<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
   <channel>
      <title>Making Light :: Michael Chertoff responds in less than a week! :: comments</title>
      <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#comments </link>
      <description>Language, fraud, folly, truth, history, and knitting. Et cetera.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 15:02:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.261</generator>
      
      <item>
      <title>Michael Chertoff responds in less than a week!</title>
      <description>From a news story today in Boston.com: Though some residents complained that law enforcement agencies overreacted, Menino said that Michael...</description>
      <content:encoded>From a news story today in Boston.com: Though some residents complained that law enforcement agencies overreacted, Menino said that Michael...</content:encoded>
      <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html</link>
      </item>

      
      <item>
         <title>Michael Chertoff responds in less than a week! -- comment #1 from Chris Clarke</title>
         <description>comment from Chris Clarke on  2.Feb.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to announce that I am collecting funds to buy Lite-Brites to be shipped to the Ninth Ward in NOLA. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted February  2, 2007  1:05 PM by Chris Clarke&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169878</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169878</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 13:05:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Michael Chertoff responds in less than a week! -- comment #2 from Scraps</title>
         <description>comment from Scraps on  2.Feb.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The convention security volunteers have taken over.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted February  2, 2007  1:10 PM by Scraps&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169881</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169881</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 13:10:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Michael Chertoff responds in less than a week! -- comment #3 from JC</title>
         <description>comment from JC on  2.Feb.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel like I should be sized for my tin-foil hat when I say this:</p>

<p>Do you suppose he thinks his job is to stir people up into pointless panic?<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted February  2, 2007  1:20 PM by JC&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169884</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169884</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 13:20:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Michael Chertoff responds in less than a week! -- comment #4 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on  2.Feb.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don't you people realize the difference here?  This incident occurred without warning (unlessyoucountthesamethinghappeninginmanyothercitiesforweeks), so Merino gets praise for his response time.</p>

<p>In NOLA, there was <i>lots</i> of advance warning.  That means they don't have to respond until much, much later.</p>

<p>Oh, wait...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted February  2, 2007  1:23 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169886</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169886</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 13:23:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Michael Chertoff responds in less than a week! -- comment #5 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on  2.Feb.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JC 3: I've been convinced for a long time that promoting a culture of fear is the primary purpose of Homeland Security.  I deeply resent the way this administration makes me feel like a nutbar conspiracy theorist, as a wise person once said.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted February  2, 2007  1:26 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169888</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169888</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 13:26:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Michael Chertoff responds in less than a week! -- comment #6 from Scraps</title>
         <description>comment from Scraps on  2.Feb.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt Chertoff thinks it's his job to stir up panic.  His job is to create an atmosphere of paranoia and fear and to take proper advantage of every opportunity -- no matter how ludicrous -- that helps consolidate power.  Chertoff and the men he lackeys for are going to keep testing the craven stupidity of the news media until they discover the limit.  It doesn't seem to be in sight yet, with the establishment media thus far reacting with the same pompous self-righteousness and anger as the politicians involved.  It's hard to believe that even this, even this absurdity doesn't expose the security apparatus as laughingstocks, but there you have it: the mass media are cowed, and they're working on the rest of us.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted February  2, 2007  2:20 PM by Scraps&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169914</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169914</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 14:20:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Michael Chertoff responds in less than a week! -- comment #7 from Adam Rice</title>
         <description>comment from Adam Rice on  2.Feb.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There may be an inverse correlation between the situation's gravity and Chertoff's response time.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted February  2, 2007  2:28 PM by Adam Rice&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169918</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169918</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 14:28:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Michael Chertoff responds in less than a week! -- comment #8 from Dave Bell</title>
         <description>comment from Dave Bell on  2.Feb.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gravity? Time? you don't think Cherthoff has some sort of pendulum, sort of swining in the breeze?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted February  2, 2007  2:45 PM by Dave Bell&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169923</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169923</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 14:45:07 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Michael Chertoff responds in less than a week! -- comment #9 from Linkmeister</title>
         <description>comment from Linkmeister on  2.Feb.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"<i>swining in the breeze?</i>"</p>

