooray".<br />
The trumpets blare.  The church bells start to chime,<br />
As we delight in one more gift of rhyme.<br />
Another writer coming out to play!<br />
Like him, we doubt that our poetic voice<br />
Is adequate to match the standards set<br />
By those who came before.  But let's forget<br />
Our worries for the moment, and rejoice.<br />
And as for content, I have drunk such tea<br />
As Sandy has described, with powdered chalk,<br />
(They called it milk.  The lied.)  So now I baulk<br />
When someone offers office drinks to me.<br />
May Sandy write the way he drinks his tea:<br />
With courage, optimism, honesty.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007 11:52 AM by abi&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166668</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166668</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:52:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #193 from joann</title>
         <description>comment from joann on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vicki #190:</p>

<p>Are you thinking of the abomination of the little metallic pot? The one that can't keep water hot? The one that is deliberately designed to spill as much water as possible?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007 12:20 PM by joann&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166671</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166671</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:20:40 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #194 from Tracie</title>
         <description>comment from Tracie on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marilee #178 -- PlumSmart is not actually prune juice, as it's made from fresh plums (and probably some other juices, as it's described as "100% juice", not "100% plum juice". If it's made from dried plums, the FDA says it still must be labeled "prune juice".</p>

<p>Five years ago the California Dried Plum Board (formerly known as the California Prune Board) won a years-long struggle with the FDA to be allowed to label dried plums as dried plums instead of (or in addition to) prunes, although dried plum juice must still be labeled prune juice.</p>

<p>And in related news, California Governor Schwarzenegger has proclaimed January 2007 as <a href="http://ww2.abc13.com/Global/story.asp?S=5917605" rel="nofollow">California Dried Plum Digestive Health Month</a>.  Really.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007 12:45 PM by Tracie&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166676</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166676</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:45:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #195 from Tania</title>
         <description>comment from Tania on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faren @ #182 - True! I have a new appreciation for William Carlos Williams after lurking here. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007 12:47 PM by Tania&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166677</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166677</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:47:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #196 from Malthus</title>
         <description>comment from Malthus on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vicki @190:</p>

<p>I must respectfully disagree. After all, the American Revolution began, more or less, with a demonstration of Proudhon's third assertion: Proper tea is liberty. (In this case, the tea was most properly resting on the bottom of Boston Harbor).</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007  2:16 PM by Malthus&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166685</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166685</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:16:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #197 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>There's no duel here, although we all are wits,<br />
so welcome, Sandy, to the rhyming crowd;<br />
we're raucous, boisterous, always a little loud,<br />
but heaven knows we do what sense permits<br />
and no more than that. We'll occasionally blitz<br />
on tea and coffee, and, frankly, we're allowed<br />
to rhyme our hearts out, keep our heads unbowed<br />
in this place (better than any beaches in St Kitts).<br />
It doesn't matter whether you drink tea,<br />
or even coffee (I'll concede that much),<br />
as that you bring some friendship to the table.<br />
With humour, sense, and kindness we make free<br />
this is a place where we can leave the hutch<br />
(or workplace) and find freedom through the cable.</i></p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007  2:32 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166690</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166690</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:32:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #198 from Kathryn from Sunnyvale</title>
         <description>comment from Kathryn from Sunnyvale on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven't owned a boat for years. (If I've ever owned a "boat"- inflatable and 9-volt powered motor.)</p>

<p>But I'd buy a <a href="http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/01/19/BAGE7NLI001.DTL" rel="nofollow"> spider boat</a>. The 21st century flexes onward.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007  3:05 PM by Kathryn from Sunnyvale&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166696</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166696</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:05:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #199 from Skwid</title>
         <description>comment from Skwid on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David @ 179, I wouldn't be surprised if HBO were going for a simplified title because of <a href="http://www.imdb.com/find?s=all&q=ice+and+fire" rel="nofollow">possible trademark confusions</a>.  Plus, just "Fire" is way punchier and easier to market.</p>

<p>I think they could do a good job of it.</p>

<p>In other TV news, anyone else planning to watch <i>The Dresden Files</i> Sunday?  There's potential there...potential for greatness and potential for travesty.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007  3:41 PM by Skwid&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166702</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166702</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:41:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #200 from Sandy B.</title>
         <description>comment from Sandy B. on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm more confident in my versifying than I am in my taste in tea... but the parallel was too good to leave lying there. (How bad IS it to drop a teabag into cold water and throw it in the microwave for two minutes?) </p>

<p>I'm looking forward to Dresden's premiere<br />
(I've started a good friend on the real books)<br />
One part anxiety, one part <i>suspire</i><br />
They've got a light, fun source to mine for hooks.<br />
Though Bob the skull they gave a human face...<br />
the concepts and the lightness could survive. <br />
But when they freehand draw, instead of trace<br />
The qualities that worked? They may not thrive.<br />
I'm barely fit to judge- I watch TV<br />
For less than fourteen hours in a season<br />
So if even if they get applause from me<br />
It hardly indicates that watchers are a-cleavin'.<br />
So free of guilt, I'll sit and watch and snark<br />
The worst case is, the screen goes quiet and dark. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007  4:49 PM by Sandy B.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166719</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166719</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:49:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #201 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody seen <i>Pan's Labyrinth</i> yet? </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007  4:58 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166721</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166721</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:58:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #202 from Skwid</title>
         <description>comment from Skwid on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice, Sandy B.!  FWIW, I generally heat the water in the microwave first, then let the tea bag steep.  No idea why...just what I've always done.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007  5:02 PM by Skwid&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166722</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166722</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:02:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #203 from Neil Willcox</title>
         <description>comment from Neil Willcox on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skwid @ 199, I think what David is referring to is that the article calls it "A Song of Fire and Ice" when the series is "A Song of Ice and Fire"; however</p>

<p>David @ 179 this is most likely a mistake by the Variety article, rather than by HBO: <a href="http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire/index.php?category=0&id=39592" rel="nofollow">Scifi.com</a> seem to have the correct title (it reads like it's written from the same press release).</p>

<p>People all over GRRM fan boards are shouting all kinds of ill-informed things about this, and since I'm as ill-informed as the next fan, I think I'll go over and do some shouting myself.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007  5:20 PM by Neil Willcox&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166725</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166725</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:20:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #204 from TexAnne</title>
         <description>comment from TexAnne on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of tea and Fluorospheroids* having opinions, I want a better kettle. My current one has a wimpy whistle and a habit of splooshing boiling water everywhere.</p>

<p>*Fluorospherites? Fluorospheridians? </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007  5:56 PM by TexAnne&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166735</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166735</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:56:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #205 from P J Evans</title>
         <description>comment from P J Evans on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TexAnne @ 204</p>

<p>I'm spoiled. I bought a Russell Hobbs electric kettle several years ago. It doesn't whistle, but the switch pops up audibly when it shuts off. (All it does is boil water. Fill kettle. Put lid back on. Push switch down, wait till it goes 'snick'.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007  6:08 PM by P J Evans&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166738</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166738</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:08:50 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #206 from Julie L.</title>
         <description>comment from Julie L. on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Particled molecular jewelry, though charming, only differentiates carbon from generic heteroatoms[*]; there's no obvious visual distinction between oxygen and nitrogen etc.</p>

<p>[*: any element that isn't carbon or hydrogen in an organic (i.e. carbon-based) molecule; afaik there are no bicuriousatoms, alas. Longer technobabble/punditry firmly quashed about trans-atoms in double bonds etc.]</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007  6:18 PM by Julie L.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166739</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166739</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:18:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #207 from Sharon M</title>
         <description>comment from Sharon M on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skwid @ 199:</p>

<p>I am cautiously optimistic about the Dresden Files. On the one hand, it is the SciFi Channel, purveyor of schlocky horror movies, but on the other hand, they did a decent job with Eureka (which comes back this summer for a second series), so, yeah, cautiously optimistic. </p>

<p>Anybody going to <a href="http://www.condfw.org/" rel="nofollow">ConDFW</a> this year? Emma Bull & Will Shetterly are GOH, and Steven Brust is coming back (as are many other most excellent authors, artists and others). </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007  6:20 PM by Sharon M&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166740</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166740</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:20:50 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #208 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Eureka</i>, Sharon M? Yesssssss!!! I thought I was the only person around her who loves that show. ("Why don't you just call it a death ray?")</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007  6:33 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166743</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166743</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:33:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #209 from P J Evans</title>
         <description>comment from P J Evans on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge @ 208</p>

<p>It's an interesting show. I hope the second season is as good as the first: it was so much fun watching the plots take a sharp turn somewhere in the middle, so the beginning of the episode was seen from the other side, so to speak. (I wonder what's going to happen to Stark?)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007  6:36 PM by P J Evans&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166745</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166745</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:36:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #210 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P J... What I like about <i>Eureka</i> is that it is so full of the joy of living. Really. Take a look again.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007  6:39 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166746</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166746</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:39:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #211 from Harriet</title>
         <description>comment from Harriet on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TexAnne (# 204) -- "Fluorospheroids" would go nicely with our hosts in their roles as "Toroids", which always reminds me of their CafePress merch with the giant orange blob menacing the Flatiron Building, as in:</p>

<p>http://www.cafepress.com/nielsenhayden.11002814</p>

<p>Also, I know that several of us <i>are</i> fairly spheroid, though the Fluorosphere contains all shapes and conditions of, er, Humanoids.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007  7:53 PM by Harriet&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166760</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166760</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:53:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #212 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My wife found this link to YouTube, where one Neal Gladstone merrily sings:</p>

<p>"I'm a liberal."</p>

<p>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOpTAL50bl8</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007  7:58 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166762</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166762</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:58:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #213 from Marilee</title>
         <description>comment from Marilee on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To go with the Candy layout, here's <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/quintanaroo/sets/72157594450089446/" rel="nofollow">Settlers of Catan cupcakes</a>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007  8:19 PM by Marilee&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166763</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166763</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:19:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #214 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tracie @ #194, does the Gubernator's declaration include the phrase "It's a warrior's drink?" Because with faux Klingon's in the White House, there should be real ones in declarations relating to prune juice.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007  9:16 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166771</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166771</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 21:16:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #215 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Draws bead, shoots errant apostrophe, which did not appear until I hit "post", I swear!)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007  9:18 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166772</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166772</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 21:18:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #216 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 19.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge, I do most love Sincerely"Eureka" possibly because it steals from books (<i>Shockwave Rider, Ecotopia</i>)rather than other TV shows. Proper tea is theft, but SF TV is theft squared.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 19, 2007  9:24 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166773</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166773</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 21:24:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #217 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 20.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About <i>Eureka</i>, JESR... I've never read either book, but, yes, if one is going to steal, one should steal from the best - although the best being stolen might disagree. </p>

<p>As for how science and its practicioners are depicted in the show... Not being a scientist, I don't feel the urge to throw things at my TV set. Besides, hey, this is TV. One thing I do wish they'd get rid of is Matt Frewer's atricious Aussie accent.</p>

<p>Speaking of how scientists are portrayed in movies and TV... I've always liked the way Gene Barry did it in <i>War of the Worlds</i>. Anybody else has an opinion on that subject?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 20, 2007 12:18 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166785</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166785</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 00:18:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #218 from MD²</title>
         <description>comment from MD² on 20.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stumbled upon <a href="http://www.packetgarden.com/" rel="nofollow">that</a>, and thought that some computer geek gardeners around here might like it.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 20, 2007 11:21 AM by MD²&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166815</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166815</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 11:21:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #219 from Susan</title>
         <description>comment from Susan on 20.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't drink coffee or tea, but this morning's wake-up was a spot of dynamite as we made a small civic festival out of <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-01-20-newhaven-arena_x.htm" rel="nofollow"> imploding our coliseum</a>.  We all took over a convenient parking garage, the city provided coffee and - supposedly - a band, though I never got to the roof level to hear it.  People brought their families.  As the sun rose it was visible under the remaining bits of the gutted coliseum - they'd already taken out the actual arena, so the implosion was mostly about bringing the rooftop parking garage to the ground for disassembly.  Most of us cheered for random demolition workers while a set of bereaved hockey fans wept and waved signs.  I ended up by chance next to someone who'd been there on its opening day 30-odd years ago.  We reminisced, though I didn't have much to add, since I'd only been there once, to hear Billy Joel back in 1986ish.  (And that says everything about why we were knocking it down.)  The running joke was that the implosion party was the biggest crowd the coliseum had ever attracted.</p>

<p>The implosion itself seemed well-done, not that I know anything about implosions.  There was a series of flashes, then some impressive booms, then all the layers collapsed more-or-less whole to the ground.  I had a moment of associative horror then, and as a huge cloud of dust boiled up and rolled toward us.  But the cloud dissipated quickly,  and the sun was shining over the layer-cake pile of parking garage with one crazily angled light pole sticking up from the top like a raddled daisy.</p>

<p>It's going to be strange coming into my city by highway now, without the big landmark that's always been the "five more minutes to home" symbol.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 20, 2007  3:55 PM by Susan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166848</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166848</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 15:55:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #220 from Faren Miller</title>
         <description>comment from Faren Miller on 20.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge (#201): <i>Anybody seen Pan's Labyrinth yet?</i></p>

<p>If it reaches Prescott at all, that may be months away. ("The Last King of Scotland" only now reached town.) But I'm dying to see it! There's a review in Locus Online.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 20, 2007  6:07 PM by Faren Miller&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166859</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166859</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:07:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #221 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 20.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faren... <i>Pan</i> just made it here to Albuquerque so don't feel too abandonned. We're about to go see it in a couple of hours. Its overall approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes is 93%, which is one of the highest I've ever seen there, next to <i>Casino Royale</i>. Well, the director is Guillermo del Toro, who  obviously loves working within fantasy, as <i>HellBoy</i> showed. (Did I ever tell you of that small Arizona town I drove thru a few years ago, where the tiny theater showed both that movie and <i>The Passion of the Christ</i>?)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 20, 2007  6:23 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166860</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166860</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:23:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #222 from coffeedryad</title>
         <description>comment from coffeedryad on 20.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which drink I prefer, I'm sure you can tell from my handle.  My poem, however, takes no side.</p>

<p>Sestina: Drink</p>

<p>And who would write, to praise her favored drink<br />
Whether cocoa, tea, or coffee, brown or green or black<br />
A soporific toddy, or a waking brew<br />
Given as a gift, or purchased, or in trade<br />
Obtained, from old and well-loved friend<br />
Sings from her heart, of what does cheer her day. </p>

<p>A ritual it is, a rite to start each day<br />
With making, pouring, quaffing of a drink<br />
Or in a cafe, speaking with a friend<br />
Cool and collected, dressed in black<br />
Discoursing now of politics, now trade<br />
Now art, while sipping steaming brew.</p>

<p>Yet other times demand another brew<br />
An alcoholic one, best supped at end of day<br />
When beans and leaves for grapes and malt we trade<br />
And Milton bid adieu as we do drink<br />
Together, quick or lazy, white or black.<br />
All beverages can help to make a friend.</p>

<p>But some are made by those who are no friend<br />
To those who grow the plants for them to brew.<br />
Their wallets full, their hearts yet glower black<br />
And misery attends their farmers through the day.<br />
Therefore, when picking out one's drink<br />
'Tis Justice sends the word to buy fair trade.</p>

<p>Now some will claim, our souls we trade<br />
When first we make caffeine our friend.<br />
They say we will do anything to get our drink<br />
And of addictivenesss accuse the brew.<br />
That is true, but still to us a day<br />
without caffeine is very, very black.</p>

<p>When waking brings a night still black<br />
And people rise, to work their living trade<br />
And dress themselves, and contemplate the day<br />
With grumpy minds, that call none yet a friend<br />
Heat up the water, make the boiling brew<br />
Put all disputes aside, and sip your favored drink.</p>

<p>ENVOI</p>

<p>For that same drink, howe'er the sky is black<br />
Will good thoughts brew, as you take up your trade<br />
And be a friend, throughout the weary day.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 20, 2007  7:01 PM by coffeedryad&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166862</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166862</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 19:01:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #223 from abi</title>
         <description>comment from abi on 20.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>coffeedryad @222</strong></p>

<p>That's wonderful.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 20, 2007  7:23 PM by abi&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166863</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166863</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 19:23:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #224 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on 20.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coffeedryad #222: Lovely!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 20, 2007  7:24 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166864</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166864</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 19:24:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #225 from TexAnne</title>
         <description>comment from TexAnne on 20.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.usps.com/communications/newsroom/2007stamps/" rel="nofollow">The USPS jumps on the knitting bandwagon</a>--go to the very bottom.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 20, 2007  8:56 PM by TexAnne&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166874</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166874</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 20:56:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #226 from Stefan Jones</title>
         <description>comment from Stefan Jones on 20.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost saw "Pan" today; saw "Letters from Iwo Jima" instead, on the grounds that I'd watch the "must-see but a bummer" film first.</p>

<p>("Letters" was well produced and well acted and moderately gripping, but definitely a bummer. Eastwood is making WWII movies shorn of all comfortable BS. Having seen "Flags of our Fathers" first was a plus; it is neat seeing how the stories interact.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 20, 2007 10:18 PM by Stefan Jones&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166877</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166877</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 22:18:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #227 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on 20.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ex-FEMA knucklehead Brown is playing the blame game now.</p>

<p>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070120/ap_on_re_us/katrina_brown</p>

<p>Says it was all politics.</p>

<p>Someone, I think it was Jon Stewart (but maybe not), had a great shpiel during Katrina showing all these republicans saying crap like "now is not the time to be playing the blame game", like half a dozen clips, followed by most of those same knuckleheads blaming the mayor, the residents, the state, and anyoen else they could think of. Complete hypocrites.</p>

<p>I tried googling for it, but haven't been able to find it. If this rings a bell with anyone and they know what show this was on or anything that would help a google search, I'd appreciate it.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 20, 2007 11:10 PM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166881</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166881</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 23:10:50 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #228 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on 20.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lemme try making that a link....</p>

<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070120/ap_on_re_us/katrina_brown" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070120/ap_on_re_us/katrina_brown</a></p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 20, 2007 11:11 PM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166882</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166882</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 23:11:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #229 from CHip</title>
         <description>comment from CHip on 20.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faren/Serge: somebody is playing strange games with <i>Pan's Labyrinth</i>; Boston would seem an obvious market, but it only reached here 8 days ago. I thought it was scheduled for 15 December \somewhere/; can anyone report when it actually opened to a real audience, as opposed to some token to make it eligible for this year's awards?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 20, 2007 11:22 PM by CHip&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166886</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166886</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 23:22:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #230 from Nina Armstrong</title>
         <description>comment from Nina Armstrong on 20.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>               Re <i>Dresden Files</i><br />
  Jim Butcher likes it. A lot.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 20, 2007 11:28 PM by Nina Armstrong&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166887</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166887</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 23:28:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #231 from Tania</title>
         <description>comment from Tania on 20.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chip - according to the always reliable <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan's_Labyrinth" rel="nofollow"> wikipedia</a> had limited US release on December 29th, and went into nationwide release yesterday. If it comes here at all, it will go to a local bar that has a theatre in the back. Beer, bar food, and a film. It's a good combination!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 20, 2007 11:46 PM by Tania&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166891</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166891</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 23:46:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #232 from Stefan Jones</title>
         <description>comment from Stefan Jones on 20.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Data point:</p>

<p>"Pan" opened up in Portland yesterday, in the large prestiege indie theater on the edge of downtown . . . and in at least one very ordinary suburban multiplex theater, which happens to be the one closest to me.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 20, 2007 11:48 PM by Stefan Jones&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166892</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166892</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 23:48:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #233 from Sharon M</title>
         <description>comment from Sharon M on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: Eureka</p>

<p>It has a nice ensemble cast, with several more-than-2-dimensional characters. The episodes stand alone nicely, but watching all of them in order gets you a nice season-long arc. </p>

