<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
   <channel>
      <title>Making Light :: Iran smalltalk :: comments</title>
      <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#comments </link>
      <description>Language, fraud, folly, truth, history, and knitting. Et cetera.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:00:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.33</generator>
      
      <item>
      <title>Iran smalltalk</title>
      <description>Some more Iran links to go with Teresa&amp;#8217;s recent post: Wikipedia: Operation Ajax Much of this Wikipedia entry is mined...</description>
      <content:encoded>Some more Iran links to go with Teresa&#8217;s recent post: Wikipedia: Operation Ajax Much of this Wikipedia entry is mined...</content:encoded>
      <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html</link>
      </item>

                  <item>
         <title>Iran smalltalk -- comment #1 from Larry Brennan</title>
         <description>comment from Larry Brennan on  4.Apr.07</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Thanks for the Persian Calligraphy article. It made my day. I only wish I could discern the individual letters in languages that use the Arabic alphabet.</p>
	 <p>Posted April  4, 2007  8:15 PM by Larry Brennan</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179344</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179344</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:15:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Iran smalltalk -- comment #2 from Chang O.C., the Original Changsta</title>
         <description>comment from Chang O.C., the Original Changsta on  4.Apr.07</description>
         <content:encoded><p>All good points.</p>

<p>Is it okay if I still think Ahmadinejad is a raving fucking loon?</p>
	 <p>Posted April  4, 2007 10:26 PM by Chang O.C., the Original Changsta</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179357</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179357</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 22:26:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Iran smalltalk -- comment #3 from Avram</title>
         <description>comment from Avram on  4.Apr.07</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Sure, Chang OC. Personally, I'm not sure how much is actual lunacy, and how much is acting up for political reasons. Ahmadinejad was elected because he promised to fix the economy, and Iran's economy has proven though to fix. Saber-rattling is an easier way of trying to rally popular support. </p>
	 <p>Posted April  4, 2007 10:31 PM by Avram</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179358</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179358</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 22:31:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Iran smalltalk -- comment #4 from morgue</title>
         <description>comment from morgue on  4.Apr.07</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Yeah, I blogged about 'All the Shah's Men' <a>about a year ago</a> and it made me furious.  I already knew the general run of events, and the importance of it, but the details of how the coup was managed were appalling.</p>

<p>From that post, and relating to Patrick's phony-middle post a few posts back: "Most eye-opening was the extent to which the British government and CIA could and did undermine democracy in Iran - as soon as your newspapers and Mullahs have their opinions co-opted by foreign interests, you've lost the ability to engage in free decision-making."</p>

<p>And lets not even mention the fact that hardline Ahmadinejad swept to electoral success at least partly because the previous, much more moderate, President was making concessions to the West and seeking to engage with the U.S., and getting nothing but hostility in return.  The electorate (and the religious leaders) got the message loud and clear - what is the point of trying to engage?</p>

<p>Gah.</p>
	 <p>Posted April  4, 2007 11:01 PM by morgue</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179362</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179362</guid>
         <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 23:01:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Iran smalltalk -- comment #5 from Melanie S.</title>
         <description>comment from Melanie S. on  5.Apr.07</description>
         <content:encoded><p>I'm sort of fascinated that this post has an ad for John McCain on the sidebar.</p>
	 <p>Posted April  5, 2007 12:40 AM by Melanie S.</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179373</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179373</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 00:40:01 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Iran smalltalk -- comment #6 from Dave Bell</title>
         <description>comment from Dave Bell on  5.Apr.07</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Apparently. <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/characters/martha.shtml" rel="nofollow">Freema Agyeman</a>, taking over from Billie Piper in <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/" rel="nofollow"><i>Doctor Who</i></a>, is half-Iranian.</p>

<p>The second episode, to be broadcast on Saturday, is set at the Globe Theatre. Chris Ecclestone tangled with Charles Dickens. David Tennant gets to meet William Shakespeare.</p>

