The most recent 20 comments posted to Making Light by novalis:

Show all comments by novalis.

Posted on entry Shameless rights grab by Marvel and DC ::: February 02, 2004, 06:19 PM:
A similar suit (although on different grounds) happened way back in the fourties. That suit appears in a fictionalized form in _The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay_, a novel both interesting in itself and as a lightly fictionalized history of comics.
Posted on entry All the elements we've heard of here at Harvard ::: February 02, 2004, 05:22 PM:
Hm, I wonder if they'll bring Michael Swanwick back for two more stories.
Posted on entry Another spam attack ::: January 14, 2004, 04:37 PM:
Graydon, I'm not sure that there are any unbroken CAPTCHAs.

E-mail addresses and IP addresses simply aren't a bottleneck. Spammers have cracked thousands of machines, and can have as many email addresses as they like (SPF is likely to improve the latter somewhat, but will probably not make a big dent until 2005).

Time delays aren't a bottleneck either -- there are enough blogs (1.8 million hits for mt-comments.cgi) that zombies can just wait it out *while posting to another hundred blogs*. Plus it penalizes people who type fast. And it only takes a short post to get googlejuice.

I agree with Brooks Moses's comments about LiveJournal.

And I agree with Graydon that there's an authority centralization problem with these systems. I actually can see away around it -- sell boxes which *are* registration and authentication servers, charge a fee to enter the network, and do DNS-style lookup of users. Kick registrars out for tolerating spamming. The problem with this, which is unsolvable as far as I can see, is that spammers will try to kill the registration servers by overloading them with fake credit cards. High (more than a few percent) rates of chargebacks get merchant accounts cancelled by credit card companies. I don't know if the same is true of 900 numbers, but AT&T got out of the 900 number business because of the high rate of chargebacks (or so said the rep I just spoke to).

OK, here's my next theory: LJ used to require you to have a friend who was a member to give you a code. You couldn't become a LJ member unless you knew one (or paid, but that bit's not important). Build a distributed version of that (basically identical technically to PGP's web of trust, but with different social semantics of key signing) Bottleneck: personal connections to other humans.

The difference between building an anti-spam system and building most other systems is that spammers are willing to destroy the whole system if they don't get their way.

Comment statistics for novalis on the Making Light blog

YearNumber of comments posted
20043

Total: 3 comments. View all these comments on a single page.