Back to previous post: Making Lumiere: The Changelog

Go to Making Light's front page.

Forward to next post: Been lied to so long you wouldn’t know the truth if it came up and kissed you on the mouth

Subscribe (via RSS) to this post's comment thread. (What does this mean? Here's a quick introduction.)

August 11, 2009

Robert M. Fletcher, Literary Scammer
Posted by Jim Macdonald at 04:09 PM * 25 comments

More on Robert M. Fletcher (and I will have yet more to say about him).

Fletcher and his various scams have been mentioned here before:

What isn’t generally known is that Robert M. Fletcher sued me, and Ann Crispin and Victoria Strauss. My post that particularly got under his skin was this one; I know this because he quoted it in his frivolous lawsuit:

This agency is an utter fraud.

What will Poet’s Literary Agency do for you? They’ll betray, bluff, burn, cheat, chisel, con, deceive, delude, diddle, double-cross, dupe, entice, exploit, finesse, flimflam, gyp, have, hoodwink, impose on, jockey, juggle, lure, manipulate, mislead, play, rook, rope in, scam, screw, seduce, shave, snow, stick, string along, suck in, take, take in, and trick you.

The Ann Crispin/Victoria Strauss portion appears to be over.

See (for the moment):

The complete text of the court order requiring Fletcher to pay Ann and Victoria’s legal expenses is below the cut. Highlight:
Over time, Fletcher used over ten names for publishing operations under the umbrella of the AEG Publishing Group. Basically, Fletcher and LAG were running a fraud by charging fees for all services while falsely giving hope to the authors that Fletcher and LAG would find a publisher for their book.

UPDATE 20AUG09 They’re changing their name (again!) to Strategic Book Group

Continued below the cut.


Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Suffolk, SS.

Superior Court
Civil Action
No. 08-0272F

Robert Fletcher and
THE LITERARY AGENCY GROUP,
An individual and a corporation,
Plaintiffs

v.

ANN CRISPIN and
VICTORIA STRAUSS, Indiviuals,
Defendants

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS
ANN CRISPIN AND VICTORIA STRAUSS’S MOTION
FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS PURSUANT TO CH. 231, § 6F

This civil action was commenced on January 24, 2008 by the Literary Agency Group and one of its principals, Robert Fletcher against the defendants, Ann Crispin and Victoria Strauss, and alleged that they both defamed Literary Agency Group (LAG) and its principal, Robert Fletcher (Fletcher) by publishing reports in Writer Beware of the plaintiff’s alleged fraud, misrepresentations and dishonesty towards authors who are looking for a publisher for their books. LAG and Fletcher would require fee charges for literary agency services, fee based publishing and fee based critique and editing referrals. Over time, Fletcher used over ten names for publishing operations under the umbrella of the AEG Publishing Group. Basically, Fletcher and LAG were running a fraud by charging fees for all services while falsely giving hope to the authors that Fletcher and LAG would find a publisher for their book.

This civil action claimed that the plaintiff, Ann Crispin and Victoria Strauss were defaming and libeling them by publishing warnings to potential authors of the fraudulent practices of LAG and Fletcher. The attorney for LAG and Fletcher on the date of the filing of this action sought a temporary restraining order against the defendants to remove the critical comments which were on the web site of Writer Beware, and to cease publishing any further defamatory publications about the plaintiffs. In lieu of entertaining the Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, the Court issued an order of notice. The Motion for a Preliminary Injunction as to the co- defendant, James McDonald [sic], came on for hearing on October 9, 2009 which was denied by the Court. To this judge’s knowledge from a review of the file and docket, there was never a hearing on a preliminary injunction as to the defendants, Crispin and Strauss.

There were some discovery motions filed by the parties. The defendants, Crispin and Strauss, noticed the deposition of the plaintiff, Robert Fletcher, who failed to attend. The defendants obtained an order by the Court requiring him to attend, and he again failed to attend. The plaintiff’s counsel indicated that neither plaintiff intended to comply with any discovery requests. The Court on March 19, 2009 ordered the Complaint dismissed as to both defendants, Crispin and Strauss. The defendant, James McDonald [sic] had already been dismissed by the Court. On April 29, 2009, the defendants, Crispin and Strauss, moved under ch. 231, § 6F for the defendants to be ordered to pay their counsel fees and costs incurred because this case was brought by the plaintiffs in bad faith, was and is frivolous and was brought only to curb the defendants, Crispin and Strauss’ first amendment rights.

