<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
   <channel>
      <title>Making Light :: Back in Brooklyn :: comments</title>
      <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#comments </link>
      <description>Language, fraud, folly, truth, history, and knitting. Et cetera.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:12:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.33</generator>
      
      <item>
      <title>Back in Brooklyn</title>
      <description>We're back from this year's Viable Paradise; we're pooped; we have 5,271,009 things to deal with before running off to...</description>
      <content:encoded>We're back from this year's Viable Paradise; we're pooped; we have 5,271,009 things to deal with before running off to...</content:encoded>
      <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html</link>
      </item>

                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #1 from Sumana</title>
         <description>comment from Sumana on 10.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Welcome back!  Hope you had a good time.  Looking forward to amusing anecdotes, etc.</p>

<p>I find the Clarke and Gaiman drawings pretty good caricatures of their subjects, but then again I'm just going on photos and have met them once at the most.</p>
	 <p>Posted October 10, 2005  9:31 AM by Sumana</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99116</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99116</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 09:31:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #2 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 10.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Welcome back indeed.</p>

<p>As for Salon's illustration of Clarke & Gaiman...  When I saw it yesterday, I thought that Gaiman was sort-of recognizable, but Clarke? Nope. Not even close.</p>

<p>By the way, am I the only person who thinks that Gaiman sounds like Alan Rickman? (That's meant as praise.)</p>
	 <p>Posted October 10, 2005  9:49 AM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99118</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99118</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 09:49:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #3 from Arthur D. Hlavaty</title>
         <description>comment from Arthur D. Hlavaty on 10.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Who are these people, and what have they done with Neil & Susanna?</p>
	 <p>Posted October 10, 2005 11:53 AM by Arthur D. Hlavaty</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99132</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99132</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 11:53:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #4 from Bruce Arthurs</title>
         <description>comment from Bruce Arthurs on 10.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>The hair in that illustration is more frightening than Shepherd Book's.  And why are crows nesting in it?</p>
	 <p>Posted October 10, 2005 12:22 PM by Bruce Arthurs</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99136</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99136</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:22:36 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #5 from Madeleine Robins</title>
         <description>comment from Madeleine Robins on 10.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Welcome home.  Catch your breaths.</p>

<p>The illo of Neil makes him look like his own pudgy cousin, the one to whom people occasionally say "You're not--that writer guy, are you?"  The one of Susanna looks like a weird amalgam of Helena Bonham Carter and Lotte Lenya.  Scary.</p>
	 <p>Posted October 10, 2005  1:35 PM by Madeleine Robins</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99145</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99145</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:35:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #6 from SeanH</title>
         <description>comment from SeanH on 10.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>I'm not actually sure I'd've recognised that image of Neil Gaiman if I'd seen it without context...</p>
	 <p>Posted October 10, 2005  1:38 PM by SeanH</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99146</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99146</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:38:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #7 from Charlie Stross</title>
         <description>comment from Charlie Stross on 10.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Nope, that's definitely not Susannah. Maybe she's acquired an evil twin, Diane Duane style?</p>
	 <p>Posted October 10, 2005  1:57 PM by Charlie Stross</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99149</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99149</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:57:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #8 from Mary Kay</title>
         <description>comment from Mary Kay on 10.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>The noses are just impossibly wrong.  And the nose is the center of the face.  Well, ok, the face shapes are wrong too.  </p>

<p>MKK</p>
	 <p>Posted October 10, 2005  3:51 PM by Mary Kay</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99164</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99164</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:51:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #9 from rhandir</title>
         <description>comment from rhandir on 10.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Oh, Neil sounding like Alan Rickman, that's facinating.</p>

<p>I actually have envisoned him sounding that way for more than ten years. <br />
However, I was most struck by the uncanny resemblance of  <a href="http://www.editorsguild.com/newsletter/JulAug05/JulAug05_Images/bride2.jpg" rel="nofollow">this fellow</a> to Neil in a recent, popular <a href="http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050922/REVIEWS/50921002" rel="nofollow">movie.</a></p>

