Joan Le Tyes

Other Events and Attributes:

• Alternate birth: of Elmsall, Yorkshire, England

Notes:

Or Jane le Tyes, le Tyas.

Joan married John Wentworth in 1314. John (son of William Wentworth and Isabella Pollington) was born in of Elmsall, Yorkshire, England. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

1. John Wentworth was born in of North Elmsall, Yorkshire, England; died after 1388.

Other Events and Attributes:

• Alternate birth: of Elmsall, Yorkshire, England
• Alternate death: Aft 1318

Notes:

"The elder Richard Tyas was dead before 2 Jan 1329, when his widow Alice granted her rents in Meltham to Richard her son." [The Cartulary of St. Leonard's Hospital, York, citation details below]

The aforementioned Cartulary makes this Richard a son of Francis/Franco/Frank le Tyes, who actually appears to have been Richard's grandfather. Our guess is that the error arises from a well-meaning misreading of a confusing aspect of of Dodsworth's "Yorkshire Notes: The Wapentake of Agbrigg" (citation details below). The father of the Richard of this page, who was a son of Francis/Franco/Frank, is generally called in various pedigrees Henry, but evidence exists that he was actually named Richard. On his pedigree chart Dodsworth says of this Richard's father "Henry le Tyes was living 1279 (more probably named Richard le Tyes)", and in the long footnote on pages 132-33 he refers to a Richard being "the son of Franco" -- we think meaning, by "Richard", the member of the le Tyes family who has often been called, probably incorrectly, Henry.

Richard married Alice le Tankersley. Alice (daughter of Richard de Tankersley and Sarah de Thornhill) died after 2 Jan 1329. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

Other Events and Attributes:

• Alternate death: Aft 1312

Other Events and Attributes:

• Alternate death: Aft 1279
• Alternate death: Aft Nov 1280

Notes:

Called in some records Henry le Tyes, but Dodsworth (citation details below) says he was probably actually named Richard.

Richard married Ellen de Neville in 1271. Ellen (daughter of Alexander de Neville and Mateleon) was born in of Redbourne, Glanford Brigg, Lincolnshire, England; died after Nov 1280. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

Richard married Sarah de Thornhill. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

Other Events and Attributes:

• Alternate death: Aft 1265
• Alternate death: Aft 1266
• Alternate death: Aft 1278

Notes:

Also called Franco le Tyas.

Other Events and Attributes:

• Alternate birth: Aft 13 Jun 1201, of Redbourne, Glanford Brigg, Lincolnshire, England

Alexander married Mateleon before 1236. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

Other Events and Attributes:

• Alternate death: Bef 1260

John married Olivia de la Mare. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

Other Events and Attributes:

• Alternate death: Aft 1234

Notes:

Also called Baldwin "Teutonicus"; Baldwin Tuetonicus vel Ties.

Baldwin married Margery de Eland. Margery (daughter of Hugh de Eland) was born about 1190; died after 1234; was buried in Lede Chapel, Ryther, Yorkshire, England. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

Other Events and Attributes:

• Alternate death: Abt 1219

Alexander married Margaret. Margaret died after Jan 1227. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

Notes:

Also called Richard de Wath.

Richard married Alice. Alice died after 1209. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

Other Events and Attributes:

• Alternate death: Abt 1216

William married Mabel de Malherbe. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

Other Events and Attributes:

• Alternate birth: of Butterworth, Lancashire, England
• Alternate birth: of Rochdale, Yorkshire, England
• Alternate death: Aft 1190

Other Events and Attributes:

• Alternate death: Abt 1198

Notes:

Widely said to have been a son of Gilbert II de Neville (d. ~1169), but John Watson (citation details below) expresses doubt that Cecily de Crevequer would have been allowed by the Church to marry her stepfather's brother.

Walter married Cecily de Crevequer. Cecily (daughter of Alexander de Crevequer and Amabel Fitz Swain) was born about 1163 in of Redbourne, Glanford Brigg, Lincolnshire, England; died before 5 Apr 1209. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

Notes:

"Cecily is said by Farrer to have been alive in 1218, but there is a Curia Regis record showing that she died before Easter 1209." [John Watson, citation details below]

Notes:

Constable of Wakefield circa 1174-78. Keats-Rohan notes that "He is known in connection with one of the miracles of St Thomas Becket, illustrated in a window of the Trinity chapel in Canterbury cathedral."

