<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
   <channel>
      <title>Making Light :: Open thread 76 :: comments</title>
      <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#comments </link>
      <description>Language, fraud, folly, truth, history, and knitting. Et cetera.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:39:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.33</generator>
      
      <item>
      <title>Open thread 76</title>
      <description>The Teeth Mother Naked at Last....</description>
      <content:encoded>The Teeth Mother Naked at Last....</content:encoded>
      <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html</link>
      </item>

                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #1 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>quoi?</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  2:11 PM by Greg London</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157690</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157690</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:11:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #2 from Scott H</title>
         <description>comment from Scott H on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Anybody seen The Fountain?  If so, what'd ya think?</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  2:11 PM by Scott H</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157691</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157691</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:11:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #3 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p><i>The Fountain</i>?</p>

<p>To me anyway... Clumsy storytelling. Great visuals. Still, like I said elsewhere, at times I had a feeling of having wandered into <i>Jonathan Livingston Seagull</i>. But it did have Ellen Burstyn, which makes up for some of it. Woohoo, Ellen!</p>

<p>What about you, Scott H?</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  2:16 PM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157697</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157697</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:16:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #4 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>    <i>testing sentiments<br />
    the calendar of feeling<br />
    announces winter</i></p>

<p>    <i>deeper the blue sky<br />
    unready to give us the<br />
    blessing of snowfall</i></p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  2:17 PM by Fragano Ledgister</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157698</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157698</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:17:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #5 from Scott H</title>
         <description>comment from Scott H on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>In re Serge #3:</p>

<p>I was debating whether to go see it this weekend.  But since you asked, I would recommend any of the following DVDs:</p>

<p>* Rome (HBO miniseries)<br />
* Code 46 (smartish SF starring Tim Robbins & Samantha Morton)<br />
* District B13 (forgettable dystopian story, AMAZING stunts.  Can be safely turned off at the 20 minute mark)<br />
* Subject Two (moody, Frankenstein-y)</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  2:29 PM by Scott H</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157703</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157703</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:29:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #6 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Does anyone know if <i>Natura Ipsa Sufficit</i> is good Latin for "Nature itself suffices" or "Nature alone is enough"? I want to use it as the motto for my Radical Pantheists' organization (yet unborn).</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  2:37 PM by Xopher</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157707</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157707</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:37:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #7 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Scott H @ 5...</p>

<p>It's not that I hated the movie. It simply was very flawed and could have been fixed by knocking out the director, fixing his script, then waking him up. Hell, even I could have improved the story, and I couldn't write my way out of a paper bag. (Well, maybe out of a small paper bag.)</p>

<p>As for your recommendations... Are they all HBO-type stories? The only one I've even heard of is <i>Rome</i> and I've never even seen it. That'll change since I got my wife the DVD of the first season for Christmas.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  2:38 PM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157708</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157708</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:38:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #8 from Teresa Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Teresa Nielsen Hayden on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>There's only a little over two hours left in TBoggs' <a href="http://tbogg.blogspot.com/2006/12/culture-crash-messala-sir-you-ask-how.html" rel="nofollow">Create your own Victor Davis "I Was A Teenaged Classicist" Hanson Blog Post</a> contest. Prize: the swanky four-disc edition of <i>Ben Hur.</i> </p>

<p><a href="http://lefarkins.blogspot.com/2006/12/relentless-smirking-and-snickering.html" rel="nofollow">Scott Lemieux</a> already wrote his.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  2:44 PM by Teresa Nielsen Hayden</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157713</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157713</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:44:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #9 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p><i>Prize: the swanky four-disc edition of Ben Hur.</i></p>

<p>Ah, there <i>is</i> somebody out there besides my wife and I who likes that movie.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  2:51 PM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157714</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157714</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:51:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #10 from JC</title>
         <description>comment from JC on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>#6: It's certainly grammatically correct and all the words mean the correct things. I don't know, off hand, if there is a more idiomatic way to say it. I think it's fine, but I'm hardly an expert.<br />
</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  2:55 PM by JC</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157716</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157716</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:55:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #11 from Tania</title>
         <description>comment from Tania on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Xopher - I read at Wonkette (and verified at the Washington Post) that the grave marker, with appropriate symbol, for the Wiccan soldier from Nevada has FINALLY been approved.</p>

<p>My last latin class was back in 1987, so I can't help with your motto. Do you have room for Agnostic Animists?</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  2:57 PM by Tania</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157718</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157718</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:57:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #12 from candle</title>
         <description>comment from candle on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Xopher @6: <i>Natura ipsa sufficit</i> is right, I think, although my worry is that it could be misread as "Nature suffices for itself" - and so you may need to do additional explaining. How about <i>Natura solum sufficit</i> - "Nature alone suffices"? I suppose then you will only find that people think you are saying "Nature is enough for the sun".<br />
</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  2:59 PM by candle</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157719</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157719</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:59:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #13 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>#10: Thanks!</p>

<p>#11: Thanks for the update.  And absolutely.  Radical Pantheism is a <i>choice</i> to worship the universe in its physical substance as such; no belief is required, nor credo espoused, other than...well, <i>natura ipsa sufficit.</i></p>

<p>#12: Thanks!  Maybe I could just more concisely phrase it as <i>Natura Sufficit</i>?  The idea is that Nature is so amazing, so wondrous, so infinitely complex in itself, that no one who is sufficiently aware of these facts needs to postulate any Divine force beyond Nature.  I like the 'Ipsa' for that reason, partly because it also means "herself" (if I'm correct in believing that 'natura' is a feminine noun).  This pleases my Wiccan bits!</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  3:09 PM by Xopher</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157721</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157721</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:09:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #14 from candle</title>
         <description>comment from candle on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>I very nearly ended up as a colleague of Victor Davis Hanson, you know.</p>

<p>VDH:</p>

<p>"With the trials of this administration having been carefully considered, not least their fortitude in the face of the decadence and corruption of the culture around them, it seems quite correct for me to remind you once again of the disastrous outcome of the Peloponnesian War. There too, a free, liberal, and open society was faced by an implacable enemy who cared little for the luxuries of life or for the false virtues of "freedom of speech"; and there too they were led astray by a populist crusade to fight overseas in distant Sicily, leaving their fields and homesteads undefended. For the relevance to the contemporary situation, read only Afghanistan for Sicily; and for Themistocles, George W. Bush. Oh no, hang on."<br />
</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  3:12 PM by candle</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157722</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157722</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:12:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #15 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p><i>This pleases my Wiccan bits!</i></p>

<p>Hmm...</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  3:12 PM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157723</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157723</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:12:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #16 from candle</title>
         <description>comment from candle on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Xopher - <i>Natura sufficit</i> would get the job done, but if you like the <i>ipsa</i>, leave it in by all means. I think it sounds better with the three terms, anyway. (<i>solum</i> *would* also have the meaning you want, but you are probably better off sticking with the one you chose yourself.)</p>

<p><i>natura</i> certainly is a feminine noun; I've been capitalising it as a kind of reflex so that it refers unambiguously to the goddess, but then I'm thinking in Roman terms. I reckon you should see <i>ipsa</i> as meaning "herself" first and foremost, whether talking about goddess or, well, phenomenon. "Nature herself suffices" seems fine to me in English.</p>

<p>That's probably enough Latin. <i>(ed.)</i></p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  3:18 PM by candle</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157726</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157726</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:18:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #17 from TexAnne</title>
         <description>comment from TexAnne on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>candle: But isn't "solum" the adverbial form? "Nature only suffices, it doesn't do anything else." I'd say "Natura sola sufficit." OTOH, "Natura sufficit" is simple and elegant.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  3:20 PM by TexAnne</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157727</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157727</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:20:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #18 from Stefan Jones</title>
         <description>comment from Stefan Jones on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>What Serge Said.</p>

<p>I don't think the moral is nearly as deep or profound of ineffable as the filmmaker thinks it was.</p>

<p>Assuming I'm not totally not getting it.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  3:21 PM by Stefan Jones</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157728</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157728</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:21:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #19 from candle</title>
         <description>comment from candle on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>TexAnne: Ouch, you're right. I really ought to be able to do this correctly, you know. Sorry, Xopher!</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  3:22 PM by candle</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157729</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157729</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:22:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #20 from Teresa Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Teresa Nielsen Hayden on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Candle, is that quote real? He actually said that?</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  3:23 PM by Teresa Nielsen Hayden</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157730</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157730</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:23:36 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #21 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Oooo, <i>sola</i>!  I like <i>sola.</i></p>