<p>That's intentional, yes?<br />
-R</p>
	 <p>Posted October 10, 2005  4:00 PM by rhandir</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99165</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99165</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:00:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #10 from jennie</title>
         <description>comment from jennie on 10.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Well, I think they sort of got Neil Gaiman's hair close to the way it looks in some of the photos I've seen. </p>

<p>That's the best I can say. </p>

<p>Of course, I've never seen either author up close, in person. But the drawing doesn't look like either of their photos. Except for maybe Neil's hair, on a bad day. </p>
	 <p>Posted October 10, 2005  4:10 PM by jennie</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99167</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99167</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:10:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #11 from Eric Sadoyama</title>
         <description>comment from Eric Sadoyama on 10.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Neil has audio and video clips of himself at his web site, <a href="http://www.neilgaiman.com/exclusive/exclusive.asp" rel="nofollow">here</a> and <a href="http://www.neilgaiman.com/audio/audio.asp" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
	 <p>Posted October 10, 2005  4:25 PM by Eric Sadoyama</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99170</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99170</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:25:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #12 from nerdycellist</title>
         <description>comment from nerdycellist on 10.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>I saw Neil twice last weekend (once for the signing at Vroman's, and then the next day at the West Hollywood Book Fair - where I was going to go anyway; I am not an author stalker.) and the only thing that looks even remotely Neil-like about that pic is the hair.  </p>

<p>As for sounding like Alan Rickman, I'm not sure I think he does, although the card catalog in my brain does tend to file them both in the same "dark hair, British, related to fantasy/horror, dishy" drawer.  He mentioned at one of the Q&As that when he first started signing and doing appearances, many people were disappointed that he wasn't a 6'7", mysteriously dressed man with a vague air of melancholy, which is what they apparantly envisioned him as. In person he seems like a very nice man, and not at all like someone who would write about eating babies.   </p>
	 <p>Posted October 10, 2005  5:10 PM by nerdycellist</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99173</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99173</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 17:10:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #13 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 10.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>But Neil Gaiman does have an air of melancholy to him, especially when he uses the 'F' word during the Hugos.</p>
	 <p>Posted October 10, 2005  6:07 PM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99176</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99176</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 18:07:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #14 from CHip</title>
         <description>comment from CHip on 10.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Neil sounding like Rickman? Not on the top level, to these ears; maybe it's just that I've recently heard Rickman only in his pissed-at-the-world roles (Marvin in <i>Hitchhiker</i>, <i>Galaxy Quest</i>'s science officer, the Metatron in <i>Dogma</i>), but I hear a strong nasal quality even through the grumpiness. He also tends to draw out, while Neil's speech is very crisp -- not faster, just spending less time on vowels and leaving more silence between words. If you ran both voices through a computer to average out the above, you \might/ get some similarity in pitch changes and rhythm.</p>
	 <p>Posted October 10, 2005  6:10 PM by CHip</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99178</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99178</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 18:10:07 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #15 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 10.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>By the way, whatever happened to that big-screen version of <b>Neverwhere</b> that Gaiman was working on? I suppose it fell into Development Hell...</p>
	 <p>Posted October 10, 2005  6:38 PM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99180</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99180</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 18:38:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #16 from Patrick Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Patrick Nielsen Hayden on 10.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Perhaps the person who spells her first name "Susannah" is Susanna Clarke's evil twin.  Goodness knows I hear quite a bit about her.</p>
	 <p>Posted October 10, 2005  7:29 PM by Patrick Nielsen Hayden</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99183</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99183</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 19:29:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #17 from Marith</title>
         <description>comment from Marith on 10.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Rhandir:  The protagonist of Corpse Bride looks more to me like a morphing of Johnny Depp and Hugh Grant.   It's that same hapless puppydog look.  </p>
	 <p>Posted October 10, 2005  7:51 PM by Marith</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99185</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99185</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 19:51:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #18 from Laurie Mann</title>
         <description>comment from Laurie Mann on 10.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Actually, the woman in the Salon cartoon looks more like Harriet Miers (Bush's latest Supreme Court nominee) than like Susannah Clarke (who looks more like this:  http://www.dpsinfo.com/images/fan/worldcons/05/050807prehsusannaclarke.jpg)</p>