<p>And the science is most fictional, in the fun way - death rays! giant bio-engineered plants! time travel! home of the future! It's a fun show, and Sharon-Bob says check it out.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  1:07 AM by Sharon M&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166896</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166896</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 01:07:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #234 from Jeffrey Smith</title>
         <description>comment from Jeffrey Smith on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Baltimore area, <i>Pan's Labyrinth</i> opened Friday at one art theatre and five multiplexes. It's being promoted on HBO and had a big ad run on <i>ER</i> Thursday night.</p>

<p>We saw it Wednesday night at a promotional preview, and it is <i>so</i> good. Probably the best fairy-tale film since Cocteau. Brutal at times; Ann closed her eyes during some of the violence but then had to open them again to read the subtitles. (We saw it at a multiplex, not the art theatre, and some in the crowd were very unhappy at being suckered into a film with subtitles.)</p>

<p>There are two parallel stories, a war story (1944, post Spanish Civil War) and a fantasy story, and they intertwine in fascinating and disturbing ways. It's a dark film, both physically (it almost all happens at night or underground) and psychically.</p>

<p>I loved it. I don't want to say much about it -- not even the debate that Ann and I are still carrying on about one of its major aspects -- but, my god, it is certainly one of the very best fantasy films ever made.</p>

<p>I have seen people online bickering about how literal some of the scenes can be read, but its ambiguities are some of its best aspects. Some things only work if you see it as a traditional fairy tale, and other things only work if you look at it from a realistic point of view. Lots of things work both ways.</p>

<p>I enjoyed watching it, and I have loved thinking and talking about it.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  1:18 AM by Jeffrey Smith&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166897</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166897</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 01:18:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #235 from Paula Helm Murray</title>
         <description>comment from Paula Helm Murray on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't usually ask things like this, but.</p>

<p>I've had very long, boring periods at work lately interspersed with high levels of being busy.</p>

<p>We're allowed Internet access as long as we don't stream video or radio and things like that that use huge amounts of bandwidth.</p>

<p>Somewhere in one of the (I think) author links I saw a reference for a word processor that basically is just  a text typer/editor (as opposed to Word), it turns the viewscreen into a green or orange text/black background text editor for writing.  </p>

<p>Because I was at work and one of the total Shall Nots is downloading anything, i just went to myself, that's cool and I'll catch it later at home.</p>

<p>Now I can't remember where I saw it.</p>

<p>Can anyone help?  Thanks!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  1:33 AM by Paula Helm Murray&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166898</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166898</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 01:33:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #236 from Tania</title>
         <description>comment from Tania on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paula - a quick look (I'm hunting for windows version) find a Mac product called <a href="http://www.hogbaysoftware.com/product/writeroom" rel="nofollow">WriteRoom</a>. I'm sentimental about the green and orange on black screens. Of course, it's easier on the eyes, too.</p>

<p>Is this it?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  2:08 AM by Tania&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166900</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166900</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 02:08:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #237 from Rob Rusick</title>
         <description>comment from Rob Rusick on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paula Helm Murray @235: <i>Somewhere in one of the (I think) author links I saw a reference for a word processor that basically is just a text typer/editor (as opposed to Word), it turns the viewscreen into a green or orange text/black background text editor for writing.</i></p>

<p>I had seen something like that too, and was able to <a href="http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/57708" rel="nofollow">find it again</a> on MetaFilter (<i>fortunately, it was where I thought I had seen it</i>). <a href="http://they.misled.us/dark-room/" rel="nofollow">DarkRoom</a> (<i>for Windows</i>) is shown as a black screen with green type. The MetaFilter thread (<i>Write without distraction</i>) mentions other editors, too.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  2:10 AM by Rob Rusick&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166901</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166901</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 02:10:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #238 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw <i>Pan</i> last night. Very interesting, and as he already showed in <i>mimic</i>, del Toro has a thing for big chittering and skittering bugs. But, should you currently be having a bout of the blues, you might want to hold off.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007 11:23 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166927</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166927</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 11:23:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #239 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's one thing I hope that <i>Eureka</i> never does again is have the sherriff's daughter be in a play put together by the town's school. She was, to put it mildly, absolutely atrocious as Puck, thus proving that some people should never be allowed anywhere near Shakespeare. It was neat though to see her leave the stage by taking off with a rocket backpack.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007 11:54 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166930</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166930</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 11:54:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #240 from Peter Erwin</title>
         <description>comment from Peter Erwin on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So here's a somewhat random question for the Fluorosphere:</p>

<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6177531.stm" rel="nofollow">This BBC News article</a> (see also <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/11/AR2006121101434_pf.html" rel="nofollow">this Washington Post article</a>) mentions a report done by a Russian academic which estimates that somewhere between one-quarter and <i>three-quarters</i> of top Russian government officials are former KGB/FSB members.</p>

<p>Which is certainly disturbing, and not a good thing for Russia (and a dramatic contrast with most Eastern European countries, where the general idea has been to <i>prevent</i> former spies from holding high positions)... but I can't help wondering: what do you <i>call</i> a government run by spies?</p>

<p>All I can come up with is "espionocracy," which kind of rolls of the tongue nicely, but is really an improper French-Greek hybrid.  Is there an appropriate ancient Greek word for spy?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007 12:10 PM by Peter Erwin&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166932</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166932</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 12:10:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #241 from nerdycellist</title>
         <description>comment from nerdycellist on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw Pan's Labyrinth a couple of weeks ago and I loved it. My roommate had the same comment as Serge about the skittering bugs though (she's not a fan of skittering bugs). I'm going to see it again, although maybe after I see a "fun" movie in the theatres; don't get me started on the idiotic release schedule, oscar-baiting, etc. etc. I work in The Industry and I think it's a load of nonsense.</p>

<p>And since this is an open thread, does anyone here know anything about basic plumbing? I live in an apartment and on thursday my tub started draining incredibly slow. Then on Friday the toilet started acting up; more slow draining after the flush. I tried drano-ing the tub and plunge-ing the toilet, but to no avail. I'm wondering if a $30 investment into a snake/plunger do-hickey will keep strangers from having to get intimate with my bathroom (and me from having to take another unpaid half day off work.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  1:08 PM by nerdycellist&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166936</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166936</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:08:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #242 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nerdycellist... I thought that <i>Pan</i>'s weird schedule was to allow it to qualify for the Oscars. I'm not sure what award it could be nominated for. Best slashing of a villain's mouth open, followed by said villain stitching his cheek closed all by himself? I must say that the faun looked pretty neat, although I wouldn't want to meet him on a dark and rainy night (of which the movie had quite a few).</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  1:20 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166938</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166938</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:20:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #243 from Linkmeister</title>
         <description>comment from Linkmeister on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nerdycellist #241, I have had serial plumbing misadventures over the past week or so, but they were all of the leaky faucet/valve variety.  It sounds like you've got a pipe problem.  I'm not sure the two problems you cite are related.  A snake for the tub might be a good idea, but check the drain to be sure you don't have a cross-type filter thing which would prohibit any snake from getting fully into the pipes before you buy one.</p>

<p>As to the toilet, I'd check the float valve inside its tank.  Those are easily and relatively cheaply replaced; just ensure that you've got the water valve below the tank (the one that has a flexible pipe going into the wall) turned completely off.  The way to test is to turn it off and flush; if no water runs into the tank, you're fine.  There's a gasket inside that valve which may not be working properly, in which case you might have a disaster (see <a href="http://www.linkmeister.com/blog/archives/002225.html" rel="nofollow">here</a> for my experience).</p>

<p>If it does continue to pump water through, turn the water off at the street side (for multiple apartment building uses, see the building supe if there is one).</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  1:20 PM by Linkmeister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166939</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166939</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:20:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #244 from nerdycellist</title>
         <description>comment from nerdycellist on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Like several other "prestige" projects, Pan was released in a handful of theatres at the end of December to qualify for awards season. Like "Children of Men", which has been getting all kinds of oscar buzz from the critics but has been roundly ignored by it's own studio, in a fair world it would seriously be considered for awards - but hey, they gave LOTR awards a few years ago. No other SF is worthy of awards, you know. (not enough victimized women and Whitey Saving the Day I guess).</p>

<p>I get cranky that anything popcorn-worthy is crammed into the summer, and anything "serious" is released at the very end of the year. Even in LA the release may only be one theatre and we have to wait a few weeks to see the Arty stuff. It's why even though I'm not the world's biggest Harry Potter buff, I enjoy the years the movies come out: it means I can spend a christmas in a theatre watching magic, pretty british scenery and Alan Rickman.</p>

<p>The toilet thing is not a flap-seal issue (have had that before) and I can't figure out how to get the drain stopper out of the bathtub drain to snake, so I guess I'm going to have to call the LL, take time off work, and possible prepare myself for lectures from strangers about toilet paper usage. Ugh.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  1:32 PM by nerdycellist&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166940</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166940</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:32:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #245 from xeger</title>
         <description>comment from xeger on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#241 ::: nerdycellist wondered:<br />
<i>And since this is an open thread, does anyone here know anything about basic plumbing? I live in an apartment and on thursday my tub started draining incredibly slow. Then on Friday the toilet started acting up; more slow draining after the flush. I tried drano-ing the tub and plunge-ing the toilet, but to no avail. I'm wondering if a $30 investment into a snake/plunger do-hickey will keep strangers from having to get intimate with my bathroom (and me from having to take another unpaid half day off work.)</i></p>

<p>You mentioned that you live in an apartment - I'm presuming that none of your neighbours have mentioned having issues as well?  I'd be somewhat surprised if the plumbing wasn't combined at some point, and that'd certainly help figure out where to target...</p>

<p>Beyond that, it's probably worth trying one of the enzymatic drain cleaners - usually overnight works best - I've had them work when draino didn't.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  1:47 PM by xeger&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166943</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166943</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:47:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #246 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nerdycellist... <i>magic, pretty british scenery and Alan Rickman</i></p>

<p>Ever seen Rickman in 1991's <i>truly madly deeply</i>? Highly recommended, and you get to see him play the romantic lead, for once.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  1:57 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166945</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166945</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:57:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #247 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge, again, @239, that's actually a favorite episode at my house, due to the younger offspring being a complete theater geek (she's a Technical Theater major now, and put in some inhuman number of hours doing tech in her high school drama department over four years) and the elder playing Bottom in his high school's production of MND. The director, in particular, was much appreciated in the "it's funny 'cause it's true!" way.</p>

<p>However, my favorite character is Fargo, and his Buffygeek-ism.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  2:10 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166946</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166946</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:10:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #248 from Dave Bell</title>
         <description>comment from Dave Bell on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's getting to be a lot of Kipling out from Project Gutenberg, but it's either been out of copyright in the US for a while, or appeared in the last few days.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  2:27 PM by Dave Bell&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166950</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166950</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:27:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #249 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked that episode of <i>Eureka</i> too, JESR. I'm not sure if the girl's rendition of Puck was bad because she was told to do it that way, as I think you suggest. But, like I said before, her rocket-propelled exit was pretty neat.</p>

<p>Did they ever tell what the dog's name is? Sirius, maybe?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  2:44 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166952</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166952</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:44:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #250 from Bruce E. Durocher II</title>
         <description>comment from Bruce E. Durocher II on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my favorite newspaper columnists, Neva Chonin, has done an interesting column about "Children of Men" <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2007/01/21/PKGMKLMK981.DTL" rel="nofollow">here</a>.  There are spoilers involved, but without giving away too much she successfully points out that between the book and the movie women ended up invisible.  If you're not worried about spoilers or have seen the film I suggest you give her column a look.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  3:36 PM by Bruce E. Durocher II&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166957</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166957</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 15:36:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #251 from Susan</title>
         <description>comment from Susan on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave @ #248</p>

<p>I'm looking for a keyword-searchable collection of e-Kipling.  Project G. doesn't seem to be it, unless there's a search-the-texts function I am missing.  Any ideas?</p>

<p>(I'm working on planning for a ball celebrating the centennial of Kipling's Nobel.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  3:50 PM by Susan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166959</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166959</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 15:50:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #252 from Sajia Kabir</title>
         <description>comment from Sajia Kabir on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re : Children of Men<br />
(The details mentioned in Chonin's column don't seem to be much of a spoiler, though I haven't seen the film yet).<br />
I'm all for having more movie characters of color,  but what's the progress in having the mother-to-be switched from a strong woman to a dependent woman of color relying on a white savior? They could have easily had made the ex-revolutionary pregnant woman of the book into a woman of color, if they were wanting to be diverse.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  3:52 PM by Sajia Kabir&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166960</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166960</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 15:52:34 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #253 from Dave Bell</title>
         <description>comment from Dave Bell on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan, why not download all the e-texts and set up a website, which can then have a "search this website" link to Google?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  4:07 PM by Dave Bell&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166963</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166963</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 16:07:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #254 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, in <i>Children of Men</i>, they changed the book's cause of infertility being with men, to the movie's being with women? It may be that they changed the cause because they didn't want the audience to think that the hero suffered from an affliction almost as bad as being unable to get it up (and, please, my sarcasm subtroutine is fully engaged here). Anyway, I mentionned this to my wife the  writer and she pointed out another possible reason. I'm assuming here that the book and the movie have the same overall plot of having to take this pregnant woman where people can figure out why she can be pregnant. If the cause of infertility is with men, why didn't they instead look for whoever had sex with the woman?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  4:43 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166967</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166967</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 16:43:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #255 from Paula Helm Murray</title>
         <description>comment from Paula Helm Murray on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!!! Write Room is it.  Y'all are the best.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  5:50 PM by Paula Helm Murray&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166970</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166970</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 17:50:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #256 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you might want to be reminded, tonight PBS is showing Part One of a new adaptation of <i>Jane Eyre</i>.</p>

<p>In the same vein, on Friday night, Turner Classic Movies is having two premieres. One is <i>Billy the Kid vs Dracula</i>, the other is <i>Jesse James vs Frankenstein's Daughter</i>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  6:06 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166972</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166972</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 18:06:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #257 from Marilee</title>
         <description>comment from Marilee on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And this afternoon, TCM had <i>Breakfast at Tiffany's</i>!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  7:22 PM by Marilee&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166982</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166982</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 19:22:40 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #258 from Missy K.</title>
         <description>comment from Missy K. on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howard Peirce, way back @ 115:  "When Jeb lost the gubernatorial election in 2006, it essentially meant the end of the Bush dysnasty."</p>

<p>Your theory is fine, except that Jeb Bush didn't lose the 2006 election, he just wasn't allowed to run.  Florida has a two-terms-and-you're-out rule for the governor, one of the few smart political things the state has done recently.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  7:25 PM by Missy K.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166983</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166983</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 19:25:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #259 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marilee... On Friday night, after those two westerns that'd make Joe Lansdale proud, TCM is showing a fantasy movie worthy of Neil Gaiman's imagination, 1942's <i>The Devil with Hitler</i>: "If he wants to keep control of Hell, Satan has to get Hitler to perform a good deed."</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  7:30 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166985</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166985</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 19:30:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #260 from Stefan Jones</title>
         <description>comment from Stefan Jones on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just saw "Pan's Labyrinth."</p>

<p>Definitely a dark film, but appropriately dark. Very southern european. I was maybe 1/3rd of the way to misting up as the credit rolled. </p>

<p>Only disappointment: I wish there was perhaps one more fantasy / quest sequence, because they were so well done.</p>

<p>Not that the rest of the film wasn't. The Captain was one nasty piece of work, and Mercedes was a true hero.</p>

<p>After watching "Children of Men," "Letters of Iwo Jima" and "Pan" on three of the last four weekend-days, I'm really in the mood for something fun and silly.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  7:38 PM by Stefan Jones&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166987</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166987</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 19:38:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #261 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re:#249 (You don't ask much, Serge... I've gained a whole lot of Eureka bookmarks, and still had to ask the brain trust at S3) The dog on Eureka is called "LoJack." He's one of the resemblances to the town of geniuses in <i>Shockwave Rider</i>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  8:08 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166990</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166990</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:08:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #262 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stefan Jones, there's few things more silly and funny than <a>Borat in Thirty Seconds as Acted by Bunnies</a>.</p>

<p>http://www.starz.com/features/bunnyclub/borat/index.html</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  8:14 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166994</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166994</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:14:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #263 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, that's <i>Eureka</i>'s reference to <i>Shockwave Rider</i>? Thanks, JESR.</p>

<p>Speaking of references... I'll probably try the new season of <i>Heroes</i> tomorrow. I never could get into the original episodes, for some reason. This time, they have a new character played by Christopher Eccleston, as an invisible man named... what else?... Claude Rains.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  8:32 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166995</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166995</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:32:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #264 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of <i>Shockwave Rider</i> is centered around various government/industrial programs which aim to control and exploit exceptional humans; there is also a genetic engineering program that produces genius dogs. There's an enclave of researchers in a small town (not as cozy as Eureka) on the redwood coast which has a checkered history with the powers that walk the land.</p>

<p>Also, now that I think of it, the hero of <i>Shockwave Rider</i> could have easily grown up to be Henry.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  8:53 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166998</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#166998</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:53:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #265 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JESR... Now I'm going to have to get a copy of <i>Shockwave Rider</i>. I presume that, since it was written by Brunner, it's not particularly humorous though. Right?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  9:29 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167000</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167000</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 21:29:50 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #266 from MD²</title>
         <description>comment from MD² on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Made a move on cold brewed coffee, using a huge french press sitting in my coffee pot collection I thought I'd never have to use.</p>

<p>Was worth the try, it's nice.</p>

<p>But not as much as I hoped from description. I think I'll stay with espresso pot in the morning, vacuum for day, and french press for evening/night.</p>

<p>Haven't dared "boiled trail coffee" yet. But I have to.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  9:44 PM by MD²&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167001</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167001</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 21:44:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #267 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, as Brunners go, it's quite optimistic and rather witty; as funny goes, it's not Pratchett (or, to be honest about my own reading habits, rather than my daughter's, it's not Tom Robbins, either).</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  9:48 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167003</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167003</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 21:48:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #268 from P J Evans</title>
         <description>comment from P J Evans on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge, it's funnier than you'd think. (I like the description of stuff as 'furnishing the mind'.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  9:49 PM by P J Evans&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167004</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167004</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 21:49:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #269 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JESR and P J... Duly noted. I doubt <i>Shockwave Rider</i> is still in print, but there are used-book stores.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007  9:56 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167007</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167007</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 21:56:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #270 from Stefan Jones</title>
         <description>comment from Stefan Jones on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never could get into Eureka. Not that it was a bad show, but that it was an OK show that I didn't feel like commiting ongoing brain-share too.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007 10:01 PM by Stefan Jones&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167009</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167009</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:01:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #271 from TexAnne</title>
         <description>comment from TexAnne on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what's the verdict on <i>The Dresden Files?</i> I totally forgot to watch it, probably because I wasn't thrilled by the first book.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007 10:03 PM by TexAnne&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167010</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167010</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:03:50 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #272 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Stefan, there are some people who swear by <i>Buffy</i> and I never could get into it. That's the way it is. To each his/her tastes... (Sure would have made my high-school life easier if if my 'fellow' students had had that attitude.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007 10:08 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167011</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167011</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:08:50 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #273 from Sharon M</title>
         <description>comment from Sharon M on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dresden Files!</p>

<p>I likes it. It's not the book(s), not that it could be, but it has a nice <i>inspired by</i> vibe. There's a little backstory, with lots left unsaid, but I have a preference for stories that just drop you into a world. </p>