<p>Rats, now I have to think.  LOL</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  3:25 PM by Xopher</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157732</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157732</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:25:34 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #22 from Teresa Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Teresa Nielsen Hayden on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>No, I was wrong; <a href="http://lefarkins.blogspot.com/2006/12/beans-and-cheese.html" rel="nofollow">here's Scott Lemieux's entry</a> for the VDH competition.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  3:26 PM by Teresa Nielsen Hayden</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157734</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157734</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:26:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #23 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Maybe neither of us is getting it, Stefan. It's like Aronofsky was trying to do a pastiche of a Sixties movie. I probably am very bourgeois in my tastes, I guess. Still, the image of that tree floating inside a bubble zipping thru space was rather neat. Too bad the storytelling wasn't up to the level of the imagery. Come to think of it, that is a complaint one can often come up where F/SF movies are concerned.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  3:28 PM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157735</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157735</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:28:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #24 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>I'm making a bet with myself that someone is soon going to post a poem of theirs in Latin.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  3:29 PM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157736</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157736</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:29:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #25 from Alex Cohen</title>
         <description>comment from Alex Cohen on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>One of the signers-on to the Project for a New American Century was Donald Kagan, the leading modern historian of the Peloponnesian War.  It's like he didn't even read his own books.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  3:30 PM by Alex Cohen</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157738</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157738</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:30:40 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #26 from candle</title>
         <description>comment from candle on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>TexAnne: Sorry, no. I'm making it up in response to Teresa's invitation @8. I could probably have been clearer about that. </p>

<p>And before anyone says anything, the argument it kind of proposes isn't supposed to make sense.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  3:33 PM by candle</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157741</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157741</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:33:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #27 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>candle #14: Now that would have been interesting.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  3:36 PM by Fragano Ledgister</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157742</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157742</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:36:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #28 from Xopher</title>
         <description>comment from Xopher on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>candle, I think it was TNH, not TexAnne, who asked the question you answer in #26.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  3:36 PM by Xopher</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157743</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157743</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:36:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #29 from Jon Meltzer</title>
         <description>comment from Jon Meltzer on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>#25: Donald Kagan was one of the professors that resigned from Cornell after the Willard Straight takeover in 1969 (others include Allan Bloom and Thomas Sowell) which makes him about as neocon as one can get. </p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  3:39 PM by Jon Meltzer</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157745</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157745</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:39:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #30 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Actually, Candle, one suspects VDH would say something like this:</p>

<p><i>Our leaders should take heart from the example of the Pelopponesian War for that conflict demonstrated that a state based on the virtues that would go on to make Western Civilisation great could triumph over a decadent, corrupt regime which sought to spread its anti-Hellenic, revolutionary ideology to all the states of the old Mediterranean world.  George W. Bush should take heart from the example of Lysander the Spartan, that heroic exemplar of all that is good, and fear not the Iranian demagogues such as Ahmadinejad, that heir of the rabble-rouser Cleisthenes.</i></p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  3:41 PM by Fragano Ledgister</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157746</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157746</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:41:04 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #31 from Bill Higgins-- Beam Jockey</title>
         <description>comment from Bill Higgins-- Beam Jockey on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Your C-SPAN geek notes interesting programs coming up on BookTV (which is C-SPAN 2 if it's available on your cable or satellite channel) this weekend.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.booktv.org/General/index.asp?segID=7622&schedID=466" rel="nofollow"> Jason Epstein, <i>Print on Demand: A Revolution in the Making,</i></a>: 3:15 PM Saturday, 45 minutes long.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.booktv.org/General/index.asp?segID=7653&schedID=466" rel="nofollow"> Marvin Kalb, Allan Adler, Paul Aiken, Jonathan Band, Andrew Glass, David Robbins, Sidney Verba, The Google Print Project and the Future of the Written Word </a>: 10:30 AM Sunday, 1 hour and 40 minutes long.</p>

<p>And for a change of pace:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.booktv.org/General/index.asp?segID=7781&schedID=466&category=After+Words" rel="nofollow"> After Words: Larry Kahaner, author of <i>AK-47: The Weapon That Changed the Face of War</i>, interviewed by Peter Singer</a>: 9 PM Saturday, 6 PM and 9 PM Sunday, 55 minutes long.</p>

<p>Anybody here familiar with the Epstein book or the Kahaner book?</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  3:42 PM by Bill Higgins-- Beam Jockey</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157747</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157747</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:42:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #32 from Scott H</title>
         <description>comment from Scott H on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Serge @ #7:</p>

<p>With the exception of Rom, all the titles I listed in #5 were reasonably current movies on DVD.  I've got one of those all-you-care-to-watch for $20 / month deals, so I'm willing to experiment on obscure titles.  The ones listed were all surprisingly good.  </p>

<p>I wade through the crap so you don't have to.<br />
</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  3:50 PM by Scott H</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157751</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157751</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:50:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #33 from candle</title>
         <description>comment from candle on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Hmm, two mistakes in the matter of a few posts. I am evidently half-asleep. Sorry, Teresa, and TexAnne, for not reading the post properly. What I meant to say was: I decided to see if I could parody VDH in a comment rather than in an email to TBoggs. Probably I should explain this stuff rather than just doing it. I hope I haven't caused *too* much confusion.</p>

<p>Fragano: you're right, the example of Lysander does seem appropriate right now. Then again, I've always liked the Spartans.</p>

<p>OK. I think I shall limit myself in future to declarative statements. I am tired. </p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  3:51 PM by candle</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157752</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157752</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:51:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #34 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Scott @ 32 says: <i>I wade through the crap so you don't have to.</i></p>

<p>It's a dirty job, but someone has got to do it. And this reminds me how much I miss Joe Bob Briggs.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  3:58 PM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157753</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157753</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:58:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #35 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Before I forget... People here have probably seen that Visa commercial that shows a cafeteria running its customers and their credit cards thru with speed and efficiency until someone (gasp!) pays with cash. Is it just me who's disturbed by the ad's accidental message that no system can or should cope with people who Do Things Differently? That being said, what the heck is that music the ad is using? I've come across it in some old Warner Bros cartoons of the Forties, and it's been used in cartoons, usually when Wiley Coyote is observing the sequence of events of his latest Rube Goldberg contraption, before the anvil falls on his head.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  4:04 PM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157754</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157754</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:04:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #36 from Scott H</title>
         <description>comment from Scott H on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Yeah, what ever happened to Joe Bob?  Last I saw of him was that hosting gig he used to do on TNT or whatever.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  4:05 PM by Scott H</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157755</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157755</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:05:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #37 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>I was hoping someone would know, Scott H. I miss Joe Bob's Drive-in Theater on TNT.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  4:06 PM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157756</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157756</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:06:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #38 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Heck, I miss the TNT of the Nineties, when they'd have things like Summer Bummer, which would show old SF movies about the end of the world. (Come to think of it, it's been ages since I saw <i>crack in the world</i>.)</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  4:10 PM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157757</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157757</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:10:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #39 from JC</title>
         <description>comment from JC on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>There was a story on NPR's All Things Considered on Monday about how NCOs at Ft. Carson in Colorado have been hazing soldiers suffering from PTSD. Officials have been drumming those ill soldiers out of the army rather than giving them the mental health care they need (and the army is supposed to provide). What's even more appalling is that the NCOs doing the hazing didn't see anything wrong with doing it. The officials had no comment. Everything seems to be scrupulously documented though.</p>

<p>I'm reminded of Jonathan Shay's _Achilles in Vietnam_. Among other things, it explains why PTSD was more common in veterans of Vietnam than of veterans of previous wars. I read it almost exactly a year ago. What struck me at the time were the parallels the Iraq War had to Vietnam in this context.<br />
</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  4:15 PM by JC</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157758</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157758</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:15:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #40 from Neil Willcox</title>
         <description>comment from Neil Willcox on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Somewhere about <a href="http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008324.html#156986" rel="nofollow">here</a> I inadvertently created a challenge to write a romance in the style of Dale Brown, bestselling technothriller author.  Imagine my suprise when I looked at the Bs on my bookshelf and found that he had already written one!*  Anyway, here's an excerpt from <i>Sky Angels</i>.  I suggest that everyone who likes technothrillers or romances look away now.</p>

<p><br />
It was a starlit night at HAWC, the High-technology Aerospace Weapons Centre in Southern Nevada. As he walked into the hanger USAF Lt Col Patrick Maclanahan looked up into the sky. That was where the trim, sandyhaired officer wanted to be; flying in a cutting edge jet rather than managing research projects on the ground. </p>

<p>Everyone else had left for the night, but Maclanahan was determined to sort out the bugs in the weapons system submenu. He climbed into the darkened B-2 Spirit stealth bomber and retrieved the troublesome electronic box, intending to tinker with the display. Just as he got the box hooked up to diagnostics, the phone rang. </p>