<p>And Alan Rickman and Neil Gaiman can sound surprisingly alike, particularly if you're half asleep... </p>

<p>No, wait, maybe I should clarify that...</p>

<p>No, wait...maybe not... ;-></p>

<p><br />
[[I dozed off during the Hugo Ceremony in 2004 that Neil MCed, and as I awoke, I thought I was listening to Alan Rickman.]]</p>
	 <p>Posted October 10, 2005 10:33 PM by Laurie Mann</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99192</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99192</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 22:33:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #19 from antukin</title>
         <description>comment from antukin on 10.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Serge, no, you're not the only person who thinks that. And yes, it <i>is</i> praise, since both of them are immensely talented and, as nerdycellist so aptly put it, "dishy." </p>

<p>Hmm now out of curiosity I want to hear Alan Rickman do a reading of Anansi Boys, just for comparison. Though I can't imagine Neil Gaiman as Severus Snape. Bwahahaha.</p>

<p>Yes, yes, I know, "sound alike" does not equal "interchangeable." ;p</p>

<p>PS I think Patrick hit the nail on the head with the John Travolta description. Though a pudgy John Travolta, to be more exact.</p>
	 <p>Posted October 10, 2005 11:19 PM by antukin</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99194</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99194</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:19:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #20 from antukin</title>
         <description>comment from antukin on 10.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Btw, <b>Neverwhere</b> was a British <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0115288/" rel="nofollow">miniseries</a> (though not a patch on the book, from the looks of it). Were they planning a big-screen version, as well? </p>
	 <p>Posted October 10, 2005 11:34 PM by antukin</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99197</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99197</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:34:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #21 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 10.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>I Neil Gaiman starts telling us that by Gramtha's Hammer, I shall be avenged, I'm outta here.</p>
	 <p>Posted October 10, 2005 11:36 PM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99198</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99198</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:36:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #22 from Georgiana</title>
         <description>comment from Georgiana on 11.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>I don't hear it. Neil and Alan Rickman are both guys but that's all the resemblance I can hear.  Mr. Rickman tends to drawl a lot more I think.   </p>

<p>Apropos of nothing much except that it was a nifty spot, I was in <i>Something the Lord Made</i> with Mr. Rickman a couple of Christmases ago.  The scene I am in was filmed in an old lunatic asylumn, which we were pretending was Johns Hopkins. It was very spooky and fun, esp. with all the little blue faced kids running around in their makeup, looking like they should be at death's door and actually full of both vim and vigor.</p>

<p>Meanwhile my son Cullen, who will be at Capclave this weekend, was hiding behind a locker at his school because a student dropped a gun and it went off right next to him.  It was an odd day for all of us.</p>

<p>Welcome back P and T.</p>
	 <p>Posted October 11, 2005  1:04 AM by Georgiana</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99202</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99202</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:04:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #23 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 11.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Alan Rickman has pretty much become typecast as a villain, but I thought he was hilarious in <b>Dogma</b>, as a rather gaimanesque angel, especially when he explains why angels can't get drunk. All because of angel Matt Damon who, after having had one too many, was very rude to God...</p>

<p>And one doesn't think of Rickman as the leading man in romantic comedies and yet there he goes, in <b>Truly Madly Deeply</b>.</p>

<p>Damn typecasting. Sure it pays the grocery bills, but...</p>
	 <p>Posted October 11, 2005  1:47 AM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99206</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99206</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:47:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #24 from marrije</title>
         <description>comment from marrije on 11.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Rickman was also a delightfully tormented and human Colonel Bradford in <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0114388/" rel="nofollow">Sense and Sensibility</a>, in which he married Kate Winslet's Marianne Dashwood. If that's not a (semi-)leading man in a romantic comedy...</p>
	 <p>Posted October 11, 2005  3:47 AM by marrije</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99211</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99211</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 03:47:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #25 from David Goldfarb</title>
         <description>comment from David Goldfarb on 11.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Put me down among those who (and I just got to hear Neil do reading and Q+A not two weeks ago) think that he doesn't sound anything like Alan Rickman.  His voice is higher in register and far less gravelly, just for a start.</p>
	 <p>Posted October 11, 2005  4:44 AM by David Goldfarb</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99216</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99216</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 04:44:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #26 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 11.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Oh yeah, marrije... I remembered that Rickman was in one Jane Austen adaptation, but not which. I should have checked on <a href="http://imdb.com" rel="nofollow">The Internet Movie Database</a>.</p>

