Scalzi's exegesis of Capobianco's argument here: "I believe what Michael is trying to say
here is that he expects the new process itself will keep the same
mistakes from happening again, regardless of who is on the
committee."
It's a bureaucratic argument, something I'd expect in a civil
service whose inept employees are too hard to get rid of: we can't
change our people (i.e., fire the fuckups), so we'll change our
process (i.e., make it harder for the fuckups to fuck up). Applies
equally to organizations whose volunteer pools are limited or
closed shops.
Comment statistics for Jonathan Crowe on the Making Light blog
The most recent 20 comments posted to Making Light by Jonathan Crowe:
Show all comments by Jonathan Crowe.