<p>It does make for an easy programming choice for Saturday night at the Britih Eastercon.</p>
	 <p>Posted April  5, 2007  4:50 AM by Dave Bell</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179392</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179392</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 04:50:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Iran smalltalk -- comment #7 from Pete Darby</title>
         <description>comment from Pete Darby on  5.Apr.07</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Ahmadinejad is no crazier than Blair or Bush...</p>
	 <p>Posted April  5, 2007  6:00 AM by Pete Darby</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179396</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179396</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 06:00:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Iran smalltalk -- comment #8 from Chang O.C., the Original Changsta</title>
         <description>comment from Chang O.C., the Original Changsta on  5.Apr.07</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Pete Darby, I'll drink to that. They're perfect for each other.</p>
	 <p>Posted April  5, 2007  6:12 AM by Chang O.C., the Original Changsta</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179397</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179397</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 06:12:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Iran smalltalk -- comment #9 from Janet Kegg</title>
         <description>comment from Janet Kegg on  5.Apr.07</description>
         <content:encoded><p>An <a href="http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-03-27-voa68.cfm" rel="nofollow"> Iranian-American mayor</a> in the news.</p>
	 <p>Posted April  5, 2007  7:41 AM by Janet Kegg</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179403</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179403</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 07:41:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Iran smalltalk -- comment #10 from Bruce Cohen (SpeakerToManagers)</title>
         <description>comment from Bruce Cohen (SpeakerToManagers) on  5.Apr.07</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Pete Darby @ 7</p>

<p>So maybe it's time for another joke thread? "Bush, Blair, and Ahmadinejad walk into a bar ..."</p>
	 <p>Posted April  5, 2007  9:08 AM by Bruce Cohen (SpeakerToManagers)</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179415</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179415</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 09:08:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Iran smalltalk -- comment #11 from Randolph Fritz</title>
         <description>comment from Randolph Fritz on  5.Apr.07</description>
         <content:encoded><p>One matter that seems not to have been mentioned is that as the <a href="http://www.tehrantimes.com/Description.asp?Da=4/5/2007&Cat=9&Num=021" rel="nofollow">Tehran Times has just reminded us</a>, China has some $16B of trade with Iran, most of it in oil.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran-China_relations" rel="nofollow">Iran has long-standing ties with China</a> and China would respond, I think, to a US invasion of Iran.  It is difficult for me to see how China could maintain its dollar reserves while at even indirect war with the USA, and not doing so would be destructive of the current world economic "order" (or is that house of cards?) and might well lead to wider conflict.<br />
</p>
	 <p>Posted April  5, 2007 11:27 AM by Randolph Fritz</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179436</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179436</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 11:27:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Iran smalltalk -- comment #12 from Jon Marcus</title>
         <description>comment from Jon Marcus on  5.Apr.07</description>
         <content:encoded><p>It's quite a stretch to say that Ahmadinejad's statement is being misinterpreted in the way Kruschev's was. The original mistranlation was by his own government's service, and has never been retracted. And he's had plenty of airtime on western media on this very topic, and has never corrected or retracted it.</p>

<p>So maybe he didn't mean to say it originally. But once "Wiped off the map" was out there, he seems to have decided that he likes the sound of it.</p>
	 <p>Posted April  5, 2007 12:34 PM by Jon Marcus</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179455</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179455</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 12:34:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Iran smalltalk -- comment #13 from Dave Bell</title>
         <description>comment from Dave Bell on  5.Apr.07</description>
         <content:encoded><p>I find myself thinking of the old Great Game, which was Russia gradually taking over the ancient trading cities of central Asia, and lurching towards India. There's a lot of weird stuff happened in that part of the world, with China and Russia in turmoil after WW1.</p>

<p>But I would expect the Chinese government to have a keen interest in who controls the states to the north of Afghanistan, between them and Iran.</p>

<p>The original Great Game was partly driven by the fears of the India Office, and the government in India itself. Expect India, and Pakistan, to see things differently from London or Washington.</p>
	 <p>Posted April  5, 2007 12:34 PM by Dave Bell</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179456</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179456</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 12:34:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Iran smalltalk -- comment #14 from Jon Marcus</title>
         <description>comment from Jon Marcus on  5.Apr.07</description>
         <content:encoded><p>(Sorry, meant to put this in the preceding post)</p>

<p>ABC is <a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/04/abc_news_exclus.html" rel="nofollow">reporting</a> that the US has been aiding an Al Qaeda splinter group that's making trouble for Iran from bases in Pakistan.</p>
	 <p>Posted April  5, 2007 12:39 PM by Jon Marcus</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179458</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179458</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 12:39:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Iran smalltalk -- comment #15 from Jenny</title>
         <description>comment from Jenny on  5.Apr.07</description>
         <content:encoded><p>The artwork in terracotta red on charcoal at the top of the calligraphy page absolutely blew my socks off. I had no idea calligraphy could be so <em>tactile</em>. </p>