<p>So, what's the overall verdict about Gaiman vs Rickman? "Yes"? "Not a perfect match"? "Not even close"? "You've got to be kidding me"?</p>
	 <p>Posted October 11, 2005  6:23 AM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99219</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99219</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 06:23:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #27 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 11.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Back to what started this thread, which is that Salon interview... At some point it says that, while continental fairy tales's characteristics can be pinned down, it's not so with those of the British Isles. I wonder what it was like across the Channel in France's Bretagne, where they were called <i>korrigans</i>...</p>
	 <p>Posted October 11, 2005  6:33 AM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99220</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99220</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 06:33:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #28 from SeanH</title>
         <description>comment from SeanH on 11.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Re: big-screen <i>Neverwhere</i> - I'd not heard anything about that, but it does sound fun. I love <i>Neverwhere</i>, it's a highlight of my DVD collection. Wouldn't surprise me at all to hear it'd fallen into Development Hell - that nether region seems to hold a special attraction for Gaiman's creations. What happened to that Gilliam adaptation of <i>Good Omens</i>, anyway?</p>
	 <p>Posted October 11, 2005 10:03 AM by SeanH</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99235</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99235</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:03:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #29 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 11.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p><b>Good Omens</b>? I didn't even know it was being worked on. Wouldn't surprise me that someone got cold feet, considering the subject matter.</p>

<p>As for <b>Neverwhere</b>, yes, that was happening. I think Gaiman himself was working on a script. But not a peep for a long time. Well, there is still the DVD. Sure, it's very low-budget, but that, in a way, lets us see the story.</p>
	 <p>Posted October 11, 2005 10:24 AM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99238</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99238</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:24:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #30 from Georgiana</title>
         <description>comment from Georgiana on 11.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>If you go to <a href="http://www.neilgaiman.com/search/search.asp" rel="nofollow">Neil's journal</a> and a search on Terry Gilliam's name you can find all kinds of stuff about the film adaptation of <i>Good Omens</i>.  Some of it is extremely funny and some of it is heartbreaking.</p>

<p>I think that even though the film had to be put on hold for a long time its future is looking better than it has in years.  Both Depp and Gilliam have more clout at the box office than they did a few years ago. </p>

<p>That's a film I would love to do. Oh yes.</p>
	 <p>Posted October 11, 2005 11:41 AM by Georgiana</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99255</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99255</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:41:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #31 from Cat Eldridge</title>
         <description>comment from Cat Eldridge on 11.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Serge says: 'Good Omens? I didn't even know it was being worked on. Wouldn't surprise me that someone got cold feet, considering the subject matter.'</p>

<p>Actually there's a script that Neil wrote for Good Omens. I reviewed it here.</p>

<p>www.greenmanreview.com/book/script_gaiman_goodomens.html</p>

<p>It was done by Hill House for aprt of their Preferred Editions series. </p>

<p>Both it and Neverwhere are in development limbo, the latter at <br />
the Hensons.</p>
	 <p>Posted October 11, 2005  3:14 PM by Cat Eldridge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99295</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99295</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 15:14:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #32 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 11.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Thanks, Cat. Still, I wonder what's holding things up for either project. </p>
	 <p>Posted October 11, 2005  3:34 PM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99304</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99304</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 15:34:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #33 from Laurie Mann</title>
         <description>comment from Laurie Mann on 11.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>I wouldn't say Gaiman and Rickman's voices are "perfect matches," but their accents are quite similar when they talk slowly, at least to this Yank.</p>