<p>"Hello? Oh hello General. No, I'm the only one here... the security system is off? Several checkpoints appear to be unmanned? No one released the dogs this evening..." He paused, abruptly distracted by a shapely woman's leg propped up on the crew ladder of the aircraft in front of him. </p>

<p>"Sorry General, can I get back to you?" Without waiting for an answer he hung up. </p>

<p>"Patrick! There you are," said Wendy Tork. "What are you doing here? Is there anything wrong?" </p>

<p>Maclanahan showed her the box. "I've been trying to get this to work all day. The weapons submenus consistently choose the wrong weapon parameters for the loadout." </p>

<p>[For my own reasons I've chosen not to copy the page and a half explaining how the Multi Function Display is supposed to integrate the onboard radar and IR, as well as external satellite, radar and other information sources along with GPS and inertial guidance with the currently available weapons as well as the current threat and mission parameters to offer the optimum selection(s) of weapon choices.] </p>

<p>"....but it doesn't recognise which weapon is in each position in the CSRL, so it might launch a SLAM as though it were a SDB or vice versa, with an obvious reduction in effectiveness." </p>

<p>"Patrick, that's not important now though, is it? I mean, what are the odds that terrorists or foreign agents are going to break into this highly secure and isolated airbase, forcing us to escape in an experimental bomber, then discover that we're the only ones in a position to make an attack against an immediate threat to world peace?" </p>

<p>"Pretty slim, I guess," said Maclanahan, "but you did ask what's wrong." </p>

<p>"No Patrick," said Wendy, "I meant is there something wrong with you? You've seemed so distant. Is it... is there someone else?" </p>

<p>Patrick looked at her. How could he be so blind? Ignoring the brief flutter of guilt, he took her in his arms and kissed her. </p>

<p>"Wendy, I could never love another... woman..." </p>

<p>As his voice stuttered his eyes flicked up involuntarily to the where the dark nose of his specially modified B-52 stared down at him reproachfully... </p>

<p><br />
(Somehow, I doubt Dale Brown will be paying me $.20 for this post;  worse still, if I ever try to join the Romance Writers of America I will undoubtedly be blackballed.  Worst of all, I've put an annotated version, which will explain some of the Dale Brown specific bits <a href="http://nightofthehats.blogspot.com/2006/12/if-dale-brown-wrote-romances-this-is.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.)</p>

<p>You can look again now.  Next I'll have to see if any Dale Brown has been translated into latin - I've seen Harry Potter in latin, so who knows?</p>

<p>* He hasn't really.  I made it up.  Sorry.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  4:16 PM by Neil Willcox</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157759</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157759</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:16:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #41 from cleek</title>
         <description>comment from cleek on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p><i>, what the heck is that music the ad is using? I've come across it in some old Warner Bros cartoons of the Forties, </i></p>

<p>that would be <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powerhouse_%28song%29" rel="nofollow">Powerhouse</a>.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  4:18 PM by cleek</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157761</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157761</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:18:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #42 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Thanks, cleek!</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  4:26 PM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157766</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157766</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:26:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #43 from cleek</title>
         <description>comment from cleek on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Serge, glad to be of trivial assistance :)</p>

<p>and if you like (or have fond memories of) Looney Tunes music, you'll probably like <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Carl-Stalling-Project-Cartoons-1936-1958/dp/B000002LJE" rel="nofollow">The Carl Stalling Project</a>.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  4:34 PM by cleek</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157767</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157767</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:34:01 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #44 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Thanks again, cleek.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  4:35 PM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157768</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157768</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:35:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #45 from Teresa Nielsen Hayden</title>
         <description>comment from Teresa Nielsen Hayden on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Candle (26), did you post it to TBoggs' site?</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  4:39 PM by Teresa Nielsen Hayden</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157769</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157769</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:39:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #46 from candle</title>
         <description>comment from candle on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Teresa: no, I didn't. I'm not entirely sure I want to, for reasons that in turn I'm not entirely sure about. But at least part of it is that my various webmail accounts are screwed up at the moment. Probably it is something to do with my browser.</p>

<p>Still, the deadline is 5pm PST, isn't it? That gives me a few hours to think about it still. I doubt the Ben Hur set is going to be sent across the Atlantic even in the best case scenario, though. (My brush with CSU Fresno is long - well, a year - in the past now.)</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  5:07 PM by candle</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157775</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157775</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:07:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #47 from TexAnne</title>
         <description>comment from TexAnne on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>On the subject of the greatest movie critic evar: he'll be displaying his chat-fu <a href="http://lostdamned.com/chat.htm" rel="nofollow">here</a> on the 14th. Anne-Bob says check it out.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  5:29 PM by TexAnne</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157782</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157782</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:29:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #48 from Stefan Jones</title>
         <description>comment from Stefan Jones on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>JC @ #39:</p>

<p>That report raised quite a few eyebrows, including of the Senatorial variety.</p>

<p>Investigations are underway.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  5:36 PM by Stefan Jones</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157784</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157784</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:36:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #49 from miriam beetle</title>
         <description>comment from miriam beetle on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>bill,</p>

<p><i>Anybody here familiar with the Epstein book or the Kahaner book?</i></p>

<p>epstein did a piece on the same subject in a recent <i>new york review of books</i>... oh, here it is: <a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19436" rel="nofollow">books @ google</a>.</p>

<p>he waxes enthusiastic about the idea of book atms, you know, that you type in the title & the book is printed, bound, cut, & spit out while-u-wait.</p>

<p>coincidentally, i read that article not long after there was the big discussion here about how that dream is not really feasible with today's technology or bookstore realities.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  6:17 PM by miriam beetle</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157797</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157797</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 18:17:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #50 from Owlmirror</title>
         <description>comment from Owlmirror on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Re: <i>The Fountain</i></p>

<p>I feel deeply ambivalent about the movie &mdash; on the one hand it was very interesting to look at, and very pleasant to listen to.  On the other, its storytelling was utterly lacking in coherence.</p>

<p>It's something that might appeal strongly to those who can disengage themselves from causal logic, and who are idiosyncratically aesthetically oriented towards surrealism and slowly-moving strongly contrasting visual patterns and slow, moody music.</p>

<p>And isn't that a wonderfully roundabout way of saying "trippy"?</p>

<p>It's better than <i>&pi; (Pi)</i>, which had similar flaws in storytelling, but was far uglier to the eye and ear.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  7:05 PM by Owlmirror</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157807</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157807</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 19:05:34 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #51 from Andy</title>
         <description>comment from Andy on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>The New York Review of Books now has a blog, A Different Stripe: http://nyrb.typepad.com/ .  It looks pretty damn good.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  7:06 PM by Andy</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157808</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157808</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 19:06:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #52 from abi</title>
         <description>comment from abi on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p><strong>Serge @24</strong><br />
Candle, maybe, but certainly not me.</p>

<p>Well, apart from a winter haiku.  But that hardly counts.</p>

<p>Non sola aethra<br />
Sole ardescit mane<br />
Sed ego quoque.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  7:10 PM by abi</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157810</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157810</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 19:10:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #53 from Rob Rusick</title>
         <description>comment from Rob Rusick on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Serge @35: <i>[..] That being said, what the heck is that music the ad is using? I've come across it in some old Warner Bros cartoons of the Forties, and it's been used in cartoons, usually when Wiley Coyote is observing the sequence of events of his latest Rube Goldberg contraption, before the anvil falls on his head.</i></p>

<p>I think it might be <b>Powerhouse</b>, by Raymond Scott. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEuwAh3LFvM" rel="nofollow">Here is a YouTube link</a> to an animation by Antonio Linhares, in the style of <a href="http://www.oskarfischinger.org/" rel="nofollow">Oskar Fischinger</a>, to Scott's composition (<i>I can tell you the name of the piece and the musician, because Antonio identified them in the info accompanying the animation</i>).</p>

<p>It's a pretty cool piece. I had recently seen a tribute to Oskar Fischinger at the Dryden Theatre (<i>at the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Eastman_House_International_Museum_of_Photography_and_Film" rel="nofollow">George Eastman House</a></i>), and when I saw this animation on YouTube, it stuck in my memory.<br />
</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  7:14 PM by Rob Rusick</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157812</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157812</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 19:14:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #54 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p><i>And isn't that a wonderfully roundabout way of saying "trippy"?</i></p>

<p>'Trippy' is the very word that came to my mind, Owlmirror, as I was watching <i>The Fountain</i>. </p>

