<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
   <channel>
      <title>Making Light :: Har har :: comments</title>
      <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/005793.html#comments </link>
      <description>Language, fraud, folly, truth, history, and knitting. Et cetera.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 17:45:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.33</generator>
      
      <item>
      <title>Har har</title>
      <description>If we weren&amp;#8217;t running Movable Type 3.121 plus MT Blacklist, right now you&amp;#8217;d be seeing the havoc caused by 300-odd...</description>
      <content:encoded>If we weren&#8217;t running Movable Type 3.121 plus MT Blacklist, right now you&#8217;d be seeing the havoc caused by 300-odd...</content:encoded>
      <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/005793.html</link>
      </item>

                  <item>
         <title>Har har -- comment #1 from sean bosker</title>
         <description>comment from sean bosker on 19.Nov.04</description>
         <content:encoded><p>You have pleased the technology Gods and we all share in the fruits of your labor. A plague of spam, thwarted!<br />
</p>
	 <p>Posted November 19, 2004  4:41 PM by sean bosker</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/005793.html#65063</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/005793.html#65063</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:41:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Har har -- comment #2 from Hormel McSpammer</title>
         <description>comment from Hormel McSpammer on 19.Nov.04</description>
         <content:encoded><p>That's interesting.  I just found a great deal on <a href="http://lostfrog.org/" rel="nofollow">lost frogs</a>.</p>
	 <p>Posted November 19, 2004  4:43 PM by Hormel McSpammer</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/005793.html#65079</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/005793.html#65079</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:43:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Har har -- comment #3 from Alex Cohen</title>
         <description>comment from Alex Cohen on 19.Nov.04</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Hee hee.</p>

<p>Uh, don't kill me.</p>
	 <p>Posted November 19, 2004  4:43 PM by Alex Cohen</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/005793.html#65088</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/005793.html#65088</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:43:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Har har -- comment #4 from xeger</title>
         <description>comment from xeger on 19.Nov.04</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Heh. Isn't it great when it works?</p>

<p>My latest irritation is the regular raft of email to the subscription address of one of my mailing lists - clearly caused by -somebody- (probably sombodies) with an address book virus.  I still haven't found a good way to deal with that, since it does seem to be legitimate mail.</p>
	 <p>Posted November 19, 2004  4:56 PM by xeger</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/005793.html#65133</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/005793.html#65133</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:56:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Har har -- comment #5 from James D. Macdonald</title>
         <description>comment from James D. Macdonald on 19.Nov.04</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Three hundred or so spams as a group seems to be a common pattern on what hits this web log.</p>

<p>Interesting.  Did you get a copy of one?</p>
	 <p>Posted November 19, 2004  6:53 PM by James D. Macdonald</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/005793.html#65543</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/005793.html#65543</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2004 18:53:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Har har -- comment #6 from pericat</title>
         <description>comment from pericat on 20.Nov.04</description>
         <content:encoded><p>It's great when stuff works <em>just right</em>, eh? </p>
	 <p>Posted November 20, 2004 12:44 AM by pericat</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/005793.html#65665</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/005793.html#65665</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2004 00:44:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Har har -- comment #7 from Sean Bosker</title>
         <description>comment from Sean Bosker on 20.Nov.04</description>
         <content:encoded><p>What just killed my last email address was some spammer using my my email in the 'from' field. I was getting hundreds of bouncebacks a day. I made sure that they weren't actually coming from me, and they weren't but it forced me to shut down an email address I've had for years.</p>
	 <p>Posted November 20, 2004 12:52 PM by Sean Bosker</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/005793.html#65690</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/005793.html#65690</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2004 12:52:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Har har -- comment #8 from Mitch Wagner</title>
         <description>comment from Mitch Wagner on 20.Nov.04</description>
         <content:encoded><p>PNH/TNH: I've found that one area that the current version of MT-Blacklist lags the previous version is in dealing with large spam attacks. </p>

<p>I have MT-Blacklist configured to hide comments that match the criteria of potential spam. That means I need to manually approve comments on posts older than 2 weeks old, or comments with more than five URLs in them. </p>

<p>That also means I need to manually delete spams fitting those criteria. </p>

<p>With MT-Blacklist 1.x, that was fairly easy. Since a large spam attack would have the same URLs in every message, I could just select one comment, de-spam it, add the URLs to my blacklist, and then press the button that causes MT-Blacklist to check the 250 most recent comments against the blacklist, deleting any comments containing blacklisted URLs.</p>

<p>Later, rinse, repeat until clean. </p>

<p>The new version of MT-Blacklist does a far better job of tagging spam--it's been 100% accurate for me in the several weeks I've been using it. But it's got NO functions that I've been able to find for batch-despamming of messages. </p>

<p>If I were ever to get 300 comments of spam in one day, I'd hve to manually click on each of those 300 messages to delete them. Ow!</p>

<p>Have you been able to find a faster way of dealing with spam attacks, short of outright blocking comments on messages >2 weeks old, or with >5 URLs?</p>

<p>Sean, what happened to you is called a "joe job." Google that phrase if you want to learn stuff. As far as I know, there's nothing you can do about it. <br />
</p>
	 <p>Posted November 20, 2004  7:55 PM by Mitch Wagner</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/005793.html#65706</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/005793.html#65706</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2004 19:55:34 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Har har -- comment #9 from pericat</title>
         <description>comment from pericat on 21.Nov.04</description>
         <content:encoded><p><a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/article/sabotage-coping-joe-job/" rel="nofollow">Here's</a> an article that describes joe jobs and offers advice in countering them.</p>
	 <p>Posted November 21, 2004  4:42 AM by pericat</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/005793.html#65723</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/005793.html#65723</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2004 04:42:07 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Har har -- comment #10 from Mitch Wagner</title>
         <description>comment from Mitch Wagner on 21.Nov.04</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Pericat, good article. </p>

<p>When I said there's nothing you can do about a joe job, I was&#8212;to use a technical journalism word&#8212;wrong. I was thinking about Point 3 and Point 4 of the points raised in the article you cite: there's nothing you can do to save the e-mail account that was joe-jobbed, and nothing you can do to convince some people who will never believe your statements that it was not you who sent the original e-mail. </p>
	 <p>Posted November 21, 2004  3:26 PM by Mitch Wagner</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/005793.html#65742</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/005793.html#65742</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2004 15:26:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Har har -- comment #11 from Dave Bell</title>
         <description>comment from Dave Bell on  2.Dec.04</description>
         <content:encoded><p>I comment here to note that the most recent Open Thread is now a big enough web page to be awkward.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  2, 2004  5:45 PM by Dave Bell</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/005793.html#67601</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/005793.html#67601</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 17:45:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      
   </channel>
</rss>