<p>I've seen almost every Rickman movie ever, from Truly, Madly, Deeply to the last Harry Potter flick.  The description of his character in Dogma as "Gaimanesque" is spot on!  (Some scenes of Dogma were filmed near my town, but, other than seeing the large movie trucks, I never saw any of the actors or Kevin Smith.)</p>
	 <p>Posted October 11, 2005  9:28 PM by Laurie Mann</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99334</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99334</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:28:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #34 from Georgiana</title>
         <description>comment from Georgiana on 11.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Serge - Gilliam had 45 of the 60 million he needed to do <i>Good Omens</i> and Hollywood wouldn't give him the other fifteen because Gilliam and Depp didn't have the box office draw. It sounds ridiculous and like it couldn't be true when I say it which is one reason I suggested you take a look at Neil's posts because he's so good at describing the sublimely stupid.  </p>

<p>Plus there <a href="http://www.neilgaiman.com/archive/2001_08_01_archive.asp" rel="nofollow">is this</a>, which still makes me laugh four years later:</p>

<blockquote> I asked Terry Gilliam how the Good Omens movie was going. His reply?

<p><br />
<b>I'll warn you in advance that we created a very different climax.  And we dropped favorite characters. We added some scenes involving cattle drives in the Old West and song and dance sequences from our favorite Bollywood films. We also tried to make the Metratron more Jewish for the sake of the financiers. Woody Allen would be perfect...or maybe Mel Brooks. Then there is the snuff movie that Crowley is producing which we get to see in utterly graphic detail...we thought it would make him more active in believable evil. And we eliminated most of the comedy. I felt it held the book back from being the "great and profound work" which we hope the film will be.</b></p>

<p>So I don't think we're going to have anything to worry about.... </p></blockquote>

<p>And before that starts rumors again, it was a joke and a very fine one at that.</p>
	 <p>Posted October 11, 2005  9:41 PM by Georgiana</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99335</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99335</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:41:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #35 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 11.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>That sounds like Gilliam all right. Also sounds like the last 15 minutes of Mel Brooks's .</p>

<p>As for Rickman's gaimanesque angel in <b>Dogma</b>... The film's director, Kevin Smith, is a comic-book fan and was the writer on the (literally) revived <i>Green Arrow</i> so I'm not surprised to see the influence of Sandman's creator in that movie.</p>
	 <p>Posted October 11, 2005 11:11 PM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99339</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99339</guid>
         <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:11:01 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #36 from Kip W</title>
         <description>comment from Kip W on 12.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>So I guess I'm the only one here who looked at that and thought, there's that nice hobbit from that movie, eh? I'll clean my specs.</p>
	 <p>Posted October 12, 2005 10:39 AM by Kip W</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99354</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99354</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 10:39:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #37 from Brooke C.</title>
         <description>comment from Brooke C. on 14.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>The cartoon Neil at <a>Nice Hair</a> looks a bit like Rickman, while still being obviously Gaiman-y.</p>

<p>IMHO, they have similar, well-enunciated accents but different voices.  To each their own separate, dishy tones.</p>
	 <p>Posted October 14, 2005  3:07 PM by Brooke C.</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99521</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99521</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:07:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #38 from Brooke C.</title>
         <description>comment from Brooke C. on 14.Oct.05</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Blast.  That's:</p>

<p>http://yami_no_miko.tripod.com/nicehair72.html</p>
	 <p>Posted October 14, 2005  3:13 PM by Brooke C.</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99522</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#99522</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:13:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #39 from Gaven</title>
         <description>comment from Gaven on 10.Nov.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Honolulu Rebate Hotel- [URL]http://blazonswob.sitesled.com/[/URL]; Golf Bollock Printing Machine - http://deluxeplug.xoompages.com/ ; af017afb70529efb 27d8febc816c6931 fd79e2faca </p>
	 <p>Posted November 10, 2006 11:09 AM by Gaven</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#151301</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#151301</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:09:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Back in Brooklyn -- comment #40 from Julia Jones sees comment spam</title>
         <description>comment from Julia Jones sees comment spam on 10.Nov.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Comment spam by Gaven at what's currently #39.</p>
	 <p>Posted November 10, 2006 11:12 AM by Julia Jones sees comment spam</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#151302</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006905.html#151302</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:12:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      
   </channel>
</rss>