<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
   <channel>
      <title>Making Light :: Lost fandoms :: comments</title>
      <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#comments </link>
      <description>Language, fraud, folly, truth, history, and knitting. Et cetera.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2002 19:36:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.34-en</generator>
      
      <item>
      <title>Lost fandoms</title>
      <description>The article I discuss here is &quot;An 'Online Community' of the Nineteenth Century&quot; by Pat Pflieger, published at Merrycoz.org's excellent...</description>
      <content:encoded>The article I discuss here is "An 'Online Community' of the Nineteenth Century" by Pat Pflieger, published at Merrycoz.org's excellent...</content:encoded>
      <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html</link>
      </item>

      
      <item>
         <title>Lost fandoms -- comment #1 from Robert L</title>
         <description>comment from Robert L on 26.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn't find anything either--but you might have more success if you spell her name Montagu, as it is generally spelled these days...</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted August 26, 2002  7:36 PM by Robert L&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6701</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6701</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2002 19:36:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Lost fandoms -- comment #2 from Mitch Wagner</title>
         <description>comment from Mitch Wagner on 26.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two recent books look at parallels between the Internet and previous technologies -  <br />
"The Victorian Internet: The Remarkable Story of the Telegraph and the Nineteenth Century's On-Line Pioneers," which discusses - among many other things - the online community, and occasional romances, that existed between telegraph operators. </p>

<p>http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0425171698/qid=1030410392/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_1/102-5510120-9223360?s=books&n=507846</p>

<p>"When Old Technologies Were New: Thinking About Electric Communication in the Late Nineteenth Century," by Carolyn Marvin, compares the telegraph, telephone and electric lights with the Internet. (She makes a case why electric lights should be considered a communication technology.) The book is interesting in that she, unlike the author of "Victorian Internet," was published in 1990, before the Internet became mainstream, nonetheless she anticipates many of the issues that came up during the Internet boom: most notably, she writes about concerns that the telephone would break up the family order by placing suitors and daughters in touch with each other without parental supervision. </p>

<p>(I mentioned this last bit in a superior fashion in another online discussion, only to receive a response that the fathers were right to worry about those things in the 19th Century - they feared that the telephone would destroy the family order as they knew it, AND IT DID. We think those fathers were quaint and funny because we grew up in the world they feared.)</p>

<p>Another other bit I remember from the Marvin book is that there was a thriving culture of electrical engineering trade press. Those writers didn't just see themselves as writing engineering news, or business news - they saw themselves, together with the engineers they were writing for, as being CUSTODIANS, and even spiritual leaders, of the changes that were being wrought by the new technology. I've been working in the computer trade press 13 years now, and that sentiment is very familiar to me. </p>

<p>Of course, one of the last of the electrical engineering trades from the boom years was edited by a fella named Hugo Gernsback who decided to publish some "scientifiction" as a change of pace, which begat John Campbell, whose begats extend in linear fasion to William Gibson and Neal Stephenson, whose novels "Neuromancer" and "Snow Crash" were bibles to the pioneers of today's Internet and so everything turns out to be related after all.</p>

<p>http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0195063414/qid=1030410576/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/102-5510120-9223360?s=books<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted August 26, 2002  9:18 PM by Mitch Wagner&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6704</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6704</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2002 21:18:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Lost fandoms -- comment #3 from Teresa Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Teresa Nielsen Hayden on 27.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Montagu, yes; I didn't have the "proper names" default clicked at the point that the Spelling Fairy smacked me on the head with her magic fairy dinger.</p>

<p>It was an oldish book in the library at Columbia: quarto, with green boards. So far even Google can't do much with that.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted August 27, 2002 12:03 AM by Teresa Nielsen Hayden&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6705</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6705</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2002 00:03:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Lost fandoms -- comment #4 from Debra Doyle</title>
         <description>comment from Debra Doyle on 27.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the Columbia library have its card catalog on-line?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted August 27, 2002  8:51 AM by Debra Doyle&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6708</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6708</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2002 08:51:07 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Lost fandoms -- comment #5 from Janet Lafler</title>
         <description>comment from Janet Lafler on 27.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mom might know something about the whole Cibber-Pope thing. She's a historian and her field is Restoration and 18th c. English theater.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted August 27, 2002  3:27 PM by Janet Lafler&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6727</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6727</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2002 15:27:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Lost fandoms -- comment #6 from Teresa Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Teresa Nielsen Hayden on 27.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thing is, I wasn't researching Mary Wortley Montagu, nor Pope neither. That might hae been while I was researching Cibber, but my vague recollection is that I was researching some minor poet of the period. His name will come to me presently.</p>

