The most recent 20 comments posted to Electrolite by Richard Brandt:

Show all comments by Richard Brandt.

Posted on entry Steven Berlin Johnson ::: April 08, 2003, 10:42 AM:
Speaking solely to your different note, page 2 of yesterday's Financial Times bore a large photograph of a young boy lying in an Iraqi hospital with both of his arms blown off. The kind of news, other than reports of casualties flowing into Iraqi hospitals at a rate of a hundred an hour, or our leaders chortling over killing 2000 to 3000 Iraqis (presumably combatants) during their incursion, that doesn't seem to get as wide play over here.

I met a girl the other night who was weeping copiously. After I bought her a drink and asked if she wanted to say what was bothering her, she informed me she couldn't live with the thought that the Ku Klux Klan was chopping up her family.

Well, okay. But after later and further reflection, what bothered me wasn't that a disturbed person would be troubled by such thoughts. It was that the rest of us can live with thoughts of page 2 of the Financial Times.

This is a horrible, horrible war. Anyone who thought our troops could minimize civilian casualties while bombing a heavily populated capital with the same pinpoint precision that allows them to avoid bombing our own troops and their allies, is living in Yesterland.

And a free Iraq will be a peace-loving Iraq and no haven for terrorists. Hey, I thought the reason Hussein publicly rewarded the families of Palestinian suicide bombers was that it was one of the few things he did that bought him popular support.

Meanwhile, I'm sure the Brits will be popular (as always) in postwar Iraq for their staunch refusal to take action against looting.

This is a horrible, horrible war, and I don't know if the peace will be any improvement.
Posted on entry Apocalypse now: ::: April 05, 2003, 11:54 AM:
One is torn over whether to view Coulter and the staff of the New York Post as harmless idiots, or as the naked face of Bush-era conservatism revealed.

If the latter, then it isn't enough for the government to be granted the power to label pretty much any American citizen seized on American soil as an "enemy combatant" and jailed for life without trial and, if they are successful in fightng this through the courts, without access to a lawyer. No, what they'd really like is for anyone who opposes the government to be shot. (As per the Post.)

More than that: They simply want to kill anyone who disagrees with them. (As per Coulter.)

Ignore for the moment the fact that the Ohio State National Guard pretty much fired blindly into a crowd, their high-powered rifles striking down students who happened to be wallking across the campus in the distance. This, though, is the kind of behavior that a literal-minded Post editorialist would have been not merely condoning but clamoring for.

But, you know, you can't make an omelet without breaking a few innocent bystanders. Conservative pundits imagine that the kind of actions they call for are only going to target whoever they branded as "liberal" that day? (The Taliban, for Christ's sake?) Well, I guess they figure, as long as none of the fallout lands on their particular heads...
Posted on entry Apocalypse now: ::: April 05, 2003, 11:45 AM:
"Or the tendency to count Gulf War One as an overwhelmingly bloodless war, with under 200 casualties (and somewhere in the 50-250,000 range on the other side, but they're wogs so they don't matter)."

Lest we forget: The estimated 50,000 who disappeared from the greater metropolitan Basra area after the revolt which Bush the Elder repeatedly called for during the Gulf War finally happened, but Hussein having withdrawn his troops from Kuwait by that time, we stood by until the uprising was mercilessly obliterated, finally instituting no-fly zones after a decent interval...
Posted on entry I've finally ::: March 17, 2003, 06:24 PM:
This whole idea that the bad taste left with the American people by the current administration will banish the GOP from leadership for aeons to come reminds me of...What, exactly? Oh, yes. It all comes back to me now. It reminds me of how the disgrace of the Nixon administration led to an endless sunny utopia of presidencies under Carter and Mondale and their successors. (Surely the extent of the Republicans' scandals could not have let them recoup in a mere four years to give us three terms of Reagan and Bush!)

As many qualms as I had about Gore-Lieberman (and they were plentiful, I assure you), I have to admit that the even greater qualms I had about this Bush doofus still gave me no idea just how bad things were going to be.

Now Bush, spurned by the U.N., has apparently abandoned all pretense of being interested in disarming Iraq. Rather than accede to the world's lack of interest in U.S. wars of world conquest, he's pretty much admitted all he was interested in all along was taking down Hussein, and installing what he apparently hopes will be the first of a string of democracies installed at gunpoint throughout the Middle East.

The Saudis, among others, should be a lot less apprehensive once they appreciate what Bush seems to believe "democracy" is: An unelected monarch able to wield unbridled power.
Posted on entry Whoa. ::: March 04, 2003, 12:55 PM:
I thought one of the givens of civil disobedience is that your actions might well run afoul of laws currently on the books and hence land you in jail. That aside, part of me has a certain sneaking fondness for the idea of laws that would jail folks who intentionally overload an e-mail server, not to mention spammers of all stripes, although I concede the thorny free-speech issues that immediately arise.

Comment statistics for Richard Brandt on the Electrolite blog

YearNumber of comments posted
20038
20021

Total: 9 comments. View all these comments on a single page.