<p>(And TexAnne - it's playing again at 10 central.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007 10:27 PM by Sharon M&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167012</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167012</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:27:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #274 from Paula Helm Murray</title>
         <description>comment from Paula Helm Murray on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge, I'm glad I'm not the only one that thinks that about Buffy.  I don't mind watching the few episodes that people have thought good (like the musical), but I just couldn't get into it.  (and I have a few friends who are scarily into it, like one who is all-Buffy all the time, she watches the DVDs constantly...)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007 10:29 PM by Paula Helm Murray&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167013</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167013</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:29:54 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #275 from Stefan Jones</title>
         <description>comment from Stefan Jones on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE Buffy and other smart, continuing shows: There's more than the matter of taste . . . there's the <i>committment</i> involved.</p>

<p>And speaking of committment . . . THANK YOU Sharon M. You mention that "Dresden Files" was playing made me go set my MythTV to record it for sampling sake, and I saw that "Battlestar Galactica" was playing tonight. That is the one show I'm devoting brainshare to.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007 11:18 PM by Stefan Jones&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167014</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167014</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:18:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #276 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Shockwave Rider</i> is one of the few John Brunner books still in print, along with <i>The Sheep Look Up</i> and, of course, <i>Stand on Zanzibar</i>.</p>

<p>I can accept the idea that good people might not fall for Buffy; I'm married to one. And commitment to complex continuing storylines is not the only matter which might discourage people; I didn't watch it until the last season, (and then spent hours every day catching up with the story) just because of the whole "teenager" aspect. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007 11:33 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167015</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167015</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:33:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #277 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I <i>had</i> to choose <i>Buffy</i> as an example. That's the part where old-time actor George Sanders would say in his inimitable manner:</p>

<p>"What have I wrought?"</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007 11:52 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167017</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167017</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:52:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #278 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 21.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stefan mentionned <i>Galactica</i>. Does anybody, male or female, have any idea why female Cylons find Baltar so attractive? Yes, like I said, to each his/her own tastes...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 21, 2007 11:58 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167019</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167019</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:58:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #279 from Sharon M</title>
         <description>comment from Sharon M on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stefan Jones @ 275:</p>

<p>You're welcome!  I've had variable access to cable and/or network tv over the years, I have no tivo (or equivalent), and regular schedules != me. And this is why I love Netflix. </p>

<p>There are series I'd never even *heard* of that I'm really enjoying. And the beauty of the commercial free multiple episodes on a disk concept needs no elaboration.</p>

<p>I saw some episodes of Buffy, and it's in my queue for further viewing. My veeery long queue, which I wish Netflix would let me categorize by format (move, series) and within format by genre. Also I'd like a pony.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007 12:15 AM by Sharon M&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167022</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167022</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 00:15:50 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #280 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharon M... <i>Also I'd like a pony.</i></p>

<p>As for myself, I'd like the complete DVD collection of 1983's TV series <i>Wizards and Warriors</i>. On the other hand, if I were granted that wish, my wife would divorce me rather than have it on while she's around.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007 12:48 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167024</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167024</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 00:48:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #281 from coffeedryad</title>
         <description>comment from coffeedryad on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abi and Fragano: thank you very much!  I've been meaning to try my hand at one of those for a while; it was nice to have the opportunity in this thread.</p>

<p>Re: _Shockwave Rider_, it's Brunner, sure, but far far lighter than _The Sheep Look Up_ or _Stand On Zanzibar_.  More like _Polymath_, I'd say, but with less Competent-Male-Hero-Saves-The-Day in.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  9:07 AM by coffeedryad&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167032</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167032</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:07:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #282 from janine</title>
         <description>comment from janine on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It snowed in Tucson last night.  As of 8:22 am, there's an inch or so on the ground.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007 10:22 AM by janine&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167037</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167037</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 10:22:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #283 from Laurence</title>
         <description>comment from Laurence on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>way upthread:</p>

<p><i>with faux Klingon's in the White House</i></p>

<p>I don't think they even qualify as faux Klingons.  Can you imagine any of them saying, "It is a good day to die," and, y'know, meaning themselves?</p>

<p>PS.  I adore my electric kettle.  And I just recently figured out that I can put my teamug in the microwave for 10-15 seconds, instead of trying to pre-warm it with hot water.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007 11:30 AM by Laurence&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167046</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167046</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:30:50 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #284 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>janine @ 282... Same here, in Albuquerque. And cold. Meanwhile, I understand that Minnesota has barely any snow. So much for Frostbite Falls, Minnesota.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007 12:11 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167050</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167050</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 12:11:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #285 from Skwid</title>
         <description>comment from Skwid on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The White House is clearly populated by Ferengi.</p>

<p>Like Serge and Paula, I've never been a fan of the Buffy show (loved the movie, though...), but I enjoyed The Dresden Files very much last night.  Not perfect (I very much miss the basement apartment and WhereTF is Mister, anyway?), but most of the changes I can happily accept as necessary or advantageous for the medium translation.</p>

<p>And BSG was thought-provoking, as usual.  I was stunned when Baltar turned out not to be <a href="http://www.rot13.com/" rel="nofollow">Gur Pubfra Bar.</a>  I really thought that was a gimme.</p>

<p>Heroes tonight!  I think I would watch this show even more devotedly if they focused exclusively on Hiro's plotline, but I think the vast majority of its viewers would disagree with that preference entirely.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007 12:14 PM by Skwid&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167051</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167051</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 12:14:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #286 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The White House is clearly populated by Ferengi.</i></p>

<p>Uh, doesn't that mean Laura Bush doesn't wear clothes?</p>

<p>(shudders)<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007 12:19 PM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167053</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167053</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 12:19:40 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #287 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I caught part of <i>Queen of the Damned</i> on TV on Saturday night. I think it got trashed when it came out, and just can't figure out why. Maybe it has to do with the titular QotD having a tendency to tell people:</p>

<p>"Join me, or... die..."</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007 12:20 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167054</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167054</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 12:20:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #288 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skwid... It looks like they're lining up Starbuck to hold that position instead of Baltar. Not sure that's a good thing. (Shades of <i>Return of the Jedi</i>'s Emperor repeatedly saying "It is your Destiny.")</p>

<p>Well, we'll see how that goes. I'm glad that the Galactica finally started looking for Earth. Now, if they could stop having Six stop wearing those sexy outfits that just make her look even more freaky...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007 12:26 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167055</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167055</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 12:26:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #289 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skwid #285: BSG is too good for that.  If something's a gimme it generally won't happen.  In fact, if they'd made Baltar Gur Pubfra Bar, I'd have been very disappointed.  And in my opinion it's still not clear who IS.</p>

<p>It did not surprise me that Q'Naan'f jubyr zbqry jnf obkrq, however.  They've been leading up to that for a long time.  </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007 12:42 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167057</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167057</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 12:42:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #290 from Skwid</title>
         <description>comment from Skwid on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole thing with Starbuck's paintings was really, really cool, I thought.  Can't wait to see where that goes.</p>

<p>Can't agree more with your second point, Xopher.  Long time coming.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007 12:52 PM by Skwid&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167058</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167058</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 12:52:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #291 from Laurence</title>
         <description>comment from Laurence on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that Baltar pretty much had himself convinced he was Gur Pubfra Bar would be enough to convince me that it was out of the question.  He's too much of a buffoon (or Trickster figure, if you will), IMO.</p>

<p>Okay, y'all:  Firefly or Battlestar Galactica?  Me:  BSG, hands down.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007 12:53 PM by Laurence&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167059</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167059</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 12:53:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #292 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that one excludes the other, but I'm for Firefly. For many reasons, one of which is that it doesn't have Baltar onboard. And Morena Baccarin is much prettier. (Never could understand what Cylons find so attractive about Baltar.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007 12:59 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167061</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167061</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 12:59:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #293 from Jon Meltzer</title>
         <description>comment from Jon Meltzer on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The White House is clearly populated by Ferengi.</i></p>

<p>Not Ferengi. Pakleds. But they think they're Ferengi. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  1:04 PM by Jon Meltzer&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167062</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167062</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:04:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #294 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge: maybe he's the human male they can get?  And since all the Cylon males are physically repulsive (well, except the Leoben model, and they're crazy), I think it's understandable.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  1:06 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167063</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167063</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:06:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #295 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#293: Pakleds who think they're Ferengi pretending to be Klingons.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  1:07 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167064</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167064</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:07:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #296 from Chryss</title>
         <description>comment from Chryss on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefly. If for no other reason than Captain Tightpants. MrrrrrrOOOOWWWW.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  1:08 PM by Chryss&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167065</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167065</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:08:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #297 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess that if Cylons have to choose between Baltar and Dean Stockwell...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  1:10 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167067</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167067</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:10:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #298 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly.</p>

<p>And I'm pretty sure that gur Svany Svir Plyba gung Q'Naan fnj jnf fbzrbar fur zrg ba Arj Pncevpn, aren't you?  Because she said "I'm sorry."</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  1:42 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167071</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167071</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:42:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #299 from Skwid</title>
         <description>comment from Skwid on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BSG is the easy choice, here.  Firefly was clever and its cancellation before it hit its full stride is a crime, but its entire run contained about as many moments of blow-your-mind, I-can't-believe-TV-can-be-this-good as, say, any three given BSG episodes.  </p>

<p>Also, while Jewel Staithe entrances me and Christina Hendricks could probably have my soul just by asking nicely (Baccarin and Glau do little for me), BSG's Lucy Lawless, Grace Park, Katee Sackhoff, Tricia Helfer, and Kandyse McClure (my favorite) make for an ensemble of hawtness that would be difficult to beat.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  1:52 PM by Skwid&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167073</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167073</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:52:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #300 from Skwid</title>
         <description>comment from Skwid on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xopher @ 298, my thought exactly.</p>

<p>Also, "Q'Naan" sounds like an Indian Flatbread dish especially made for semi-omnipotent non-corporeal entities.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  1:56 PM by Skwid&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167075</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167075</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:56:54 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #301 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, you're telling me I need to watch the new battlestar galactica? My list of "stuff I must watch" is getting fricken long.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  1:58 PM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167076</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167076</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:58:01 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #302 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or like the holy book of a bread-worshipping Middle Eastern religion.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  1:59 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167078</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167078</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:59:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #303 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knew I shoulda put '#300:' in front of that...</p>

<p>Greg, don't just start watching it now.  It will spoil some early surprises for you.  Get the miniseries on DVD; if you like that, you'll like the series too.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  2:00 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167079</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167079</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:00:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #304 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What, no fans of BSG's Mary McDonnell? </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  2:11 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167080</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167080</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:11:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #305 from Larry Brennan</title>
         <description>comment from Larry Brennan on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg @ 286 - Barbara Bush, too. (tectonic shudder)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  2:17 PM by Larry Brennan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167082</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167082</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:17:54 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #306 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Writers Sharon Lee and Steve Miller have just posted on their site the first chapter of new novel <a href="http://www.korval.com/fledgling/" rel="nofollow">"Fledgling"</a>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  2:27 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167083</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167083</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:27:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #307 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Get the miniseries on DVD</i></p>

<p>Wait, so, if I want to catch up with the BSG series, I need to start by watching a mini series first? Not year 1 of the series playing now? Is the miniseries like a prequel to the regular series?</p>

<p>Yes, I live under a rock.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  2:28 PM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167084</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167084</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:28:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #308 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Firefly vs BSG: I really, really, prefer humor to unrelieved gloom, so, Firefly all the way. Also points to Firefly for one of the best marriages in genre television.</p>

<p>My husband is a big fan of Mary McConnell's character, for the record.</p>

<p>Me, I'm sort of disappointed that D'Anna seems to have been the Cylon version of the Edsel.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  2:39 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167085</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167085</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:39:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #309 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The miniseries isn't a prequel exactly, but it does establish the situation and lay the groundwork for the series.  It's also the first chronologically.  Don't watch any introductory material, or read the DVD box in case of spoilers.  There are some things in the miniseries that are MUCH more fun to figure out for yourself than to be told.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  2:39 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167086</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167086</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:39:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #310 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm a big fan of Mary McDonnell, and the character is well-drawn, but I no longer think of her as one of the "good guys."  She's too racist (yes, I'm a Heloite).</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  2:42 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167087</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167087</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:42:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #311 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JESR... Unrelieved gloom is the main reason why my wife has stopped watching BSG. Nobody on the Galactica seems to have heard of the concept of gallows humor. Like I once said in an earlier thread, imagine Law&Order's Brisco on that ship.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  2:42 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167088</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167088</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:42:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #312 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What exactly happened with Roslin and Helo, Xopher? I know I missed a couple of episodes.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  2:46 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167089</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167089</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:46:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #313 from Tania</title>
         <description>comment from Tania on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge - <a href="http://www.sheldoncomics.com/archive/061226.html" rel="nofollow">Sheldon discusses angst on BSG</a> and <a href="http://www.sheldoncomics.com/archive/061227.html" rel="nofollow">again.</a></p>

<p>We rent or borrow each season as they become available, and enjoy them. And I'm with Serge, I don't get the appeal of Baltar. Then again, I found Ted Raimi as O'Neill on SeaQuest to be attractive, but couldn't stand him as Joxer in Xena. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  2:58 PM by Tania&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167090</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167090</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:58:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #314 from abi</title>
         <description>comment from abi on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Serge @311</strong><br />
I'm with your wife.  My husband watches it and put the headphones in.  Real life in winter is enough of a downer without adding such unrelieved gloom in my fiction.</p>

<p>If I want to watch a story arc crash into despair, I'll do it with Blakes Seven.  Then at least I get Avon's wit and unintentionally funny special effects.  (Explosions in space where the smoke <em>rises</em> and the debris <em>falls</em>.  You can't beat that.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  3:02 PM by abi&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167091</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167091</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:02:07 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #315 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>abi... Ah yes, good ole Avon. It'd be interesting, having him onboard the Galactica and watching the sparks fly. Of course, He probably would quickly wind up with everyone ganging up on him and shoving him out thru an airlock and in his birthday suit.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  3:06 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167092</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167092</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:06:04 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #316 from Jack Ruttan</title>
         <description>comment from Jack Ruttan on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#184: Fragano (God, I'm behind, and I hope no one's already mentioned this): Anarchists don't use teabags, they put the leaves loose in the pot.</p>

<p>Read Orwell's essay on making the proper pot of tea if you don't believe me. But that might be more British than purely anarchist. I have no idea how they treat it elsewhere.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  3:06 PM by Jack Ruttan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167093</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167093</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:06:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #317 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tania... I love the cartoon, especially the part about Starbuck having 300 reasons to be unhappy. As for Apollo, he has one single reason to be unhappy and we know who that is.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  3:09 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167095</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167095</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:09:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #318 from Laurence</title>
         <description>comment from Laurence on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't really think of BSG as unrelieved gloom, mostly because Baltar makes me laugh.  Firefly was actually too silly for me.  (For comedy, I prefer "Scrubs".)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  3:10 PM by Laurence&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167096</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167096</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:10:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #319 from Jack Ruttan</title>
         <description>comment from Jack Ruttan on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#278 Serge "Stefan mentioned Galactica. Does anybody, male or female, have any idea why female Cylons find Baltar so attractive? Yes, like I said, to each his/her own tastes..."</p>

<p>He's a good listener? </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  3:13 PM by Jack Ruttan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167097</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167097</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:13:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #320 from Sarah S</title>
         <description>comment from Sarah S on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#278</p>

<p>Crazy is always hot.</p>

<p>For a little while, anyway.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  3:17 PM by Sarah S&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167098</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167098</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:17:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #321 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/1044872.html?mode=reply</i></p>

<p>Or, even better, Munch, in any of his incarnations (what's another crossover to that character?). Or Lindsey from Arrested Development as a Cylon. But I never underestimate the power of authorial intent to beat the inherent comedic power from an actor (Lucy Loveless in BSG proves that already).</p>

<p>I am, at the moment, convinced that there are no live good guys left on BSG, minus poor tortured Helo himself. So I'm very glad for Heroes starting over tonight, for Eureka having a second season pick-up, and even for the pale brew that is Bones.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  3:17 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167099</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167099</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:17:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #322 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, yes, I forgot to press command c and quote Serge on Lennie Brisco; that link, by the way, leads to a Fandom Wank discussion of Star Gate, where one of the SGA showrunners calls the fans lemmings.</p>

<p>Sorry about that, but when one packs links all over the internet all day, like an ant with sugar thses things happen.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  3:22 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167100</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167100</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:22:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #323 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JESR... You don't think Apollo is a tortured good guy? No matter what, it was heart-breaking to see how they finally had Starbuck admit to Apollo what he means to her. Too bad they had to literally beat the crap out of each other to get there.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  3:23 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167101</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167101</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:23:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #324 from abi</title>
         <description>comment from abi on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Serge @315</strong><br />
I would pay good money to see Avon on BSG, so that he could turn to Adama and say, "I'm not stupid, I'm not expendable, and I'm not going."</p>

<p>Or, to President Roslyn, "As far as I am concerned you can destroy whatever you like. You can stir up a thousand revolutions, you can wade in blood up to your armpits. Oh, and you can lead the rabble to victory, whatever that might mean."</p>

<p>(Both actual Blakes Seven quotes, of course.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  3:24 PM by abi&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167102</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167102</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:24:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #325 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>abi... <i>"I'm not stupid, I'm not expendable, and I'm not going."</i></p>

<p>Heheheheh...<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  3:27 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167103</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167103</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:27:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #326 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm pretty anti-Apollo, tending to see him as a self-indulgent pretty boy. </p>

<p>Although I appreciate what he does for a small wet towel. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  3:43 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167104</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167104</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:43:01 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #327 from Skwid</title>
         <description>comment from Skwid on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like others have commented, I frequently laugh at Baltar and Baltar's Six.  Colonel Tigh and Starbuck are also occasionally good for a laugh.</p>

<p>I don't feel the show is <i>oppressively</i> dark, although some particular episodes certainly are.  The show as a whole has uplifiting themes of hope, faith, familial love, honor, and convictions in the face of moral ambiguity (both questioning unjust convictions and holding just ones in the face of adversity).  These are positive strengths which are very difficult to portray in the medium, and they are played so well that they far outweigh any episodic angst one must endure, IMNSHO.</p>

<p>OTOH, my opinion of Farscape (to bring in yet another oft lauded show) was, in a nutshell: "Soooooaps iiiiin Spaaaaaace - Now with muppets!"</p>

<p>TTDV.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  3:56 PM by Skwid&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167105</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167105</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:56:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #328 from Will A</title>
         <description>comment from Will A on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tempting to start up another bardic conflict on BSG vs. Firefly. Maybe next time. For now, I've got some casting trivia to tie together the <i>Pan's Labyrinth</i> and Buffygeekism threads:</p>

<p>Doug Jones, the actor underneath the faun and the pale man makeup, also played the tallest Gentleman in Buffy's <i>Hush</i>. He introduced <i>Pan's Labyrinth</i> on opening night hereabouts. A fine mime, that fellow.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  4:31 PM by Will A&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167109</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167109</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:31:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #329 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge #312: Jryy, svefg fur gevrq gb unir uvf certanag tveysevraq guebja bhg na nveybpx, whfg orpnhfr fur jnf n Plyba.  Gura fur pbbxrq hc n fpurzr gb qrsenhq uvz naq uvf jvsr bs gurve onol, yrnivat gurz gb tevrir bire n fhofgvghgr pbecfr.  Naq fur jnf cerggl haercragnag jura sbhaq bhg.  Gung'f jul V qba'g guvax bs Ebfyva nf bar bs gur tbbq thlf nal zber. </p>

<p>And if Helo's a good guy, so is Athena, yes?   </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  4:32 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167110</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167110</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:32:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #330 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xopher @ 329... Got it. I'm more bugged by her issueing a directive about measures to increase humanity's ranks. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  4:49 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167111</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167111</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:49:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #331 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skwid, I am struggling with the concept of anyone preferring BSG over Farscape, especially on the basis of <i>Farscape</i> being soapy.</p>

