Bloggasm has covered the William Sanders incident:
http://bloggasm.com/the-ethics-of-hate-mail-should-bloggers-post-email-correspondence-without-permission
Sanders elucidates his position here:
http://webnews.sff.net/read?cmd=read&group=sff.people.sanders&artnum=84840
Xopher 234: Either click my name or
http://solipcyst.blogspot.com/2008/07/story-sanders-rejected-some-at-asimovs.html
OK, since Mamatas has stood up for our right to post rejection letters, I posted one from him to the same story Sanders rejected. Thanks for the solidarity.
Thank you, Lawrence.
This discussion has been very interesting for me. As the recipient of the letter, I am concerned about the legal and ethical implications of my posting the letter. I am too much of a rookie to really know the propriety of my posting the letter, and there seems to be a complete split down the middle as to whether it was OK.. I can't have been the first person in the history of the internet to have done it? But as for the legal issues, I have posted what I think about it on my blog, and I welcome people to tell me if I am wrong or misinformed on the legal aspect.
| Year | Number of comments posted |
|---|---|
| 2008 | 7 |
Total: 7 comments. View all these comments on a single page.
The most recent 20 comments posted to Making Light by Luke Jackson:
Show all comments by Luke Jackson.