<p>It's frustrating to watch a movie that <i>could</i> have been great. </p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  7:29 PM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157813</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157813</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 19:29:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #55 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>A Latin haiku, abi? I guess that'll do for me to feel like I won my bet with myself.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  7:30 PM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157814</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157814</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 19:30:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #56 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Thanks, Rob. Cleek had already posted a link to Wikipedia about <i>Powerhouse</i>, but getting something on YouTube is great too. Thanks again.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  7:32 PM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157815</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157815</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 19:32:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #57 from abi</title>
         <description>comment from abi on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p><strong>Serge @55</strong><br />
On the one hand, I haven't done any Latin composition* since I finished university and decided that I wasn't a good enough Classicist to pursue it further.</p>

<p>On the other hand, I am weak, I've had some whisky, and it was you inciting me.  Aren't you a bit beardy for a muse?</p>

<p>On the gripping hand, I do actually enjoy composing haiku in entirely unsuitable languages.  I no longer have the C++ one I wrote years ago, but you get the idea.</p>

<p>------<br />
* barring the inevitable slogan requests</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  7:37 PM by abi</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157816</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157816</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 19:37:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #58 from Linkmeister</title>
         <description>comment from Linkmeister on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Neil @#40, "a shapely woman's leg" or "a woman's shapely leg?"</p>

<p>What's that called? Dangling participles? ;)</p>

<p>Oh, and wouldn't a B-52 look down "bombastically" rather than "reproachfully?"</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  7:47 PM by Linkmeister</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157818</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157818</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 19:47:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #59 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p><i>Aren't you a bit beardy for a muse?</i></p>

<p>Probably, abi, but I've never been called a muse before. You've made my day.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  8:08 PM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157823</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157823</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:08:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #60 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>(Picked up from the previous thread)</p>

<p>Good question, Susan, about feline chirality. I'll have to see what it is that the Bad Cat does.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  8:10 PM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157824</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157824</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:10:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #61 from Chris Quinones</title>
         <description>comment from Chris Quinones on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>That Linhares animation sounds like it was done to one of Stalling's adaptations of the central section of Powerhouse, for some Looney Tune or other. Just noting that there's more to it than that, and that the other main section is probably as familiar but not as well-known (it tends to show up in Roadrunner-type chase scenes; I can hum it for you if you're within shouting distance...)</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  8:21 PM by Chris Quinones</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157826</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157826</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:21:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #62 from Marilee</title>
         <description>comment from Marilee on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Tania and Xopher, it's not the grave marker that's been <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/03/AR2006120301126.html" rel="nofollow">approved</a>.  It's a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/photo/2006/12/03/PH2006120301136.html" rel="nofollow">plaque</a> in a <b>state</b> veterans cemetary.  It's a great step forward, but it's not a grave marker and not a  <b>national</b> cemetary. </p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  8:41 PM by Marilee</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157829</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157829</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:41:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #63 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Holy Cow, Batman, Rumsfeld may be sued for torture!</p>

<p>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061208/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/detainee_abuse</p>

<p>If ever I had considered bribing a judge, it would be right now, Lawful Good or not.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  8:59 PM by Greg London</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157830</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157830</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:59:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #64 from Tania</title>
         <description>comment from Tania on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Marilee -</p>

<p>Thanks for the clarification. I must admit to not really knowing enough about grave markers vs. plaques to have been aware that a difference exists (we usually cremate our dead). I learn the most interesting things here.</p>

<p>re: Latin compositions. I always hear the theme music from the Mighty Mouse cartoon when sharing favorite Latin palindrome - Sum summus mus! </p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  9:19 PM by Tania</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157834</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157834</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 21:19:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #65 from Dawno</title>
         <description>comment from Dawno on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Neil (#40) Thank you so much. I needed a laugh tonight! My former senior director (ex Air Force) and I were talking about books and I told him I like military fiction and technothrillers. He enthusiastically recommended Dale Brown to me as I am an Air Force brat and I assume he felt that I shouldn't be limiting my self to all that Navy stuff of Clancy's. </p>

<p>So I ordered up a bunch of Brown (I read fast so I like to have a couple books in a series ready at hand)from Amazon. I didn't think I'd read the passage you quote - but damn if it wasn't perfect. (especially your mention of the page and a half you skipped - that's exactly how I read Brown and Clancy - skim for plot, skip the lovingly detailed specs of whatever super weapon de jure comes along). I have to admit that I have a number of unread Dale Brown books sitting on the shelf. I think I took a sanity break after the third or fourth one. My willing suspension of disbelief can only stand so much stress.</p>

<p>If you ever do write <i>Sky Angels</i>, I promise to read it.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  9:52 PM by Dawno</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157840</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157840</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 21:52:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #66 from TexAnne</title>
         <description>comment from TexAnne on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Re <i>The Fountain:</i> Forget the plot--<i>does Hugh Jackman take his shirt off?</i></p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006  9:52 PM by TexAnne</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157841</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157841</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 21:52:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #67 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Sorry to disappoint you, TexAnne, but at no point is Hugh Jackman shirtless in <i>The Fountain</i>.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006 10:21 PM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157847</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157847</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 22:21:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #68 from TexAnne</title>
         <description>comment from TexAnne on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Serge: Pfui and Hrmph. I'll go see it anyway, I suppose, once I'm done with this silly grading. (The official seal I just generated has the motto "J'enseigne, donc je suis," and the central motif is a bootprint. Naturally, it's all surrounded by laurel leaves.)</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006 10:27 PM by TexAnne</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157848</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157848</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 22:27:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #69 from Bill Higgins-- Beam Jockey</title>
         <description>comment from Bill Higgins-- Beam Jockey on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>In #65, Dawno writes:</p>

<p><i> I didn't think I'd read the passage you quote - but damn if it wasn't perfect. (especially your mention of the page and a half you skipped - that's exactly how I read Brown and Clancy - skim for plot, skip the lovingly detailed specs of whatever super weapon de jure comes along). </i></p>

<p>Funny, I'm the sort of reader who whizzes through the plot and slows down for the superweapons...</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006 11:10 PM by Bill Higgins-- Beam Jockey</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157852</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157852</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 23:10:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #70 from Bill Higgins-- Beam Jockey</title>
         <description>comment from Bill Higgins-- Beam Jockey on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>P.S. I gave up on Clancy at <i>Rainbow Six</i>, two or three novels after I should have, and am unlikely to start reading Dale Brown.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006 11:32 PM by Bill Higgins-- Beam Jockey</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157896</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157896</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 23:32:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #71 from Rob Rusick</title>
         <description>comment from Rob Rusick on  8.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Chris Quinones @61 : <i>I can hum it for you if you're within shouting distance...</i></p>

<p>That made me laugh; I was thinking <i>we've traced the call, and <b>he's in the house...</b></i></p>

<p>The first person to respond to Serge's question (<i><a href="http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157761" rel="nofollow">cleek</a></i>) gave a wikipedia link to a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powerhouse_%28song%29" rel="nofollow">Powerhouse</a> entry; there's a couple of sound links at the end of the article; one to a portion of the &ldquo;assembly line&rdquo; theme Serge was thinking of, and another to a portion of the &ldquo;chase&rdquo; theme you're describing. I hadn't noticed the first post before I had run off on my own, to track down my scrap of memory. </p>

<p>You're responding to my post (<i>and thanks for checking out the animation</i>). Both themes were familiar, but I never would have been able to attach a name to them, or recognized that they came from the same piece.<br />
</p>
	 <p>Posted December  8, 2006 11:39 PM by Rob Rusick</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157907</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#157907</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 23:39:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #72 from CHip</title>
         <description>comment from CHip on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Alex Cohen @ 25: IMO, one of the qualifications for a neocon is the ability to look at anything showing "that trick never works!" -- and say "but \we'll/ do it \right/" (if they don't ignore the demo completely). "right" is of course defined as whatever half-assed way they want to do it.</p>

<p>Serge @ 67: I thought I recalled him taking his shirt off to apply the sap. I suppose the angle means it doesn't count....</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006 12:22 AM by CHip</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158028</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158028</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 00:22:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #73 from Bruce Baugh</title>
         <description>comment from Bruce Baugh on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Since it's an open thread:</p>

<p><a href="http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2006/12/08/a-friday-tale-of-two-ts/" rel="nofollow">Tamora Pierce, an art teacher, and a young student interact in various ways to the mutual gain of all.</a> This has had me smiling for an hour now, after a heart-consuming rotten day.<br />
</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006  1:57 AM by Bruce Baugh</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158101</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158101</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 01:57:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #74 from Owlmirror</title>
         <description>comment from Owlmirror on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Re: #66, #67, #68 & #72</p>

