<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
   <channel>
      <title>Making Light :: A debate for the Silly Season :: comments</title>
      <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#comments </link>
      <description>Language, fraud, folly, truth, history, and knitting. Et cetera.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2002 00:04:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.33</generator>
      
      <item>
      <title>A debate for the Silly Season</title>
      <description>Over on Pigs and Fishes, Avram Grumer takes exception to Meryl Yourish's analysis of the dating potential of various superheroes....</description>
      <content:encoded>Over on Pigs and Fishes, Avram Grumer takes exception to Meryl Yourish's analysis of the dating potential of various superheroes....</content:encoded>
      <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html</link>
      </item>

                  <item>
         <title>A debate for the Silly Season -- comment #1 from John M. Ford</title>
         <description>comment from John M. Ford on  2.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><p>> Feldman, Feinman, Superman, Lieberman, Aquaman,<br />
> Zuckerman, Iceman, Bergman, Sandman, Goldman,<br />
> Silberman, Hawkman, Wolfman, Batman, Spiderman,<br />
: Schneiderman --</p>

<p>     -- Attorneys at Law.</p>

<p>     Though does this mean that Sachs is Goldman's teenage sidekick?</p>
	 <p>Posted August  2, 2002 12:08 PM by John M. Ford</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1688</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1688</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2002 12:08:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>A debate for the Silly Season -- comment #2 from Debra Doyle</title>
         <description>comment from Debra Doyle on  2.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Niven's speculations are beside the point, really . . . we're talking dating, here, not breeding, and any reasonably intelligent and filthy-minded human female should be able to think of three or four different ways to spend an entertaining weekend with the Man of Steel.  Who is, as we all know, a gentleman, and thus presumably capable of remembering -- among other things -- to take his weight on his elbows.</p>

<p>And that's before we even get into the realm of Kryptonite sex toys and other interesting appliances.</p>
	 <p>Posted August  2, 2002 12:50 PM by Debra Doyle</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1689</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1689</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2002 12:50:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>A debate for the Silly Season -- comment #3 from Teresa Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Teresa Nielsen Hayden on  2.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Mike, he spells it "Sacks" when he's out adventuring. He changed his science-hero name around the same time Eisenmann changed his.</p>

<p>Spot on, Debra. Not to mention borrowing that rope of Wonder Woman's for the weekend.</p>
	 <p>Posted August  2, 2002  1:01 PM by Teresa Nielsen Hayden</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1692</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1692</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2002 13:01:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>A debate for the Silly Season -- comment #4 from Erik V. Olson</title>
         <description>comment from Erik V. Olson on  2.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><p>You'd have to be a pretty confident guy to go tying up people with that rope.</p>
	 <p>Posted August  2, 2002  1:58 PM by Erik V. Olson</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1693</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1693</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2002 13:58:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>A debate for the Silly Season -- comment #5 from David Moles</title>
         <description>comment from David Moles on  2.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Okay, I give up -- what Crisis is "Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex" pre-?</p>

<p>And is the Eisenmann you're talking about the one who goes by the stage name of "Tony Stark"?</p>
	 <p>Posted August  2, 2002  2:21 PM by David Moles</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1695</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1695</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2002 14:21:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>A debate for the Silly Season -- comment #6 from Kevin J. Maroney</title>
         <description>comment from Kevin J. Maroney on  2.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><p>David: That's a question to which there are two answers, the "lightly geekish" and the "so unbelievably geekish that you draw stares on the subway". I, of course, know both. </p>

