Clearly "vote suppression" can't be squared with being
pro-democracy, because a "good message" doesn't suppress a voter
turnout, instead it changes the distribution of votes. Ostensibly,
more votes would be distributed toward the candidate with the "good
message".
But neither PapaDoc nor Bush have that message, and I'm quite sure
suppression of the (predominantly) black vote is the goal. Don't
get too sidetracked about whether the comment stems from racism,
pure strategy, unconscious provincialism... or what not. It is
entirely undemocratic and at this point I think focussing on the
statement's overt anti-democracy (rather than its implied racism)
is the smartest move.
Comment statistics for oyster on the Electrolite blog
The most recent 20 comments posted to Electrolite by oyster:
Show all comments by oyster.