FINDING OF FACTS

This civil action was brought by the plaintiffs to intimidate the defendants from publishing articles critical to the plaintiff’s business practices. The plaintiff had no intention of proceeding or winning the lawsuit. The plaintiff, Robert Fletcher, sent multiple e-mails to both defendants, Crispin and Strauss threatening them with both physical harm and threatening them with this lawsuit. In fact, in two of his e-mails, he indicated that his purpose was not to prevail in the lawsuit but just to bankrupt the defendants, Crispin and Strauss.

After the civil action commenced, the plaintiffs refused to give any discovery at all and Fletcher himself refused to attend his noticed deposition after being ordered by the Court to attend.

Eventually, the defendants, Crispin and Strauss, moved to dismiss the case for Fletcher’s failure to attend his deposition, as ordered by the Court.

The plaintiffs have exhibited extreme bad faith in bringing this frivolous lawsuit for the sole purpose causing great expense and harassment to Crispin and Strauss. Fletcher expressly states that it was his purpose in the e-mails. This Court concludes and finds that this case was brought in bad faith by the plaintiffs for the mere purpose of causing great inconvenience and financial costs to Crispin and Strauss (as set out in Fletcher’s pre-lawsuit e-mails to the defendants, Crispin and Strauss). This case is frivolous and this Court finds so, finds that the two plaintiffs and their lawyer, Jerrold G. Neeff, knew it to be frivolous before it even commenced. This Court rules that the defendants, Ann Crispin and Victoria Strauss are entitled to have all their legal fees and expenses incurred paid to them by the plaintiffs, Robert Fletcher and The Literary Agency Group.

This Court finds that the claims asserted by the plaintiffs to be wholly insubstantial, frivolous and not advanced in good faith.

ORDER

The defendants, Ann Crispin and Victoria Strass’s Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs under ch. 231 § 6F is ALLOWED. Counsel for said defendants shall file an affidavit within twenty days of the date of this Order setting the legal work performed by each lawyer or paralegal, the amount of time involved, the hourly rates for each person involved and any expenses incurred.

By the Court,
/s/
Thomas E. Connolly
Justice of the Superior Court

Date: July 31, 2009


Also:

The State of Florida is investigating Fletcher:

Case Number: L07-3-1146

Subject of investigation:
Writer’s Literary Agency Group, Writer’s Literary Agency, Writer’s Literary & Publishing Services, New York Literary Agency, Writer’s Literary Children’s Agency, The Children’s Literary Agency, Children’s Book Publishing Agency, Writer’s Literary Poet’s Agency, Poet’s Literary Agency, Poetry Book Publishing Agency, The Christian Literary Agency, Writer’s Literary Screenplay Agency, Screenplay Writers’ Agency, The Screenplay Agency, The Literary Agency Group, f/k/a Rapidpublishing-screenwriter911, Inc., Stylus Literary Agency, S T Literary Agency, Inc. , Writers Literary & Publishing Services Company, Writers’ Book Publishing Agency, Strategic Publishing Group, Strategic Book Publishing, Strategic Book Marketing, AEG Publishing Group, My Editor Is A Saint, Author’s Edge, Sydra-Techniques, Global Book Agency, Eloquent Books, and Robert M. Fletcher a/k/a Robert Williams a/k/a Bob WIlliams a/k/a Robert West and Leslie Williams a/k/a Leslie W. Mroz

Subject’s address:
699 SW 8th Terrace, Boca Raton, FL 33486-5509 (Home Address) 1355 West Palmetto Park Road, Boca Raton, FL 33486 (P.O. Box) or 3840 West Hillsboro Blvd., #302, Deerfield Beach, FL 33442 (P.O. Box)

Subject’s business:
Talent agency

Allegation or issue being investigated:
(1) Charging aspiring writers various fees totaling hundreds of dollars for professional services that were either not rendered at all or were not rendered in good faith; (2) Charging for unnecessary services; and (3) Creating unreasonable consumer expectations concerning their prospects for publication by failling to criticize submitted drafts, in order to encourage the consumer and collect more fees.

