The most recent 20 comments posted to Making Light by chris:

Show all comments by chris.

Posted on entry "Radical Presentism" ::: November 10, 2009, 06:39 AM:
There's also a rugger player called Austin Healey, which is endlessly confusing.

I blame the parents, myself.

Xopher, I'm a bit surprised that in the pre-Sesame Street world the name Kermit didn't immediately invite comparison with the younger Roosevelt, or with his son. Not that I wouldn't personally prefer being green.
Posted on entry It was twenty years ago today ::: November 10, 2009, 04:35 AM:
I vaguely remember the wall going up (I was 10 at the time). It seemed mad, impossible - you can't build a wall around a whole city, not even the Russians can get away with that. But they did, and there we were, thirty years later, accepting it as if it was the most normal thing in the wall.

Until somebody decided it wasn't. Which was great. But what are we going to get used to next?
Posted on entry Technically American ::: November 05, 2009, 10:35 AM:
You could see signs in Britain saying "No dogs, blacks or Irish" until the late 1960s.

Now they say "No travellers". Plus ça change.
Posted on entry And furthermore, the Anaconda Plan didn't actually take place on the Snake River ::: November 04, 2009, 12:40 PM:
I'm familiar with the term "shanks' mare" for being on foot, but this is the first time I've encountered "shanks' pony". Where did you pick that up, IYDMMA?

I think "shank's pony" is the standard version in Britain. Certainly I've used it for 50 years and only recently encountered "shank's mare".
Posted on entry And furthermore, the Anaconda Plan didn't actually take place on the Snake River ::: November 03, 2009, 05:54 AM:
As a fellow countryman of Keegan, I confess to having thought the Gettysburg Address was 10, Main Street, Gettysburg. But if I was planning to write about it in a book, I'd familiarise myself with it. I can only assume that in this case Keegan was relying on memory across 50 years or so, but even then, you'd think that once you'd read the thing the gist of it would stay with you. It's not complex.

Teresa's point about rivers in American history can be generalised to any other land mass, and is surprisingly little understood. Generally, when I come across a historian who understands rivers I come away impressed, even if they're weak in other respects. You'd think that Keegan, who must understand rivers as battlefield features (about #7 in the list of what's important about them in history), might get it. Shame he doesn't.
Posted on entry "He used...sarcasm. He knew all the tricks." ::: November 03, 2009, 04:13 AM:
Transatlantically, I simply can't see any down side to Rep. Grayson finding his voice. The legislature, any legislature, OUGHT to be a Hogarthian scrum, because its members ought to be advancing or defending deeply held principles with all the passion they can muster.

I'm deeply suspicious of politicians who always try to civilise the process. Essentially they're saying that the debate should be restricted to a narrow consensus within which it doesn't much matter who wins. And that's wrong. Much of the time it does matter.

The British House of Commons has been blessed for many years with Dennis Skinner, one of the last members to understand this. They keep trying to shut him up; they haven't succeeded yet. I believe he's retiring at the next election, and we'll all be poorer for it, but he should go to work as an adviser to Alan Grayson.
Posted on entry Been lied to so long you wouldn't know the truth if it came up and kissed you on the mouth ::: August 12, 2009, 06:40 AM:
If IBM came along as said, "We need Michigan, Maine, Oregon... etc., would we hand over the land?

What worries me from afar is that if IBM asked for those specific states, the people now forming the anti-health care claques would say, "Sure, take them."

So much of this, like every issue that has arisen since Obama emerged as a serious candidate, has been overdetermined by the unfinished business of 1861/5 that I wonder if you'll ever achieve anything until you settle that.
Posted on entry In Siberia? ::: July 18, 2009, 11:23 AM:
I can't get an idea of the scale of this thing, but it strikes me there are significant features of a Roman camp which are not there - most notably the viae. Your standard castra had a wide road leading from the main gate up to the central administrative block and continuing behind it, and another crossing the camp in front of said block. These gave the troopd space to form up and enabled them to march in and out in formation.

There's maybe a path leading into this one, but the others are missing, most notably the transverse one. So I'd go with it having been built by someone who'd heard about Roman camps, as suggested above.

Also, did the Romans ever build camps on lake islands? The purpose of permanent camps was usually to control the surrounding territory, which isn't so easy if you have to embark your troops in boats before making a sally, and then disembark them, which is a very vulnerable operation.

But I'd love to know what it is.
Posted on entry The secret fighting style of ACORN ::: April 14, 2009, 12:41 PM:
Thinking up the alibis that everyone's forgotten
Just another mummy's boy gone to rotten
They pat some good boys on the back and put some to the rod
But I never thought they'd put me in the

Goon squad....
Posted on entry How we spent Monday ::: March 31, 2009, 01:52 PM:
The train from Arth-Goldau pulled in over a minute late

Um, in some countries that almost qualifies for ridiculously early.
Posted on entry How to Save America ::: March 11, 2009, 02:45 PM:
My neighbor's bitching about the other one; it drops apples on his side of our property line

So why doesn't he stop bitching and eat them? So he doesn't have to buy imported fruit that week.

Posted on entry "Principles of the American Cargo Cult" ::: February 02, 2009, 11:04 AM:
This has always struck me as one of those "is the glass half full, or half empty?" kind of things.

Isn't it rather a reworking of:
I've heard you say many times that you're better than no one
And no one is better than you;
If you really believe that, you know you have nothing to win
And nothing to lose...

which may or may not be true, but at least offers a way forward.
Posted on entry Unfortunate Headline ::: December 15, 2008, 05:50 AM:
Oops. Remembered the name wrong @55. Link to the original story here.
Posted on entry Unfortunate Headline ::: December 15, 2008, 04:35 AM:
Terry @106, I blame the parents, myself.
Posted on entry Unfortunate Headline ::: December 13, 2008, 11:24 AM:
Oh absolutely. Though it has to be better than Richard Head, which is also attested. I'm reminded of the story of the woman called Dickson who tried to join a social networking site and was rejected by some filter. She got so mad she tried to register as "Penisson", and was accepted without trouble.
Posted on entry Unfortunate Headline ::: December 13, 2008, 11:02 AM:
Caroline @50, I live about 15 miles from Penistone, whence the lawyers ancestors presumably hailed. I wouldn't make a special journey, though.
Posted on entry What do they have in common? ::: December 10, 2008, 08:25 AM:
No love for my favourite version? Moving Hearts from the eponymous album, with Christie Moore singing to bring tears to your eyes.
Posted on entry A different kind of "political science" ::: December 03, 2008, 11:34 AM:
89. You also forgot Newfoundland (1907). Arguably the original Dominions are best regarded as W2.x (1...6), with versions of W3.x implemented by the Statute of Westminster, 1931. W4 would be the "new Commonwealth" dominions, and possibly W5 (or W3.1.1 [why does that look horribly familiar?]) for the expanded Canada of 1949.
Posted on entry A different kind of "political science" ::: December 03, 2008, 10:44 AM:
Josh, a 14th century Catalan mystic pioneered electoral systems math? More, please!

Comment statistics for chris on the Making Light blog

YearNumber of comments posted
200913
200836
200734
20068
200510

Total: 101 comments. View all these comments on a single page.