<p>BSG is more of a soap opera than Grey's Anatomy, even, and I say that as a person who skipped about half of high school to catch critical episodes of "Another World."</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  5:26 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167113</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167113</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 17:26:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #332 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#330: That too.  She at least felt guilty about that, though.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  5:43 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167116</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167116</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 17:43:01 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #333 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack Ruttan #316: I rather think it's an English (or British) thing. I don't use teabags myself.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  6:17 PM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167118</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167118</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 18:17:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #334 from Nancy C</title>
         <description>comment from Nancy C on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.netcharles.com/orwell/essays/nicecupoftea.htm" rel="nofollow">Orwell essay on tea here</a></p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  7:02 PM by Nancy C&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167120</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167120</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:02:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #335 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wait a sec. Battlestar is a <i>soap opera</i>? If so, I think I'll invest my DVD rentals elsewhere.</p>

<p>Please advise...<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  7:02 PM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167121</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167121</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:02:36 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #336 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, there are those who think any drama series with multi-ep arcs is a soap opera.  It's been getting a little soapier lately with some marital infidelities, but I don't think it's completely saponified just yet.  Watch the miniseries and see what you think.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  7:07 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167122</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167122</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:07:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #337 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are days when BSG feels like Dallas in space, with a side of Dark Shadows. But, in truth, I was (possibly over-)reacting to the vile canard against Farscape.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  7:20 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167124</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167124</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:20:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #338 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Begone, vile canard!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  7:24 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167126</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167126</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:24:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #339 from Tania</title>
         <description>comment from Tania on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the duck* wants to stay!!</p>

<p>*it always kills me when Daffy Duck uses 'canard'</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  7:43 PM by Tania&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167127</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167127</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:43:50 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #340 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*canard exits quacking*</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  7:44 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167128</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167128</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:44:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #341 from TexAnne</title>
         <description>comment from TexAnne on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#340: ...pursued by a bear.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  7:45 PM by TexAnne&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167130</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167130</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:45:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #342 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ludwig von Drake can stay.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  7:46 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167131</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167131</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:46:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #343 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh oh... I hope this duck talk doesn't mean we're going to engage in foul punning.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  7:47 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167132</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167132</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:47:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #344 from Marilee</title>
         <description>comment from Marilee on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Missy K, #258, yesterday's WashPost had a piece on how Jeb was supposed to be president now titled <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/19/AR2007011901364.html" rel="nofollow">What Would Jeb Do?</a></p>

<p>Serge, #278, he's the only human who will have sex with them.</p>

<p>Laurence, #291, Firefly</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  7:54 PM by Marilee&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167133</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167133</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:54:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #345 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe, marilee, but Cylons sure aren't very picky. Of course, as Xopher pointed out, they don't have much choice. Anyway, the thing that irritated me the most about Baltar from the very beginning is that he was acting like he was bonkers and people didn't seem to notice. By the way, that actor was also in the <i>Jason and the Argonauts</i> of a few years ago and he acted the same way in there too. He pretty much made me miss John Colicos's Baltar.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  8:43 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167138</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167138</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:43:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #346 from Randolph Fritz</title>
         <description>comment from Randolph Fritz on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy C@334 (a momentous number in itself): hmmm, obviously Orwell was <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sen_no_Rikyu" rel="nofollow">Sen no Rikyū</a> in a previous life.</p>

<p>BSG v2 has always seemed to me  over-produced and under-scripted; I can only tolerate it in small doses.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  9:29 PM by Randolph Fritz&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167145</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167145</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:29:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #347 from nerdycellist</title>
         <description>comment from nerdycellist on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, I kind of have a shameful tendre for Baltar. I know not why. I am usually much more attracted to large, hulking, basically decent men (such as Titus Pullo, on Rome) and less to small hairy *evil* ones. I do have to say I've given up on BSG. After the first ep or so of the season, when I realized that every female chararcter (except Mrs. Tigh, who was a hoor) was defined by her relationship with babies. Sorry, not why I watch sci-fi. </p>

<p>So anyway, Firefly and Farscape yes! I do enjoy the silly, so long as females get to behave as humans (or whatever their alien race is). I did catch the first Dresden Files and liked it well enough that I will probably continue to watch it. No one pissed me off, one of the Canadian actors playing a cop used a reasonable Chicago accent, and I really do enjoy Terrance Mann. Probably not like Titus Pullo or Baltar, but you never know.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007  9:34 PM by nerdycellist&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167146</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167146</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:34:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #348 from Sharon M</title>
         <description>comment from Sharon M on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Firefly vs. BSG, I'm for Firefly. I didn't like the BSG miniseries, though I do intend to try the series at some point. Firefly (with the exception of one episode) was just good.</p>

<p>Firefly hits that same spot that Star Wars did, back when I was a kid. It's a universe that I want to <i>play</i> in.  Farscape was good, and visually very nice - it did spend a lot of time on how these people dealt with each other, but I wouldn't call it a soap opera. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007 11:54 PM by Sharon M&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167167</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167167</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 23:54:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #349 from Bruce Arthurs</title>
         <description>comment from Bruce Arthurs on 22.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shifting television series a bit:</p>

<p>On HEROES, I think I've figured out who Claire-the-indestructible-cheerleader's biological father is:</p>

<p>It's Jack Bauer.  No matter how often or how badly that guy gets shot, stabbed, beaten, tortured, etc., he's going full tilt again one or two commercial breaks later.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 22, 2007 11:57 PM by Bruce Arthurs&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167168</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167168</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 23:57:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #350 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nerdycellist... Baltar, a basically decent man? Except for the part where he actively contributed to the near-total extermination of Humanity. I don't know what he could do to redeem himself for <i>that</i>. Anyway, I am happy to see that the BSG's crew is finally able to do something active, namely having stories where they are finding a way to Earth instead of their constantly being chased. Sure, they have little choice, but none of them have considered what'll happen when they get to an Earth even less prepared than Caprica, with a bunch of Cylon ships hot on their heels.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  4:15 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167180</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167180</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 04:15:01 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #351 from ethan</title>
         <description>comment from ethan on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven't managed to watch any Battlestar Galactica yet, but to whoever chose Firefly because of dreamy Nathan Fillion, a-frickin'-men.  That whole show had the most attractive cast, ever.</p>

<p>And I can't remember the last time I've had a more extreme "Holy crap, you're incredibly right" moment than Skwid's Ferengi comment at #285.  Wow.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  4:35 AM by ethan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167182</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167182</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 04:35:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #352 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it's just me, but every time I see that Hillary ad on the right side of ML's front page, I keep thinking I'm looking at StarGate's Samantha Carter. Teal'c and Jack O'Neill in the White House sounds like an interesting idea.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  4:35 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167183</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167183</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 04:35:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #353 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge #352: Teal'c as Secretary of Defense, perhaps?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  9:25 AM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167205</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167205</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:25:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #354 from Carrie S.</title>
         <description>comment from Carrie S. on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Baltar, a basically decent man? Except for the part where he actively contributed to the near-total extermination of Humanity.</i></p>

<p>Not to defend Baltar, who is a squid of a man, but he didn't know what he was doing.  He thought he was committing a minor peccadillo to get into the pants of a hot blonde; he had no idea about the whole end of humanity thing.</p>

<p>He has since done other things which make him morally bankrupt, but letting Caprica!Six into the defense computers would have been a very minor sin indeed if she'd been what he thought she was.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  9:25 AM by Carrie S.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167206</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167206</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:25:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #355 from Skwid</title>
         <description>comment from Skwid on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carrie @ 354:<br />
A-<i>hem</i>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  9:45 AM by Skwid&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167212</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167212</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:45:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #356 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Six, a hot blonde? Ewww...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007 10:08 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167217</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167217</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:08:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #357 from Susan</title>
         <description>comment from Susan on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>but to whoever chose Firefly because of dreamy Nathan Fillion</i></p>

<p>Am I the only one who found the actor decorative but the character so annoying that it was an active turnoff?</p>

<p>Give me Wash any time.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007 10:09 AM by Susan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167219</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167219</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:09:36 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #358 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fragano @ 353... <i>Teal'c as Secretary of Defense, perhaps?</i></p>

<p>Or maybe as Press Secretary.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007 10:10 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167220</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167220</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:10:07 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #359 from Carrie S.</title>
         <description>comment from Carrie S. on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#355, you are not a squid, you are a Skwid.  Different animal.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007 10:16 AM by Carrie S.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167221</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167221</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:16:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #360 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan... Heck, any spaceship pilot who, like Wash, passes time by having two action-figure dinosaurs duke it out on his dashboard has got my vote.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007 10:23 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167222</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167222</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:23:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #361 from ethan</title>
         <description>comment from ethan on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan #357: <i>Am I the only one who found the actor decorative but the character so annoying that it was an active turnoff?</i></p>

<p>Aw, c'mon, Mal meant well.  And he was seriously dreamy.</p>

<p><i>Give me Wash any time.</i></p>

<p>Well, heck, give <i>me</i> Wash any time, too!  Or Simon.  I'd take Jayne in a pinch.  Hell, give me Zoe, River, Inara, or Kaylee.  What a bunch of pretty people.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007 10:29 AM by ethan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167223</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167223</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:29:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #362 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge #358: That would make press conferences interesting.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007 10:46 AM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167224</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167224</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:46:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #363 from nerdycellist</title>
         <description>comment from nerdycellist on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge, I wasn't saying Baltar was a decent man; I think he's a weasel and am disturbed that I'm somewhat attracted to him, as my type skews Decent.</p>

<p>Nothing against Cap'n Tightpants, but I think I do love Wash just a tiny bit more.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007 10:49 AM by nerdycellist&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167225</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167225</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:49:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #364 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, Fragano. Then again Teal'c would probably quickly get moved to another job. Imagine a Press Secretary who actually answers questions, and truthfully. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007 10:51 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167226</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167226</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:51:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #365 from Faren Miller</title>
         <description>comment from Faren Miller on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sidenote from a tennis fanatic: If anyone else out there stayed up late to watch Australian Open tennis shown live yesterday (till midnight AZ time, an hour earlier for West Coasters, way late on the East Coast), they could have winced and delighted in a massive session of punning from one of the commenters during the Serena Williams match, in advance of the Andy Roddick/Mardy Fish match that came later. Mostly "fish" jokes, of course, though Serena and her excellent Israeli opponent Shahar Perer (sp?) also came in for some name punning. A fun late evening for me, at any rate!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007 10:52 AM by Faren Miller&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167227</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167227</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:52:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #366 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zoe: "Captain, requesting permission to have my husband tear off my clothes."<br />
Wash: "Work work work."</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007 10:54 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167228</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167228</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:54:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #367 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge #364: That would be interesting, to say the least.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007 11:09 AM by Fragano Ledgister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167233</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167233</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:09:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #368 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>354: <i>letting Caprica!Six into the defense computers would have been a very minor sin indeed if she'd been what he thought she was.</i></p>

<p>I should probably watch the miniseries soon, just to see it before I read it. That said, I'd say I have a very different view on revealing state secrets. I love my wife and all, but I wouldn't be giving her the launch codes for the nuclear missiles or the deactivation codes for the space shields. </p>

<p>Even if she had good intentions, it could endanger her. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007 11:36 AM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167235</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167235</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:36:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #369 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>357: <i>Nathan Fillion</i></p>

<p><i>Am I the only one who found the actor decorative but the character so annoying that it was an active turnoff?</i></p>

<p>My wife seemed to appreciate the scene where he was left in the desert, naked.</p>

<p>What annoyed you about the character?</p>

<p>Personally, I liked him. My favorite character was probably Jayne, though.</p>

<p>Hm, actually, if I bin the characters, they end up in three categories, like, neutral, dislike. Most of the characters were "like". The shepard and River, I was neutral about. And Simon was probably the only one in the "dislike" category.</p>

<p></p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007 11:47 AM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167236</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167236</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:47:04 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #370 from Adam Stephanides</title>
         <description>comment from Adam Stephanides on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark @ 33: The one that springs to my mind is "In Blue" by John Crowley, but it's a difficult story to understand. (In fact, I don't.)</p>

<p>On another topic, I checked out the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/EXPOSED-Turn-Heat-Bruce-Bowman/dp/1419609971/sr=8-1/qid=1169568934/ref=sr_1_1/104-0475038-4086327?ie=UTF8&s=books" rel="nofollow">Amazon page</a> for the book discussed in the "Rave Reviews for Sale" article on the left sidebar, and the parts written by the author himself (as opposed to the "New York Times reviewer") are barely coherent. And yet the book was ranked #5556 in sales, which means that someone is buying it. I was mystified until I realized that these sales must be due to the article itself, from people who either wanted to view a train wreck or actually thought that the book sounded good.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007 11:58 AM by Adam Stephanides&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167238</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167238</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:58:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #371 from ethan</title>
         <description>comment from ethan on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg London #369: <i>My wife seemed to appreciate the scene where he was left in the desert, naked.</i></p>

<p>Oh my, appreciate, yes.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007 12:00 PM by ethan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167241</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167241</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:00:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #372 from Carrie S.</title>
         <description>comment from Carrie S. on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>...I'd say I have a very different view on revealing state secrets. I love my wife and all, but I wouldn't be giving her the launch codes for the nuclear missiles or the deactivation codes for the space shields.</i> </p>

<p>The following is in the first roughly half hour of the miniseries: Baltar was having an affair with a woman who was, unknown to him, a Cylon agent.  She told him that she was working for a defense contractor or somesuch and wanted to get into the defense computers to steal a march on her competitors.  He arranged for this to happen (I misremember whether he gave her the codes or just logged her in himself).  Since she was a Cylon, what she actually used the access for was to allow the Cylon fleet to bombard the various planets of the Colonies without warning.</p>

<p><i>Even if she had good intentions, it could endanger her.</i></p>

<p>Since the woman was asking for the access, one must assume that she, a reasonable adult, was willing to accept the risk.  Baltar is not the kind of guy who would worry his head over whether he should expose someone else to that sort of risk even if they asked for it, an attitude he would no doubt justify by prating about "Who am I to tell a person what risks she can handle?" and whatnot--callousness dressed up as dislike for condescension.</p>

<p>There are a lot of directions in which Baltar's act can be bad; all I'm saying is that "knowingly facilitating the destruction of the human race" isn't one of them.  If Six had wanted the access for the reason she claimed she did (and that Baltar believed she did), there would have been very little badness caused by Baltar's actions.</p>

<p>We can but hope that Baltar has learned that they're called "state <i>secrets</i>" for a reason, but his subsequent behavior makes this unlikely.  He's a slime.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007 12:03 PM by Carrie S.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167243</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167243</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:03:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #373 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Ben Browder as John Crichton out-hots anyone on any of the other shows we've discussed.  Partly it's the character, a folksy genius with a sense of humor about pop culture; I'm a sucker for that (shut up, ethan).  </p>

<p>But mostly it's the very callipygian Ben Browder himself.  Especially after he starts wearing black leather all the time (which he did because he discovered that he didn't get hurt as often or as badly doing the action scenes when he was wearing it).  </p>

<p>I have been known to declare that the unit of masculine callipygy is "the browder."  Ben, of course, has 1 browder; no one else has more than 750 millibrowders.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007 12:33 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167247</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167247</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:33:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #374 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not even Tahmoh Pennikett, Xopher?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007 12:38 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167248</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167248</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:38:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #375 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I share Helo's philosophy.  That doesn't mean I think he's the hottest.  I'll take Jamie Bambir over him, actually.  But remember, it's the <i>character as much as the actor...Helo is married.  So is Apollo, though gung frrzf nobhg gb raq.</i></p>

<p>Leaving aside attachments, though, John Crichton has an incredibly sexy personality.  Masculine yet warm, brash yet humble, confident yet...well, confident.  Makes me go all tingly inside.</p>

<p>Also, there aren't a lot of butt shots on BSG. Not enough, anyway.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007 12:47 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167249</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167249</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:47:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #376 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh.  I didn't look carefully enough at the preview.  Just 'character' should be in italics.  Sorry.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007 12:48 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167250</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167250</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:48:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #377 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xopher... <i>I'll take Jamie Bamber over him</i></p>

<p>I think there's a joke somewhere in there.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007 12:51 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167251</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167251</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:51:04 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #378 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'll take Jamie Bamber over easy.  Or over my knee. Or over a barrel.  Or <b>[censored]</b>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007 12:53 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167252</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167252</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:53:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #379 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Since the woman was asking for the access, one must assume that she, a reasonable adult, was willing to accept the risk.</i></p>

<p>Since she was asking for access, one then must assume the potential that she has other motives.</p>

<p>If she was dangling herself like a piece of bait before him, all the more reason to doubt her intentions.</p>

<p>I can't sympathize with his situation at all.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  1:14 PM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167255</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167255</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:14:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #380 from Jon Meltzer</title>
         <description>comment from Jon Meltzer on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#329: after all that, I expect Cthulhu to show up. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  1:27 PM by Jon Meltzer&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167259</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167259</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:27:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #381 from ethan</title>
         <description>comment from ethan on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xopher, I am shutting up.</p>

<p>I've never seen, and kind of only vaguely even heard of, <i>Farscape</i>, but a quick perusal of the Superhighway reveals a certain swooniness to this Browder fellow, in photographs at least.  Man oh man does the punctuation in that sentence seem off to me.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  1:29 PM by ethan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167260</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167260</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:29:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #382 from Jon Meltzer</title>
         <description>comment from Jon Meltzer on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and </p>

<p>"Cu'atyhv ztyj'ansu Pguhyuh E'ylru jtnu'anty sugnta!"</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  1:35 PM by Jon Meltzer&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167262</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167262</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:35:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #383 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where, oh where, is the love for Shepherd Book?</p>

<p>Xopher, the thing I most hold against SG-1 is that they've made Ben Browder boring.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  1:49 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167264</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167264</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:49:32 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #384 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JESR... On the other hand, StarGate gave Claudia Black the chance to show how goofy she is. She's the only reason I still bother. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  1:53 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167265</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167265</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:53:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #385 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge, my dedication to Claudia Black is well known but I thought the "John Quixote" episode of Farscape gave her goofiness free rein, what with the southern accent and the lisp. That episode also proves that Ben Browder has a better grasp of dialog and pacing than the entire SG writing staff.</p>

<p>(Deletes two hundred word rant on the standard SG-1 plot,four acts of pointless exposition and technobabble then WHAM! God jumps out of the box, etcetera and so on.)  </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  2:04 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167266</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167266</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:04:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #386 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JESR... I must confess I missed that episode of <i>FarScape</i>. I pretty much dropped out after Scorpius showed up and when Chrichton started resorting a bit too much to shouting. Yes, yes, he was crazy.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  2:16 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167267</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167267</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:16:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #387 from Paula Lieberman</title>
         <description>comment from Paula Lieberman on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/01/23/cialeaktrial.ap/index.html?eref=rss_topstories</p>

<p>Watergate II, with more scum, slime, and lies, and cockroaches... </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  2:38 PM by Paula Lieberman&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167272</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167272</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:38:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #388 from P J Evans</title>
         <description>comment from P J Evans on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paula @ 387:</p>

<p>Don't forget the entertainment of watching them blaming each other for their problems. Or, as someone at Firedoglake put it, someone being thrown under the bus just when it loses its wheels.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  2:46 PM by P J Evans&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167274</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167274</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:46:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #389 from Rob Rusick</title>
         <description>comment from Rob Rusick on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge @384: <i>[..] StarGate gave Claudia Black the chance to show how goofy she is.</i></p>

<p>I like that bit they did when she was taking a psych evaluation:<blockquote>[ Reading question ]</blockquote></p>

<blockquote>"You are walking in the desert, and you see a tortise on its back. You do not help it. Why?"

