The most recent 20 comments posted to Making Light by Jed Hartman:

Show all comments by Jed Hartman.

Posted on entry Hugo and Campbell finalists ::: March 24, 2006, 01:38 AM:
Add me to the list of those who long for the return of the colophon. And who like Scalzi et al's suggestion of including names of more people who worked on a book (with their permission).

Regarding how to find out what short fiction to watch during the year:

Tangent Online is a good place to start. Under the able leadership of Eugie Foster, it's bounced back from the problems it was having a while back, and is now publishing largely well-written reviews of a substantial percentage of the short sf being published.

Rich Horton and Nick Gevers review short fiction in every issue of Locus (as Anne mentioned). And Rich singlehandedly covers the whole field in his year-end market summaries; he reads approximately all the professionally published (and much of the semiprofessionally published) short sf every year. That doesn't help you much during the year (unless you read his Locus reviews), but it can be quite handy at the end of the year, and can give you suggestions of venues to watch during the next year.

Meanwhile, the Internet Review of Science Fiction has a regular short-sf-reviews column; formerly written by Bluejack, currently written by Lois Tilton. Both are smart and perceptive reviewers, and I'm not just saying that because they sometimes like what we publish.

Anne KG Murphy may have been too modest to mention that she's been known to write good reviews of short sf too, for Emerald City.

The Best SF site provides regular reviews of the print prozines. However, Mark Watson (the reviewer there), unlike most of the reviewers mentioned above, is uninterested in online magazines other than the sadly departed Sci Fiction.

The Free Speculative Fiction Online site may initially appear to be the flip side of that, but actually it specializes in linking to online versions of stories from print magazines (or by pro authors who've appeared in print magazines); not really quite what you're looking for. But I thought it was relevant enough to mention.

You may also be interested in online communities like shortform, a LiveJournal group that discusses short sf.


Regarding transparency and the Hugos: I almost entirely agree, but the one area where I'd love to see more transparency is in receipts for ballots. When I see the notes saying that n ballots were discarded for various reasons, I always fret that mine was among them, no matter how implausible that is. I doubt there's any really good way to do this, but it would be totally cool if voters could be told "Your ballot was indeed counted." (More plausible via email than papermail, but even so there would be various logistical problems; I'm not saying this is a good idea, just something that I wish for occasionally.)
Posted on entry What we did on our vacation ::: September 08, 2005, 04:07 PM:
I pretty much go along with Matt A's comments up at the top.

As for shinypenny's quote about the unruly locals: It seems to me that there's some room for middle ground here.

Maybe those particular police guarding that bridge had a racist belief that letting black people into their neighborhood would be bad and/or unsafe. Maybe some of the people in the crowd were also behaving in an unruly manner. Maybe the bridge was also potentially unsafe for pedestrians to cross. Maybe those particular police were scared and exhausted and had inadequate communications and had heard about rioting looters and felt they needed to be hard-line to protect themselves and their city. I don't think those various stories are mutually incompatible.

I wasn't there; I don't have good enough data to know what happened. But I suspect that "what happened" was not one solid monolithic story in which all members of each group behaved identically for identical reasons, and everyone agreed about what everyone did and why. I suspect that if you asked everyone who was there for their version of events, you'd get three to five major versions of What Happened, each with a dozen minor variations, depending on who you talked with, and I suspect that most of those versions would be more or less factually accurate. Think _Rashomon_.

Relatedly: maybe the cop at the station lied to the crowd (about the buses) to get them to leave; or maybe he had received false information; or maybe he had received rumors of buses and he exaggerated their reliability to get the crowd to leave; or maybe there was something else going on. My understanding is that there were very few conduits of information into or out of the city; in those circumstances, it all turns into one big game of Telephone. Rumors get distorted and exaggerated and turned into Facts. And of course the behavior of one police officer, or even all the officers at a particular station, doesn't imply that The Police all felt or behaved the same way.

Just to be clear: I am not doubting any of this very sad and distressing account. (And thank you, Teresa, for posting it.) I'm quite willing to believe that everything happened pretty much as Bradshaw and Slonsky said it did. But I'm also willing to believe that others who were there might have seen slightly different things, perceived the same things through different filters, put different interpretations on events, remembered things differently afterward.

I've been in plenty of situations where I compared notes afterward with others who were there and found that their perceptions of what had happened and why were very different from mine.

Of course, it's also possible that Scheer is just lying. I'm just saying that his version of events and Bradshaw & Slonsky's version are not entirely mutually exclusive.

Side note: Mary Kay wrote: "I still find it hard to believe that it was that easy to get a large group of unrelated individuals to behave in a unified fashion." Note that the group size changed a lot during the course of events. They started with 500 people; when they left the police station for the bridge they were down to about 200; that crowd grew as they went to the bridge, but then the crowd dispersed at the bridge, leaving a "small group" to settle on the freeway; that small group eventually grew to 80 or 90 people. So it sounds like the most cooperative behavior (on the freeway) happened in a group of a few dozen people, not the 500 they originally started out with. (But I don't mean to downplay that cooperative behavior; I'm very pleased and impressed that it happened regardless of group size.)
Posted on entry No ideas but in pieces ::: June 01, 2005, 04:08 PM:
Continuing the Waldrop aside, if anyone hasn't read "Mary Margaret Road-Grader," you can read it by following that link. (We reprinted it at Strange Horizons a few years ago.) It's the one that starts out "It was the time of the Sun Dance and the Big Tractor Pull."
Posted on entry Open thread 20. ::: April 01, 2004, 11:39 AM:
I wanted to belatedly mention that the abovementioned Pogo CD can also be acquired at the iTunes Music Store -- I was astonished to see it there, and almost bought it, but now I can't decide whether I want the booklet that comes with the CD or whether I'm willing to settle for just the music (and instant gratification). At any rate, if nothing else it means you can listen to 30-second clips of all the songs if you want to see what they're like. (If you have iTunes, of course.) Even includes Walt Kelly singing.

...Hrm -- sorry if the above sounds like an ad. I'm not associated in any way with the Pogo CD or the iTunes Music Store; just thought other Pogophiles might be interested.
Posted on entry On the getting of agents ::: February 25, 2004, 03:16 AM:
I can't find the font-related movie clip I wanted to post, so this'll have to do: Helvetica Bold Oblique Sweeps Fontys (from the Onion a few years back).

Comment statistics for Jed Hartman on the Making Light blog

YearNumber of comments posted
20061
20052
20042

Total: 5 comments. View all these comments on a single page.