<p>Actually, I think Hugh Jackman <i>does</i> take his shirt off.  There's a scene where he's giving Rachel Weisz a warm bath, and there's a bit of splashing around in the water as bathing becomes making out.</p>

<p>I think the shirt comes off then, but I wouldn't swear to it.</p>

<p>Oh, and the shirt does definitely come off at the end, as mentioned, but at that point, he's been stabbed.  The Jackman torso is shown with a bloody wound, which might affect its visual appeal and pulchritudousness.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006  3:25 AM by Owlmirror</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158128</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158128</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 03:25:04 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #75 from Peter Erwin</title>
         <description>comment from Peter Erwin on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Bill Higgins said (#69):<br />
<i>Funny, I'm the sort of reader who whizzes through the plot and slows down for the superweapons...</i></p>

<p>The last time I tried to read a Clancy novel (<i>The Bear and the Dragon</i>), I found myself desperately hoping for the war to start, so that he'd stop the horrible, horrible attempts at politics, non-military conversations, and sex scenes.  (OK, only one sex scene, but it was really bad writing). Not to mention the tediously silly atemtps to show off his research by constantly referring to certain characters by the Secret Service code names.</p>

<p>And, in fact, things did improve once the war started.</p>

<p>I don't remember the other two Clancy books I read (his first two) being nearly that bad.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006  7:12 AM by Peter Erwin</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158165</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158165</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 07:12:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #76 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>CHip and Owlmirror... I think you're right about both scenes, but I have this feeling they're not quite the shirt-removal situations that TexAnne was hoping for. Heheheh... Meanwhile, last night, I did see Hugh shirtless on TNT's broadcast of <i>van Helsing</i>. My only excuse is that I was desperate for something, anything, to watch until I was sleepy - a state greatly hastened by that movie. Remember the end when Kate Beckinsale's character is dead and Hugh puts her body on a heap of wood and sets the whole thing on fire? I turned to my wife and said: "Look! A baking sale!"</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006  7:14 AM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158166</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158166</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 07:14:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #77 from TexAnne</title>
         <description>comment from TexAnne on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Ew, <i>Van Helsing.</i> I'm its target audience incarnate, and I barely made it to the end. I felt so sorry for the people who made it...you can see the bones of a decent movie, but the suits killed it.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006  8:37 AM by TexAnne</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158167</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158167</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 08:37:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #78 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>You too, eh, TexAnne... I wonder how much the studio's suits were responsible for the <i>van Helsing</i> mess. Steven Sommers, its director, had made the <i>Mummy</i> movies, which were very successful, so I presume that gave him clout enough that the studio would have let him do what he wanted. It's like he forgot everything he had done right with the previous movies. Forget about pacing. Take what you did before and give people <i>more</i> of it. That might explain why it was such a mind-numbing rollercoaster ride. (My wife hated the movie as much as I did, but we have a disagreement over it. I maintain that <i>The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen</i> was better.)</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006  8:47 AM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158168</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158168</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 08:47:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #79 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p><i>"Look! A baking sale!"</i></p>

<p>Now, now. Be nice.<br />
Or the Great Spirit of conditional giving <br />
won't bring you any presents.</p>

<p></p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006 10:21 AM by Greg London</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158179</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158179</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 10:21:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #80 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p><i>the Great Spirit of conditional giving won't bring you any presents.</i></p>

<p>Waugh!!!</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006 10:39 AM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158183</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158183</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 10:39:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #81 from Arthur D. Hlavaty</title>
         <description>comment from Arthur D. Hlavaty on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>The role of the combat mimeographer was immortalized in <i>Good Morning, Vietnam</i>, with the fannish line, "I live to collate, sir."</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006 10:50 AM by Arthur D. Hlavaty</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158186</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158186</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 10:50:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #82 from James D. Macdonald</title>
         <description>comment from James D. Macdonald on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>From the annals of <a href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=17422476&method=full&siteid=94762&headline=i-m-not-filming-up-skirts-i-m-spying-on-al-qaeda--name_page.html" rel="nofollow">Security Theatre</a>:</p>

<blockquote>A DETECTIVE was arrested for allegedly filming up women's skirts with a hidden camera.
<p>
The married anti-terrorist officer told police he was working undercover to video al-Qaeda suspects. But back at the station they found his camera had close-ups of bottoms and knickers. </p></blockquote>

<p>Props for <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/19/washington/19cards.html?ei=5088&en=5e9000b0261c5602&ex=1310961600&adxnnl=1&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&adxnnlx=1165680474-Mtt44wPniYa3BB9rwY2LSA" rel="nofollow">Security Theater</a>:</p>

<blockquote>WASHINGTON, July 18 — Flat-bottomed rescue boats at double the retail price, $68,500 worth of unused dog booties, hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of computers that somehow disappeared and a $227 beer brewing kit.
<p>
These are just a few of the questionable purchases that Congressional auditors have found by digging through half a year of credit card records from the Homeland Security Department, including records for the months immediately after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita last year.</p></blockquote>

<p>At least the US guys didn't buy any miniature cameras to film up girls' skirts.</p>

<p>Did they?</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006 11:11 AM by James D. Macdonald</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158189</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158189</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 11:11:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #83 from P J Evans</title>
         <description>comment from P J Evans on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Peter Erwin @ 75</p>

<p>The first two Clancy books <i>are</i> better than the rest; I have those, and got rid of the others. (I heard that the Washington reaction to <i>Red Storm Rising</i> was something like 'OMG! We forgot about Iceland!')</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006 11:34 AM by P J Evans</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158192</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158192</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 11:34:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #84 from Rob Rusick</title>
         <description>comment from Rob Rusick on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Serge @78: I'd suggest the suck in <i>The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen</i> was concentrated in that stunningly awful Venice sequence, whereas <i>van Helsing</i> sucked more uniformly.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006 11:35 AM by Rob Rusick</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158193</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158193</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 11:35:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #85 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Well said, Rob... I had a bit of a problem with the Nautilus being able to navigate the canals without getting stuck in mud, let alone being able to turn corners. And let's not talk about the destruction of a whole neighborhood by Nemo's missiles without a single human death. Overall, though, it had good stuff in it. In some ways, it was better than Alan Moore's graphic novel. In some other ways, it was <i>not</i> better. I wish they had kept the novel's Quartermain as a burnt-out man, and the Beauty/Beast relationship between Minna and Hyde.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006 12:04 PM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158197</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158197</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 12:04:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #86 from Fade Manley</title>
         <description>comment from Fade Manley on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Haiku in Latin? This is making me wish my Latin-English dictionary weren't packed away with my Wheeler's. I'm just adept enough at Latin to realize how much I suck at it, but now I desperately want to go write poetry in a foreign language.</p>

<p>(I am not, however, about to start posting my conlang poetry here, despite temptation. I have enough self-awareness to realize that throwing around one's conlang is a step down from "Let me tell you about my character" as clueless geeky behavior goes.)</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006 12:13 PM by Fade Manley</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158198</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158198</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 12:13:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #87 from Paul</title>
         <description>comment from Paul on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p><a href="http://gnn.tv/articles/2791/BREAKING_Congresswoman_McKinney_Files_Articles_of_Impeachment" rel="nofollow">"Rep. McKinney Files Articles of Impeachment"</a></p>

<p>Has this been confirmed anywhere else?</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006 12:29 PM by Paul</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158201</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158201</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 12:29:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #88 from Dan Layman-Kennedy</title>
         <description>comment from Dan Layman-Kennedy on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p><i>Van Helsing</i> is one of those movies on my fruitcake* list - i.e., Stuff I Like That Everyone Else Hates. I can't help myself. I'm a sucker for the New Pulp, absurd plotting, over-the-top fx, and all.</p>

<p>I've warmed a bit to <i>LXG</i>, though it remains one of the few films I indulge in griping about how much better the book was - in this case because there was so much cinematic potential with the stuff that was in the comic that got pushed aside. And really, it was a very small amount that it asked me to turn off my brain more than I was willing to, or I'd have really liked it; if nothing else, the production values are stunning. <i>Van Helsing</i>, by contrast, is unpretentious; silly as it is, it didn't get there from starting life as a smart and literate comic.</p>

<p>*Referring, of course, to the much-despised commercial fruitcake, as per the Other Thread.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006  1:40 PM by Dan Layman-Kennedy</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158215</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158215</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 13:40:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #89 from Charlie Stross</title>
         <description>comment from Charlie Stross on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>The collision between the discussion of Dale Brown, Tom Clancey, and the possibility of Donald Rumsfeld being sued has crystallised a realization in my head:</p>

<p>I <i>thought</i> that what was wrong with the world was that responsibility for the Script had just been handed over to a team consisting of the ghosts of George Orwell and Phil Dick. </p>

