The most recent 20 comments posted to Making Light by Dom:

Show all comments by Dom.

Posted on entry Generous to a fault ::: February 14, 2009, 03:04 PM:
Abi @5: Charity auctions organized by the recipient charity work just the way they should. But I still object to publicity grabs that aren't cleared with the victims or charities.

If you are the victim of a well-publicized disaster, I feel that you have a moral right to the value of all the publicity the disaster generates, in addition to any unencumbered donations you receive.

Let's say that you get burned in a major fire, and as a result (a) the local news station's ratings increase, making them A=$10,000 in extra ad revenue; (b) the Lifetime channel pays you B=$10,000 for the movie rights; (c) someone writes a book about the fire, including your story, paying C=$5,000 for the book rights; (d) donors give you D=$25,000; (e) the local news station spends a certain amount of time directing people to Acme Car Dealership to donate money, where the equivalent amount of advertising time would cost E=$7,000, and people go to Acme Car Dealership, donate F=$1,500 (which Acme matches with G=$1,500 of their own) and eventually generate H=$10,000 in extra car sales profits for Acme.

In my opinion, you should be entitled to A+B+C+D+E+F=$58,500.

Victims are legally entitled to D+F after some overhead; stealing that would be fraud. This seems uncontroversial. It is in sponsors' interest to run donation-based promotions as long as H>E+G. But I think sponsors (and news media) cheat if they withhold amounts E and A from victims.

You could argue that the media and sponsors should keep A and E respectively because the victims are getting D and F.

Serge @6: They got to keep amount E, which I personally think is wrong and sleazy. I won't try to change your mind if you feel that E belongs to the sponsors; I just feel that it belongs to the victims. I may be wrong, and some argument that (F+G)/E ≥ D/A might convince me.

Matthew Daly @8: They could just donate money on their own, ask their existing customers to donate, even mention their favorite charity in their paid advertising. Or donate items to a charity auction or something.

Diatryma @13: That's a great idea.

(Sorry about the algebra.)
Posted on entry Generous to a fault ::: February 14, 2009, 10:35 AM:
Not to be a spoilsport, but I thought that promotion was a slimy publicity grab by the publisher from the very first time I read about it. Even without stealing the donations (as in Zarquon's link) this kind of promotion is sleazy.

There is really no reason not to donate money directly to the Red Cross (or any legitimate charity or relief agency) regularly or after a specific disaster.

Any for-profit company that uses a disaster as free publicity, in this kind of "BUY OUR STUFF! Proceeds to the Red Cross" way is, in my opinion, trying to profit (in the form of publicity) from someone else's misfortune. Frankly, I hope they are fined enough to exceed the value of the free advertising they got out of the fire victims.
Posted on entry Bank of America: utter slime ::: February 12, 2009, 02:28 PM:
Terry Karney @92: The likely reason to use Czech was to get the will down to seven letters. After all, why would a German leave a will in Czech? (You could shave off one more by leaving everything to your dog, but that would be silly.)

Terry Karney @93ff.: We really need a good national infrastructure for sending, receiving, and keeping small, positive amounts of money that isn't tied to our corrupt and insolvent banking system. There is cash, of course, for local transactions. The USPS issues money orders and stamps, including barcoded e-stamps. Surely that could be a start.
Posted on entry Bank of America: utter slime ::: February 11, 2009, 06:59 PM:
"Everything to [my] wife," in Czech, would be even shorter: Vše ženě.

According to dubious Internet sources, exactly such a will was once signed by a German.
Posted on entry Web advertising fail ::: February 02, 2009, 07:55 AM:
Out of curiosity, I clicked on the ad. The sites it leads to are interestingly scammy. They all try to sell both "acai" and "colon cleanse" pills.

They seem to have a different .com domain for various geographical markets, as well as different names for the same model. Compare www.www-karensweightloss.com (Karen Joyce from Scranton, PA) with emilysweightlossblog.com (Emily Stevenson from Seattle, WA) or thisdietsavedme.com (Nicholle Stevenson from Miami).

The fake blog entry has fake comments, all of which praise the scammy product. There is, of course, no way to actually comment: "Comments have been temporarily closed due to spam."

This blog seems to have kept track of the scammers running the ad. (The scam is apparently so widespread that Google searches on information about the scam carry advertising for meta-scams.)
Posted on entry From catchy to clichéd in no time flat ::: January 21, 2009, 02:52 PM:
#17, 19, 28:

Second Audio Program technology is already supported even in analog television transmissions. PBS uses it to verbally describe performances (ballet, for example) for visually impaired viewers.
Posted on entry The true history of the Bush years ::: January 19, 2009, 12:44 AM:
That list makes the 2000's seem like a decade of remarkably boring comedians.
Posted on entry ObamaWorld ::: December 10, 2008, 05:34 PM:
The guy with the bag of cash looks like Blagojevich, but surely the programmers couldn't be that fast?