<p>[ Chews pencil. Writes ]</p>

<p>"Because... I.. am.. also.. a tortise."</p></blockquote>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  2:48 PM by Rob Rusick&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167275</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167275</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:48:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #390 from Paula Lieberman</title>
         <description>comment from Paula Lieberman on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P. J. @388:</p>

<p>I want the lot of them excised from the US Government and any position except inmate in federal prison, serving hard time and with enormous fines... let their families enjoy the lifestyles of the subminimum wage healthcare-bereft residents in lousy neighborhoods with inadequate insulation and dubious plumbing.... </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  3:11 PM by Paula Lieberman&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167277</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167277</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:11:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #391 from Steff Z</title>
         <description>comment from Steff Z on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>back to #357 et seqq.: <br />
yeah.  Wash.  <br />
Another vote for the inate hotness of the goofy-but-highly-skilled.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  4:06 PM by Steff Z&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167291</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167291</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:06:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #392 from Steff Z</title>
         <description>comment from Steff Z on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eeep. I mean "innate" of course.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  4:07 PM by Steff Z&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167292</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167292</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:07:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #393 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>"Because... I.. am.. also.. a tortise."</i></p>

<p>now THAT is funny.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  4:13 PM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167295</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167295</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:13:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #394 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ethan #381: Rent the first few episodes.  You won't be disappointed.  If you think he's swoony in stills, just <i>wait</i> 'til you see him in motion.</p>

<p>JESR #383: I don't find him boring even on SG-1.  But I have a very constant nature, to my consistent detriment!  As for rants about SG-1...you should see mine about how even their <i>math</i> is wrong.  It requires two-inch steel cable to suspend my disbelief for this show.  But I still watch, even though I think they jumped the shark when they introduced the Ori.</p>

<p>Idea for crossover episode: A small child comes through the quantum mirror (or through the gate, mysteriously).  He says his name is D'Argo Sun-Crichton, and that there are monsters after him.  Shortly thereafter, in come Daddy and Mommy.  Wackiness ensues.</p>

<p>I'd love to see Browder play both Crichton and Mitchell in the same episode; still more to see Black play her two characters, who contrast MUCH more sharply.  </p>

<p>Anybody want to write the script /a/n/d/ /w/e/'/l/l/ /s/p/l/i/t/ /t/h/e/ /m/o/n/e/y/?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  4:14 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167296</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167296</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:14:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #395 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you toss Baltar into this, Xopher? And I do mean toss, very forcefully.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  4:19 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167301</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167301</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:19:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #396 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno, Serge.  I was kind of thinking Tricia Helfer should appear on SG-1 as a Jaffa.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  4:24 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167305</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167305</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:24:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #397 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, no, no, Xopher... Virginia Hey. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  4:26 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167306</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167306</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:26:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #398 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, no.  Virginia Hey has to come in as a Prior(ess).  I'd like to see Gigi Edgely play a Wraith, though.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  4:29 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167308</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167308</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:29:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #399 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gigi, ouioui, Xopher... About Virginia Hey, did you know she was in 1982's <i>Road Warrior</i>?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  4:54 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167311</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167311</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:54:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #400 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gigi would make an awesome wraith; she was the scariest pixie ever.</p>

<p>All this crossover talk makes me wish I could find a unified link for a SGA/Eureka crossover I read, which starts with Fargo hiding under his desk and whimpering, as any ex TA of Rodney McKay's would probably do.</p>

<p>SGA: the fic is better than canon!</p>

<p>(It's in the 50s outside, and not raining, so I am catching up on pruning that should have been done in August. Some days I'm really sorry I'm so good at growing great big roses).</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  5:22 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167314</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167314</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:22:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #401 from Peter Erwin</title>
         <description>comment from Peter Erwin on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>JESR #383: I don't find him boring even on SG-1. But I have a very constant nature, to my consistent detriment! As for rants about SG-1...you should see mine about how even their math is wrong. It requires two-inch steel cable to suspend my disbelief for this show. But I still watch, even though I think they jumped the shark when they introduced the Ori.</i></p>

<p>The only thing that really caused my disbelief to crash when watching <i>Firefly</i> was the one "marooned in space with air running out" episode, because making space travel -- and the whole issue of where everything was -- plausible or coherent (or even consistent) was clearly something Whedon and company weren't the least bit concerned about.</p>

<p>(Well, that and the space station that had no traffic control, collision sensors, or even radar, so that random ships could crash into it whenever they wanted.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  5:58 PM by Peter Erwin&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167320</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167320</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:58:54 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #402 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>None of that ever bothered me about <i>Firefly</i>, Peter, even though it normally would have. That's probably because I liked the feel of the whole thing, and the characters, and the premise that they were putting together a family that was better than what they were born in.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  6:03 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167322</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167322</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:03:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #403 from Peter Erwin</title>
         <description>comment from Peter Erwin on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge (#402): Well, the fact that I quite liked the feel of the whole thing -- and the characters, and the dialog, and so forth -- is what kept things like what I mentioned from poisoning the show as a whole.  (I just can't buy that one episode, because I can't believe they're in any real peril.  The other problem is that the peril depends partly on a breakdown of technology, and the technology of <i>Firefly</i> is hopelessly inconsistent as well.[*])</p>

<p>Of course, my problem is that I'm an astronomer, so I tend to twitch involuntarily when people can't be bothered to get space-related things even remotely right, even though I know (intellectually) that I shouldn't let it get in the way of my enjoyment of the story.</p>

<p>[*] For example: it's the twenty-whatever-th century, and they can travel easily between the stars/planets/moons/whatever, and yet the doctor is restricted to mid-20th Century medicine?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  7:03 PM by Peter Erwin&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167334</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167334</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 19:03:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #404 from Meg Thornton</title>
         <description>comment from Meg Thornton on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>abi @ 314</p>

<p>*grin*  Ah yes, good old BBC "wobbly sets" science fiction, where you get to see special effects which are done on a very low budget.  I just purchased the fourth season of Blake's 7 recently, and got quite a giggle out of the episode "Traitor".  It appears when <i>Liberator</i> exploded at the end of season three, the contents of the wardrobe room fell onto Helotrix - Tarrant winds up wearing one of Avon's old tunics, and I spotted at least another two of Avon's, two of Vila's and one of Blake's tunics on the various Helots.  Best laugh of the entire series (Servalan - sorry, *Sleer* was responsible for annexing the costume budget, it seems).</p>

<p>Quite frankly, Avon was a *wonderful* creation.  All sci-fi series really need someone as intelligent, cranky, grumpy and snarky as Avon, if only to throw the sheer unrelieved heroism of most lead characters into hideous relief.  Some of his lines are absolute triumphs.  </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  7:17 PM by Meg Thornton&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167336</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167336</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 19:17:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #405 from Marilee</title>
         <description>comment from Marilee on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys do know that SG1 is ending this summer?  There's still SG: Atlantis, and probably a new one, though.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  7:26 PM by Marilee&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167339</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167339</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 19:26:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #406 from Bob Oldendorf</title>
         <description>comment from Bob Oldendorf on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I learned about <i>Firefly</i> here, actually - went off and bought the DVDs; and someone here gave my wife and daughter tickets for one of the preview showings of <i>Serenity</i> (shout-out for Kate: thanks again!).</p>

<p>I <i>liked</i> it well enough, better than most of what's on tv, certainly, and would have liked to see more of it than was made... but </p>

<p>a) I'm discomforted by Mal's  ethics and b) even more discomforted that everybody in <i>Firefly</i> fandom seems to be too busy cheering for him to be much concerned about it.</p>

<p>He's been forced to the wall by large-scale economic and political forces...and we see him begin crossing the line... and the show seems ambivalent about this. </p>

<p>This being action-adventure TV, I was left wondering if we're being told that criminality is OK if it's being done by Good Guys.  I was left uncomfortable by that sort of moral reasoning, mostly because I couldn't figure out just what reaction Joss was attempting to elicit. (Presumably, given more scope, some of this ambiguity would have been resolved.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  7:42 PM by Bob Oldendorf&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167341</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167341</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 19:42:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #407 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marilee, not to mention two TV movies to tie up the SG-1 story, and a development deal on a third Stargate-verse series (and David Hewlitt's half-hour SF comedy, not SG related). </p>

<p>About the moral ambiguity of Malcolm Reynolds: in the larger context of the 'verse, where the government has used the population of whole planets for drug experiments, and stolen River and messed with her mind, and even the preacher has a dark past, it's not as if there's an unambiguous morality anywhere- except in Inara's guild, and that's been a matter of a certain amount of fannish angst.</p>

<p>After a bunch of years thinking about the Whedon mind, I have come to believe that the Larger Message is the one that gets said midway through the run of Angel: "if nothing you do matters, all that matters is what you do."</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  7:54 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167343</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167343</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 19:54:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #408 from Rob Rusick</title>
         <description>comment from Rob Rusick on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JESR @407: <i>[A] development deal on a third Stargate-verse series [..]</i></p>

<p>I first parsed that to mean that all the dialog would be in meter and rhyme. </p>

<p>An odd notion; I don't know why my brain suggests such things.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  8:46 PM by Rob Rusick&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167350</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167350</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 20:46:32 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #409 from Julie L.</title>
         <description>comment from Julie L. on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Now is the winter of our discontent<br />
Made glorious summer by our Sun-God Ra...."</p>

<p>(I haven't seen any Stargate except for the original movie.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  9:00 PM by Julie L.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167353</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167353</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:00:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #410 from Randolph Fritz</title>
         <description>comment from Randolph Fritz on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OLPC again, a <a href="http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/005888.html" rel="nofollow">discussion</a> of philosophy and content.  It seems clear the intention is to make the third world adopters an educational lab, and damned if I think it's ethical to do so.  I Have A Bad Feeling About This.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  9:09 PM by Randolph Fritz&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167354</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167354</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:09:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #411 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter @ 403... Yes, I do have to take my brain thru major contortions to accept some if not most of the premises of <i>Firefly</i>, but it gives me something in exchange. As for Mal's ethical shortcomings...</p>

<p><i>Take my love, take my land <br />
Take me where I cannot stand <br />
I don't care, I'm still free <br />
You can't take the sky from me <br />
Take me out to the black <br />
Tell them I ain't comin' back <br />
Burn the land and boil the sea <br />
You can't take the sky from me <br />
There's no place I can be <br />
Since I found Serenity <br />
But you can't take the sky from me... </i></p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  9:12 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167355</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167355</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:12:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #412 from Will A</title>
         <description>comment from Will A on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>#407 ::: JESR I was left uncomfortable by that sort of moral reasoning, mostly because I couldn't figure out just what reaction Joss was attempting to elicit.</i></p>

<p>My guess is that uncomfortable ambiguity was the intent. Joss tells a whole lot of hero stories that call hero stories into question. </p>

<p>Zoe: Want to know the definition of a hero? Someone who gets other people killed. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  9:12 PM by Will A&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167356</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167356</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:12:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #413 from Nancy C</title>
         <description>comment from Nancy C on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, I am not an astronomer, but I am bothered by the fact that Firefly occurs all in one solar system.  Somehow, that just doesn't work for me.</p>

<p>As for Mal's ethics, I'd guess that he does not feel obligated to obey the rules of a government he rebelled against, lost to, and feels is illegitimate.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007  9:13 PM by Nancy C&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167357</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167357</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:13:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #414 from Bob Oldendorf</title>
         <description>comment from Bob Oldendorf on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I get that Mal's ambiguity is probably deliberate.  And real life is full of complicated choices, too.  </p>

<p><i>As for Mal's ethics, I'd guess that he does not feel obligated to obey the rules of a government he rebelled against, lost to, and feels is illegitimate.</i></p>

<p><br />
Well, there's that.. but Mal is not just a defeated rebel - he's also turning himself into an armed bandit. And we're rooting for him.  </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007 10:06 PM by Bob Oldendorf&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167365</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167365</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 22:06:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #415 from Tania</title>
         <description>comment from Tania on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dresden Files Episode 1 is up on iTunes as a free download this week. If anyone here is an iTunes user...</p>

<p>Yeah. I seem to be subscribed to a lot of podcasts. I don't have a problem. I could stop at any time.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007 11:12 PM by Tania&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167381</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167381</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 23:12:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #416 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on 23.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>a) I'm discomforted by Mal's ethics </i></p>

<p>erm.</p>

<p><i>he's also turning himself into an armed bandit.</i></p>

<p>In the train job, he stole medicine and then gave it back when he realized it was needed or people would die.</p>

<p>He's hauled cattle, which I believe was owned by the man who paid him to haul, the illegal part was the private owning of the cattle, or something. Didn't quite get if there was anything illegal there, or if he was just trucking.</p>

<p>He stole meds from a government hospital, and it was sufficiently explained that supplies there would be suficient that no one would die if they cleaned out a few cabinets. </p>

<p>They salvaged supplies off a ship, which turned out to be government food, which turns out to be illegal in that universe, and had to sell it under the counter.</p>

<p>I can't remember the details of the "bank job". That may have been banditry. But all other cases of unrepentant banditry appear to be stealing from, or in some way sticking it to, the government. And given planet wide government experiments, and the sort of torture they did to River, the government in that universe is Evil (tm).</p>

<p>I may be projecting onto Mal here, but he seems to be of Lawful Good alignment. And Mal's in a world where those who make the Law are evil. And given those circumstances, Mal rightfully choose Good over Law, and has to deal with it. At one point, I think Mal said something to the effect of they're out in the dark with no rudder or something. Law would give him steerage, but it's implemented by an evil government. So, he feels like he's blowing in the wind.</p>

<p>But at least in the bits we've seen so far, Mal tries to follow the Good. <br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 23, 2007 11:36 PM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167385</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167385</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 23:36:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #417 from Bob Oldendorf</title>
         <description>comment from Bob Oldendorf on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg London:</p>

<p>I lack the attention span to be an obsessive fan, but my impression was that each time out, Mal's capers were getting more serious, the rationales to justify the thefts were getting more strained... he was pushing the limits each time, and was millimeters from crossing over.  I found that tension uncomfortable. (Especially when everyone else seems to be rooting for him.)</p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007  1:24 AM by Bob Oldendorf&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167434</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167434</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:24:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #418 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn't obsessing, I just happened to watch all the episodes over the course of a single weekend. (didn't see them on TV, saw the movie, liked it, bought the DVD for the series, watched them all at once.)</p>

<p>I didn't get that impression of Mal. Character-wise, he's a sort of Robin Hood archtype. He'd be lawful good, but the Law got taken over by the evil government, so now he's Chaotic Good.</p>

<p>He robs from the evil government and uses it to help himself and others like River and her brother. And when he finds out he robbed from the poor (the medicine from the train robbery), he gave it back to the poor, risking getting arrested in teh process.</p>

<p>He's probably a little more edgier than Robin Hood, but I think that's probably the closest archetype for his character.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007  2:55 AM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167454</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167454</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 02:55:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #419 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for myself, I've always been a sucker for stories where a misfit joins the crew of a spaceship, and in the process finds a Home. I've read Cherryh's <i>Merchanter's Luck</i> (*) and a few other things. Does anybody have any other suggestions, modern or not?</p>

<p>(*) I know, I know, in that case, the captain is the misfit, whose only Home almost gets taken away by his crew.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007  8:58 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167482</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167482</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 08:58:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #420 from Carrie S.</title>
         <description>comment from Carrie S. on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I can't sympathize with [Baltar's] situation at all.</i></p>

<p>I kinda can, but only in the way that makes me want to smack him, because everything you say about Six having motives Baltar might not know about is completely true.  Baltar's very, very smart, and like many smart people the idea that he could be wrong is alien to him.  Once he thinks he's identified Six as being just as venal as he is, he decides he's got her number (er, no pun intended) and stops looking, because he's smart and he can't be <i>wrong</i>.</p>

<p>He <i>still</i> didn't intend anything like what happened and is horrified when it does, and if he'd been doing what he thought he was doing it wouldn't have been a bad thing except in the stuffy governmental way.  That's all I'm saying.  Intentions do count, though admittedly in this case even intending to end poverty or find a cure for cancer wouldn't have been sufficient mitigation. :)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007  9:27 AM by Carrie S.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167487</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167487</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:27:34 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #421 from Faren Miller</title>
         <description>comment from Faren Miller on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geez, for a non-watcher of these shows, the latest discussion is starting to sound like a Soap Opera Digest fan forum! </p>

<p>But getting back to the subject of masculine eye-candy, anyone with a love of jutting butts can only regret this is no longer the era of tight-shorts tennis. (Yes of course, I had to mention tennis again here, even with no takers on the previous remark.) These days most of the guys are wearing droopy drawers, but with tank tops in vogue there are plenty of biceps on view [ditto on some of the women!]. And the occasional in-match shirt change can be fun too, even for a hormonally-challenged crone.</p>

<p>While sex appeal is only part of the lure of tennis -- elegant motion, good reflexes and quick thinking also play their part -- it <i>can</i> add to the fun.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007 10:15 AM by Faren Miller&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167500</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167500</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:15:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #422 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faren, did you agree with Eva Green's comment to Daniel Craig's James Bond about his tush in <i>Casino Royale</i>?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007 10:23 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167503</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167503</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:23:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #423 from P J Evans</title>
         <description>comment from P J Evans on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faren @ 421:</p>

<p>There's more than one reason why some football players are called 'tight ends'. Think of Jerry Rice.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007 10:53 AM by P J Evans&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167507</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167507</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:53:04 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #424 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Baltar to butts...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007 10:55 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167509</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167509</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:55:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #425 from Tania</title>
         <description>comment from Tania on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faren - I'm not a bum girl, I like shoulders. So, yes - I like the occasional shirt change in a tennis match. And swimming...Now that is a sport I can watch strictly for the eye candy. Tasty eye candy.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007 12:50 PM by Tania&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167539</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167539</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:50:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #426 from ethan</title>
         <description>comment from ethan on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooh, tennis men, Daniel Craig...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007 12:57 PM by ethan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167544</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167544</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:57:36 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #427 from Peter Erwin</title>
         <description>comment from Peter Erwin on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tania (#415) said:<br />
<i>The Dresden Files Episode 1 is up on iTunes as a free download this week. If anyone here is an iTunes user...</i></p>

<p>Oh, <i>thanks</i>... like my poor laptop's hard disk wasn't full enough already ;-)  (Since I don't live in the US, this is about the only way I can watch such things.)<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007  1:42 PM by Peter Erwin&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167561</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167561</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:42:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #428 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PNH: extra 'of' in the "German Freethinkers" Sidelight.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007  2:06 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167575</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167575</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:06:32 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #429 from Sarah S</title>
         <description>comment from Sarah S on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#421</p>

<p>Elegant motion? Good reflexes? Quick thinking?</p>

<p>That <b>is</b> my definition of sex appeal.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007  2:17 PM by Sarah S&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167581</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167581</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:17:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #430 from Skwid</title>
         <description>comment from Skwid on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a representative of non-pinhead Texans, thanks for the "Freethinker" Sidelight, Patrick.  If Comfort weren't way, way far away I'd make a pilgrimage and lay some flowers down.  Oh, and Rory Harper?  Should you find your way over here, you can bite my Son of the Texas Revolution ass.</p>

<p>(Never heard WoNA used in anything other than jest)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007  2:59 PM by Skwid&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167600</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167600</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:59:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #431 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>{sigh}</p>

<p>It is amply obvious to me that y'all live in areas where the weather is crappy, and have, therefore, no reason to step away from the computer and take care of gardening chores left undone far too long.</p>

<p>I'm never going to catch up on any of this, but I'd like to report that one can now walk under the hazelnut bush.</p>

<p>At least one of them.</p>

<p>On its east side.</p>

<p>If you duck a little.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007  5:01 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167697</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167697</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:01:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #432 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much ducking, JESR? And how tall is this person supposed to be, when in a non-ducking physical state?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007  5:10 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167703</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167703</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:10:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #433 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm 5'6" and must only duck a <i>little</i>.</p>