<p>I've googled the artist, Mohammed Ehsaei, and found some more of his works online. <a href="http://www.url.com" rel="nofollow">This</a> is particularly cool - it looks like a three-dimensional chrysanthemum of letters, or the world's most tangled tagliatelli.</p>

<p>Wonder what it says. I wish I could read Farsi.</p>

<p>  </p>
	 <p>Posted April  5, 2007 12:41 PM by Jenny</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179459</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179459</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 12:41:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Iran smalltalk -- comment #16 from Jenny</title>
         <description>comment from Jenny on  5.Apr.07</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Sorry, I messed up the link</p>

<p><a href="http://www.qoqnoos.com/body/paint/m-ehsaei/p02.htm" rel="nofollow">amazing calligraphy here</a></p>
	 <p>Posted April  5, 2007 12:44 PM by Jenny</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179460</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179460</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 12:44:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Iran smalltalk -- comment #17 from FungiFromYuggoth</title>
         <description>comment from FungiFromYuggoth on  5.Apr.07</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Jon Marcus wrote: <i>The original mistranslation was by his own government's service, and has never been retracted. And he's had plenty of airtime on western media on this very topic, and has never corrected or retracted it.</i></p>

<p>Ahem. From CNN:<br />
<blockquote><i>BLITZER: But should there be a state of Israel?<br />
    SOLTANIEH: I think I've already answered to you. If Israel is a synonym and will give the indication of Zionism mentality, no.<br />
    But if you are going to conclude that we have said the people there have to be removed or they have to be massacred or so, this is fabricated, unfortunate selective approach to what the mentality and policy of Islamic Republic of Iran is. I have to correct, and I did so.</i></blockquote></p>

<p>And from <i><a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1535777-2,00.html" rel="nofollow">Time</a></i>:<br />
<blockquote>    <i>TIME: You have been quoted as saying Israel should be wiped off the map. Was that merely rhetoric, or do you mean it?<br />
    Ahmadinejad: [...] Our suggestion is that the 5 million Palestinian refugees come back to their homes, and then the entire people on those lands hold a referendum and choose their own system of government. This is a democratic and popular way. </i></blockquote></p>

<p>(Of course, just after that Ahmadinejad engaged in a bit of Holocaust denial, so I'm not seeing anything in here to refute Chang O.C.'s position.)</p>

<p>I am reminded of the "Why didn't Muslim groups condemn 9/11" trope - just because you haven't heard about something doesn't mean it didn't happen.</p>

<p>For further reference, Google turned up this in no time at all: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud_Ahmadinejad_and_Israel</p>
	 <p>Posted April  5, 2007  2:05 PM by FungiFromYuggoth</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179474</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179474</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:05:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Iran smalltalk -- comment #18 from Avram</title>
         <description>comment from Avram on  5.Apr.07</description>
         <content:encoded><p><a href="#179455" rel="nofollow">Jon Marcus @12</a>, if you look at the page I linked to, it points out that the "wiped off the map" phrasing was <em>one of several translations</em> that the Islamic Republic News Agency used, inconsistently. And that Iran's Foreign Minister has tried to clarify the statement. </p>
	 <p>Posted April  5, 2007  2:07 PM by Avram</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179475</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179475</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:07:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Iran smalltalk -- comment #19 from Bruce Cohen, SpeakerToManagers</title>
         <description>comment from Bruce Cohen, SpeakerToManagers on  5.Apr.07</description>
         <content:encoded><p>jenny @ 16</p>

<p>Mmmm, that's lovely.  I don't know why exactly, maybe the shapes of the letters, or the colors he used in those two pieces, but Ehsaei's calligraphy reminds me of Hannes Bok's paintings. Especially  that lovely magazine cover he did for Zelazny's "A Rose for Ecclesiastes".  As soon as I get home from work this evening I'm going to dig out my collection of Bok and just start at it for awhile.<br />
</p>
	 <p>Posted April  5, 2007  5:08 PM by Bruce Cohen, SpeakerToManagers</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179514</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179514</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:08:04 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Iran smalltalk -- comment #20 from Jon Marcus</title>
         <description>comment from Jon Marcus on  6.Apr.07</description>
         <content:encoded><p>Avram, I did read what you wrote, and followed the link. I realize that there have been multiple translations. But it's still quite significant that this didn't come from AIPAC, or Fox News, or some other questionable source. This came from Iran, any agency that presumably can translate accurately. They've aided and abetted any misunderstanding.</p>

