Go to Making Light's front page.
Forward to next post: Oh lord, won’t you buy me …
Subscribe (via RSS) to this post's comment thread. (What does this mean? Here's a quick introduction.)
I have to quote this one. LanguageHat posted it in the Egoscanning comment thread, in the wake of Arthur Hlavaty’s remark that “I cast no first stones; I was egoscanning when the Web was a scientifictional dream.”
Ralph 4CR looked around in astonishment. “You mean… there are invisible beams all around us, carrying information to all parts of the globe, even as we speak?”The Master of Communications turned towards him solemnly. “Yes,” he asseverated, “and the information is not carried whole, but is broken up into a myriad of infinitesimal packets, to be reassembled without fail when they reach their destination.”
“You astonish me,” breathed Ralph. “And this information is accessible to all?”
“It is,” nodded the Master. “The issues of the day are debated by all citizens, no matter where they may be located, and communication no longer waits on tides or weather.”
“And what are the great issues so decided?”
The Master cast a glance at the poll on his screen: Which Jedi Knight Are You? He looked severe. “I fear our issues would mean nothing to you across the great gulf of time you have traversed. You should go now and refresh yourself. We will speak later. You have much to learn. Vanna, show our young guest to his room.”
A lissome blonde appeared from behind a curtain and beckoned…
Urm... Every other post now appears to be indented subsidary to this (delightful) one, and the sidebar has departed for another clime.
Could these events perhaps be related?
I think that deserves some kind of award: not for the content, although that's superb, but for managing to use the word 'asseverated' correctly.
(Amazing: an obscure word that Stephen Donaldson hasn't used to mean something completely different.)
That's why they denominate me Language Hat!
And thanks, Teresa; it's nice to have one's scientifictional efforts appreciated. Now perhaps that Gernsback fellow will finally publish my "Captives of the Web"...
Stephen Donaldson's use of obscure words makes me suspect he writes using three thesauri and no dictionary.
But's it's nice to see "asseverated" for the first time.
"Now perhaps that Gernsback fellow will . . ."
About fourteen years back, I was walking around my employer's office building (Bi-County Boulevard, Farmingdale, NY) when I came across a door for . . . Gernsback Publications.
They were still around, publishing electronics hobby mags.
No idea if they're still around. I'd Google for the answer, but I actually prefer that they remain in a Schrodinger's-Cat-like indeterminate state.
Graydon, is the problem fixed now?
What delighted me (and several other skiffy editors) about "asseverated" is that it's exactly the kind of saidbookism Gernsback would have used.
Nix, I'd give it a rasff award in a flash, only this isn't rasff.
"What delighted me (and several other skiffy editors) about 'asseverated' is that it's exactly the kind of saidbookism Gernsback would have used," TNH opined.
"Nix, I'd give it a rasff award in a flash, only this isn't rasff," added
the plucky blogger, grinning raffishly.
(Rasff misses you.)
"What is the muck on the food?" Ginger spat at the departing guard. "Parmesan!" grated Biggles.
(Rasff misses you.)
What he said.
Patrick --
Yup, fixed. Much appreciated.
In the unlikely event there's anyone reading this thread who's as ignorant as I about modern stefnal acronyms, here's what I got off Google:
RASFF, the rec.arts.sf.fandom Usenet newsgroup, has sometimes been described as an online con room party, with conversations having little to do with SF and much to do with bagels, cats, Jewish minutiae, and chocolate.
KAM, I agree with you about Donaldson. The sentence that almost made me throw one of his books across the room was "The horses were almost prostrate upon their feet."
LH: Rasff didn't throw me, but stefnal has me korgged. Please define?
stefnal is an abbreviation of "scientifictional".
Niwdog's Law:
Given sufficient time, any online conversation evolves into a discussion of Jewish minutiea. This does not terminate the discussion, and often leads to a rhetorical breakthrough or reinvigoration.
(On that note, jumping back a thread, Mormon Undies don't surprise me all that much. Undershirt-style tzittzit can be just as confusing to the unknowing (the number of times I've seen a well meaning nonjew -- or even a more-secular-than-I Jew -- helpfully point out that someone seemed to have loose threads... Well, its a high number)
So, BSD, these non-jews/more-secular-than-I-Jews are commenting on blogs now? Or is that Nu?