<p>Cutting a 3" diameter branch with a pruning saw is good exersize, but a rotten way to maintain a hedge planting.</p>

<p>The ratio of sitting and having a nice glass of water to cutting branches off of things (the quince tree is now less messy and no longer blocks access to the Russell's Cottage Rose) has passed 1:1 and is dropping fast.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007  5:53 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167716</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167716</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:53:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #434 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile, JESR, I have one big bush in the backyard that, come Spring, will become intimately acquainted with my saw. Even last year, its own weight was making it tilt away from the house. When Albuquerque went thru that freaky snowstorm during the Holidays, the weight of the snow made it tilt even further away. It's all melted away now, but the bush hasn't sprung back one bit. So, if pruning doesn't help, well, I have a pickaxe with the bush's name on it.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007  6:01 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167722</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167722</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:01:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #435 from Kathryn from Sunnyvale</title>
         <description>comment from Kathryn from Sunnyvale on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JESR @431,</p>

<p>No, because as of today in my yard you can walk under the date palm tree without getting scratched. It doesn't ever get hot here, but if it did, under the palm would always be deep dark shady cool*.</p>

<p>However, you will likely lose an eye if you walk there, due to the many branches now cut at arm-height. </p>

<p>I've been testing all my pruning equipment and saws to see if any work well on palm branches.</p>

<p>None do. <br />
Swearwordy fibrous thick stems, some almost as thick as my fist in cross-section. I'm now eyeing power tools. Perhaps the reciprocating saw. Probably not the Dremel, because even the metal cutting tips might not be strong enough for the plasteel-carbonfiber-neutronium strong palm branches.</p>

<p>* But we don't need shade, therefore the need to find a tool that works. The other current features of the yard are a lush carpet of <a href="http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/alert/alrtoxal.html" rel="nofollow"> Oxalis pes caprae</a> (aka Rancid Buttercup, O. pestilence) and several giant aloes (aka Ouch). Luckily for the latter, I've found a local nursery that'll take them for trade. Unluckily, this requires digging up 3-foot diameter sea urchins.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007  6:27 PM by Kathryn from Sunnyvale&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167730</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167730</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:27:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #436 from P J Evans</title>
         <description>comment from P J Evans on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't remember what my father used when trimming the fronds on the palm-that-came-with-the-house (aka the palm that was trying to kill the power drop). I think it might have been his bow saw.</p>

<p>Have you tried a tungsten carbide rod saw blade in a hacksaw frame? Or something designed to cut green wood?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007  6:34 PM by P J Evans&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167732</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167732</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:34:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #437 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge, I actually have a friend in Albuquerque who retired from landscape contracting in Maine, but I will refrain from trying to make connections as I'm pretty sure there was a reason she got out of that business.</p>

<p>Me... things went to hell last year, and actually the year before that, too, so that things I should have taken care of with a soft pinch are now the subject of wistful longing for chainsaws.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007  6:57 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167740</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167740</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:57:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #438 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathryn, the name of that Oxalis bodes no good.</p>

<p>I've seen people struggle enough with the whimpy windmill palm to know that, as much as date palms are filled with all sorts of virtues, I'd not take one on for a bet. My advice for young gardeners would include taking a pruning saw to any sort of shrub or tree with branches more than a half-inch in diameter and seeing what it's like before they commit to ownership. By that measure, I'd have a lot more magnolias and a lot fewer plums, cherries, and peaches. </p>

<p>My solution to the hardest cuts, of course, is to hand the saw to my 20 year old son, but he'll move away eventually (if providence is kind) and then I'll have to come up with a better solution soon.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007  7:15 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167748</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167748</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:15:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #439 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JESR @ 437... Things landscapy went to hell last year? That's pretty much the way it was for me too. I had two Projects from Hell at the office (one still burning quite hot) and there basically wasn't time for the backyard. And the weeds grew and grew and grew. I was finally able to pull most of them by autumn, but not all of them, by the time the weather became too cold.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007  8:15 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167763</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167763</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 20:15:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #440 from Melissa Mead</title>
         <description>comment from Melissa Mead on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figued that with all the gardeners on here, somebody might be interested:<br />
(I go every year. It's fun, and for a good cause.)</p>

<p>http://www.gardenandflowershow.com/home.html</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007  8:47 PM by Melissa Mead&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167767</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167767</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 20:47:01 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #441 from Kathryn from Sunnyvale</title>
         <description>comment from Kathryn from Sunnyvale on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge and JESR 437-39,</p>

<p>Sympathy on the lost landscaping year: that happened for me too. The previous owner was ill for a few years, followed by 18 months of an empty house, and then for the past year my life's been a few hours short of a full clock. All that neglect has to be addressed before I can do my own gardening. At least it didn't become a jungle: in part because the oxalis keeps anything else from growing. Still, I've taken out a few small trees that could have been hand pulled when seedlings years back.</p>

<p>On oxalis- those are my names for it. Nasty bulblet-producing weed that it is, it gets worse if you try to dig it out. I'm not into gRoundup, and the climate here isn't conducive to solarizing the soil (plus I have a colony of <a href="http://montereybay.com/creagrus/CABatrachoseps.html" rel="nofollow">slender salamanders</a> to protect). So all I can do is try to starve the oxalis out by scything off the stems. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007  9:08 PM by Kathryn from Sunnyvale&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167772</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167772</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:08:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #442 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge, two springs in a row, actually- not conflicts with projects, just with my physical abilities: year before last I gave myself a third-degree burn on my foot, which was a problem until it healed; last year I managed to ass-toboggan down the back steps twice in the same week and couldn't actually bend or lift, or stretch, much. This is in conflict with the kinds of roses I grow- huge climbers,like Long John Silver, and modern shrubs, like Darlow's Enigma, and damasks, like Ispahan. I've spent more time pruning and tying in those three this week than in the past two years- and Ispahan still has probably twice as many canes as it should, Darlow's Enigma needs some structual props, and I haven't even touched the three-year-old Brenda Colvin, since I don't yet own the ten-foot 6X6 post which is the next stage in its training.</p>

<p>I have a little problem with roses the way Janis Joplin had a little problem with heroin.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007  9:23 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167774</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167774</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:23:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #443 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kathy from Sunnyvale... <i>my life's been a few hours short of a full clock</i></p>

<p>May I steal that expression from you, Kathy?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007 10:12 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167783</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167783</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:12:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #444 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JESR... <i>I have a little problem with roses the way Janis Joplin had a little problem with heroin.</i></p>

<p>That sounds like a good opening line for a story of the seedy world of gardening, with a detective named Phillip Marl-hoe.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007 10:13 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167784</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167784</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:13:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #445 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge, I should suffer loss of points for quoting myself, though- I first used that line on the Prodigy gardening boards, in 1991 or so. I've just been unable to improve on it (or break my addiction to roses, especially old ones with strong scents).</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007 10:21 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167786</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167786</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:21:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #446 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathryn, love those salamanders. I'm much too dry here (sitting as I do atop a glacial lacustrine sand dune) for salamanders; I've got Pacific Chorus Frogs, garter snakes, and toads to worry about, so I'm spray free.</p>

<p>Or have been; the combinbation of the domesticated thug Geranium "Claridge Druce" and creeping buttercup has driven me to the brink of herbicide. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007 10:35 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167788</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167788</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:35:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #447 from Nancy C</title>
         <description>comment from Nancy C on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JESR, </p>

<p>If I may pick your brain:</p>

<p>I live in Buffalo, NY, which is a zone 5b.  I was given a rose book for Chrismas 2005, with a pledge to put in the garden. (Yes, he promised me a rose garden.)  I would very much like flowers with scent.  What should I plant?</p>

<p>If not, just consider me very jealous of your roses.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007 11:09 PM by Nancy C&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167798</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167798</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 23:09:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #448 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JESR @ 444... Well, there's nothing wrong with quoting oneself. By the way, after burning your foot one year and falling down the stairs the year after that, you'd better be careful this year.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007 11:27 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167803</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167803</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 23:27:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #449 from Marilee</title>
         <description>comment from Marilee on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JESR, #431, I own a condo, so I don't do gardening.  Of course, when I owned houses, I didn't do much gardening either.  I was willing to prune, but I didn't weed or plant.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007 11:50 PM by Marilee&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167808</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167808</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 23:50:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #450 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 24.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy, there's two reblooming, very fragrant, extremely hardy, old fashioned roses which I recommend to anyone in more northern areas: Rose de Rescht, which is a deep rose-red, attar of roses scented Portland rose, and Stanwell Perpetual, which is pale pink, rosewater scented, and is a sport of the Scotch briar rose. Neither takes a lot of pruning, nor any spraying at all, and they have a nice presence in the garden. </p>

<p>I think Antique Rose Emporium still carries both of them; Heirloom has gotten spotty on the availability of old roses. There's a NE rose vendor whose name escapes me, too. </p>

<p>Then there's the Explorer Series of roses, which were developed in Canada;John Cabot is very nice, I hear,although I haven't grown that one. </p>

<p> </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 24, 2007 11:52 PM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167809</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167809</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 23:52:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #451 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge, I can but hope.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007 12:01 AM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167813</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167813</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:01:36 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #452 from xeger</title>
         <description>comment from xeger on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#435 ::: Kathryn from Sunnyvale cursed:<br />
<i>Swearwordy fibrous thick stems, some almost as thick as my fist in cross-section. I'm now eyeing power tools. Perhaps the reciprocating saw. Probably not the Dremel, because even the metal cutting tips might not be strong enough for the plasteel-carbonfiber-neutronium strong palm branches.</i></p>

<p>I'm still absolutely chuffed with <a href="http://www.leevalley.com/wood/page.aspx?c=1&p=32923&cat=1,42884,42924&ap=1" rel="nofollow">this saw</a> from Lee Valley, which I've used for far too many things, including zip-tieing it to the end of a painters extension pole for tree pruning branches up to 5-or-6" in diameter.  After all of that, and green wood, it _still_ cuts plywood cleanly.  Wonderful thing!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  1:13 AM by xeger&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167823</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167823</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 01:13:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #453 from Peter Erwin</title>
         <description>comment from Peter Erwin on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge said (#444):<br />
<i>That sounds like a good opening line for a story of the seedy world of gardening, with a detective named Phillip Marl-hoe.</i></p>

<p>Sounds more like a Sam Spade story to me.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  1:38 AM by Peter Erwin&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167829</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167829</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 01:38:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #454 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Ignores puns for the shiny, shiny goodness of that Japanese saw. I haven't bought a new saw for months, at least).</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  1:48 AM by JESR&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167831</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167831</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 01:48:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #455 from Tania</title>
         <description>comment from Tania on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter @#453- I'm thinking a romance about a perennial rake and the protagonist's attempts to cultivate him.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  2:02 AM by Tania&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167834</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167834</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 02:02:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #456 from Kathryn from Sunnyvale</title>
         <description>comment from Kathryn from Sunnyvale on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter said (453)<br />
<i>Sounds more like a Sam Spade story to me.</i></p>

<p>No, more modern than that. Perhaps a Grew Grafton: "C is for Corm", "F is for Fungicide"...</p>

<p>Xeger,<br />
2nd the motion to declare that saw shiny. By the way, if you happen to be carrying that saw and walking by a palm branch, could you test it out? If your neighbors don't have one, try the local botanical garden. I'm sure they won't mind.</p>

<p>mmmmm, saws. Having recently rediscovered how good it is to have a very, very sharp and strong and wellfit kitchen knife, I'm tempted by that saw.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  2:24 AM by Kathryn from Sunnyvale&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167839</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167839</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 02:24:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #457 from Peter Erwin</title>
         <description>comment from Peter Erwin on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathryn of Sunnyvale said (#456):<br />
<i>No, more modern than that. Perhaps a Grew Grafton: "C is for Corm", "F is for Fungicide"...</i></p>

<p>More modern?  So... nothing with Nancy Grew?  Or Auguste Lupin?</p>

<p><br />
tania (#455):<br />
Ouch.  <i>Ouch</i>. (And I missed "perennial" on the first read-through...)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  3:01 AM by Peter Erwin&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167841</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167841</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 03:01:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #458 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you never heard of the seminal gardening mysteries by Arthur Conan Soil?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  4:24 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167847</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167847</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:24:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #459 from Tania</title>
         <description>comment from Tania on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge - ::groan:: Your mind is a fertile place where these things take root. </p>

<p>Here's a funny picture on <a href="http://wonkette.com/politics/funny-pictures/sotu-truth-in-advertising-231240.php" rel="nofollow">Wonkette</a>. I think it will amuse a few people.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  4:47 AM by Tania&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167849</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167849</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:47:36 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #460 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let's not forget Hercules Poireau.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  4:53 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167851</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167851</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:53:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #461 from Peter Erwin</title>
         <description>comment from Peter Erwin on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Have you never heard of the seminal gardening mysteries by Arthur Conan Soil?</i></p>

<p>You mean the stories of Hemlock Hoelmes?<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  5:59 AM by Peter Erwin&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167859</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167859</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 05:59:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #462 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Peter, but I have heard of Agatha Christree's Miss Maple.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  8:19 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167876</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167876</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 08:19:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #463 from xeger</title>
         <description>comment from xeger on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#456 ::: Kathryn from Sunnyvale wrote:<br />
<i>Xeger,<br />
2nd the motion to declare that saw shiny. By the way, if you happen to be carrying that saw and walking by a palm branch, could you test it out? If your neighbors don't have one, try the local botanical garden. I'm sure they won't mind.</i></p>

<p>Tempting... but I suspect unfortunate comments from the owners of the botanical gardens ;)</p>

<p><i>mmmmm, saws. Having recently rediscovered how good it is to have a very, very sharp and strong and wellfit kitchen knife, I'm tempted by that saw.</i></p>

<p>Speaking of tools that tempt, I really need to get one of <a href="http://www.hidatool.com/gardenpage/hoes.html" rel="nofollow">the lovely bear claws</a> that Berkeley's Hida Tools makes, again.  One of the level best all around garden tools I've ever had - and unfortunately lost to mov[ing|ers].</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  8:34 AM by xeger&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167878</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167878</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 08:34:36 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #464 from kelek</title>
         <description>comment from kelek on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the proper use of commas, in a racially charged <a href="http://www.pvponline.com/article/3097/tues-jan-23" rel="nofollow">context</a>.</p>

<p>Offtopic discussion <a href="http://www.pvponline.com/blog/3098/uno-bitch" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  9:06 AM by kelek&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167885</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167885</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:06:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #465 from Nancy C</title>
         <description>comment from Nancy C on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, JESR!</p>

<p>I will look for those roses.  I was planning on buying Canadian, on the theory that the plants will be used to the climate, at least, if they didn't find the weather here positively balmy.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  9:25 AM by Nancy C&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167889</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167889</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:25:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #466 from Skwid</title>
         <description>comment from Skwid on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kelek @ 464, thanks for the reminder of why I don't read PVP anymore, and why I never went near their forums when I did.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  9:47 AM by Skwid&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167896</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167896</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:47:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #467 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"If it's worth doing, it's worth overdoing."</p>

<p>- the narrator of <i>MythBusters</i> during yesterday's episode where the gang went to Moffet Air Base's BIG zeppelin hangar to prove it is possible to fold a square piece of paper more than seven times, provided said sheet is 200 feet on each side, and provided that you have a steamroller with you. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  9:59 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167899</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167899</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:59:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #468 from ethan</title>
         <description>comment from ethan on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, hey, Xopher: way back...<a href="http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008472.html#165995" rel="nofollow">here</a> you told me to see <i>Eyes Wide Shut</i> and pay attention to the way people react to L. Ron...er, I mean Tom Cruise's character.</p>

<p>Well, I saw the movie, and first of all, goodness gracious.  I recently went through a long period of watching movies and reacting each time with pretty much just a "meh," to the point where I was starting to be afraid that I just didn't particularly care for movies anymore.  Which terrified me, because movies are one of the few things I'm really passionate about.  Then I saw <i>Children of Men</i> and one reason I'd be willing to seriously fight anyone who makes fun of that movie is that it broke that long streak; I responded strongly to it and I started to think that maybe I was OK.  Watching <i>Eyes Wide Shut</i> makes me positive.  DAMN that's a good movie.  Why did everyone hate it?</p>

<p>OK.  For another thing, I'm curious about what you said in the post I linked to.  Did you mean just the way all the characters react to him sexually, or is there more to it that I'm too dense to see?</p>

<p>Also, that was totally the Illuminati.  Was that not the Illuminati?  That was the Illuminati.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007 10:04 AM by ethan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167902</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167902</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 10:04:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #469 from Faren Miller</title>
         <description>comment from Faren Miller on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge (way upthread) -- haven't seen the Bond movie. As for your comment on "the seedy world of gardening", for the British version see PBS series "Rosemary and Thyme" (which has Peter Lovesey as a consultant). Of course, it does lead me to question the wisdom of anyone who hires this gardening duo, since someone *always* dies after they show up! (I'm not so sure about their design sense either, but the show's opening credits are gorgeous.)<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007 10:25 AM by Faren Miller&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167911</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167911</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 10:25:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #470 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil Gaiman has pulled another magic trick on me.</p>

<p>Yesterday, I dropped by the comics store, and, after a delay of months, <i>there</i> was the 6th of his 6-issue miniseries, <i>The Eternals</i>. I find myself reading thru, racing to the end, wondering if the Dreaming Celestial was going to flatten San Francisco and then the rest of the world. I get to the last image and... and... it said 'to be concluded'.</p>

<p>Huh?</p>

<p>I looked at the cover. It said this was the 6th of a 7-issue story. This is the first time I've seen a mini-series transform itself into a longer one before my very eyes.</p>

<p>Hats off to the magician.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007 10:30 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167913</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167913</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 10:30:32 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #471 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faren @ 469... Your comment about "Rosemary and Thyme" reminds me of the "Monk" episode where his new lady partner asks about the tendency of people dying when he's around. She jokingly asks if he's the Prince of Darkness, but he urges her not to say that because that's how rumors get started.</p>

<p>As for the Bond movie... Go see it. The last one I had seen was <i>Goldeneye</i>, which was so-so except for Sean Bean being in it. This one's good. And this is the first movie where my wife actually liked the character of Bond. And there's no naked lady dancing in the opening credits.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007 10:36 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167915</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167915</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 10:36:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #472 from P J Evans</title>
         <description>comment from P J Evans on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy C @ 466</p>

<p>High Country Gardens has <a href="http://www.highcountrygardens.com/catalog/product/82721/" rel="nofollow">John Cabot</a>. They prefer you order plants in multiples of three, but you might want to try the hardy rose collection, which is four varieties.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007 10:46 AM by P J Evans&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167919</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167919</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 10:46:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #473 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Watching Eyes Wide Shut makes me positive. DAMN that's a good movie. Why did everyone hate it?</i></p>

<p>Ew. Uh. Hm. Well. I didn't like it. Actually, I think it might be up there as number 2 of all time worst movies for me (with "Mars Attacks" beating it out by a narrow margin).</p>

<p>Top ten reasons I didn't like Eyes:</p>

<p>10: every advertisement for movie used the "Baby done a bad bad thing" song by Chris Isaak. (A song I really like.) Ninety percent of the movie soundtrack consisted of a guy sitting at a piano going <i>ping</i> ... five seconds of silence ... <i>ping</i>.</p>

<p>9: the "out-of-whack" event for Tom's character happens when he and his wife are getting high and his wife says she fantasized about some guy one time. Good lord, man, get a grip.</p>

<p>8: Tom Cruise, who has played a sexually aggressive male in most of his movies, can't seem to bring himself to do the deed.</p>

<p>7: In a party where everyone shows up in limos and he shows up in a taxi, why does he still get through the front door?</p>