<p>However, I now realize that we're not living in a scripted world <i>at all</i>. Instead, we're non-player characters in an adventure game setting created by Tom Clancy and Dale Brown, watching Team America (played by your neighbour's dumb kid who lives in their basement) get its collective ass handed to it by an irate celestial GM who was hoping to run an interesting character-driven session rather than munchkin hack'n'slay, and who is therefore taking it out on the kid.</p>

<p>Certainly if Clancy had ever handed in a novel where the Forces of Good&trade; were subjected to the kind of hard nosed rules-lawyering we've seen since July 2003, his editors would have felt the need to take him aside for a quiet word ...</p>

<p>Look! Over there! Is that clock melting, yet?</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006  1:45 PM by Charlie Stross</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158216</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158216</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 13:45:07 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #90 from Joe J</title>
         <description>comment from Joe J on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Here's the link to the NPR story on PTSD that JC (#39) and Stephan Jones (#48) mention above. This was definitely a "driveway moment" for me. I must have sat silently in my parked car for a good five minutes just listening to it. I'm glad that there are at least a few news outlets in the world that actually believe in journalism still.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6576505" rel="nofollow">Soldiers Say Army Ignores, Punishes Mental Anguish</a> </p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006  1:51 PM by Joe J</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158217</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158217</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 13:51:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #91 from Stefan Jones</title>
         <description>comment from Stefan Jones on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>The sargeants interviewed for that piece . . . on one hand, you get the feeling that they're the kind of chaps you'd want leading you in battle.</p>

<p>One the other: What total fucking self-brainwashed macho-bureaucratic pricks.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006  2:01 PM by Stefan Jones</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158219</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158219</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 14:01:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #92 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p><i>Van Helsing, by contrast, is unpretentious; silly as it is, it didn't get there from starting life as a smart and literate comic.</i></p>

<p>Good point, Dan. But Sommers's <i>Mummy</i> movies were unpretentious too and they were fun, in a leave-your-brain-at-the-front-desk way. My own problem with <i>van Helsing</i> is that there was way too much stuff being thrown at us. Think of the action-packed scene at the beginning of <i>Raiders of the Lost Ark</i> and maintain the same pace to the movie's very end. Numbing. For <i>me</i> anyway.</p>

<p>Back to <i>LXG</i>, what did you think of the 2nd graphic novel, with its background of the War of the World? It left me unsatisfied. Not sure why.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006  2:08 PM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158220</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158220</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 14:08:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #93 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>#87 from the impeachment link:</p>

<p><i>This manipulation of intelligence was done, the charge continues, “with the intent to misinform the people and their representatives in Congress in order to gain their support for invading Iraq, denying both the people and their representatives in Congress the right to make an informed choice.”</i></p>

<p>Yaw! </p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006  2:17 PM by Greg London</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158224</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158224</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 14:17:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #94 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>#84 <i>I'd suggest the suck in The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen was concentrated in that stunningly awful Venice sequence, whereas van Helsing sucked more uniformly.</i></p>

<p>They're playing "Constantine" (Keaneu Reeves) on TV now, and I've seen it at least three times. Everytime I watch it, I like it more. Apparently it bombed at the box office though, which I don't understand. I mean, Constantine seems better than some of the big money makers in the same genre. Though I might be missing something.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006  2:21 PM by Greg London</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158226</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158226</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 14:21:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #95 from Rob Rusick</title>
         <description>comment from Rob Rusick on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Serge @85: <i>[..] I had a bit of a problem with the Nautilus being able to navigate the canals without getting stuck in mud, let alone being able to turn corners.</i></p>

<p>My jaw dropped when it even <b>fit</b> in a canal. In the scene where we first see the Nautilis, it's about the size of the Titanic. Then there's that ridiculously large &ldquo;auto-mobile&rdquo; (<i>just the sort of thing you would carry around in a submarine, on the off chance it might be useful</i>), racing along wide, lengthy, and unpopulated streets; it would seem that Venice would have to be as large as Manhattan for the time it took for the car to reach its destination. I don't get why firing a missle in the center of the city was going to stop the rest of the submerged bombs from going off, or why they didn't just all go off at once (<i>or at least, finish detonating in the time it took for the car to reach its destination</i>).</p>

<p>But that sequence aside, I thought the rest of the movie hung together fairly well.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006  2:41 PM by Rob Rusick</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158228</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158228</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 14:41:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #96 from Zarquon</title>
         <description>comment from Zarquon on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Happy Hogswatch! Sky One in the UK has produced a live action version of Terry Pratchett's "Hogfather". There's a promo site at http://www.skyone.co.uk/hogfather/ with links to video clips from the show and "making of" clips.<br />
It looks really coooool.<br />
</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006  3:55 PM by Zarquon</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158234</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158234</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 15:55:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #97 from Lila</title>
         <description>comment from Lila on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Paul #87: Google News gives several hits from the likes of the Boston Globe. I believe she did introduce such a bill. Unfortunately it will die a-borning as Pelosi will have nothing to do with it and McKinney has even less credibility than Bush himself.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006  4:05 PM by Lila</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158236</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158236</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 16:05:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #98 from Jeremy Osner</title>
         <description>comment from Jeremy Osner on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Could somebody please remind me of the name and address of the excellent fiction blog that has been linked to many times from this very site and the comments thereto? I followed links and always liked it, now I can't remember where it is and it's killing me...</p>

<p>Aha! "Hitherby Dragons" is what it's called. Nemmine, thanks!</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006  4:11 PM by Jeremy Osner</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158238</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158238</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 16:11:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #99 from Sharon M</title>
         <description>comment from Sharon M on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>The Joe Bob Briggs website is at <a href="http://www.joebobbriggs.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.joebobbriggs.com/</a></p>

<p>It's got a ton of his columns - the drive-in movie reviews (alphabetically), Vegas guy, the John Bloom work, and many other Joe Bob type things. </p>

<p>The last time I remember seeing Joe Bob televised was God Talk, on the Craig Kilbourn version of the Daily Show. Sadly, I have found no clips. God Talk was easily the funniest bit from that era of the Daily Show.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006  4:17 PM by Sharon M</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158239</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158239</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 16:17:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #100 from JESR</title>
         <description>comment from JESR on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p><a>Some people deserve the fans they've got.</a></p>

<p>http://blogs.news-journalonline.com/247/2006/12/why_we_love_the_fireflyserenit.html</p>

<p>(This may also be an argument for free travel between the US and Canada?)</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006  5:01 PM by JESR</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158243</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158243</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 17:01:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #101 from NelC</title>
         <description>comment from NelC on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Anybody know anything about the <a href="http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=791" rel="nofollow">EPA closing their files and selling the furniture?</a></p>

<p>Is this really about Bush blatantly serving his dark masters by destroying the EPA? Even he wouldn't be that obvious, would he?</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006  5:33 PM by NelC</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158261</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158261</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 17:33:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #102 from Jack Ruttan</title>
         <description>comment from Jack Ruttan on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>#95: I thought the Venice thing was the most fun in "League." Completely absurd, like something from a Georges Méliès fantasy film. The cream-coloured Rococo submarine, the out-of time auto, and all the buildings falling down like packs of cards. </p>

<p>I also watched the movie looking forward to the director and cast trashing Sean Connery on the DVD commentary, but didn't get so much of that. </p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006  5:59 PM by Jack Ruttan</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158270</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158270</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 17:59:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #103 from Marilee</title>
         <description>comment from Marilee on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Tania, #64, the plaque is for a <a href="http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2006/May-22-Mon-2006/news/7509332.html" rel="nofollow">Memorial Wall</a>.  A grave marker is usually made of white or gray stone or concrete (I've seen brown in the Confederate cemetary close to my condo, though).  The older ones can be very big and ornate, and in national veteran's cemetaries (like Arlington National) some folks still get fancier grave markers (my mother is buried in the Officer's Headstone section; my father will join her there) but most people just get plain <a href="http://dest.travelocity.com/website/destinations/photos/034_208.jpg" rel="nofollow">markers</a> with personal info and the religious symbol on <a href="http://static.flickr.com/32/94751351_e3f3136207_m.jpg" rel="nofollow">it</a>.</p>

<p>Paul, #87, indeed McKinney filed for <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/08/AR2006120801588.html" rel="nofollow">impeachment</a>, but it's not going anywhere.  (scroll down to third item)</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006  6:41 PM by Marilee</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158273</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158273</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 18:41:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #104 from Kip W</title>
         <description>comment from Kip W on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>JESR @100: I went to YouTube a while back and looked for "God Stuff" and found thirty segments. Alas, they're not there now (at least, not under that name), victims of the Comedy Central purge. As a consolation prize, here's <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=yQT6AwcaIZo&mode=related&search=" rel="nofollow">The Farting Preacher</a>, for sophomoric laffs.</p>