<p>Unintentional, I'm sure, but oh so apt.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted February  2, 2007  3:09 PM by Linkmeister&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169931</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169931</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 15:09:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Michael Chertoff responds in less than a week! -- comment #10 from Nicole J. LeBoeuf-Little</title>
         <description>comment from Nicole J. LeBoeuf-Little on  2.Feb.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*takes off hat to Chris Clarke @ 1 before falling over in an apoplectic fit borne of conflicting gut-level responses towards both hysterical laughter and inconsolable sobbing*</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted February  2, 2007  3:29 PM by Nicole J. LeBoeuf-Little&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169938</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169938</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 15:29:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Michael Chertoff responds in less than a week! -- comment #11 from Steve Buchheit</title>
         <description>comment from Steve Buchheit on  2.Feb.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That's because Boston checked off all their boxes in the NIMS (National Incident Management System) manual, where as Lousiana hadn't even taken off the shrink wrap. So Boston gets the gold-star on their record. Lollipops all around!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted February  2, 2007  4:42 PM by Steve Buchheit&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169967</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169967</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 16:42:01 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Michael Chertoff responds in less than a week! -- comment #12 from Annalee Flower Horne</title>
         <description>comment from Annalee Flower Horne on  2.Feb.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Teresa-- funniest comment on this I've seen so far.</p>

<p>Everyone here in NI who's heard of the incident thinks it's ridiculous that it became a big deal. I think a friend of mine from Belfast said it best when she noted that usually, when people blow things up, they <i>hide</i> the explosives instead of covering them with LEDs.</p>

<p>The whole thing's pretty farsical when you look at it from this side of the pond (probably less so when you're getting arrested over it, though). IMO, the best thing for the honorable civil servants of Boston to do would have been to laugh at themselves over it. That was their best chance to save face. I can see why they missed said chance, though: it probably had blinking lights attached to it.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted February  2, 2007  5:10 PM by Annalee Flower Horne&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169973</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169973</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 17:10:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Michael Chertoff responds in less than a week! -- comment #13 from Scraps</title>
         <description>comment from Scraps on  2.Feb.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They're not interested in saving face; they intend to bluster their way through it.  It's the Republican response to everything that goes wrong, and it's proved to be a strategy seemingly without practical limit.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted February  2, 2007  5:14 PM by Scraps&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169977</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169977</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 17:14:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Michael Chertoff responds in less than a week! -- comment #14 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on  2.Feb.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scraps, Tom Merino is a Democrat, I'm told.  Hard to believe, I know.  But apparently even Democrats can be fascist assholes from time to time.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted February  2, 2007  5:22 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169980</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169980</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 17:22:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Michael Chertoff responds in less than a week! -- comment #15 from Scraps</title>
         <description>comment from Scraps on  2.Feb.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I'll try to reassure myself that it's a good thing Democrats are learning the lesson.  Yeah, that's it.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted February  2, 2007  5:56 PM by Scraps&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169990</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#169990</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 17:56:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Michael Chertoff responds in less than a week! -- comment #16 from ethan</title>
         <description>comment from ethan on  2.Feb.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry if I'm repeating myself--I feel like I may have said this here before, but here I go again!</p>

<p>Here in Southern New England, the usual rules for Republicans and Democrats don't apply, or at least they don't apply in the same ways.  That's why Rhode Island had a Republican senator for so long--not because we're dummies, but because Chafey really is (mostly) better than any of his Democratic opponents (including the one I helped vote in over him, sadly).  I'm not a huge expert on Massachusetts politics, but I'd imagine it's pretty similar.  So I think Scraps's "Republican reaction" comment pretty much applies.</p>