<p>And no, it wasn't William Ashbless. Earlier than that.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted August 27, 2002  4:45 PM by Teresa Nielsen Hayden&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6729</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6729</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2002 16:45:34 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Lost fandoms -- comment #7 from Janet Lafler</title>
         <description>comment from Janet Lafler on 27.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Savage, perhaps?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted August 27, 2002  4:48 PM by Janet Lafler&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6730</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6730</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2002 16:48:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Lost fandoms -- comment #8 from Sherwood Smith</title>
         <description>comment from Sherwood Smith on 27.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can track Mary Wortley Montagu's activities through her published letters (and footnotes) plus copies of the Spectator; MWM and a couple of her aristocratic friends apparently wrote some of these numbers, under assumed names.  But if you read Spectator from day to day you can find hidden and not-so-hidden pokes not only at one another, but some of their Parisian friends.  This before Pope got pissed at MWW and turned on her--in print.  (Flamewar!)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted August 27, 2002  5:16 PM by Sherwood Smith&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6731</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6731</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2002 17:16:36 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Lost fandoms -- comment #9 from Kip</title>
         <description>comment from Kip on 28.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least once, I looked at <b>Nineteenth-Century American Children & What They Read</b> and saw "read" as being in the present tense. Next time you see one on the subway, try and see what their book is.</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted August 28, 2002  8:45 AM by Kip&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6739</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6739</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2002 08:45:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Lost fandoms -- comment #10 from Alison Scott</title>
         <description>comment from Alison Scott on 30.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somewhere in the middle of the Tate Modern, there's a fandom comprising small fanzines, mail art and other toys, produced by a group of artists. I think it was the mid-50s or early 60s; at any rate, it's all been lovingly presented as a Great Art by the Tate. I must have another look next time I'm there.</p>

<p>Dale Speirs has produced many interesting articles in his fanzine Opuntia, covering historical forerunners of fandom. </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted August 30, 2002  5:55 AM by Alison Scott&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6771</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6771</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2002 05:55:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Lost fandoms -- comment #11 from Alan Bostick</title>
         <description>comment from Alan Bostick on 30.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pioneers and architects of today's Internet weren't just inspired by the likes of Bill Gibson and Neal Stephenson.</p>

<p>It is a True Fact, for example, that Usenet's Great Renaming (the creation of the rec.*, soc.*, sci.* etc. hierarchies) was postponed from its originally scheduled date of Sept. 1, 1986, because too many members of the Usenet Cabal would be away at Confederation, the Atlanta worldcon, at the time.  (Many of them, as I recall, were even working ops at the con.) </p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted August 30, 2002  1:14 PM by Alan Bostick&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6776</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6776</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:14:01 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Lost fandoms -- comment #12 from Matt McIrvin</title>
         <description>comment from Matt McIrvin on 31.Aug.02</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article speaks of an algebra puzzle that led to a somewhat jocular forum-wide flamewar and paradoxically cemented the sense of community:</p>

<p>x^2 + y^2 = 8<br />
x + xy = 6</p>

<p>The answer is described as being x=2, y=2; the flames were over how one would "prove" that this is the answer.</p>

<p>But it's not the only answer.  There's another real solution at approximately x=2.393955784, y=1.506311955.  I think there are couple of complex solutions too, but that's cheating.</p>

<p>It's no wonder this was so hard to attack using the algebraic methods known to the young readership; it's equivalent to a quartic equation. These can be solved analytically but it's not pretty.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted August 31, 2002 12:33 PM by Matt McIrvin&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6782</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6782</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2002 12:33:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Lost fandoms -- comment #13 from Bob Webber</title>
         <description>comment from Bob Webber on  1.Sep.02</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giving the complex roots is a lot lot less cheating than citing an approximate solution to ten places.  You scum-sucking finite-math maggot.</p>

<p>Signed,<br />
Pre-digital fart-faced jackass Bob<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted September  1, 2002 10:53 AM by Bob Webber&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6788</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6788</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2002 10:53:50 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Lost fandoms -- comment #14 from yog@sff.net</title>
         <description>comment from yog@sff.net on  1.Sep.02</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of people commenting on other's comments, and fandom, there's something afoot over at Fan Fiction Network (http://www.fanfiction.net/)</p>

<p>"August 26th, Monday 2002 -- In order to prevent future abuse, FanFiction.Net's Upload Guideline has been modified to clearly bar any form of message board style entries: Any form of entry that would use the review system as a message board: "Ask...", interactive, and etc."</p>

<p>Yes, indeed.  Review board abuse.  They need to get a double-back-action high-pressure condensatory manipulator.  (I saw one of those being auctioned off on Ebay just the other day.  Maybe they got it?)</p>

<p>Further discussion at the Godawful Fan Fiction message board (http://www.voy.com/13774/)</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted September  1, 2002 11:01 AM by yog@sff.net&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6789</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6789</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2002 11:01:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Lost fandoms -- comment #15 from Teresa Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Teresa Nielsen Hayden on  7.Sep.02</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob, do you and Matt already know each other?</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted September  7, 2002  2:42 PM by Teresa Nielsen Hayden&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6825</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6825</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2002 14:42:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Lost fandoms -- comment #16 from Bob Webber</title>
         <description>comment from Bob Webber on  9.Sep.02</description>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I don't believe I've ever met Matt before.</p>

<p>Now that I know where he stands on solutions to quartic equations, of course, I wouldn't piss down his throat if his guts was afire.<br />
</p>]]>
	 &lt;p&gt;Posted September  9, 2002 10:47 AM by Bob Webber&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6834</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/001424.html#6834</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2002 10:47:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>