AG unit handling case:
Economic Crimes Division in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

If you, or anyone you know, has had any contact with Fletcher under any of his names, or any of his businesses, please get in touch with the State of Florida.

Please spread this word everywhere.




Welcome to Making Light's comments section. Moderator: Teresa Nielsen Hayden.

Comments on Robert M. Fletcher, Literary Scammer:

#1 ::: Evan Goer ::: (view all by) ::: August 11, 2009, 04:15 PM:

An alphabet of sins! For a second there I thought High Holy Days had come early. :)

#2 ::: Dave Langford ::: (view all by) ::: August 11, 2009, 04:43 PM:

I am so pleased by this.

#3 ::: Sylvia ::: (view all by) ::: August 11, 2009, 04:56 PM:

But your portion of the case is not yet resolved?

#4 ::: Jaws ::: (view all by) ::: August 11, 2009, 04:59 PM:

"But won't Fletcher just appeal this and tie it up some more?"

Well, maybe... but not through a (competent) lawyer. Having defended a few § 6F motions (against collection agencies and mortgage brokerages) myself back in the day, the most important aspect of the order is the part labelled "Findings of Fact". The judge was really irritated at Fletcher (and his lawyer), because by making the findings of fact that he did, in the way that he did, he set this up so that to win an appeal against the order Fletcher would have to show by "clear and convincing" evidence that is already in the record that the judge's decision was not well founded in fact... and then would have to overcome the judge's discretion.

In short, Yog, you might want to consider going after Fletcher's boat with an admiralty lien... because this is a very solid sanction order indeed.

#5 ::: Liza ::: (view all by) ::: August 11, 2009, 05:01 PM:

I didn't know you could say "basically" in a court memorandum. Huh.

#6 ::: edward oleander ::: (view all by) ::: August 11, 2009, 05:06 PM:

I pray that if I'm ever sued, it is by someone as inept and self-damning as Fletcher...

#7 ::: Dave Bell ::: (view all by) ::: August 11, 2009, 05:12 PM:

Sylvia @ #3

Lawyerspeak can be MEGO-provoking stuff. Quoting from the paragraph immediately before the "Finding of Facts" header:

The Court on March 19, 2009 ordered the Complaint dismissed as to both defendants, Crispin and Strauss. The defendant, James McDonald [sic] had already been dismissed by the Court.

I'd say that is pretty definite.

Sounds as though Jim would have a claim for costs too.

#8 ::: Jaws ::: (view all by) ::: August 11, 2009, 07:18 PM:

Yog can confirm this, but I infer that he was dismissed for want of jurisdiction at an early stage (Absolute Write didn't/doesn't have enough contacts with Massachusetts to make it an appropriate venue for a Florida resident suing a New Hampshire resident for a business tort). Thus, this finding doesn't apply to him personally, although a judge would be entitled to rely upon those pre-lawsuit e-mails and infer that there was the same purpose as to Yog; this judge did not specifically do so, and was correct not to do so (no personal jurisdiction means nothing is valid).

#9 ::: Tom S. ::: (view all by) ::: August 11, 2009, 07:25 PM:

The next question would be what action Jerrold G. Neeff, Esq, might face from the Florida Bar for bringing a lawsuit that he knew to be frivolous and in bad faith (as the judge stated)? I'm no lawyer, but that seems like it has to be sanctionable.

#10 ::: Tom S. ::: (view all by) ::: August 11, 2009, 07:33 PM:

Myself @#9: make that "The Massachusetts bar" -- sorry for the reading comprehension error.

#11 ::: Jane Smith ::: (view all by) ::: August 12, 2009, 10:41 AM:

I am so very pleased by this ruling. And hope that Ann, Victoria and James can now rest a little, and get over the stress that this must have caused them.

I'm particularly pleased by the judge's comment that Fletcher's dealings are fraudulent. That's a lovely little nugget, isn't it?

#12 ::: DaveKuzminski ::: (view all by) ::: August 12, 2009, 11:18 AM:

A copy of that ruling should be provided to the Florida Attorney General. It just might inspire him to take more positive action in shutting down Fletcher's activities.

#13 ::: James D. Macdonald ::: (view all by) ::: August 12, 2009, 12:23 PM:

Fletcher is known to have over seventy aliases.