<p>Lightly geekish: The reference is to <i>Crisis on Infinite Earths</i>, a 1985-86 DC Comics miniseries which made vast and retroactive changes to major elements of DC superhero continuity. Before the Crisis, DC had an elaborate system of alternate earths (e.g., Earth-1, Earth-2, Earth-Prime) where different generations of superheroes lived. The World War II vintage Flash, Jay Garrick, lived on Earth-2, while the later Flash, Barry Allen, lived on Earth-1. However, there were also Earth-2 and Earth-1 versions of Superman; the Earth-2 version was the original Siegel & Shuster version, who was a bit less powerful than the later, Earth-1 Superman who was depicted in the  Mort Weisinger/Julie Schwartz-edited comics of the 1950s, 60s, and 70s. The Earth-2 version was depicted as significantly older than the Earth-1 version, and was married to Lois Lane. </p>

<p>DC's editorial Powers That Be felt that this multiple-earth system made continuity too complex for new readers, and asked one of their star writers (Marv Wolfman) to write a story which simplified things. The Crisis swept this system away and collapsed all of the earths into a single Earth (sometimes called "Earth-DC" or, later, "Earth-Zero", but never within the comics themselves), and a lot of characters, especially duplicates, were killed, exiled, retired, or, worst of all, made to have Never Been. Also, a lot of characters underwent subtle or not-so-subtle retroactive changes. </p>

<p>Okay. So that's the lightly geeky answer. The supergeeky answer is: Teresa was wrong to refer to the "pre-Crisis" Superman. The Superman about whom Larry Niven wrote "Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex" is the Earth-1 Superman. The Earth-1 Superman survived the Crisis unchanged to become the Earth-Zero Superman. </p>

<p>However, a few months after Crisis, a separate mini-series, <i>Man of Steel</i>, retroactively redefined the powers and history of the Earth-Zero Superman. He's less powerful than the original Earth-1 Superman, and more of his powers are implicitly or explicitly psychic, so things like the super-sperm described in "Kleenex" don't work any more. Also, the various rainbow hues of kryptonite which were part and parcel of the Earth-1 Superman's mythos were retroactively defined out of existence; Niven makes reference to them, but they're no longer part of the DC Universe. </p>

<p>So, the Superman about which Niven wrote is significantly different from the Superman who appears in current DC comics. The new Superman is often called "the post-Crisis Superman", but the true comics pedant thinks of him as the "post-Man of Steel Superman". </p>

<p>Now aren't you glad you asked? <br />
</p>
	 <p>Posted August  2, 2002  3:21 PM by Kevin J. Maroney</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1698</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1698</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2002 15:21:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>A debate for the Silly Season -- comment #7 from Jim Meadows</title>
         <description>comment from Jim Meadows on  2.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><p>   I'm sure there was a Superman comic (it may have been just before "Crisis on Infinite Earths" which touched on the sort of problems Larry Niven imagined. I remember it as a panel which hinted at what the Comics Code Authority would probably describe as difficulties in childbirth experienced by Mrs. Superman. It was just a panel, and I think it came as a flashback in one of those "imaginary" stories that were not part of regular continuity, which DC used to do from time to time.<br />
   I might still have the issue at home, and I'll look for it tonight, but only if I'm feeling sufficiently geeky.<br />
</p>
	 <p>Posted August  2, 2002  4:03 PM by Jim Meadows</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1700</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1700</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2002 16:03:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>A debate for the Silly Season -- comment #8 from Yahmdallah</title>
         <description>comment from Yahmdallah on  2.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Thank you Kevin J. Maroney!</p>

<p>I worked in a bookstore (which carried all the major comics) during that multi-earth stuff, and I got so lost, I gave the heck up.  It's nice to have that cleared up after all this time.</p>

<p>As for the topic at hand, as a very young guy, I wondered what it would be like to date/mate the "She-hulk."  Would she change during sex?  Would you dread PMS? (Probably.)  Would she hurt you during sex when she was green? (Would her changing "during" inadvertently squash the unit?)  How would she smell? How did her underwear stay on when all her clothes ripped off?  Etc.  But then along came Josie and the Pussycats, my cartoon crush moved on, and I stopped thinking about the problems of superpower sex. Then came Jr. High...</p>
	 <p>Posted August  2, 2002  4:11 PM by Yahmdallah</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1702</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1702</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2002 16:11:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>A debate for the Silly Season -- comment #9 from Teresa Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Teresa Nielsen Hayden on  2.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><p>(*cough*)</p>