From Baildon and the Baildons, citation details below:

The most notable episode in Jordan's life is his connection with St. Thomas à Becket, narrated by two monks of Canterbury, William and Benedict, who were contemporaries of the murdered Archbishop; their collected accounts of the miracles are said to have been made within a few years after the murder, and the incidents are therefore probably not later than 1180. The story is given in the notes to Dean Stanley's Historical Memorials of Canterbury, with some omissions and one important misprint; the following is in the main the Dean's translation, with some corrections and additions from the Latin text.

William the Monk begins his tale thus:

There came to Canterbury a knight, Jordan son of Heisulf, of the town which is called by the name of Broken Bridge [nomine Fracti Pontis, i.e. Pontefract], with his wife, and a son about ten years old, who was, as he asserted, being dead, restored to life by the Blessed Martyr Thomas.

Benedict omits the important reference to Pontefract, and begins:

The hand of the Lord was heavy on a knight of great name, Jordan son of Eisulf, and smote his household with disaster from the time of August unto the Easter days. Many were sorely sick in his house, and there was no one who could help. The nurse of his son William, surnamed Brito [cognomine Britonis], died of a violent disease [mortuo acuta], and was buried. Then the son himself died. Mass was said -- the body laid out -- the parents were in hopeless grief. It so happened that there arrived that day a band of twenty pilgrims from Canterbury whom Jordan hospitably lodged for love of the Martyr. When the priest came to bear the corpse to the church for burial, the father cried "By no means shall my son be carried forth, since my heart assures me that the Martyr Thomas is unwilling that I should lose him; for I was his man while he was in the body, and his familiar friend."

From the pilgrims he borrowed some water in which a drop of the Saint's blood had been mixed, and bade the priest pour it into the boy's mouth. This was done without effect. The father still delayed the burial, and the priest, while admiring his faith, thought him mad, as the boy had now been dead two days. Jordan then himself uncovered the body, raised the head, forced open the teeth with a knife, and poured in some of the water. A small sign of red showed itself on the boy's left cheek. A third draught was poured down his throat. The boy then opened one eye, and said, "Why are you weeping, father? Why are you crying, lady? Be not sad; behold the Blessed Martyr Thomas has restored me to you." He was then speechless till evening. The father put into his hands four pieces of silver, promising that the boy should offer them to the Martyr at Mid-Lent, and the parents sat and watched him. At evening he sat up, ate, talked, and was restored well to his parents.

But the performance of the vow was neglected and delayed. And so St. Thomas appeared to a leper, Gimpe, by name, in his sleep, who lived on the knight's estate, about three miles from his house, and said "Gimpe, art thou asleep?" The leper said "I was, until you awoke me. Who art thou?" "I am Thomas, Archbishop of Canterbury; knowest thou Jordan, the son of Eisulf?" And Gimpe replied "Very well, lord, as the best ot men, who has done many good things to me." He was then ordered to go and warn Jordan of the evils that would befall him unless he instantly fulfilled his vow. The leper did nothing. The Saint appeared a second time, and ordered the leper to send for his priest, who refused to convey so idle a tale to a great and powerful man. St. Thomas appeared a third time, and ordered the leper to send his daughter for the knight and his wife. They came, heard, wondered, and fixed the last week in Lent for the performance of the vow.

But it so fell that the Earl Warenne, the knight's lord, in whose name alone the aforesaid knight possessed his property [cujus nomine res soli miles praetaxatus Dossidebat]," came to that place, and prevented them from setting out on their pilgrimage; thus they did not keep their vow. On the last day of the last week, namely, on Holy Saturday before the day of our Lord's Resurrection, the Lord smote with a violent disease another son of the knight's, a little older, and more beloved than the one resuscitated, because his father's face was shown more perfectly in his features. On the morrow the parents themselves were taken ill and confined to bed, and were despaired of. And the disease took hold of the boy, and he slept in death on the seventh day, on the sixth day [fetia] of Easter Week. Twenty of the knight's household were also sick.

Then the knight and his wife determined at all hazard to accomplish their vow. By a violent effort -- aided by the sacred water -- they set off; their servants by a like exertion dragging themselves to the gate to see them depart. The lady fell into a swoon seven times from the fatigue of the first day, and was in despair at the long journey; but her husband said "Alive or dead she shall be brought to Canterbury." When she saw the pinnacle of the Temple of Canterbury, she dismounted from her horse, and with her husband and son, barefoot, walked the remaining three miles to the Martyr's sepulchre, and then the vow was discharged.

Benedict adds that he received this story in a letter from the priest, who stated that the boy was undoubtedly dead and brought to life again.

John married Maud Fitz Swain. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]