<p>By the way, I hope 2007 is the year I finally buy the CD with Spike Jones doing "The Powerhouse." I keep seeing it in the store, and not getting it.</p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006 10:29 PM by Kip W</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158314</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158314</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 22:29:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #105 from Kip W</title>
         <description>comment from Kip W on  9.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Very sorry to hear about George William Swift Trow, who I knew only from <i>National Lampoon</i>, where he was indeed good. </p>
	 <p>Posted December  9, 2006 10:30 PM by Kip W</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158315</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158315</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 22:30:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #106 from Stefan Jones</title>
         <description>comment from Stefan Jones on 10.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>#101: Ignorance is Strength</p>
	 <p>Posted December 10, 2006 12:28 AM by Stefan Jones</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158339</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158339</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:28:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #107 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 10.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Sharon M @ 99... Thanhks for the link to Joe Bob Briggs's site.</p>
	 <p>Posted December 10, 2006  9:02 AM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158377</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158377</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:02:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #108 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 10.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Greg London @ 94... <i>They're playing "Constantine" (Keaneu Reeves) on TV now, and I've seen it at least three times. Everytime I watch it, I like it more.</i></p>

<p>I think I travelled the same road with 1980's <i>Flash Gordon</i>. From being thought of as a piece of bleep, it has become one of my Guilty Pleasures. Unfortunately, my wife went the other way, from liking it to threatening divorce if I put the DVD on if she's around. Okay, I made the divorce bit up. But I can't watch it when she's around. The situation is the same with another of my Guilty Pleasure, 1976's <i>At The Earth's Core</i> even though it has everything a person could ask for. It's got Doug McClure. And Caroline Munro. Peter Cushing as a scientist who makes a bow using his suspenders. Special effects that give cheese a bad name. Dinosaurs from the guy-in-a-rubbersuit school of thought. What is there not to like?</p>
	 <p>Posted December 10, 2006  9:14 AM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158380</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158380</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 09:14:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #109 from Dan Layman-Kennedy</title>
         <description>comment from Dan Layman-Kennedy on 10.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Serge, I like the second volume of <i>League</i> very much, though I also appreciate that it went a little dark and gritty for a lot of people's taste. </p>

<p><i>Constantine</i> has grown on me too. Once I got over wanting it to be <i>Hellblazer</i> (and wishing for James Marsters), it's a perfectly decent occult yarn, and true in many ways to the spirit of the earlier comics. (I'd still like to visit the universe where they actually made a movie out of <i>Dangerous Habits</i>, though.)</p>
	 <p>Posted December 10, 2006 11:17 AM by Dan Layman-Kennedy</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158402</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158402</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:17:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #110 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 10.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Dan... I probably should re-read the second LXG novel. When I first came across it, something felt different, not necessarily in the story itself. Maybe it was the lack of a lettercol where people got into the spirit of the whole thing and wrote letters in a quaint style. Or maybe... The first novel had a pastiche of pulp stories where Quartermain met John Carter and Randolph Carter and Wells's Time Traveller and even the Hounds of Tindalos. The second novel's extra feature was more like a catalogue of all kinds of literary references. Yeah, I guess I should have focused on the story itself.</p>
	 <p>Posted December 10, 2006 11:26 AM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158404</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158404</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:26:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #111 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 10.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Christmas time is here<br />
Happiness and cheer<br />
Fun for all that children call<br />
Their favorite time of the year</p>

<p>Snowflakes in the air<br />
Carols everywhere<br />
Olden times and ancient rhymes<br />
Of love and dreams to share</p>

<p>Sleigh bells in the air<br />
Beauty everywhere<br />
Yuletide by the fireside<br />
And joyful memories there</p>

<p>Christmas time is here<br />
We'll be drawing near<br />
Oh, that we could always see<br />
Such spirit through the year<br />
Oh, that we could always see<br />
Such spirit through the year...</p>

<p><i>(from 1965's Charlie Brown Christmas Special)</i></p>
	 <p>Posted December 10, 2006 11:49 AM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158406</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158406</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:49:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #112 from abi</title>
         <description>comment from abi on 10.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>I note that <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/6167237.stm" rel="nofollow">Pinochet</a> is dead.</p>

<p>I firmly believe that no one, and no crime, is unforgiveable, but that was a belief he sore tried in me.  As Cordelia Naismith said, "I'll have to leave that to the Infinite.  You exceed my capacity."</p>
	 <p>Posted December 10, 2006  1:51 PM by abi</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158426</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158426</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:51:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #113 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 10.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Pinochet is dead, abi? Good riddance.</p>
	 <p>Posted December 10, 2006  2:07 PM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158430</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158430</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 14:07:40 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #114 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on 10.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Abi #112: The sad thing is that he was not in prison when he died.</p>
	 <p>Posted December 10, 2006  2:46 PM by Fragano Ledgister</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158432</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158432</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 14:46:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #115 from PixelFish</title>
         <description>comment from PixelFish on 10.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Abi @ 112: I know the feeling. </p>

<p>This is more for Teresa, but here's an interesting <a href="http://www.sltrib.com/lds/ci_3661420" rel="nofollow">article</a> about how LDS church leaders lent verbal support to Pinochet's regime. I remember being quite tweaked when I first discovered it myself, but hearing that your erstwhile church leaders considered his coup "an act that served the purposes of the Lord" is more than a little disturbing. </p>
	 <p>Posted December 10, 2006  2:59 PM by PixelFish</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158434</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158434</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 14:59:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #116 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 10.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p><i>The sad thing is that he was not in prison when he died.</i></p>

<p>Neither was Marechal Petain, after France's liberation.<br />
</p>
	 <p>Posted December 10, 2006  3:46 PM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158438</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158438</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:46:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #117 from Kip W</title>
         <description>comment from Kip W on 10.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Any bets on whether Dubya goes to the funeral and makes noises about what a great patriot (and friend of Amurka) he was?</p>
	 <p>Posted December 10, 2006  5:04 PM by Kip W</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158450</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158450</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:04:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #118 from TexAnne</title>
         <description>comment from TexAnne on 10.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Kip, 117: I thought it was traditional for the second banana to go to  those thi--oh, wait.</p>
	 <p>Posted December 10, 2006  5:33 PM by TexAnne</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158456</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158456</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:33:07 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #119 from Mary Aileen Buss</title>
         <description>comment from Mary Aileen Buss on 10.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>I keep reading that Particle as "a thousand or so oracular <b>ducks</b>." I like the image, but it does strange things to my brain.</p>

<p>--Mary Aileen</p>
	 <p>Posted December 10, 2006  6:57 PM by Mary Aileen Buss</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158466</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158466</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 18:57:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #120 from NelC</title>
         <description>comment from NelC on 10.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Kip, I heard on the news that there won't be a state funeral, so the opportunity for Georgie to wax eloquent <i>(snurk)</i> will be limited.</p>
	 <p>Posted December 10, 2006  8:04 PM by NelC</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158478</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158478</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:04:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #121 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on 10.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Mary Eileen Buss #119:</p>

<p>Your comment led me to do this:</p>

<p><i>we go for learning to the newest source<br />
the oracle of a thousand quacking fowl<br />
the ducks who speak wiser than any owl<br />
and congregate on every watercourse<br />
the wisest monk hiding beneath his cowl<br />
or savvy boy scout schooled by baden-powell<br />
has no more sense that ordinary horse<br />
the birds though overwhelm the sense<br />
give no option to us but now to hearken<br />
to their wise redes given in loudest voice<br />
we crowd up to the strong barrier fence<br />
the sky above is clearly bound to darken<br />
but still we find we've lost all power of choice</i></p>
	 <p>Posted December 10, 2006  8:30 PM by Fragano Ledgister</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158484</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158484</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:30:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #122 from Mary Aileen Buss</title>
         <description>comment from Mary Aileen Buss on 10.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Fragano @121:</p>

<p>Hey, I'm a muse! Cool!</p>

<p>--Mary Aileen</p>
	 <p>Posted December 10, 2006  8:58 PM by Mary Aileen Buss</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158491</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158491</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:58:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #123 from Juli Thompson</title>
         <description>comment from Juli Thompson on 10.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Somewhere around here, I have a videocassette of Daily Show God Squad episodes.  I got it as an extra when I subscribed to <a href="http://www.wittenburgdoor.com/home.html" rel="nofollow">The Door,</a> one of America's truly great theological magazines.  Joe Bob had a Bible study column in there for quite a few years, and it was worth the price of the subscription.  Actually, going to the website to get the url, I see that he's listed as Vaguely Associate Editor, which is probably a good thing.</p>