<p>Oh, and Xopher: <i>I deeply resent the way this administration makes me feel like a nutbar conspiracy theorist</i>.  A-frickin'-MEN to that.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted February  2, 2007  6:22 PM by ethan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#170000</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#170000</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 18:22:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Michael Chertoff responds in less than a week! -- comment #17 from Epacris</title>
         <description>comment from Epacris on  2.Feb.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ethan (#16), You can even <a href="http://www.cafepress.com/nielsenhayden.11458165" rel="nofollow">get</a> <a href="http://www.cafepress.com/nielsenhayden.10462083" rel="nofollow">yourself</a> <a href="http://www.cafepress.com/nielsenhayden.11458049" rel="nofollow">a</a> <a href="http://www.cafepress.com/nielsenhayden.10557273" rel="nofollow">t-shirt</a>!</p>

<p>and I'd like to second Nicole's reaction (#10) to Chris Clarke's (frist!) comment.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted February  2, 2007  7:50 PM by Epacris&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#170028</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#170028</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 19:50:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Michael Chertoff responds in less than a week! -- comment #18 from Craig</title>
         <description>comment from Craig on  2.Feb.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xopher, I totally missed your calling him "Merino" the first time, but caught it the second time. I wonder if the name will stick?!</p>

<p>Being congratulated by Chertoff? That's gotta be one of the worst endorsements anyone can ever receive on any issue. That's really when a bloke should know he should feel embarrassed.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted February  2, 2007  9:08 PM by Craig&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#170044</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#170044</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 21:08:36 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Michael Chertoff responds in less than a week! -- comment #19 from TexAnne</title>
         <description>comment from TexAnne on  2.Feb.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, Xopher--why are you insulting my favorite breed of sheep? Their wool makes wonderful socks.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted February  2, 2007  9:16 PM by TexAnne&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#170045</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#170045</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 21:16:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Michael Chertoff responds in less than a week! -- comment #20 from ethan</title>
         <description>comment from ethan on  2.Feb.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the sweater I'm wearing right now!  And the two I just got for $14 the other day!  Hooray, merino!</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted February  2, 2007  9:37 PM by ethan&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#170050</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#170050</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 21:37:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Michael Chertoff responds in less than a week! -- comment #21 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on  2.Feb.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>18, 19: *blush* I wish I could claim credit.  The fact is, I just misspelled his name.</p>

<p>OTOH, we've been hearing him bleat for days now.  Time for him to go home shorn.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted February  2, 2007 11:09 PM by Xopher&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#170064</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#170064</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 23:09:07 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Michael Chertoff responds in less than a week! -- comment #22 from CHip</title>
         <description>comment from CHip on  2.Feb.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xopher et al: Boston city politics are even more removed from party divisions than New England politics generally. In mayoral and council elections(*) nobody runs on a party ticket; they just all make a scrum that the primary reduces to 2N candidates for N positions. This is especially significant for city council, which has 4 at-large seats; at least councillor got his seat because he placed 5th of 8 before one of the top 4 resigned.</p>

<p>(*) I'm blanking on what if any labels were used for the Suffolk County DA race, which is parallel because ~90% of Suffolk is Boston.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted February  2, 2007 11:48 PM by CHip&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#170073</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#170073</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 23:48:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Michael Chertoff responds in less than a week! -- comment #23 from James D. Macdonald</title>
         <description>comment from James D. Macdonald on  3.Feb.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Department of Everything Old is New Again:</p>