<p>I was directly quoting Avram.</p>
	 <p>Posted August  2, 2002  6:15 PM by Teresa Nielsen Hayden</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1711</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1711</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2002 18:15:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>A debate for the Silly Season -- comment #10 from Avram</title>
         <description>comment from Avram on  2.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><p>The Niven essay has one massive flaw: It never once mentions the Bottle City of Kandor.  </p>

<p>I once toppled Teresa with my post-Byrne update riff on "Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex".  I speculated that, since Supes's powers extend to cover his body (and even a small distance beyond), they might be able to function at great distance, using a detached body part as a proxy.  Telekineses could even move the body part, the same way it allows him to fly.  No need to chop off a finger, though; every healthy adult male comes with a ready supply of expendible, ejectable biomass.  When danger threatens, all Clark Kent has to do is zip into the closet -- where he keeps his porn stash....  </p>
	 <p>Posted August  2, 2002  6:22 PM by Avram</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1714</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1714</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2002 18:22:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>A debate for the Silly Season -- comment #11 from James Macdonald</title>
         <description>comment from James Macdonald on  2.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Okay, guys -- don't ask me how I know about this one.</p>

<p>The original site seems to be down, but in the Google Cache....</p>

<p>http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:36_T-uzTgRUC:www.asstr.org/~Titmouse/T14.htm+titmouse+lois+lane+superman&hl=en&ie=UTF-8</p>
	 <p>Posted August  2, 2002  7:03 PM by James Macdonald</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1717</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1717</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2002 19:03:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>A debate for the Silly Season -- comment #12 from John M. Ford</title>
         <description>comment from John M. Ford on  2.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Avram, when the Niven essay first came out, darn near everyone I knew at college immediately mentioned Kandor.  Shows you the kind of effete snobs we were.</p>

<p>Nowadays I suppose the big guy and LL would just turn up the romantic red-sun lighting in the Fortress of Solitude boudoir.  (Red sky at night . . . oh, never mind.)</p>

<p>I don't suppose this would be a good time to mention the Nancy Reagan Manhunter?  No, I didn't think so.</p>

<p>    -- Jesuitical JMF</p>
	 <p>Posted August  2, 2002 11:29 PM by John M. Ford</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1718</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1718</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2002 23:29:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>A debate for the Silly Season -- comment #13 from Teresa Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Teresa Nielsen Hayden on  3.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Nancy Reagan is a shapeshifting alien with strange tastes in food? So much is explained.</p>
	 <p>Posted August  3, 2002 12:36 AM by Teresa Nielsen Hayden</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1720</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1720</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2002 00:36:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>A debate for the Silly Season -- comment #14 from Vera Nazarian</title>
         <description>comment from Vera Nazarian on  3.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><p>LOL! I love the superheroes being Jewish theory!</p>

<p>*giggle*</p>

<p>Vera</p>
	 <p>Posted August  3, 2002 12:51 AM by Vera Nazarian</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1722</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1722</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2002 00:51:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>A debate for the Silly Season -- comment #15 from Kevin J. Maroney</title>
         <description>comment from Kevin J. Maroney on  3.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Jim: I don't remember a pre-Crisis or pre-Man of Steel Superman story dealing with the difficulties of a human woman bearing a Kryptonian baby, but I wouldn't be surprised if Cary Bates or Elliot Maggin did one. However, there were three different "alternate near futures" featuring the post-MOS Superman as part of the <i>Armageddon 2001</i> crossover in 1991, and I'm pretty sure that in at least one of them Lois died from the difficulty of carrying Clark's child. <br />
</p>
	 <p>Posted August  3, 2002 12:56 AM by Kevin J. Maroney</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1724</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1724</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2002 00:56:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>A debate for the Silly Season -- comment #16 from Avram</title>
         <description>comment from Avram on  3.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><p>I thought Nancy Reagan was the Joker.</p>
	 <p>Posted August  3, 2002  2:06 AM by Avram</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1726</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1726</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2002 02:06:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>A debate for the Silly Season -- comment #17 from Kip T. Williams</title>
         <description>comment from Kip T. Williams on  3.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Tom Lehrer was big on crypto-Kryptonian smut, too, if I recall: "Novels that pander / to my taste in Kandor / give me a pleasure sublime..." (To which I want to add, "They fight crime!")</p>

