Mark DF-
For an examination of the types of questions you're asking, check out Robert Pape's "Dying to Win". It's a little technical, but it's a great examination of the strategic logic of suicide terrorism. He explodes a lot of myths:
1) That suicide terrorism is unique to islamist radicals (even most of the suicide terrorism in the middle east has historically been carried out by nationalist and marxist groups, who draw their attackers from a pretty representative cross-section of society. The single biggest user of suicide terrorism is the Tamil Tigers, a marxist/ethnic separatist movement in Sri Lanka)
2) That suicide terrorism is irrational. (It occurs generally in distinct campaigns, has a distinct punitive strategic logic, with distinct goals [almost always the removal of an occupying force from territory the terrorists value])
3) That suicide terrorism is ineffective. (Suicide campaigns work about as often as not, and are especially effective against democracies, for reasons that are not entirely clear)
Of course all this is specifically focused on suicide terrorism, and the logic of the organizations that use it as a strategy, not necessarily the individuals who carry it out.
[Disclaimer, I'm an undergraduate at the department where Pape teaches, and just finished taking a class from him, so I think he's dreamy.]
| Year | Number of comments posted |
|---|---|
| 2006 | 2 |
| 2003 | 4 |
Total: 6 comments. View all these comments on a single page.
The most recent 20 comments posted to Making Light by Chris W.:
Show all comments by Chris W..