<p><b>The Battle of the Kegs</b><br />
by<br />
Francis Hopkinson</p>

<p>Gallants attend and hear a friend<br />
Trill forth harmonious ditty,<br />
Strange things I'll tell which late befell<br />
In Philadelphia city.<br />
<p><br />
'Twas early day, as poets say,<br />
Just when the sun was rising,<br />
A soldier stood on a log of wood,<br />
And saw a thing surprising.<br />
<p><br />
As in amaze he stood to gaze,<br />
The truth can't be denied, sir,<br />
He spied a score of kegs or more<br />
Come floating down the tide, sir.<br />
<p><br />
A sailor too in jerkin blue,<br />
This strange appearance viewing,<br />
First damned his eyes, in great surprise,<br />
Then said, "Some mischief's brewing.<br />
<p><br />
"These kegs, I'm told, the rebels hold,<br />
Packed up like pickled herring;<br />
And they're come down to attack the town,<br />
In this new way of ferrying."<br />
<p><br />
The soldier flew, the sailor too,<br />
And scared almost to death, sir,<br />
Wore out their shoes, to spread the news,<br />
And ran till out of breath, sir.<br />
<p><br />
Now up and down throughout the town,<br />
Most frantic scenes were acted;<br />
And some ran here, and others there,<br />
Like men almost distracted.<br />
<p><br />
Some fire cried, which some denied,<br />
But said the earth had quaked;<br />
And girls and boys, with hideous noise,<br />
Ran through the streets half naked.<br />
<p><br />
Sir William he, snug as a flea,<br />
Lay all this time a snoring,<br />
Nor dreamed of harm as he lay warm,<br />
In bed with Mrs. Loring.<br />
<p><br />
Now in a fright, he starts upright,<br />
Awaked by such a clatter;<br />
He rubs both eyes, and boldly cries,<br />
"For God's sake, what's the matter?"<br />
<p><br />
At his bedside he then espied,<br />
Sir Erskine at command, sir,<br />
Upon one foot he had one boot,<br />
And th' other in his hand, sir.<br />
<p><br />
"Arise, arise," Sir Erskine cries,<br />
"The rebels--more's the pity,<br />
Without a boat are all afloat,<br />
And ranged before the city.<br />
<p><br />
"The motley crew, in vessels new,<br />
With Satan for their guide, sir,<br />
Packed up in bags, or wooden kegs,<br />
Come driving down the tide, sir.<br />
<p><br />
"Therefore prepare for bloody war;<br />
These kegs must all be routed,<br />
Or surely we despised shall be,<br />
And British courage doubted."<br />
<p><br />
The royal band now ready stand<br />
All ranged in dread array, sir,<br />
With stomach stout to see it out,<br />
And make a bloody day, sir.<br />
<p><br />
The cannons roar from shore to shore.<br />
The small arms make a rattle;<br />
Since wars began I'm sure no man<br />
E'er saw so strange a battle.<br />
<p><br />
The rebel dales, the rebel vales,<br />
With rebel trees surrounded,<br />
The distant woods, the hills and floods,<br />
With rebel echoes sounded.<br />
<p><br />
The fish below swam to and fro,<br />
Attacked from every quarter;<br />
Why sure, thought they, the devil's to pay,<br />
'Mongst folks above the water.<br />
<p><br />
The kegs, 'tis said, though strongly made,<br />
Of rebel staves and hoops, sir,<br />
Could not oppose their powerful foes,<br />
The conquering British troops, sir.<br />
<p><br />
From morn to night these men of might<br />
Displayed amazing courage;<br />
And when the sun was fairly down,<br />
Retired to sup their porridge.<br />
<p><br />
A hundred men with each a pen,<br />
Or more upon my word, sir,<br />
It is most true would be too few,<br />
Their valor to record, sir.<br />
<p><br />
Such feats did they perform that day,<br />
Against these wicked kegs, sir,<br />
That years to come: if they get home,<br />
They'll make their boasts and brags, sir. </p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p><br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted February  3, 2007 12:14 AM by James D. Macdonald&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#170074</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#170074</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 00:14:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Michael Chertoff responds in less than a week! -- comment #24 from Martyn Taylor</title>
         <description>comment from Martyn Taylor on  3.Feb.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#6 - Scraps</p>

<p>What you describe sounds pretty much like a classic terror tactic (remembering when terrorists couldn't actually get their hands on anything dangerous and had to make do with making people afraid they would)  Does this mean that members of the Security Industry have read Che Guevara?</p>

<p>No, I didn't think so either.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted February  3, 2007  4:22 AM by Martyn Taylor&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#170095</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#170095</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 04:22:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Michael Chertoff responds in less than a week! -- comment #25 from NelC</title>
         <description>comment from NelC on  3.Feb.07</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Members of the Security Theatre don't read Che. They watch 24, where all the bombs have blinking LEDs.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted February  3, 2007  3:02 PM by NelC&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#170164</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008622.html#170164</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 15:02:04 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>