<p>Fungi and Avram, I don't deny that there's a wide range of views in Iran, as other links on this page indicate. I'm talking about Ahmadinejad's views. Denials by various functionaries don't have any bearing.</p>

<p>If Bush spouts some idiocy, no matter how his staffers (or even the Democratic opposition) tries to explain it away, we're still stuck with idiocies attributed to our president. Same goes for Iran.</p>

<p>Finally. Fungi, I wasn't aware of that Time quote. It sounded...close anyway. But when I went back to check what was behind the ellipses, I found this first response to the question: "People in the world are free to think the way they wish."  It was a non-denial, with the sentence you quoted coming at the end of a paragraph of subject-changing. That's probably why the page Avram linked in the article didn't bother with it.</p>

<p>Is this a slam dunk either way? No. That's kinda my point. Characterizing it as the "Misquote of the Century" and drawing parallels to a misunderstood idiom which Khrushchev explicitly denied* is, as I said, quite a stretch.</p>

<p>*("I once said, 'We will bury you,' and I got into trouble with it. Of course we will not bury you with a shovel. Your own working class will bury you.")</p>
	 <p>Posted April  6, 2007  2:27 AM by Jon Marcus</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179577</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179577</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 02:27:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Iran smalltalk -- comment #21 from Tim in Albion</title>
         <description>comment from Tim in Albion on  6.Apr.07</description>
         <content:encoded><p>The amount of free-lancing that goes on in Iran is consistently underappreciated.  The point was made by someone interviewed on NPR in connection with the British sailor hostage crisis.  Apparently this kind of thing happens frequently: some group takes action on its own initiative, and then the government (itself far from unified) tries to handle the resulting situation to its maximum advantage.  It's not a centrally-planned country.</p>

<p>Ahmadinejad may be wacko, but he is clearly capable of seizing the moment; things like this are perfect for his "Grand Gesture" style.  The mistake we make is focusing on him instead of the distributed problem.  Replacing Ahmadinejad probably wouldn't change things on the ground very much.  For that, you'd need a paradigm shift among Iranians in general.  To get that, you need patient, long-term diplomacy.  For that, you'd need a paradigm shift in the USA.</p>
	 <p>Posted April  6, 2007  1:16 PM by Tim in Albion</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179631</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179631</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 13:16:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Iran smalltalk -- comment #22 from John D. Berry</title>
         <description>comment from John D. Berry on  7.Apr.07</description>
         <content:encoded><p>If you're fascinated by Iranian typography and calligraphy, you might find this recent book worth checking out:</p>

<p>New Visual Culture of Modern Iran<br />
by Reza Abedini & Hans Wolbers<br />
(Mark Batty Publisher, 2006)<br />
www.markbattypublisher.com/servlet/book_view?number=30</p>

<p>John<br />
</p>
	 <p>Posted April  7, 2007  4:56 AM by John D. Berry</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179688</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#179688</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 04:56:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Iran smalltalk -- comment #23 from Calton Bolick</title>
         <description>comment from Calton Bolick on 16.Apr.07</description>
         <content:encoded><p><em>This came from Iran, an agency that presumably can translate accurately. </em></p>

<p>And your belief that they can do so is what, exactly? Hint: the problems of translating one's native language into a foreign language don't seem to be any less than that of translating from a foreign language into one's native language. Specific issues of meaning, idiom, and vocabulary, yes. Scale? No.</p>

<p>Signed,<br />
Looks at middling/bad translations of foreign-language text into English for a living.</p>
	 <p>Posted April 16, 2007  2:13 AM by Calton Bolick</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#181018</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#181018</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 02:13:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
                  <item>
         <title>Iran smalltalk -- comment #24 from Jason Wallace</title>
         <description>comment from Jason Wallace on 21.Jun.07</description>
         <content:encoded><p>A real great blog on Iranian Jews is by Karmel Melamed, he's a reporter that exclusively covers Iranian Jews and issues dealing with Iran:</p>

<p>http://www.iranianamericanjews.blogspot.com/</p>

<p>The pieces on this blog are very interesting and informative on Iranian Jews.</p>
	 <p>Posted June 21, 2007  6:00 PM by Jason Wallace</p></content:encoded>
         <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#195752</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008821.html#195752</guid>
         <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:00:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      
   </channel>
</rss>