The most recent 20 comments posted to Electrolite by Alex Wallenwein:

Show all comments by Alex Wallenwein.

Posted on entry The great FEC scare. ::: March 13, 2005, 08:03 PM:
I'll join the "pledge to defy the FEC" drive anytime. There is no other way since Congress has already passed the BCRA, and the Supremes upheld it on spurious reasoning.

As to Declan McCoullogh crying "wolf" once again: What matters is not who wrote the article but what Bradley Smith actually said and whether it holds water.

FECA (2 USC 431) in Subsection (9)(A)(i) states
"The term ''expenditure'' includes -
(i) any purchase, payment, distribution, loan, advance,
deposit, or gift of money or anything of value, made by any
person for the purpose of influencing any election for Federal
office;"

"Expenditures" are considered "contributions" under BCRA - and thus may be regulated under it.

"Anything of value" is unbelievably broad. Is a private citizen's negative opinion about a certain candidate, expressed on a popular blog online something "of value" to his opponent?

"... for the purpose of influencing any election for federal office" is equally broad. When you publish a blog entry that says "Candidate X sucks", are you implicitly trying to influence an election?

You bet.

Wanna bet that some activst judge will agree with that statement when he has a chance to use it?

In 2002, the FEC exempted the Internet from regulation under BCRA by a 4-2 vote, but U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly last fall overturned that decision. "The commission's exclusion of Internet communications from the coordinated communications regulation severely undermines" the campaign finance law's purposes, Kollar-Kotelly wrote.

The FEC then decided not to appeal that decision. That's what got Bradley hot under the collar.

Do you see how the noose tightens, ever so slowly?

There is no doubt in my mind that the trend is to choke private citizens' right to free speech on the internet - and elsewhere - right out of existence.

This trend will continue unless a whole bunch of one-sided and "hysterical" bloggers become whistleblowers like Bradley Smith did and cotninue to "overreact" for all it's worth, until the BCRA is overturned.

This must not stand!

I am somehwat surprised and dismayed at the cavalier attitude with which most contributors to this blog treat this issue. Afraid to be called "silly" one day for "overreacting"?

Not me. Having a little bit of egg on your face is a far cheaper price for freedom than losing your life for it.

I'm willing to do both.
For those who feel the same way, there is a petition drive going on that can be accessed through this article:
Total Revolt.

Alex Wallenwein
Editor,
Euro vs Dollar Monitor

Comment statistics for Alex Wallenwein on the Electrolite blog

YearNumber of comments posted
20051

Total: 1 comments. View all these comments on a single page.