<p>Actually, though, I just wrote to point out one of the few really good jokes Ralph Bakshi ever made. First there was this really boring Terrytoon series he did called "The Mighty Heroes" -- a labored take-off on superdoers, with Mighty Man, Cuckoo Man, Rope Man, Baby Man and Hurricane Man.</p>

<p>Years later, Ralph -- helped out immeasurably by the talented John Kricfalusi -- revived Mighty Mouse for TV, and one episode featured the now-retired Heroes, who had since become accountants, and who now worked in an agency called "Man, Man, Man, Man and Man."</p>

<p>--Captain Kip</p>
	 <p>Posted August  3, 2002 10:42 AM by Kip T. Williams</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1733</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1733</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2002 10:42:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>A debate for the Silly Season -- comment #18 from David Moles</title>
         <description>comment from David Moles on  4.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Thanks, Kevin. I have to admit I was hoping for a Larry Niven-related Crisis rather than a DC-related Crisis -- it would explain so much.... </p>
	 <p>Posted August  4, 2002  2:35 PM by David Moles</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1746</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1746</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 04 Aug 2002 14:35:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>A debate for the Silly Season -- comment #19 from Steve</title>
         <description>comment from Steve on  4.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><p><a href="http://www.toonopedia.com/mighty_h.htm" rel="nofollow">The Mighty Heroes</a> are covered on the Greatest Site on the Web (Silver Age), <a href="http://www.toonopedia.com" rel="nofollow">Don Markstein's Toonopedia</a>.</p>
	 <p>Posted August  4, 2002  9:51 PM by Steve</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1749</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1749</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 04 Aug 2002 21:51:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>A debate for the Silly Season -- comment #20 from Teresa Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Teresa Nielsen Hayden on  4.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Thanks, Steve. How was the Bellagio?</p>
	 <p>Posted August  4, 2002 10:05 PM by Teresa Nielsen Hayden</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1750</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1750</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 04 Aug 2002 22:05:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>A debate for the Silly Season -- comment #21 from Steve</title>
         <description>comment from Steve on  4.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Remarkably like a Hilton with gilt-framed mirrors, an in-house circus troupe, and people dropping $1500 a hand at pai gow poker. I suspect my attempt to live the life of a high-roller was stymied by staying at the cheapest room in the place.</p>

<p>"O" was super-faboo, and I didn't lose too much money; I generally find Las Vegas enjoyable on a couple of levels as long as I'm not there too long.</p>

<p>On topic, here's a <a href="http://www.io.com/~woodward/chroma/crisis.html" rel="nofollow">Crisis</a> page; the length of the introduction makes me thankful that I didn't start reading Batman until a few years ago, when the mother of all retcons was no longer a factor.</p>

<p>And, to stretch, <a href="http://www.npr.org/programs/theride/jridley/" rel="nofollow">John Ridley</a> has written about both superheros and Las Vegas, so they're surely related! Intrinsically American icons, like Muhammad Ali and talking Parkay tubs!</p>
	 <p>Posted August  4, 2002 10:29 PM by Steve</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1751</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1751</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 04 Aug 2002 22:29:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>A debate for the Silly Season -- comment #22 from Mary Kay</title>
         <description>comment from Mary Kay on  5.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><p>"And, to stretch, John Ridley has written about both superheros and Las Vegas, so they're surely related! Intrinsically American icons, like Muhammad Ali and talking Parkay tubs!"</p>