<p>I'll see if I can dig the video up, and I'll send it out to anyone who wants it.</p>
	 <p>Posted December 10, 2006  9:14 PM by Juli Thompson</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158498</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158498</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 21:14:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #124 from MD²</title>
         <description>comment from MD² on 10.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>You know what's the problem with you people ? You're making procrastination far too enjoyable. I'm supposed to be writing bad poetry to inflict on an incredulous world, damn it ! Not thinking about the notable absence of books in houses, and what it tells us of those inhabiting them, the use of respectability in class-warfare and how the advent of low cost computers and printers have generated a shame and fear of their own handwriting in loads of the lower-middle class people around me (what used to be only a fear of <i>sounding</i> right has expanded to fear of not actually  <i>looking</i> right), the possible use of carrots in fruitcakes (and why in hell I haven't made a carrot cake in such a long time), stories about the Monthly Tsar and why the hell I'm reminded of Tristan Tzara every time I read the word "cédrat"...</p>

<p>Bless you.</p>

<p>Been kept wondering by the japanese translation, in a "Am I not reading enough in the english sentences, or am I reading too much in the japanese ones ?" way.</p>
	 <p>Posted December 10, 2006  9:31 PM by MD²</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158500</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158500</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 21:31:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #125 from Robert L</title>
         <description>comment from Robert L on 10.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Hey Teresa, There's a comprehensive post about Claude Degler on metafilter, in which you are (not surprisingly) name-checked and linked:</p>

<p>http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/56844</p>
	 <p>Posted December 10, 2006  9:43 PM by Robert L</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158505</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158505</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 21:43:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #126 from Dan Layman-Kennedy</title>
         <description>comment from Dan Layman-Kennedy on 10.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Regarding the Oracular Decks Particle, I just want to point out that I found out about the Hello Kitty tarot <a href="http://maestro23.blogspot.com/2004/08/sanriomancy.html" rel="nofollow">two years ago.</a></p>

<p>This is not so much to boast as to marvel that I uncovered <i>anything</i> weird on the Internets before TNH did.</p>
	 <p>Posted December 10, 2006 10:06 PM by Dan Layman-Kennedy</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158514</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158514</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:06:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #127 from Erik Nelson</title>
         <description>comment from Erik Nelson on 10.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>I accidentally read the particle heading "fake blurbs" as "fake burbs"<br />
and this has me envisioning some sort of vast Potemkin village kind of setup.</p>
	 <p>Posted December 10, 2006 10:46 PM by Erik Nelson</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158520</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158520</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:46:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #128 from Sam Kelly</title>
         <description>comment from Sam Kelly on 10.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Actually, a Potemkin Suburb would be terribly useful for decoying in firms or institutions needing lots of educated middle-class workers.  Imagine their terrible disappointment when the plasterboard comes down and they see a housing estate behind it... </p>
	 <p>Posted December 10, 2006 11:01 PM by Sam Kelly</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158525</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158525</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:01:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #129 from Greg London</title>
         <description>comment from Greg London on 10.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p><i>I travelled the same road with 1980's Flash Gordon</i></p>

<p>Is that the one with Queen doing the whole soundtrack?</p>

<p>I love you, Flash, but we only have (N) minutes to save the Earth.</p>

<p>Nag, nag, nag.</p>

<p>Yeah, that was pretty cool.<br />
</p>
	 <p>Posted December 10, 2006 11:04 PM by Greg London</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158527</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158527</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:04:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #130 from Lizzy L</title>
         <description>comment from Lizzy L on 10.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>George won't go to Pinochet's funeral. But it will be interesting to see whether Cheney goes, and if not Cheney, who. I think they won't want to risk Cheney but I suspect he's a Pinochet fan -- only in the political sense, of course.</p>

<p>(Look, it's Advent, getting on towards Christmas, Peace on earth to men and women of goodwill; I'm trying to be <i>nice.</i>)</p>
	 <p>Posted December 10, 2006 11:15 PM by Lizzy L</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158532</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158532</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:15:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #131 from Anne</title>
         <description>comment from Anne on 10.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>#67 <i>At no point is Hugh Jackman shirtless in The Fountain</i></p>

<p>No, as noted later in the thread there is a long kissy bathtub scene whose entire purpose seems to have been to have a long loving look at wet shirtless Hugh.</p>

<p>The Fountain is A Big Serious Allegory; the only way it could be less subtle is if the main characters had names like Loving Man Blinded by Own Ambition and Woman Of Intuition. Stirring violins are unrelenting in telling us "here's a  Poignant Important Moment; here's another". Also there is lots and lots of crying in close-up, which drives me bats because it makes me cry involuntarily even if I'm totally unmoved. </p>

<p>I agree that it could have been good with a few changes; as-is, it's tolerable only because Jackman and Weiss (and yay Ellen Burstyn!) are very watchable.  If you love surreal images, it might be worth seeing on the big screen, but otherwise not.</p>
	 <p>Posted December 10, 2006 11:19 PM by Anne</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158533</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158533</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:19:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #132 from Clifton Royston</title>
         <description>comment from Clifton Royston on 11.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Teresa, note that there is an Earth Destruction Advisory page (with earth destruction status alert button.)  I believe there might also be a Firefox extension for it, so that you can have your browser automatically inform you if the Earth has been destroyed.</p>
	 <p>Posted December 11, 2006  2:20 AM by Clifton Royston</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158548</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158548</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 02:20:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #133 from ajay</title>
         <description>comment from ajay on 11.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>You can also sign up to a mailing list, which will send you an email as soon as the Earth's destruction has been confirmed. </p>

<p>Yes, the internet will still be working; just at a slightly higher overall latency rate.</p>
	 <p>Posted December 11, 2006  5:00 AM by ajay</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158558</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158558</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 05:00:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #134 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 11.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>The Daily Show God Squad episodes, Juli? I might be tempted to take you up on the offer. I always got a big laugh out of the segment's opening montages, especially those that'd have Marvel Comics's Thor pop in, and also HellBoy. Speaking of the latter, a couple of years ago, I drove thru a small town in southern Arizona where one half of the theater's marquee advertised <i>HellBoy</i>, and the other half <i>The Passion of the Christ</i>. Really. One last thing... Did the comic-book ever explain why HellBoy has such a thing about cats that a lovecraftian horror beats the crap out of him in a New York subway station because he's got a box filled with kittens to protect?</p>
	 <p>Posted December 11, 2006  6:12 AM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158565</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158565</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 06:12:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #135 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 11.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Yes, Greg, 1980's <i>Flash Gordon</i>  is the one with Queen doing the whole soundtrack. ("Hi! I'm Flash Gordon, quarterback for the New York Jets!")</p>
	 <p>Posted December 11, 2006  6:14 AM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158566</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158566</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 06:14:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #136 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 11.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Anne, about Ellen Burstyn's presence in <i>The Fountain</i>, yay indeed! I loved her in 1980's <i>Resurrection</i>, the ending of which had me with a big lump in my throat. And did you see her in last year's TV show <i>The Book of Daniel</i>? It was a great show about loving each other, which is a very Christian thing, but not enough for certain religious people who I understand managed to quickly get it cancelled. We can't have Aidan Quinn's character of a priest who loves his homosexual son, or have Jesus fake snoring when Quinn asks His opinion about his upcoming sermon.</p>
	 <p>Posted December 11, 2006  6:22 AM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158567</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158567</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 06:22:40 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #137 from Fragano Ledgister</title>
         <description>comment from Fragano Ledgister on 11.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Mary Aileen Buss #122: You're welcome.</p>
	 <p>Posted December 11, 2006  8:14 AM by Fragano Ledgister</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158570</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158570</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:14:07 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #138 from TexAnne</title>
         <description>comment from TexAnne on 11.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Serge, #134: HB's love of cats was invented for the movie. </p>
	 <p>Posted December 11, 2006  9:04 AM by TexAnne</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158575</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158575</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:04:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Open thread 76 -- comment #139 from Serge</title>
         <description>comment from Serge on 11.Dec.06</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Thanks, TexAnne... I wonder if del Toro ever explained where that came from. Meanwhile, he is working on a sequel that I understand will come out in 2008. Until then, he has <i>Pan's Labyrinth</i>, out soon. That looks interesting, visually anyway. Hmmm... Those are the same words I used about <i>The Fountain</i>. My fingers are firmly crossed.</p>
	 <p>Posted December 11, 2006  9:14 AM by Serge</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158577</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008351.html#158577</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:14:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