<p>6: When they unmask him at the party and the woman "sacrifices" herself, so they let him go. If Tom's knowledge of the party is a threat, it's a threat. boinking some chick won't change that.</p>

<p>5: woman ends up dead after "sacrifice". Tom thinks its foul play. But if Tom's the problem, why would they kill her? Unless they're idiots.</p>

<p>4: My GAWD is this a slow movie.</p>

<p>3: Tom investigates death of sacrifice girl but is warned of powerful people who don't want him looking. He stops. End of that story thread. Apparently it wasn't important. Why was it in the movie.</p>

<p>2: The movie could perhaps be summed up as a "banging shutter" plot. There's a noise. People are scared. go investigate. its a banging shutter. In this case, the "banging shutter" is Tom's wife's drug-induced admission that she had a fantasy about another man. And then nothing happens.</p>

<p>1: And to those who talk about the story being a dream from the point after they get high, wow, so the last line is "And then he woke up."<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007 10:48 AM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167921</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167921</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 10:48:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #474 from Skwid</title>
         <description>comment from Skwid on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Eyes Wide Shut</i> is the least sexy movie about sex ever made.  And despite Greg's clear insanity (<i>Mars Attacks</i> is brilliant), I agree with every point he makes above.</p>

<p>That said, I'll watch the first five minutes of that movie any time I happen to see it on premium cable.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007 11:21 AM by Skwid&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167930</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167930</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:21:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #475 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>despite Greg's clear insanity </i></p>

<p>Hey!   </p>

<p>;)<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007 11:35 AM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167933</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167933</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:35:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #476 from Sarah S</title>
         <description>comment from Sarah S on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg and Skwid-</p>

<p>That was exactly my reaction. I also remember thinking that anyone who thought the sex in that movie was erotic, edgy, or shocking hadn't logged much time on the Web.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007 11:39 AM by Sarah S&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167935</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167935</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:39:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #477 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I'll watch the first five minutes of that movie any time </i></p>

<p>I can't remember. What happens in the first five minutes? The only good thing I recall about that movie was Leelee Sobieski was awesome. I was more interested in her five minutes of screen time than Tom running around for an hour.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007 11:39 AM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167936</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167936</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:39:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #478 from ethan</title>
         <description>comment from ethan on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skwid #474: "<i>Eyes Wide Shut</i> is the least sexy movie about sex ever made."</p>

<p>And that would be bad, if it had been meant to be sexy.  It wasn't.</p>

<p>I could go point-by-point through Greg's list at #473 and say why I think each one is dumb, but he's entitled to his opinions, no matter how much I disagree, and no matter how gratingly he expresses them.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007 12:44 PM by ethan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167948</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167948</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:44:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #479 from Ursula L</title>
         <description>comment from Ursula L on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigh.  I just saw this: http://www.emergencykindness.net/</p>

<p>Emergency Kindness is shutting down, due to lack of funds.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  1:22 PM by Ursula L&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167961</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#167961</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:22:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #480 from ethan</title>
         <description>comment from ethan on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before anyone even responds, I wanna give a big "whoopsy" and "sorry for the snippiness" for my remakrs at #478.  I fell victim to that "Expressing unfelt rage on the internet is fun!!" syndrome I always tut-tut in others.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  4:42 PM by ethan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168022</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168022</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:42:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #481 from MD²</title>
         <description>comment from MD² on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.coolfrenchcomics.com/tintinbatman.htm" rel="nofollow">Purely gratuitous</a>, but I had to share that find.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  4:43 PM by MD²&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168023</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168023</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:43:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #482 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'll just say this: EWS is not about the plot.  The plot is a convenient framework upon which Kubrick hangs the things that make it valuable.</p>

<p>And if you don't see that...I can't explain it.  Nothing wrong with you.  But you either get it or you don't.  </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  4:58 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168035</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168035</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:58:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #483 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ethan...Lrf, rirel punenpgre va gung zbivr ernpgf gb uvz frkhnyyl.  Gung vf, gurl nyy jnag gb shpx uvz (va gur urgreb frafr bs "unir frk jvgu," abg gur zber fcrpvsvp tnl frafr).  Naq rnpu crefba ernpgf gb gung hetr va uvf be ure bja vaqvivqhny jnl.  Gur fravbe qbpgbe ol gnxvat uvz haqre uvf jvat; gur ubgry pyrex ol syvegvat funzryrffyl; gur tnat bs qehaxra sengoblf (zl snibevgr, naq gur bar gung znqr zr abgvpr) ol pnyyvat uvz "snttbg" naq ebhtuvat uvz hc.  Gung vf rknpgyl ubj vzzngher fgenvtug znyrf ernpg gb srryvat frkhny qrfver sbe bgure znyrf (ng yrnfg barf gurl qba'g xabj).</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  5:06 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168037</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168037</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:06:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #484 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>WOT:</b> Is it terribly immature of me to be amused by the fact that 'sex' rot13s into 'frk'?</p>

<p>I suppose it is.  Luckily, I don't care.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  5:07 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168038</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168038</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:07:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #485 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MD&sup2... How dare you ruin the pleasures of my youth? Tintin shooting zee Batman? Heheheh...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  5:09 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168039</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168039</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:09:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #486 from ethan</title>
         <description>comment from ethan on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge #485: At least he didn't link to the Tintin comics that...er...wuzzisface, the guy who made <i>The Sexual Lives of the Belgians</i>...Jan Bucquoy.  At least he didn't link to the ones he made.</p>

<p>Xopher #483: Ahh.  OK.  I'd gotten halfway, I just hadn't made the interesting conclusions.  Looking at the bit with the fratboys through that lens somehow hadn't occurred to me, even though it should have been the most obvious.  ...And I've been staring at the cursor for nigh on five minutes now trying to put into words what I want to say next, and I just cannot, for some reason.  You know.  Right?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  5:27 PM by ethan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168048</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168048</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:27:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #487 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The plot is a convenient framework upon which Kubrick hangs the things that make it valuable.</i></p>

<p>I hadn't heard it put that way before. If I could tweak it ever so slightly to: </p>

<p><i>The plot is a convenient framework upon which Kubrick hangs the things that he finds valuable.</i></p>

<p>Then I could agree with the statement. </p>

<p>Hm, thinking about Kubrick films now. Must go to IMDB for a bit....<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  5:45 PM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168058</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168058</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:45:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #488 from Sandy B.</title>
         <description>comment from Sandy B. on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back to Pan's Labyrinth... </p>

<p>I feel sort of unsophisticated, or something.</p>

<p>I didn't enjoy the movie, even though it was mostly very well done, because nothing good happened in it. Ever. At all. To anyone. </p>

<p>I hope that's not a terrible spoiler. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  5:49 PM by Sandy B.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168060</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168060</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:49:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #489 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, I meant the things <b>I</b> find valuable.  Kubrick may have been in love with the plot, for all I know.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  5:51 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168062</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168062</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:51:01 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #490 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ethan @ 486... And this probably involves old sailor Capitain Haddock. Thanks for sparing me.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  5:51 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168063</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168063</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:51:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #491 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandy B: unfortunately it IS a terrible spoiler.  I was going to see it in the theatre, and now I'll wait for it on DVD, so I can cry in my own bathroom.  </p>

<p>Not sure that's not a good thing, but I'm also not sure how you could think that telling people "it doesn't end happily" might not be a spoiler.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  5:53 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168065</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168065</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:53:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #492 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ethan 486: Yeah.  I do know.  It took me several days after I saw it to figure out what it was that I liked about it, and much longer than that to put it all together in a way I could describe in words, even to the extent I have, which isn't that much.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  5:56 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168067</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168067</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:56:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #493 from Lexica</title>
         <description>comment from Lexica on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the statement that "nothing good happened to anybody, ever" could be debated.</p>

<p>However, I don't think there's much room for debate in "It's a Guillermo Del Toro movie; expect bleakness." But that's no more spoilerish for <i>Pan's Labyrinth</i> than it is for <i>The Devil's Backbone</i> or <i>Cronos</i>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  6:29 PM by Lexica&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168074</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168074</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 18:29:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #494 from ethan</title>
         <description>comment from ethan on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just saw <i>Pan's Labyrinth</i> myself, and I have to say, I found myself responding FAR more to the real-world stuff than to the fantasy elements.  Both the content and the general appearance of the fantasy sequences seemed a bit snoozy and underdeveloped to me.  Not sure why.  But the "post"-civil war Spain, I thought, was brutal and beautiful.</p>

<p>I agree with Xopher at #489; the non-plot interested <i>me</i>, whether or not it was what interested Kubrick.  Then again, I suppose it might be in my nature to respond to formlessness like that.  I talked about <i>Solaris</i> here, which was similarly glacial in pace, and a lot of the movies I like are similar.  Then once again, a lot of the movies I like are also about James Bond.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  6:33 PM by ethan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168076</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168076</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 18:33:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #495 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xopher... When we originally talked about the movie, I suggested not to go see <i>Pan</i> if one is having the blues. As for del Toro movies always being bleak, that doesn't include his Hollywood work, of course. (Me, I'm looking forward to his animated sequel to <i>HellBoy</i>. It'll tide me over until he's done with the live-action sequel. Ah, Selma Blair...)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  6:35 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168077</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168077</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 18:35:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #496 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ethan.. Tarkovsky's original <i>Solaris</i>, right?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  6:37 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168078</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168078</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 18:37:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #497 from TexAnne</title>
         <description>comment from TexAnne on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MD-carré(e): Waouh! That cheered me up no end!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  6:54 PM by TexAnne&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168080</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168080</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 18:54:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #498 from MD²</title>
         <description>comment from MD² on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@TexAnne: Glad you liked it (and you too Serge).</p>

<p>You just made me realise that having a pseudonym who reads as "aime décarrer" might not be the best way to fight French stereotypes. Not that anyone will notice.</p>

<p>ethan (#486): Damn. Had forgotten about Jan Bucquoy. It will take years now for my mind to feel a little less soiled again.</p>

<p>Good.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  7:40 PM by MD²&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168086</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168086</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 19:40:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #499 from Bill Higgins-- Beam Jockey</title>
         <description>comment from Bill Higgins-- Beam Jockey on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sidelights race condition!  Thank you, Tom Whitmore.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  7:44 PM by Bill Higgins-- Beam Jockey&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168088</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168088</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 19:44:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #500 from kelek</title>
         <description>comment from kelek on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skwid @ 466</p>

<p>Sorry about the eye-burning quality of...<br />
of...<br />
well, of whatever that is in PVP. (What is it about that strip, anyway? I can't find the right word.)</p>

<p>The intent was to engage our better selves in a discussion of the relationship between punctuation and humor.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  8:47 PM by kelek&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168105</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168105</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:47:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #501 from Tom Whitmore</title>
         <description>comment from Tom Whitmore on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG! did I just manage to hit both Sidelights and Particles with one article? </p>

<p>Feeling highly honored here!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  8:52 PM by Tom Whitmore&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168106</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168106</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:52:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #502 from Teresa Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Teresa Nielsen Hayden on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaargh! That's exactly what you did, and Patrick posted his first. So full credit to you -- but the extra version has now disappeared from Particles.</p>

<p>Good piece, that. Thanks again.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007  9:23 PM by Teresa Nielsen Hayden&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168111</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168111</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:23:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #503 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 25.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know why Blogger i/s/ /s/u/c/h/ /a/ /p/i/e/c/e/ /o/f/ goes to such elaborate lengths to keep you from indenting?  I have a poem stanza that I want to look like this:</p>

<p>My cocoon looks just like me, but<br />
In those eyes there is no light;<br />
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <i>(Because I sent the light away,</i><br />
In those gestures, no power;<br />
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <i>And focused all my power on the one,</i><br />
In that face, no motion.<br />
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <i>The only one who made me move.)</i></p>

<p>...done with &amp;nbsp;s to space over.  Blogger takes the &amp;nbsp;s out and replaces them with spaces <i>in the code</i> to force the lines flush left.  Blockquote won't do, obviously.  I even tried beginning those lines with '|' and it took <i>that</i> out, which I'm not sure I believe even though I just saw it.</p>

<p>It doesn't even wait for you to publish before taking out the &amp;nbsp;s.  Put them in in HTML, switch to Compose, back to HTML, they're gone.</p>

<p>Why does Blogger suck in this way?  And is there any way around it?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 25, 2007 10:39 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168120</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168120</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:39:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #504 from Skwid</title>
         <description>comment from Skwid on 26.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've seen a number of posting forms exhibit that behavior, Xopher.  I think it's a kludge to prevent nbsps and similar formatting tricks from breaking insufficiently sophisticated page layout code, possibly a legacy no longer even needed but necessary at some point.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 26, 2007  9:28 AM by Skwid&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168217</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168217</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:28:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #505 from Paula Lieberman</title>
         <description>comment from Paula Lieberman on 26.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canadian roses from Vancouver are not likely to be all that winter hardy for more eastern regions of the continent that get ice and snow and spend much time below freezing... Not all of Canada is in Zone 6 or colder! </p>

<p>(I always meant to get to Nor'east Roses but then it got sold to people in California and they moved the entire operation of miniature roses and growing them from Rowley, MA, out to California... I waited too long...) </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 26, 2007 10:11 AM by Paula Lieberman&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168228</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168228</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:11:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #506 from ethan</title>
         <description>comment from ethan on 26.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xopher, blogger sucks in a lot of ways, and I'm at a loss to explain them.  She's a cruel mistress, or something.</p>

<p>And Serge #496, <i>Christ</i>, yes, Tarkovsky's original.  The Soderbergh version is so weirdly awful that I feel like he must have done it on purpose, and if I could only figure out why I would be at piece, or something.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 26, 2007 10:30 AM by ethan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168233</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168233</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:30:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #507 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 26.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>etan @ 506... I figured you had to be talking of Tarkosky's <i>Solaris</i>. I just wanted to make sure. Having seen both versions was frustrating to me. I'm one of those who wanted to tell Tarkovsky to get on with it, and I thought Soderbergh might tighten things up a bit. Unfortunately, it also threw out some of the original's best images, like the planet making it rain inside the house's simulacra because it didn't really understand what rain is. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 26, 2007 11:44 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168257</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168257</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:44:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #508 from P J Evans</title>
         <description>comment from P J Evans on 26.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of coffee, I retrieved my 'Kansas Home Cook Book'. There's a recipe for 'Syrup of Coffee':<br />
"Put a half pound of ground coffee into three pints of boiling water; boil down to one pint, cool and drain off the liquid into a clean stew pan, put it on the fire again, and, when boiling, add white sugar to make it the consistency of syrup; when cool, bottle and seal. When wished to use, put two teaspoons in a coffee-pot--pour on one quart boiling water."</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 26, 2007  2:44 PM by P J Evans&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168314</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168314</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:44:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #509 from ethan</title>
         <description>comment from ethan on 26.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bwahahahaha, I just noticed that at #506 I said "I would be at piece" rather than "at peace."  What a fool.</p>

<p>Serge #507, my main problem with Soderbergh's version is that his main interest seemed to be telling a dull love story through flashback, and any of the philosophical and science fictional ideas were just incidental.  Which, you know, love stories are fine, but not boring ones with pointless SF trappings.  And you're right, it was one of the least visually interesting movies I can think of, which is odd considering that Soderbergh is such a visual director.</p>

<p>I can't agree with you about wanting Tarkovsky to get along with it, but I can understand that reaction.</p>

<p>(MD)(MD) #498: Have you seen <i>The Sexual Lives of the Belgians</i>?  I loved it, but even thinking about the scene where he's talking to the camera about women he's been with, all the while stuffing his face with french fries and getting positively covered with mayonnaise, makes me want to yak.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 26, 2007  3:10 PM by ethan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168322</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168322</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:10:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #510 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 26.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ethan, if you're going to expand MD&sup2;, it would be MDD or DMD.  Your expansion reduces to (MD)&sup2; or M&sup2;D&sup2;.</p>

<p>And that second one sounds like a droid.  "EmmtooDeetoo, have you seem <i>The Sexual Lives of the Belgians</i>?"</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 26, 2007  3:22 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168325</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168325</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:22:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #511 from Julie L.</title>
         <description>comment from Julie L. on 26.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And meanwhile, <a href="http://gheehappy.com/" rel="nofollow">the Hindu pantheon a la Sanrio</a>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 26, 2007  3:35 PM by Julie L.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168333</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168333</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:35:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #512 from ethan</title>
         <description>comment from ethan on 26.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, you're right.  Oh good lord, I'm actually, physically blushing.  How useless!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 26, 2007  3:35 PM by ethan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168334</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168334</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:35:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #513 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 26.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick!  Take a picture!</p>

<p>I love pictures of guys blushing.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 26, 2007  3:42 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168337</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168337</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:42:04 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #514 from eric</title>
         <description>comment from eric on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case any of you have any cute receptors left after the panda particle, video of the squeaking baby tiger kitten at the local zoo: <a href='http://youtube.com/watch?v=idRc_KkInds' rel="nofollow">tiger video</a> and <a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gw0yKaBq2t4' rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007 12:59 AM by eric&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168427</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168427</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 00:59:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #515 from Jon Meltzer</title>
         <description>comment from Jon Meltzer on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#511: Hello Kali? </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007  7:21 AM by Jon Meltzer&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168442</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168442</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 07:21:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #516 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie L. 511: Death, death, DEATH to Sanrio!  Ick.  I wonder if they have Christian icons depicted in this way, with a cute little Jesus nailed to a cute little cross with cute little nails?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007  7:46 AM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168444</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168444</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 07:46:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #517 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I'll stick with the traditional Ganesha statuette that my Indian co-worker is going to get me. I told her that the Lord of Auspicious Beginnings, and Remover of Obstructions would be appropriate for yours truly to keep in his office after spending 2006 on two Programming Projects from Hell. (And yes, I made it very clear to her that I intended no offense, but that I also valued the symbol.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007  8:04 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168445</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168445</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 08:04:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #518 from Peter Erwin</title>
         <description>comment from Peter Erwin on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those wacky Hindu god depictions have been mentioned on and off at BoingBoing; the artist is apparently an animator at Pixar, and this is a personal side project.  (Since he actually has a Hindu background, the odds of him producing similar Christian/Voodoo/Pagan images aren't high.  Though I admit the idea of, say, Norse gods done that way has a certain bizarre appeal.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007  8:15 AM by Peter Erwin&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168447</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168447</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 08:15:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #519 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge 517: If you like, I can point you to some instructions for daily devotions to Ganesh-ji, which I have made part of my own routine.  (I know you probably don't "believe in" Ganesha, but a. you don't have to believe in a god to pray to one, and b. you obviously connect with his energy, and want more of it in your life, which the devotions will help with, whether or not you believe in the god, or even the devotions themselves.)</p>

<p>I've done the simplest one for years: set up the Ganesh-ji image; set a sweet before it; burn sandalwood incense; say "Om Ganeshaya Nama" 108 times*; eat the sweet.  The more complicated ones are actually shorter, but involve reciting a bunch of Sanskrit which at this stage I still have to read.</p>

<p>*Easiest way to get this right: get a traditional mala.  Those strings of beads with a tassel on them?  Those are malas (108** beads plus the tassel bead or "guru bead;" don't count on that one when you do the puja).  For Ganesha sandalwood is best.  They're not that hard to find.  The first time I did it I had no mala; I looked around for something I had 108 of, and wound up using $10.80 in dimes!  The puja was quite successful, even though I also forgot the sweet.</p>

<p>**I don't know why 108 is the sacred number in Hinduism.  I've long suspected it has to do with the fact that it's 2&sup2;&times;3&sup3;, but that's idle speculation on the part of a mathemystic neo-Pagan.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007  8:28 AM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168450</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168450</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 08:28:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #520 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter 518: It's comforting to know that it's a Hindu being irreverent rather than some Japanese guy being culturally insensitive.  I still find the depiction of Kali-ma distasteful, but I'm pretty sure Ganesha won't mind...if you had an elephant's head, would you take yourself too seriously?  He doesn't!</p>