<p>Hunter S. Thompason was right.  Psychedelic drugs are redundant in Loas Vegas.</p>

<p>MKK<br />
</p>
	 <p>Posted August  5, 2002  1:34 AM by Mary Kay</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1754</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1754</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2002 01:34:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>A debate for the Silly Season -- comment #23 from Rob Hansen</title>
         <description>comment from Rob Hansen on  5.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><p>It's obvious that the couple with the best sex life in comics are Reed & Sue Richards. He's entirely flexible and she's able to form these invisible force fields in pretty much any shape she can visualize, and to squeeze with them. With powers like these you don't need sex toys, but it just so happens that he's the also the most brilliant man on the planet and could whip up a whole new wildly inventive batch of same before breakfast if he so chose.</p>

<p>There's also some evidence that Sue is a top. On the two occasions that villains have brought out her 'dark' side this has turned her into Malice, a dominatrix clad from head to toe in black leather, complete with spike-studded mask.</p>
	 <p>Posted August  5, 2002  7:23 AM by Rob Hansen</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1755</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1755</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2002 07:23:40 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>A debate for the Silly Season -- comment #24 from Steve</title>
         <description>comment from Steve on  5.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><p>I dunno, Rob; if Mr. Fantastic really was, would Sue moon over Namor like that? Maybe he's just not a very good listener.</p>

<p>Sue and Reed's marriage is explored in a throwaway bit in Alan Moore and Gene Ha's <a href="http://www.visi.com/~geneha/top10.html" rel="nofollow">Top Ten</a>, which is amusing but not as amusing (or horrifying) as Moore's explanation for why superheroes have teenage sidekicks.</p>
	 <p>Posted August  5, 2002  9:29 AM by Steve</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1759</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1759</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2002 09:29:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>A debate for the Silly Season -- comment #25 from James Macdonald</title>
         <description>comment from James Macdonald on  5.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><p>"I dunno, Rob; if Mr. Fantastic really was, would Sue moon over Namor like that? Maybe he's just not a very good listener."</p>

<p><br />
It occurs to me that Namor can hold his breath for a Really Long Time.</p>

<p>Another clue?</p>
	 <p>Posted August  5, 2002  9:38 AM by James Macdonald</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1760</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1760</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2002 09:38:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>A debate for the Silly Season -- comment #26 from Elise Matthesen</title>
         <description>comment from Elise Matthesen on  5.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Subject: Beneath the Planet of the Incredible Luuuv Techies!</p>

<p>Re:  "He's also cheerful, inventive, energetic, inquisitive, and a techie; and without going into a lot of detail, let me assure you that that's a fun combination."</p>

<p>Without going into a lot of detail in return, I just have to say that my favorite phrase from one such is, "Cool!   Is that repeatable?"</p>

<p>Techies. Gotta love 'em.</p>
	 <p>Posted August  5, 2002  2:09 PM by Elise Matthesen</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1768</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1768</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2002 14:09:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>A debate for the Silly Season -- comment #27 from Kevin J. Maroney</title>
         <description>comment from Kevin J. Maroney on  6.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Steve: Grant Morrison's recent <i>Fantastic Four 1234</i> miniseries has a wonderful exploration of the Reed/Sue/Namor triangle. A major factor is, precisely, that Reed is, well, Reed a lot of the time. </p>

<p>When you refer to Alan Moore's explanation of why superheroes have teen sidekicks: Are you referring to the super-molestors? Rick Veitch did that story at greater length and less subtlety, if that's possible, in <i>Brat Pack</i> in the 1980s. <br />
</p>
	 <p>Posted August  6, 2002 12:04 AM by Kevin J. Maroney</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1782</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/000406.html#1782</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2002 00:04:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      
   </channel>
</rss>