The most recent 20 comments posted to Electrolite by Catie Murphy:

Show all comments by Catie Murphy.

Posted on entry Your eye-on-the-ball report for today. ::: February 25, 2004, 06:33 PM:
What strikes me as most relevant out of all of this discussion is that Tina cares enough to vote.

The majority may not agree with her choices or her reasons for those choices -- I, in fact, don't, given that our politics are structured on a two-party system and that a candidate who is not a nominee of one of those two parties has virtually no chance of winning. My personal choice is to take the Democratic nominee, even if I might regard him as merely being the lesser of two evils rather than being someone whose politics I can find myself in passionate agreement with, because our political system favors pitching in with one party or the other.

However, it doesn't seem to me that because Tina's approach fails to mesh with mine means she's throwing away her vote. In fact, I think she's doing the right and honorable thing by voting her conscience, even in the face of deplorable odds. She's accepting one of her duties as a citizen of this country, and is casting her vote in the fashion she believes would be best *for* the country. To me, it's the 40% or more of the population who don't go to the polls who are throwing away their votes. I may not agree with Tina and I might think that her strategy of voting for an alternate candidate may help someone I don't like get elected, but I absolutely can't fault somebody for voting her conscience. Tina *cares*. I can't see that as part of the problem.
Posted on entry Our fellow Americans. ::: February 20, 2004, 06:45 PM:
Oh, bravo, Patrick.
Posted on entry Nailing the "Information Please" fifth column. ::: December 30, 2003, 08:35 PM:
Actually, Lisa, that's what I thought of too, and I'm not even from a small New Hampshire town. :)
Posted on entry Lazy blogging. ::: November 27, 2003, 01:43 AM:
Of course, the actual protagonist of The Lord of the Rings is Sam.

Yah, and if Sean Astin doesn't get a best supporting actor Oscar for his role, I'm going to be *bitterly* disappointed. I love the movies, I love all the characterization, but man, I *believe* Sam.

I am, of course, anticipating bitter disappointment. Hollywood awards systems aren't set up to handle an ensemble cast like the LotR has. I expect a huge influx of awards for the third movie which will be retroactively fitted to the previous two, instead of the trilogy sweeping the Oscars for three years running like it should've. Hmph.
Posted on entry All that way for this. ::: October 22, 2003, 02:08 PM:
*strangled noise* Isn't a US military base anywhere in the world by definition US territory? Isn't that the idea?

*more strangled noises* I think I have go to write to my Congress creatures, cursed be their names, and ask that question. And maybe a letter to the editor. God, how do you *deal* with crap like that?
Posted on entry Back when they didn't even try to hide it. ::: August 25, 2003, 01:13 AM:
This is a point often brought up in some of my discussions of the dismal public school system. Not what Patrick's quoted here specifically, nor the article itself, but the fact that there's a distinct degree of disadvantage to a higher education when your prospects -- or your ambitions -- only go so far as a McJob. The backbone of our economy is factory jobs, farm labor, fast food -- intellectuals, generally speaking, don't keep the guts of the country running.

To take from the experiences of friends of mine: one woman with years of experience in the computer industry, but no degree, has been out of work for two years now because she's too over-qualified for McDonalds (K-Mart, Safeway, name your equivilant poison) to hire. Even if she got that job, she and her boss would both know as soon as something better comes along, she'd be jumping ship. Without even a formal college education, she's been effectively priced out of that market, and yet she's stuck in a position where it'd be easier, financially, if she could get that sort of position.

Compare that to a friend of mine who began working at McDonalds while still in high school, and didn't pursue anything beyond her high school diploma, as far as education is concerned. She isn't bringing a BA or a PhD to the table, but her boss knows if he hasn't got a lifer there, he's at least got the high likelihood of a long-term employee. Higher education wouldn't do her a lot of good at that position, and if she needed that job, an education might even prevent her from getting it.

I have a difficult time envisioning a world in which everyone was so well-educated that they'd all be too bored to work fast food (although, y'know, that'd probably be good for the collective waistline of the country), or, perhaps more to the point, a world in which everyone was so well-educated that there would be no one left to take the fast food positions /because/ those positions would be too boring.

I happen to think that education is the answer to pretty much all evils, and that practicality (on the McJob level, anyway) aside, it ought to be pursued. It seems likely, although maybe not absolutely inevitable, that if we manage to develop a so-well-educated society that no one can be bothered to do backbone work, that we may find another way to /do/ the backbone work.

Of course, that combined with aging research, could make for science fiction utopian hells in which we all wither away spiritually while living on and on and clearly I need to stop now because, if nothing else, dinner is ready. :)

Comment statistics for Catie Murphy on the Electrolite blog

YearNumber of comments posted
20042
20038
20021

Total: 11 comments. View all these comments on a single page.