I have been unable to determine the real existence of the following persons:

Hil Mallory
Mary Bluestone
Ellen Green
Georgina Orr
Sherry Fine

I suspect that they are all Robert M. Fletcher.

#14 ::: DaveKuzminski ::: (view all by) ::: August 12, 2009, 01:20 PM:

Just the usage of those aliases should be enough for a competent AG to base a case of fraud upon.

#15 ::: James D. Macdonald ::: (view all by) ::: August 12, 2009, 02:46 PM:

Among other aliases:

I'm reasonably sure that both "billy Walsh" and "Jonathan" who showed up right here at Making Light were none other than Robert Fletcher/Robert West/Bob West/Bob Williams himself.

#16 ::: Serge ::: (view all by) ::: August 12, 2009, 03:00 PM:

Georgina Orr?

That one is kind of obvious, isn't it?

#17 ::: Dave Bell ::: (view all by) ::: August 12, 2009, 03:56 PM:

@ #15

Looking at those two posts, there's more than the content. There's a feel to the errors in the text which, with a larger sample and decent analysis, might blow away any disguise. Or maybe not; they're showing a common sort of error in there, and their authors might just suffer from the same imperfections of literacy.

#18 ::: James D. Macdonald ::: (view all by) ::: August 12, 2009, 04:01 PM:

Right now his major efforts seem to be AEG/Strategic Book Publishing/Eloquent Books. He's found the motherlode in vanity publishing, he thinks.

But, you know something? He's still a fraudster, and he will go down and go down hard.

When he does I'll send him a nice fruit basket.

#19 ::: Nicholas ::: (view all by) ::: August 13, 2009, 02:40 AM:

A minor typo - at the moment, both of your links to previous posts go to the "WL Writers'..." article. "Take My Logline" is over here.

#20 ::: Dave Bell ::: (view all by) ::: August 13, 2009, 04:50 AM:

I've just come across an advert for this scammer in the on-line edition of The Guardian, put there by Google Ads.

I sent an email to the Books Editor, with URLs for the Florida investigation and the Massachussets court ruling.

This could get interesting, though the UK's libel laws might be seen as an opportunity by Fletcher.

#21 ::: Scraps ::: (view all by) ::: August 13, 2009, 01:25 PM:

Good for you. It's good to watch fraudsters going down.

#22 ::: James D. Macdonald ::: (view all by) ::: August 13, 2009, 01:44 PM:

Nicholas #19: Thanks. Fixed.

#23 ::: [spam deleted] ::: (view all by) ::: August 14, 2009, 01:34 AM:

[posted from 114.224.161.217]

#24 ::: Clifton Royston sees spam ::: (view all by) ::: August 14, 2009, 01:38 AM:

Oh look, a less literary scammer.

#25 ::: sonya sylvia ::: (view all by) ::: September 23, 2009, 08:24 PM:

my husband has just paid 78 dollars to wl literary agency for a critique on 9/7/09 now they want 2000 dollars for editing before they "sell" his book. i am so upset by all this my husbands book is wonderful and to know now he is being scammed really makes me mad !! What do i do now?

Welcome to Making Light's comment section. Moderator: Teresa Nielsen Hayden.

Comments containing more than seven URLs will be held for approval.

If you want to comment on a thread that's been closed, please post to the most recent "Open Thread" discussion.

You can subscribe (via RSS) to this particular comment thread. (If this option is baffling, here's a quick introduction.)

Post a comment.
(Real e-mail addresses and URLs only, please.)

HTML Tags:
<strong>Strong</strong> = Strong
<em>Emphasized</em> = Emphasized
<a href="http://www.url.com">Linked text</a> = Linked text

Spelling reference:
Tolkien. Minuscule. Gandhi. Millennium. Delany. Embarrassment. Publishers Weekly. Occurrence. Asimov. Weird. Connoisseur. Accommodate. Hierarchy. Deity. Etiquette. Pharaoh. Teresa. Its. Macdonald. Nielsen Hayden. It's. Fluorosphere. Barack. More here.















(You must preview before posting.)

Dire legal notice
Making Light copyright 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 by Patrick & Teresa Nielsen Hayden. All rights reserved.