Go to Making Light's front page.
Forward to next post: 11/11/11/11
Subscribe (via RSS) to this post's comment thread. (What does this mean? Here's a quick introduction.)
Security expert Bruce Schneier has weighed in on The Problem with Electronic Voting Machines.
Mr. Schneier has been one of the most objective, realistic, and sane people there are when it comes to matters of security, encryption, and stuff like evoting.
I do like his comment that we're more secure in electronic voting if the code isn't secret. Lovely lucid comment!
I recently had a chance to plug his Beyond Fear to someone after a discussion of airline security and "security". Not only is he (as Greg London put it) "objective, realistic, and sane" but he also writes nice clear explanations that you can give to people to help them see new sides of the problem.
Just so, all round. Bruce is into real security.
Amazing! Bruce Schneier rocks!
Regards,
Nikole
Comments containing more than seven URLs will be held for approval. If you want to comment on a thread that's been closed, please post to the most recent "Open Thread" discussion.
You can subscribe (via RSS) to this particular comment thread. (If this option is baffling, here's a quick introduction.)
HTML Tags:
<strong>Strong</strong> = Strong
<em>Emphasized</em> = Emphasized
<a href="http://www.url.com">Linked text</a> = Linked text
Spelling reference:
Tolkien. Minuscule. Gandhi. Millennium. Delany. Embarrassment. Publishers Weekly. Occurrence. Asimov. Weird. Connoisseur. Accommodate. Hierarchy. Deity. Etiquette. Pharaoh. Teresa. Its. Macdonald. Nielsen Hayden. It's. Fluorosphere. Barack. More here.