The bridge to Nowhere was cute.
Posted on entry The religious right, gone barking mad ::: October 28, 2008, 03:50 AM:
Elders' homes have shrines... which they use to summon up a GEnie... at 3 a.m... to release curses agaist McCain?

I'm pretty sure this happens in America, too.
Posted on entry Links for 15 Oct 2008 ::: October 15, 2008, 11:16 PM:
The October 2008 whiteboard video explanation of CDOs ("How we got them to take our crap") is copied from this cool December 2007 animation.

(Oops, I just noticed that the link is in the sidebar, not this thread. Forgive the digression.)
Posted on entry Talking like a pirate ::: September 19, 2008, 07:20 PM:
Possibly the weirdest Chinese counterfeit products are books, such as Harry Potter and Leopard Walk Up to Dragon, which is terrible fanfic sold as if it were a Rowling translation.

Imagine these people outside an sf convention!
Posted on entry Trinity ::: July 17, 2008, 02:29 AM:
There is an interesting neurological phenomenon called blindsight.

Back in college I lived near a guide dog training facility. One day at the bus stop, a blind lady with a dog asked me to let her know when the #31 bus pulled up.

While we made small talk, the #7 arrived; just then she mentioned that the #7 bus line didn't quite pass her destination. Odd coincidence, I thought. The #13 was next, and she suddenly mentioned that bus line, too. We ran out of things to talk about, but when the #17 bus stopped by, she mumbled something to herself about seventeen.

Thinking that she might have been a partially sighted guide-dog trainer, I asked whether she could see the numbers on the buses. She glared at me for the stupid question, so I let her know when the #31 showed up and never saw her (or the dog) again.
Posted on entry Got it in one ::: July 03, 2008, 08:25 AM:
I think the Jerkosphere is simple vandalism, extended into the realm of reputation and self-esteem.

Consider customer-vandals who steal towels, urinate on bathroom floors, or take hundreds of ketchup packets which they never use. Their thinking seems to be roughly: the hotel/restaurant owner is rich, in part due to my spending, so if it is possible for me to make her poorer, I will take the opportunity to do that.

It doesn't make economic sense, but as a behavioral-economic model it predicts the behavior of a tiny fraction of the population quite well.

Analogously, if someone has a good reputation (like Boing Boing) or high self-esteem (like the cosplayer in #104), then online reputation vandals will take every opportunity to reduce that person's or company's reputation or self-esteem, even if there is no direct benefit to them, just because it's possible.
Posted on entry Got it in one ::: July 02, 2008, 07:34 PM:
For anyone interested in insightful book-length analysis verbal argument and gender, I highly recommend books by blogger Suzette Haden Elgin, including The Gentle Art of Verbal Self-Defense and Genderspeak.
Posted on entry Things that ought to be obvious ::: June 30, 2008, 05:43 PM:
#31: OK, sorry.

#36: Oh. It really wasn't obvious without further research.

Boing Boing deleted posts referring to a third-party author/blogger, which made people upset, causing them to comment on Boing Boing posts by blogger Cory Doctorow about his own book, which comments were also deleted, making people upset again.

The two separate deletion events make the circumlocutions in this thread doubly confusing.
Posted on entry Things that ought to be obvious ::: June 30, 2008, 05:03 PM:
The only meaning I can glean from this discussion/argument is that the book Little Brother is so bad that the author had to delete comments complaining about how bad it was from his own blog, which made people upset. Is that roughly the situation?
Posted on entry This can't be good for one's soul ::: February 19, 2008, 10:20 AM:
Gayle Greeno wrote a series of novels about telepathic kitties. Possibly they were giant telepathic alien kitties; I'm not sure.

The author of Eternity of Blood, meanwhile, plans sequels!
Posted on entry Intimations of mortality ::: January 02, 2008, 03:45 AM:
Happy Birthday!

#12 The obvious solution is to redefine squares and/or prime numbers.

Or you could choose a reference planet with a longer year.

The good news is that our host's age in days will next be the square of a prime on Pentecost 2010.
Posted on entry Happy New Year! ::: January 01, 2008, 12:17 AM:
Happy New Year! May yours bring peace, joy, health and prosperity!

(Is anyone busy publishing a novel right now for maximum award eligibility?)
Posted on entry The Exciting Ron Paul Phenomenon ::: November 12, 2007, 09:28 AM:
The strangest thing about Ron Paul and next year's election is that he's the only candidate whose supporters seem excited about his candidacy.

Everyone I've met who supports Clinton, Obama, Giuliani, etc. is either clearly into politics as a career, or resigned to voting for the one barely adequate candidate.


Comment statistics for Dom on the Making Light blog

YearNumber of comments posted
20097
200812
20073
20061

Total: 23 comments. View all these comments on a single page.