The most recent 20 comments posted to Making Light by Derek Lowe:

Show all comments by Derek Lowe.

Posted on entry We never knew ::: December 07, 2004, 04:01 PM:
"For instance, in the areas actually attacked on 9/11, Manhattan and Washington D.C., Bush polled 16% and 11%. We’re natural targets, so we have to pay attention to this stuff."

There's a bit of post hoc, ergo propter hoc in that analysis. After all, it's not like DC and Manhattan have been Republican strongholds. I haven't been able to find earlier statistics for Manhattan (New York county) yet, but Bush polled 14% there in 2000, and Dole had 12.5% of the vote in 1996. (I don't regard these as significant differences, but if there is a difference, it's the other way around from what you seem to be suggesting.)

As for DC, data is available from the Clerk of the House Election Statistics Site. And a similar trend holds - here are the Republican percentages of the total vote, by year: 2000, 9%. 1996, 9.3%. 1992, 9.1%. 1988, 14.3%. 1984, 13.7%. 1980, 13.4%. 1976, 16.5%. 1972, 21.6%. 1968, 18.2%. Bush seems to have done no worse than in 2000, possibly a small bit better.

Now, I realize that you may be saying simply that Bush didn't manage to rack up any great increases in Manhattan or DC. But your argument seems to be that since Bush is so terrible, he did poorly in the areas hit by 9/11, and would have done poorly everywhere else if the people in such backwaters didn't find thinking about these things "tiresome." By those lights, shouldn't he have done worse in Manhattan and DC, instead of the same or marginally better?
Posted on entry Glad to hear it ::: November 04, 2004, 09:34 PM:
Although I voted for the Other Side on Tuesday, I'm actually glad to see this latest comment thread. Less talk of slitting wrists or moving to New Zealand, more political strategizing. That's the ticket.

It'd help, in the long run, to take fewer swigs from the "they're all stupid/evil" bottle. Sure, performers like Ann Coulter do it on the other side, over and over. But they don't do the Republicans any long-term good, either.

I wouldn't be at all surprised to see a Democrat win in 2008, just on a general move-on-to-the-next-crew basis. And for that reason, I think there's going to be a wild and fierce competition for the nomination. Y'all should get ready to make the most of the 2006 elections and then nominate the biggest butt-kicking vote-magnet you can find in '08.
Posted on entry East Coker ::: November 02, 2004, 10:08 PM:
Ummm. . .you're right about what the mood was over at NR earlier this evening, but those exit polls now look rather worth denouncing. Virginia for Kerry? As a Bush voter, I'm glad that I'm at least getting an evening's worth from this election. This one's nowhere near over.

To stick with Eliot, from "Gerontion":

History has many cunning passages, contrived corridors
And issues, deceives with whispering ambitions
Guides us by vanities. Think now
She gives when our attention is distracted
And what she gives, gives with such supple confusions
That the giving famishes the craving. . .
Posted on entry Playing against type ::: October 21, 2004, 12:54 PM:
I note that no one here has mentioned the best team in baseball, the St. Louis Cardinals. (I grew up in NE Arkansas, an easy 5-hour drive up I-55 to St. Louis.)

We haven't played our own game 7 yet, and the Cards have found some interesting ways to lose in recent years, but I'm ready for a repeat of 1967.
Posted on entry Wedge ::: September 13, 2004, 09:47 AM:
Brett Matthews: "Perhaps the Greens and the Grays will form an alliance and we will rule America. They will call us the "G's."

With our old age will come wisdom, and the G's will tax the hell out of the corporations because we want a nice planet for our grandchildren."

Hmmm. Are you familiar with the view that corporations are largely collectors of taxes, rather than payers of taxes? Their increased costs are, whenever possible, passed along to their customers. . .
Posted on entry Open thread 27 ::: August 26, 2004, 04:44 PM:
On the military front, a good book on the experience of battle itself (and the experience of it as seen from the home front) is Paul Fussell's "Wartime". His classic "The Great War and Modern Memory" shouldn't be missed, either.

The most unvarnished account of 20th-century combat I'm aware of is E.B. Sledge's "With The Old Breed at Peleliu and Okinawa". But it's so intense that it has to be taken in small, difficult doses. How people take the real thing is another subject altogether.
Posted on entry Typesetting: when it changed ::: June 22, 2004, 10:33 AM:
Yep, that must have been a Varityper we used on the college newspaper (Hendrix, in Arkansas) back in 1982. Fonts were on thick plastic arcs, four to a wheel, as I recall. Paper output, hot wax strips on the back - I was digging in a box the other day and found some of the stuff, now with lines showing through the paper where the wax has seeped over the years.

After I graduated in 1983, I got a call that summer from the two folks who were taking over the editing job. They needed everything I knew about running the machine, so I dumped out my stock, telling them that they were lucky they hadn't waited a couple of months because I was surely going to forget it all (as I have.)

The Mac revolution in my field, chemistry, was led by an outfit called Cambridge Scientific, with a program called ChemDraw. Since we organic chemists speak in structural drawings, this program was an immediate revelation for anyone who saw it in use.

My second-year continuation exam from grad school (fall of 1985) was prepared with plastic templates and rub-on letters. That was my first (and last) exposure to the stone-ax method of prepared publication-ready chemical structures. I still have the originals in my files to impress/bore my younger colleagues.
Posted on entry Any soldier anyhow ::: June 04, 2004, 10:04 AM:
Good for you, Theresa. I'm very glad to see this post, and I'll be interested to see what comments it brings.

You're absolutely right about this not being a for-or-against-the-war question, but a humanitarian one. And in that category I put both our troops and the Iraqi population, in different ways.

I supported the war decision, and still do, with some pain both then and now. But I can respect many of the people who didn't, and I can understand their reasoning. My respect, though, doesn't extend to those - I think they're few, but they're sure loud - who seem to be actively wishing for disaster. I supposes there's an ecological niche for an organism to thrive on schadenfreude.

I'd also suggest the Spirit of America organization to those wishing to help out relations with the Iraqi population.
Posted on entry Open thread 20. ::: March 29, 2004, 09:47 AM:
Tizzy seas on melon collie.
Posted on entry From correspondence ::: January 30, 2004, 10:05 AM:
Makes me want to sit down and have what I write turn out to be "The Code of the Woosters".
Posted on entry Query ::: December 12, 2003, 03:12 PM:
Another strange plant-distribution story is the seaside alder. It's found in Delaware, New Jersey, Maryland. . .and along the Blue River in SE Oklahoma. Nowhere else. Makes for an odd-looking range map.

No one's sure if they're an ice age leftover, an early deliberate introduction by natives, or what.

Comment statistics for Derek Lowe on the Making Light blog

YearNumber of comments posted
200410
20034
20021

Total: 15 comments. View all these comments on a single page.