<p>I take back my angry response, which was made in ignorance of the facts.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007  8:30 AM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168451</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168451</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 08:30:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #521 from Aconite</title>
         <description>comment from Aconite on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If you like, I can point you to some instructions for daily devotions to Ganesh-ji</i></p>

<p>Xopher, if that's an open offer, I'd very much appreciate the information.  My e-mail address is as given; just correct the obvious misspellings in the part after "@."</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007  8:39 AM by Aconite&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168452</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168452</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 08:39:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #522 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xopher @ 519... I did tell my co-worker that I am not a follower of Hinduism, nor that I am planning to convert, but that I like the symbolism, and I'm big on symbols. I've printed your suggestions about the proper care. There are some that I won't be able to follow, since Ganesha will be sitting in my office, and burning anything might set off the smoke detector. Thanks again. I very much appreciate.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007  8:43 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168453</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168453</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 08:43:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #523 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, Xopher, have you read Ian McDonald's novel <i>River of Gods</i>? It's set in India in 2047, where AIs collide and fuse with the mythology.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007  8:46 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168454</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168454</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 08:46:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #524 from Peter Erwin</title>
         <description>comment from Peter Erwin on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xopher (#520): For what it's worth, there's <a href="http://www.sepiamutiny.com/sepia/archives/001348.html" rel="nofollow">a 2005 post on the book</a> at the desi-related group blog Sepia Mutiny which opines that "... any kid-safe interpretation of Kali is bound to cross the line into kitsch."</p>

<p>(Most of the commenters seem to like the depictions.)<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007  9:10 AM by Peter Erwin&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168456</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168456</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 09:10:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #525 from Lis Riba</title>
         <description>comment from Lis Riba on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Edding's office burned down! </p>

<p><a href="http://www.nevadaappeal.com/article/20070126/NEWS/101260101" rel="nofollow">Details</a></p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007 11:08 AM by Lis Riba&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168464</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168464</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 11:08:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #526 from Rob Rusick</title>
         <description>comment from Rob Rusick on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to hear of the fire, although it could have been much worse. No one was hurt; even the bulk of his archived work escaped. Hopefully the wound to pride does not fester (<i>I could imagine that it might</i>).</p>

<p>Re: Hindu mythology.</p>

<p>My introduction to Hindu mythology (<i>about 30 years ago</i>) had been reading Roger Zelazny's <b>Lord of Light</b>. It inspired me to go to the library and read more.</p>

<p>For years I could find second hand copies of 'Lord of Light' any time I looked in a Salvation Army. I often bought an extra copy so I could pass one along; gave one to one of my high school teachers, and another later to a teacher in art college.</p>

<p>So I know we have taken a whack at the silliness of Sean Connery in <b>Zardoz</b>, but considering his role in the movie, his black ponytail and moustache, and that he dressed in red; should we take him to be Yama (<i>the Hindu god of death</i>)?<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007 12:10 PM by Rob Rusick&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168471</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168471</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:10:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #527 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahem, Rob... I for myself have never taken a whack at Sean Connery over his accoutrement in <i>Zardoz</i>, and not just because he'd have whacked me back hard. Of course, I also enjoyed <i>The Core</i>, so what does that say about my tastes in movies? (Don't answer that question.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007 12:26 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168475</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168475</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:26:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #528 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That being said, Rob... As for the idea of non-Indians playing Indian gods, have you ever seen Peter Brook's 6-hr version of the <i>Mahabharata</i>?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007 12:40 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168479</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168479</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:40:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #529 from Peter Erwin</title>
         <description>comment from Peter Erwin on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge (#528):<br />
Wow -- I hadn't thought about that film for years.  One of the most astonishing things I've ever seen (spread out over three nights on PBS, back in the early 1990s); I need to go find it on DVD.  Thanks for reminding me of it!</p>

<p><a href="http://www.cinempire.com/multimedia/mahabharata/stills.html" rel="nofollow">Some stills from the film, for those who never saw it.</a></p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007  1:29 PM by Peter Erwin&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168481</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168481</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:29:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #530 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter @ 529... You're welcome. The DVD has been out for about 3 years now. Here's another link:<br />
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097810/</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007  1:39 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168484</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168484</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:39:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #531 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#529: Is it me, or is there a microphone hanging in <a href="http://www.cinempire.com/multimedia/mahabharata/photos/11.html" rel="nofollow">this shot</a> on the left and some electrical cabling hanging on the right?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007  1:43 PM by Greg London&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168486</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168486</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:43:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #532 from Clifton Royston</title>
         <description>comment from Clifton Royston on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week Bush issued a White House order which essentially takes over direct operation of all Federal agencies.  It also seems to bar them from enforcing any new legislation or regulations except where they get approval from the White House that it is a response to a "market failure".</p>

<p><a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/01/20070118.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/01/20070118.html</a></p>

<p>Some explanation of these wording changes here:<br />
<a href="http://pressesc.com/01169810826_bush_takes_over_government" rel="nofollow">While you were sleeping (Bush took over the Government)</a></p>

<p>This seems like something we should be aware of, to put it mildly.  I guess this is Bush's new spirit of bipartisanship - order the Federal government not to do anything the Congress tell sit to. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007  1:52 PM by Clifton Royston&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168488</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168488</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:52:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #533 from Rob Rusick</title>
         <description>comment from Rob Rusick on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>As for the idea of non-Indians playing Indian gods, have you ever seen Peter Brook's 6-hr version of the Mahabharata?</i></p>

<p>No, I can't say that I have. Good? Or an example of non-Indians playing Indian gods and looking silly?</p>

<p>I took a risk once, and went to see <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0074084/" rel="nofollow">1900</a> (<i>aka <b>Novecento</b></i>) when it was playing at the Dryden auditorium; advertised as a 4-hr film*. Just before the film started, they announced that they had been able to get a copy of the 5-hr director's cut, which was what they would be showing. </p>

<p>Fortunately, it was an engaging film, and only dragged in the last half-hour.</p>

<p>With the development of the Indian film and CG industries, it would be interesting to see a mini-series production of 'Lord of Light'; I'd like an American hand in that production to keep it from becoming Bollywood-silly. It would be nice if it could be done without offending Hindu sensibilities, and involving Indian talent from the start seems like it would be the way to go. You'd have the advantage of Indian locations too. No, I don't think anyone is actually working on this; it's just my fantasy of a film production.</p>

<p><br />
* <i>The risk is, I am not going to leave once the film has started. I once sat through a 4-hr film that bored me in the first five minutes and did not let up.</i><br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007  1:56 PM by Rob Rusick&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168491</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168491</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:56:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #534 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silly, Rob? One might think so when the cast is European (a young Ciaran Hinds as Ashwattaman, for example), African, and Japanese. But it works.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007  2:02 PM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168493</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168493</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:02:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #535 from Peter Erwin</title>
         <description>comment from Peter Erwin on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Silly, Rob? One might think so when the cast is European (a young Ciaran Hinds as Ashwattaman, for example), African, and Japanese. But it works.</i></p>

<p>... and Indian, and Caribbean, and ... (it's an astonishingly international cast, really).</p>

<p>I agree with Serge -- it works.</p>

<p>(As a side note: only a couple of the characters are "gods" -- e.g., Krishna; most of them are humans.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007  2:30 PM by Peter Erwin&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168498</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168498</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:30:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #536 from Vicki</title>
         <description>comment from Vicki on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is more a cultural than a theological question, but I don't know where else to ask it:</p>

<p>There are branches of Protestant Christianity, or significant numbers of people in some branches, who behave as though the End of the World is a consummation devoutly to be wished, and in fact something to be worked for. Is this desire to blow us all up so that they can get to heaven something that also turns up among Mormons?</p>

<p>I say it's a cultural more than a theological question because I'm not aware of any significant sect that explicitly teaches "it is your duty to start a world war in the Middle East," but there seem to be people who are eager to immanentize the eschaton by so doing.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007  7:53 PM by Vicki&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168538</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168538</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:53:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #537 from CHip</title>
         <description>comment from CHip on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob@533: why should it be necessary not to offend Hindus? The book is specifically about people who use technology to assume the personae of Hindu gods (rather than, say, superheroes); what we see is what happens when people are given too much power to go along with their imagination. The ]real[ Hindu gods aren't involved.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007  9:07 PM by CHip&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168551</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168551</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:07:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #538 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.  CHip (537), I see what you mean, but may I suggest that "why should it be necessary not to offend Hindus?" might not have been the best way to start?  That sounds like you think it's OK to offend Hindus, though the rest of your post makes it clear that's not what you intend.</p>

<p>I'd be more concerned about offending Buddhists, actually.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007  9:20 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168553</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168553</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:20:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #539 from Rob Rusick</title>
         <description>comment from Rob Rusick on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CHip @537: <i>why should it be necessary not to offend Hindus?</i></p>

<p>Well... it would be nice not to. We might hope they wouldn't take offense, but we've seen Christians ready to picket 'Life of Brian' because it was assumed sight-unseen that it disrespected Jesus. I have no idea whether Hindus are typically so thin-skinned, but we might assume that some are. It would be nice to have an answer for them (<i>much as Peter Jackson was able to answer Tolkien fans</i>).<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007 10:03 PM by Rob Rusick&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168556</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168556</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:03:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #540 from Rob Rusick</title>
         <description>comment from Rob Rusick on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vicki @536: I can't answer for Mormons, but this is an issue (<i>people who are eager to immanentize the eschaton with a world war in the Middle East</i>) which bothers me too. I have a book in the box library (<i>'The End of the World' by ? & ?</i>) which does a set of one and two page synopses of 'End of the World' cults from 67 AD onto UFO cults of the modern day. This is obviously a theme throughout history, and a part of our world. I wish people working to make it real would read some of this stuff. If they persist in that work, I hope Philip Jose Farmer will construct a Hell to put them into.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007 10:25 PM by Rob Rusick&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168559</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168559</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:25:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #541 from nerdycellist</title>
         <description>comment from nerdycellist on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I recall, the mormons I grew up with and around weren't particularly interested in causing the world to end so much as they were very proud of being prepared for the second coming; they "knew" it would be soon, and were pretty proud of their 2 years worth of food storage, especially knowing that the gentiles would be all unprepared for the second coming. (was there some joke about the "24 hour" food supply - e.g. the gun?)</p>

<p>So not so much trying to screw the world up so much as to hasten the end of it, but more of an off-putting anticipatory schadenfreude about the whole thing.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007 10:32 PM by nerdycellist&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168562</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168562</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:32:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #542 from MD²</title>
         <description>comment from MD² on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ethan@509: I've seen it, but can in fact hardly remember anything about it.<br />
Generally, if it's older than three weeks, do not expect me to remember anything, my brain is wired in strange ways (if at all).  Pieces of info come and go and I have no control over them. There's a character in a book by Orson Scott Card (a glance at my library tells me it's <i>Wyrms</i>) which is quite like me: can't really remember anything but the place where the needed info has been put down.<br />
I can astonish my librarian friends by going into their library, walk straight to the not read for years book I know I need, open it seemingly randomly and find the bit of info I'm looking for. Yet often I can't even tell you the title of the book or the name of the author.<br />
Everytime they move everything around I loose a part of my brain.</p>

<p>The internet and search engines have probably saved my life.</p>

<p>[Sorry, longer than expected explanation and next to useless to boot.]</p>

<p>Serge@517: <i>Ganesha [...]Lord of Auspicious Beginnings, and Remover of Obstructions.</i></p>

<p>Everytime I read this one I can't help but think about a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Mantras-mandarins-bouddhisme-tantrique-Biblioth%C3%A9que/dp/2070731804/sr=8-1/qid=1169953967/ref=sr_1_1/103-5587890-7011020?ie=UTF8&s=books" rel="nofollow">book </a>I read for a paper I did on tantrism. Around four obsessive pages on the size and specificities of the genital organs of elephants (male AND female, and why both can be confused by the ignorant), their practices, and the impact they can have on people, is the best introduction I can think of on the sexual coding of religious imagery.</p>

<p>For Xopher: 108. <br />
In buddhism, I've often seen this described as the number of <a href="http://www.virtuescience.com/defilements.html" rel="nofollow">failings</a>/<a href="http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1461749" rel="nofollow">afflictions</a>/defilements  (after a quick googlin' around it seems this last one might be the most used translation in english... strange how tranlations of the religious vocabulary can color things; see "éveil" in french for "enlightenment" in english)which can prevent you from reaching enlightenment.<br />
If you're trying to reach for deeper knowledge in hindusim, a quick detour via bouddhism (especially those branches touched by tantrism) can prove invaluable. As I'm sure you know.</p>

<p>Also stumbled upon <a href="http://www.luckymojo.com/buddhawalnut.html" rel="nofollow">this</a> while looking around.</p>

<p><i>I'd be more concerned about offending Buddhists, actually.</i></p>

<p>I concur. Some private event in Korea have taught me those pacifist monks can sure be mean brawlers.</p>

<p><i>I have no idea whether Hindus are typically so thin-skinned, but we might assume that some are.</i></p>

<p><a href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/407226.cms" rel="nofollow">Ind</a><a href="http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=71749" rel="nofollow">eed</a>.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007 11:22 PM by MD²&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168563</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168563</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 23:22:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #543 from MD²</title>
         <description>comment from MD² on 27.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And that second one sounds like a droid. "EmmtooDeetoo, have you seem The Sexual Lives of the Belgians?"</i></p>

<p>Inquiry: How could a meatbag such as you identify my true spambot nature ?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 27, 2007 11:42 PM by MD²&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168565</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168565</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 23:42:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #544 from Marilee</title>
         <description>comment from Marilee on 28.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob, #526, I was first introduced to Hindu gods when I was eight and dreamed many nights in a row that I was Kali out on a pier.  I had to look her up to find out what I'd become.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 28, 2007 12:45 AM by Marilee&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168567</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168567</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 00:45:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #545 from Rob Rusick</title>
         <description>comment from Rob Rusick on 28.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marilee, that's an interesting notion. Had there been something that inspired the dreams? Or had you been having dreams, and later found something that seemed to match in books you read (<i>...oh, so <b>that's</b> who that was</i>).</p>

<p>Reminds me of another of Zelazny stories. In <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isle_of_the_Dead_%28novel%29" rel="nofollow">Isle of the Dead</a>, his protagonist has taken up an alien religion. It is not a matter of professing belief; he has to wait until one of the gods of their pantheon selects him. While this does happen for him, he is skeptical whether these gods are 'real'. They prove to have more power than he expects.</p>

<p><b>To Die in Italbar</b> shares the same background; but the Wikipedia entry for it is only a stub.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 28, 2007  2:06 AM by Rob Rusick&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168570</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168570</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 02:06:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #546 from Peter Erwin</title>
         <description>comment from Peter Erwin on 28.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xopher said (#519):<br />
<i>**I don't know why 108 is the sacred number in Hinduism. I've long suspected it has to do with the fact that it's 2²×3³, but that's idle speculation on the part of a mathemystic neo-Pagan.</i></p>

<p>The (one) brief explanation I remember hearing when I was in India was that 1 + 0 + 8 = 9; and 9 is, as we all know, one of the Deeply Meaningful Small Integers.  (And, as you pointed out, 9 times 12 = 108). <a href="http://www.mailerindia.com/slokas/mantras/index.php?signify108" rel="nofollow">This page</a> has some suggestions, though it's a mish-mash of possible reasons for significance and examples of significance.</p>

<p>The Wikipedia page on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_108" rel="nofollow">108</a> points out that the characteristic you mentioned means that it is a "hyperfactorial" (which I'd never heard of before);  "2&sup2;&times;3&sup3;" can be expanded to read "1&sup1;&times;2&sup2;&times;3&sup3;".  It also has several other interesting/pointless examples of 108 things (the number of Penelope's suitors in <i>The Odyssey</i>!  the number of minutes Yuri Gagarin orbited the Earth! etc.).</p>

<p><br />
As an aside, I was rather croggled to discover that, yes, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_numbers" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia actually has individual entries for each of the numbers between -1 and 200</a> (and for most of the numbers between 200 and 300, as well).</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 28, 2007  4:50 AM by Peter Erwin&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168586</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168586</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 04:50:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #547 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 28.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw <i>The Painted Veil</i> last night. It starred Edward Norton and Naomi Watts, who both produced it. Very good. And sad.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 28, 2007  8:20 AM by Serge&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168600</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168600</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:20:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #548 from Mez</title>
         <description>comment from Mez on 28.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MD² #542 "can't really remember anything but the place where the needed info has been put down"<br />
O Lord, O Lord, yes! O, pain too.  After several years of my living with & caring for my surviving parent in our old family home, she died & I had to arrange people to do a fast pack-up of everything in the flat while I was in hospital, 'cos I had to move out.  Now all of it, including many of my things, is in boxes filling a shipping container and whenever I remember something I need or could use or would like, I can still visualize just where it used to be.  But in what box now? In which part of the container? No idea.</p>

<p>Then there's the way they re-shelved nearly everything in the library at work a year or so back. I used to be able to put my hand precisely on every report series, even the old obscure ones down in dark dusty corners of L-space, but I'm still a bit lost now. P'raps if I'd been able to work more since, I'd have re-memorized it all.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 28, 2007  8:36 AM by Mez&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168601</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168601</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:36:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #549 from TexAnne</title>
         <description>comment from TexAnne on 28.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.yarnivore.com/mt/archives/000839.html" rel="nofollow">NSFW knitting.</a> (Nearly as bad as disco.)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 28, 2007  9:52 AM by TexAnne&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168609</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168609</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 09:52:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #550 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on 28.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emdeetoo 543: <i>Inquiry: How could a meatbag such as you identify my true spambot nature?</i></p>

<p>Why do crypto-spambots always assume that no one else is a crypto-spambot?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 28, 2007 10:10 AM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168614</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168614</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 10:10:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #551 from john</title>
         <description>comment from john on 28.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter Erwin @ 546<br />
"51.<br />
This appears to be the first uninteresting number, which of course makes it an especially interesting number, because it is the smallest number to have the property of being uninteresting."<br />
 - David Wells, Curious and Interesting Numbers<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 28, 2007 10:42 AM by john&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168619</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168619</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 10:42:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #552 from Bruce E. Durocher II</title>
         <description>comment from Bruce E. Durocher II on 28.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O.K.: I've spotted a gap in Wikipedia's info on Jabberwocky and have tried to correct it, but I'm not sure I got it in right.  In "References in Popular Culture" it should say:</p>

<p>"    * In the 7/16/1970 to 7/23/1970 sequence of Dan O'Neil's comic strip Odd Bodkins, Fred Bird, Hugh, and 5$Bill O'Brady escape Hell in the year 10,1970 a.d. via motorcycle and are attacked from the air by a Bandersnatch identified as a "Jabberwocky." They are saved by the Batwinged Hamburger Snatcher, who drives off the Jabberwocky from the air and then (it is implied), kills it off-panel. 12"</p>

<p>And in Notes it should say: </p>

<p>"12. O'Neill, Dan. (1973) <em>The Collective Unconscience of Odd Bodkins</em> ISBN 912078-33-2"</p>

<p>Can Someone Who Knows Wikipedia look this one over and make sure I didn't screw it up?  Thanks!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted January 28, 2007 12:50 PM by Bruce E. Durocher II&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168638</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008549.html#168638</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:50:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Open Thread 79 -- comment #553 from Marilee</title>
         <description>comment from Marilee on 28.Jan.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob, #545, I assume I'd heard of Kali somewhere.  I read voraciously starting at three.  I think what triggered the dreams was that when I was eight, my mother went into what was (in hindsight) clinical depression.  I started doing the cooking, cleaning, laundry,